911 AMATEUR part3
-
-
- socialservice
- added this
The newsmedia aired forged broadcasts on 9/11
THIS IS A VIDEO ANALYSIS of 4 so-called "amateur" shots
of the strikes on WTC2 on 9/11 2001.
THE SHOTS ANALYZED ARE CREDITED TO :
1 : Evan Fairbanks
2 : Luc Courchesne
3 : Michael Hezarkhani
4 : Tina Cart
MOST RELEVANT POINTS TO FOCUS ON
IF YOU WISH TO DISCUSS THIS RESEARCH :
SHOT 1 : (Evan Fairbanks) This video has many oddities. One is that the airplane melts into the tower with NOTHING - not even the aft assembly – breaking off. Another is the impossible reflection in the car windshield : this incredible blunder establishes the ineptitude of the authors of this forgery - or the courage of a whistleblower.
SHOTS 2 & 3 (Courchesne and Hezarkhani) : Both these shots clearly show, on 'plane' impact, two explosions on the tower (over and under right wingtip). If these are not shape charges planted in the tower, what could they possibly be ? Please do not suggest “fuel in the wingtips exploding” …
SHOT 4 : (Tina Cart) The stripes on the World Trade Centers are extremely bright - even though they are in shade. This ALONE exposes this shot as a forgery. If you should disagree, please explain.
The ineptitude of the "911 video forgery team" may be a difficult thing to take in. How could such incompetence go undetected in a presumably well-funded operation ? Yet this is what we have and what emerges from the close scrutiny of these images, repeatedly broadcast on TV.
This “911 AMATEUR” series is the sequel to my
wider analysis of all the 9/11 TV footage which
has well over a million views on the internet :
"SEPTEMBER CLUES" (part1-8)
English version : www.livevideo.com/socialservice
italian subtitles : www.livevideo.com/tricky1975
spanish subtitles : www.youtube.com/user/jesudel
-
- groups:
- News and Politics, Politics, VC2 Top Contenders US, 9/11
-
-
socialservice
-
jdchristianson :
On your avatar you look like a wise man with a white beard... :) I was relieved to see you're a kid, probably too young to remember the events of that fateful day.No, there were no millions of people in the very limited area, unobstructed by high rise buildings, south of the Twin Towers. That area was also swiftly evacuated and cordoned off after the first strike on the North Tower. Most witnesses reported seeing a small aircraft, a few even said they saw a missile.
Regarding the questions you have about the eyewitnesses, I recommend you to watch "SEPTEMBER CLUES part9" and then "SEPTEMBER CLUES epilogue" on my youtube channel, this might get you up to speed on this matter - certainly anything but 'video gossip', my friend ..... :
http://www.youtube.com/user/simonshack
Get back to me after that - I'll be glad to answer any
questions you might have. - 4 years ago
-
socialservice
-
-
jdchristianson
-
hmm... I think this falls under the category of video gossip. lol. How would you go explaining to hundreds of people watching the building that there was no plane, and more over don't you think that someone would have said something if they saw the explosion and no plane? Were talking about a very large population per square mile in central Manhattan. Millions of eyes.
Looks like a fun project though, just needs to be shortened a bit I would say, condensed with the editing. - 4 years ago
-
jdchristianson
