News and Politics | March 07, 2008 | 20 comments

Guess what Florida & Michigan voters? You DO count...sorta

Image
woodywoodbeck
Democrats agree that new voting is needed to determine convention delegates for Florida and Michigan, but they can't figure out how to pay for it.

Both states held their Democratic presidential preference primaries early, in January. For that, the Democratic National Committee followed through on its warning and stripped both of their delegates for violating party rules by scheduling their primaries too early.

The Democratic candidates agreed not to campaign in either state, and New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, who won both states, was the only top-tier candidate on the ballot in Michigan.

What do you guys think? Should these states go to Hillary since she "technically" did win them or do you guys think they should vote again in both states?
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics,   Election 2008
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Politics Barack Obama Election 2008 5 more
  3.     
    |

20 comments // Guess what Florida & Michigan voters? You DO count...sorta

  • wjstuben
    • 0
      wjstuben  
    • dreams and wishes... arent we past all that?

      the problem is not that we have two "completely qualified candidates", its history... look at the patterns, the next up is a dem. people want a change, they will vote the opposite empowered party.
      its not democracy, its a wollf-in-sheeps-clothing corporate community. look at things like the patriot act and its renewal, big oil and a few other "buzz words" floating around all this.

      when you go to vote, ask yourself, "who's paying for what theyre preaching?",,,,

      i dont mean to direct all this at AceHardchester, but the phrasing used was irritating

    • 4 years ago
  • RudyRudell
    • 0
      RudyRudell  
    • We should just solve this issue like they did in the first years of the party, force whomever has the lesser amount of delegates to be the other candidates VP. That way everyone's happy and someone is set up to take the next election.

      Obama/Clinton '08

      boosh.

    • 4 years ago
  • wjstuben
    • 0
      wjstuben  
    • im sure this is echoed in michigan.... there is no "win" without a contest.
      obviously, my vote is for O'Bama. it will be interesting to see if new media (blogging and social groups) will have any pull in this.
      i'd love a vote here. and i think that no matter the outcome, michiganders should have a say. the field is already without any decent form of competition, do we really need to narrow it anymore?

    • 4 years ago
  • uroborus8
  • imaroxtar
    • 0
      imaroxtar  
    • No Way should they go to that "MONSTER"! Clinton is turning out to be one of the most dirty and contradicting candidates the democratic party has ever seen. She knew the rules going into the election, yet she's trying to bend them to her favor. I'm an Obama supporter from Florida and I (nor many of my friends and co-workers) went to vote for Obama in the primary because we thought it didn't matter since we were stripped of our delegates. I decided to take the time off to vote in the general election to make a little extra cash. Now my state might go to Clinton even though no one campaigned here, no voter turnout drives were held, no hope that any vote cast would matter at all. Florida should not have the delegates reinstated and I'm even against a new primary. The candidates should stick the rules they both agreed to at the beginning of this primary.

    • 4 years ago
  • jmathew
    • 0
      jmathew  
    • In Michigan, she narrowly won. 2nd place in Michigan was "Undecided" which Obama voters were told to put. If they give have that primary count, Obama wouldn't a single delegate. (hense why Hillary wants them to count and doesn't want a re-vote now with Obama on the ballot)

      The voting results of Michigan and Florida are not accurate as many voters didn't bother voting as they were told it would not count. These voters (regardless if they wanted to vote for Hillary, Obama, or Edwards) shouldn't be penalized because they were following the rules.

    • 4 years ago
  • sammycorrado
    • 0
      sammycorrado  
    • Are you kidding me. What good is a date. If you are passionate about a candidate then an early date won't determine anything. Fuck the logistics it comes down to a VOTE. If any of you have been to Michigan , you would know that it is a complete mess and the people of the glove REALLY NEED A SAY. This is absolute BULLSHIT.

    • 4 years ago
  • Common_People_Productions
  • RonTayan
  • mj_fortunato
    • 0
      mj_fortunato  
    • As a MI resident, I would gladly participate in another primary election (one with an actual choice this time would be welcomed.) Unfortunately the state can't afford it. Ahh. The price of democracy.

    • 4 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Since they violated the rules for the days they could hold the primary, they should pay for redoing it and redo it... perhaps the candidates who want to be on the ballot should pay for it on second thought. They are the ones using donations for their mudslinging. The bottomline is that the voters should have their voices heard and their delegates seated. It is the voters who should be of primary importance.

    • 4 years ago
  • derk
    • 0
      derk  
    • This is going to shake down as one - if not "the" - biggest decision the Dem Party has faced in years.

      Unfortunately, there just is no solution that will satisfy everybody.

      - Obama supporters want a redo.
      - Clinton supporters want the delegates.
      - And Nobody wants to foot the bill.

      The bottom line: States tried to save money and gain some political importance by moving their primaries up. They were warned they (and their voters) would be penalized. This is clearly (and singularly) the fault of the states themselves. They are the ones that have disenfranchised their own voters..

      But to not have these voters voices heard will be a catastrophe for the democratic process, let alone the party.

      I say fire the idiots who moved their primaries, but not before you send them the bill. the rest of the nation simply cannot pay for the redo without creating strife and dissent.

    • 4 years ago
  • sircamels
    • 0
      sircamels  
    • yeah it shouldn't count because in Michigan I believe it was 55 percent for Clinton, and 40 percent Uncommited... meaning 40 percent would rather vote for no one that her.....

      oh yeah... but there is no way Michigan could fund a do-over... with the state the michigan economy is in... worst in the nation.... the state government shut down earlier this year because of budget issues....

    • 4 years ago
  • woodywoodbeck
    • 0
      woodywoodbeck  
    • So as democrats and republicans or whatever party you fall into, ask yourself, no matter who you like or dislike, how can you say you believe in democracy if you go around feeding into the BS, the political games, saying some peoples votes count less or more than others, and continue to spread the seed of distaste towards one candidate over another when everyone has the right to decide for themselves...do you not agree?

    • 4 years ago
  • woodywoodbeck
    • 0
      woodywoodbeck  
    • There is a reason this democratic election is so divided, thats because they have two completely qualified candidates who both could potentially be running the country this time next year...

      Both of them have done their fair share of rights and wrongs but I propose for you to look at the bigger picture...that being US...the voters, the citizens, the people of this country. No matter who you vote for; it should be for someone who will help make your dreams, wishes, and needs happen.

      Anyone else agree?

    • 4 years ago
  • AceHardchester
    • 0
      AceHardchester  
    • Of course they should go to Hillary, because she represents the same interests as George Bush does; she's just packaged for a different group of people.

    • 4 years ago
  • mpitre0629
    • 0
      mpitre0629  
    • No way should the previous votes in Florida or Michigan count. I live in Texas and there were reports here that republican voters were voting for Clinton only because they think that would be a better match-up for McCain.

    • 4 years ago
  • vnprado
    • 0
      vnprado  
    • i think i heard that obama wasnt even on the ballot for michigan. and i live in florida. there werent any campaign adds on the T.V. and not much talk of either candidates. a revote would the the DEMOCRATIC thing to do.

    • 4 years ago
  • keeshii768
    • 0
      keeshii768  
    • She didn't win them she was the only name on the ballot that voters recognized. Like devo said, a redo is the only way to make it fair.

    • 4 years ago
  • devo64
    • 0
      devo64  
    • No way should they go to Hillary. She didn't "win" them, she was given them. In all fairness a redo is the best option I believe.

    • 4 years ago
more from News and Politics:

top videos