News and Politics | May 29, 2008 | 63 comments

Genetically engineered sugar to hit U.S. in 2008

Image
cubbingabout
Background Information: American Crystal, a large Wyoming-based sugar company and several other leading U.S. sugar providers have announced they will be sourcing their sugar from genetically engineered (GE) sugar beets beginning this year and arriving in stores in 2008. Like GE corn and GE soy, products containing GE sugar will not be labeled as such.
Since half of the granulated sugar in the U.S. comes from sugar beets, a move towards biotech beets marks a dramatic alteration of the U.S. food supply. These sugars, along with GE corn and soy, are found in many conventional food products, so consumers will be exposed to genetically engineered ingredients in just about every non-organic multiple-ingredient product they purchase.

The GE sugar beet is designed to withstand strong doses of Monsanto's controversial broad spectrum Roundup herbicide. Studies indicate farmers planting "Roundup Ready" corn and soy spray large amounts of the herbicide, contaminating both soil and water. Farmers planting GE sugar beets are told they may be able to apply the herbicide up to five times per year. Sugar beets are grown on 1.4 million acres by 12,000 farmers in the U.S. from Oregon to Minnesota.

Meanwhile candy companies like Hershey's are urging farmers not to plant GE sugar beets, noting that consumer surveys suggest resistance to the product. In addition the European Union has not approved GE sugar beets for human consumption.

Click on link for full article from the Organic Consumers Organisation
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics,   Food
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Politics US Food 4 more
  3.     
    |

63 comments // Genetically engineered sugar to hit U.S. in 2008

  • 7c0m9
    • 0
      7c0m9  
    • Its a law somewhere that its our right not to know about genetically engineered foods. The FDA doesn't have to tell us about any genetically altered food. The FDA is now overshadowed by corporations. What about rice? if we engineer anything how bout more rice?

    • 3 years ago
  • spoonieday
    • 0
      spoonieday  
    • also, another problem is that genetic manipulation is also done at the seed level, meaning that they make plants that will not produce seed. that means poor farmers can't buy seed, grow them and then save the next generation of seeds. the need to buy seeds every year or season is driving farmers into debt, forcing them out of farming and into the cities or to suicide.

      mono-culture is bad, diversity is good. some one said everyone needs to take biology classes. well I have, and they taught that diversity is the key to our ecological system. monsanto wants to end crop diversity, so that's bad.

    • 3 years ago
  • Cretony38
  • spoonieday
    • 0
      spoonieday  
    • dmitri, why do you make the assumption that most organic food is non-local and that most non-organic is local? When I go the grocery store I often find non-organic produce shipped from south america. if it's grown down there anyway, wouldn't it be better if it was organic? I grow my own, so that's pretty local. As far as pesticides go, there are very effective natural pesticides like tobacco juice, most bugs won't eat plants sprayed with it and it washes off. Another easy way to reduce the pest problem is to not plants acres upon acres of only one crop. it's like a big road sign for bugs that says "eat here"

      there are farmers who have been farming the same land for more than 40 generations who never had access to the kind of chemical pesticides that we currently use on food.

    • 3 years ago
  • plusaf
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • plusaf:

      Hey I thought all this hype about GM’s was bullshit too. Then I watched the video provided and did a little research myself. This isn’t hype or a campaign by tie dye wearing hippies who hate technology. One of the biggest problems is that the FDA doesn’t recognize that there is a difference between natural crops and GM crops.

      There is a difference and a major one. GM crops are genetically unstable. It’s nothing like selective breeding. We know Monsanto’s products are unsafe because Monsanto documents say they are unsafe. Furthermore Monsanto has a history of dirty practices. PCB’s, rBGH, “biodegradable” pesticides and now GM seeds unnecessarily risk the health of humans and the planet just for the sake of money. Tell me why I should risk my health just so a rich global enterprise can make more money?

    • 3 years ago
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • However one wants to spin this is irrelevant to me at this point. My viewpoint is simple. No matter if you do or don't believe that GMO is safe or dangerous, I would like the option to know what I am consuming.

      For me and my family, I personally do not want to eat GMO food, nor do I want to consume HFCS, nor fluoride in my H2O, there are those who do.

      So to spend my precious time arguing, gets us no where. I just want to label GMO foods. They tell me if the food has other ingredients, tell me if it has been GM.

    • 3 years ago
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • Image
    • In my view, asking Congress to pass legislation to Label GMO food will be a huge step in the direction to limit sales of GMO foods.

      Public opinion polls show 85% and up, of Americans want to see GMO labels on their food.

      This link will take you the campaign that is organized and wants get this legislation passed.

      Legislation

      HR 5269
      Introduced May 2, 2006
      The Genetically Engineered Food Right to Know Act

      Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) has introduced legislation to label genetically engineered foods call the Genetically Engineered Food Right to Know Act (HR 5269

      We must press congress to pass it...

      thanks to all who are concerned.

    • 3 years ago
  • misticblue7
    • 0
      misticblue7  
    • i don't understand why GE is logically to these corporations..(oh, that's right, profit, and lots of it). while our health and longevity as a world nation is put on the back burner...how sad... we have to unite, and vote, and protest...this is the only way...

    • 3 years ago
  • sueathome
  • H3ADLINE
    • 0
      H3ADLINE  
    • Actually, the benefit of GE crops is not that you can use more pesticides, herbicides, etc., but that you can use less of them and the plants will still be as protected. For the farmer (or more likely, the corporation) it's about saving money, not about throwing more into it. The selling point is a lower use of chemicals, and hence a lower overall price on the grower on that end.

    • 3 years ago
  • cwc_agent
  • passjay
    • 0
      passjay  
    • Ohhh nooooo, we're already chemically unbalanced as it is. Noiw you want to pump genetically induced sugars into the U.S. Come on, give me a break, just when things were looking up--yeah right.

      You government officials pumping up the oil prices. In a war Iraqi Freedom, U.S. troops took over control of the oil reserves, so I am asking the question to anyonw out here of how is it that the price of oil can be prognosed by anyone in the U.S. Government?

    • 3 years ago
  • cwc_agent
    • 0
      cwc_agent  
    • Yes...why is it that this has 74% approval, 396 views, and 48 comments, yet isn't even on the front page, while the leading story on the front page which was picked for t.v. has 90 views, 64% approval, and 18 responses?

    • 3 years ago
  • Cobi321
    • 0
      Cobi321  
    • wait, wait wait... So genetic alterations are 'ok' to society when we do it to cure diabetes using K-cells. But when it is used to make food production a lot more efficient it is seen as 'unnatural?' I don't understand the issue here other than ignorance. I think people should just take a college biology class before they start immediately assuming technology is evil. Technology isn't bad, ignorance towards it is.

    • 3 years ago
  • cwc_agent
    • 0
      cwc_agent  
    • Cobi321:

      Your response is ignorant. GMO's are not more efficient, they are bad for the environment and bad for people. Round up resistant crops make no sense is the people and animals eating the crops are not resistant to round up.

      Do you want to eat food with a high concentration of round up? Do you want round up running off in your watershed?

    • 3 years ago
  • patriotgames1
    • 0
      patriotgames1  
    • Oh and its sems very weird that an issue of this quality with so many responses and views and an approval rating of 75% is at the bottom of the ratings unless someone in current is keeping it there?

    • 3 years ago
  • patriotgames1
  • blackdaylight
  • debbieclarke
  • Dmitri_Molotov
    • 0
      Dmitri_Molotov  
    • Not so cubbingabout, organic foods have to travel from farms that are farther away, and these days to travel you've got to put out an awful lot of carbon. Unless you know that you're buying local, screw organic.

    • 3 years ago
  • Angry_Patriot89
  • jubal
  • SpookyFish
    • 0
      SpookyFish  
    • I still can't believe that the FDA isn't forcing companies to label their products as GMO. What's even more unbelievable is that the majority of Americans don't even know/care that they're consuming chemicals that have been proven to cause cancer.

      The only chance we have of stopping this is to spread awareness and resistance.

    • 3 years ago
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • Image
    • Switch to agave, its so much sweeter and good for you too. It tastes delicious in coffee or tea. Its organic!!

    • 3 years ago
  • BetterWatching
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • None of this will matter once the Codex Alimentarus is implemented. We will not have a choice, genetically modified foods will become mandatory.

    • 3 years ago
  • featherly
    • 0
      featherly  
    • As well as many of our food products, much of our medicine is genetically engineered. Rather than boycott, or fight against the trend, it is our duty to understand the knowledge that seeds such technology. Artificial life is coming whether we agree with it or not. It takes individuals, with good intentions, to study and aspire to join the ranks of decision makers. We live amidst a battleground so enormous that, unless you’re willing to confront the truth, it is invisible to common people. We must breach the ranks, this means much sacrifice, years of study, but in the end, we are the future, and the information we have gathered, and the credentials we have earned, will allow us to steer the current, back to the way of nature and the natural genetic code that unfolded over billions of years of change. We are the change! What I do know, is that love and good intention will prevail. In the end, we all have to deal with our own selves, our own conscious.

    • 3 years ago
  • sammunster
  • adam_romano
  • Ricky84
  • Kati_kat
    • 0
      Kati_kat  
    • I'm sorry but its not just GE by itself--GE always comes paired with industrial practices that are destroying our soils. This kind of technology only produces more for a short period of time, then it craps out and we're left with less than we had before due to salinization and desertification, among other water and soil related issues.

      The genetic monocultures cwc mentioned are the big danger of our time. Genetic diversity is paramount to a species ability to survive. We seriously need to get off the boat of "we can control nature" and start trying to work within her rules, because all our tampering is going to come around and bite us in the ass much sooner than we think.

      Read the Botany of Desire and watch Harvest of Fear and The Future of Food, then tell me genetic engineering will save us. Its not the technology I'm afraid of, its the short-sighted humans involved with the technology that have me worried.

    • 3 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • I’m guessing you don’t know about Monsanto Sal. In that case you should watch this video or do some research because nothing that comes from that corporation is safe. Our government denies that genetically modified food is different from natural food. However this is wrong. Scientific studies have already proven that there is a difference yet the FDA ignores the truth.

      You know what? I just tried to find the link to “The World According to Monsanto – A documentary that Americans won’t ever see.” Apparently it’s been pulled from google video and youtube, go figure. I guess the only way you can watch it now is by torrent file.

      What I think is silly is that you are either ignoring the scientific data or have no idea such damning information exists. If you don’t understand the danger of Monsanto then you probably shouldn't be talking about it.

      I did happen to stumble across this article further explains why GE sugar beets will be a problem for the US.

      http://www.familyfarmdefenders.org/pmwiki.php/GeneticEngineering/StopMonsantosRo...

    • 3 years ago
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • Ricky84:

      My post was a little unclear on my standpoint, so let me make it a little clearer.

      I'm well aware that Monsanto is shady as hell dude and I agree with you that they are a dangerous company that is seriously affecting our nation's health.

      What I do not agree with is all the hype around genetically engineered food. People just do not seem to understand what it is. While all the possible health risks can't be known, under all current genetic theory it makes no sense that it would be damaging to your health. And it's not just the FDA that thinks that, organizations and scientists worldwide agree on that. Again, we must be willing to consider the possibility of flaws in genetic theory. But GE crops have been around for a WHILE and the genetics behind them is well understood. It's not really that different from selective breeding, which is something people just don't understand.

      The DANGEROUS thing about monsanto is their CHEMICALS, not their GE. The main benefit of organic foods is not that they are "natural," it's that they are free from damaging PESTICIDES that threaten not only the food but groundwater among other things.

      That's what I meant to say in my earlier post, which I admit didn't reveal that at all.

    • 3 years ago
  • covelogibbs
    • 0
      covelogibbs  
    • Ricky84:

      "People just do not seem to understand what it is." Shouldn't that be one of the basic requirements before taking a bite of something, understanding what it is before you eat it? Please keep researching with an open mind saladin. Your participation here shows that you are thinking about it and you care, which is good. :-)

    • 3 years ago
  • Ricky84
  • LukesAlive
    • 0
      LukesAlive  
    • Most everything we've been eating for years now have been Genetically engineered in one way or another. Thats why i use plant sweetener in my coffee. But after all i am just a crazy vegetarian.

    • 3 years ago
  • nmsamanda
    • 0
      nmsamanda  
    • Monsanto is evil. I urge everyone to do their best and avoid products like roundup or anything else from monsanto!!! Philip Morris is in bed with them. My smoking was putting $$$ in their pockets that knowledge helped me quit. Hemp is about the only thing they haven't ruined.

    • 3 years ago
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • There's nothing wrong with genetically engineered foods, study genetics before you make silly assumptions.

      But this pesticide shit is worrying.

    • 3 years ago
  • AnemicElitist
    • 0
      AnemicElitist  
    • This makes me want to SCREAM!!! As long as there's more money to be made off a product, companies will find a way to make it, even at the expense of consumers. And like U.S. milk, this sugar doesn't have the OK in the EU. Does that not tell us something? PROTEST!

    • 3 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • Monsanto is the devil. They’re using old world ideas coupled with new age technology. We don’t need crops that are resistant to herbicides. To depend on chemicals that harm our body/world is an outdated approach. What we need are smarter farming practices that take in account their effect on the world at large. Once again NASA is the only government agency that seems to get this point.

      http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/PrecisionFarming/

    • 3 years ago
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • Ricky84:

      Yeah I know what link I provided. The point still remains. I’m not saying everything needs to be grown organically. Some farmers will want to use pesticides. This way of farming is a million times better than current practices. Pinpointing water/pesticide/herbicide needs down to two square meter increments is amazing compared to simply saturating the entire field. If you are strictly organic that’s cool I can respect that.

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • Nature is not perfect. There are lovely bugs that infiltrate our food and unless you want to bite into dead bodies of bugs I think it's good that farmers protect the food from such insects.

      I think the worry over the chemicals and the engineering of food is way overprotective. It's like a parent trying to keep their child from being sick by cleaning their hands every five seconds. What happens? The child is the sickest child in the class.

      I abide by the five second rule and eat food that has fallen on the ground. I would eat engineered food, that' fine. I'm not going to pay more for 'organic' as if it's going to keep me living 2 years longer...wow. I rarely get sick. I'm not going to alter my way of living to keep me from getting what I don't get with the life style I have now.

    • 3 years ago
  • covelogibbs
    • 0
      covelogibbs  
    • J_Jammer:

      One of the main reasons to buy organic is the health of the farm workers, the ground water, etc., not just the health of the person eating the produce.

      Oh, and if you're not eating organic, you are eating genetically modified food.

    • 3 years ago
  • gormlesstwat
    • 0
      gormlesstwat  
    • J_Jammer:

      I'm not going to alter my way of living to keep me from getting what I don't get with the life style I have now

      Even if you know you've got an increased chance of getting cancer?

    • 3 years ago
  • AceHardchester
    • 0
      AceHardchester  
    • Feel free to not eat it. It's that simple. I don't eat cows. I wouldn't dream of telling someone who was very hungry not to eat a cow.

      I can understand the positives to organic food, but I am with Dmitri on this one.

    • 3 years ago
  • sgwhites
    • 0
      sgwhites  
    • AceHardchester:

      My question is how clearly will it be labeled? I don't think I'd want to eat this stuff, but I wonder how easy that's going to be if the powers that be decide that "genetically engineered" doesn't need to be displayed on the label.

    • 3 years ago
  • covelogibbs
    • 0
      covelogibbs  
    • AceHardchester:

      Since we don't label GMO's how would you know if you were eating it or not? The public has a right to know, but until a labeling law is passed, eating certified organic is the only way to avoid it. When you're eating a cow, usually, you will know it.

    • 3 years ago
  • KosterK7
  • ipodrulz
    • 0
      ipodrulz  
    • A little late - everything we eat is already full of chemicals and drugs. We could grow our own food, but I'm pretty sure the soil we purchase is also "enhanced".

    • 3 years ago
  • hahaheather
    • 0
      hahaheather  
    • There's already so many harmful sugar substitutes on the market (backed by the evil FDA). This doesn't shock me in the least. People are becoming more aware of what they're putting into their bodies, but ironically, thanks to the economy, cannot afford what they know they should consume.

    • 3 years ago
  • cwc_agent
    • 0
      cwc_agent  
    • And the comment about curing world hunger is laughable, the way to solve world hunger is not to encourage GM foods but to encourage eating lower on the food chain and reducing waste.

      The world right now is producing enough food to feed us all, the problem is the food is being wasted, used as livestock feed, turned into biofuel and other ridiculous things.

    • 3 years ago
  • Hawkmang
    • 0
      Hawkmang  
    • This makes me sick! I think we should change the FDA acronym from Food and Drug Administration to Foundation for Destroying America. Here's to government market manipulation! :-)

      And since we're on the topic of sugar, here's a nice little tidbit from Ron Paul's "The Revolution: A Manifesto" (pg. 72):
      "Consider a single, almost trivial example of government favoritism: sugar quotas. The United States government limits the amount of sugar that can be imported from around the world. These quotas make sugar more expensive for all Americans, since they now have fewer choices as a result of diminished competition. The quotas also put at a competitive disadvantage all those businesses that use sugar to produce their own products. That's one reason that American colas use corn syrup instead of sugar: American sugar, thanks to the quotas, is simply too expensive (And it's also a reason that colas in other countries taste so much better.)"

    • 3 years ago
  • echoz
    • 0
      echoz  
    • freakn disgusting. I was just discussing this shit with a friend and I recall telling him I didn't wanna be anybody's freakn lab rat for GMO foods...scientists have already found it wanting!

      Those extra proteins they know are not good. And Canada wasn't complimentary or apologetic about rejecting that shit either...

    • 3 years ago
  • diabolical44
    • 0
      diabolical44  
    • its getting harder and harder each and every day to find food that isn't filled with chemical garbage. Big business is willing to poison the American people in order to make a few extra bucks.

    • 3 years ago
  • cwc_agent
    • 0
      cwc_agent  
    • No do you want to know whats bad for the environment? Genetic monocultures. I don't know about any of you but I'll choose organic sugar over sugar from beats sprayed five times yearly with roundup any day.

      Or since we're modifying plants to withstand pesticides, maybe we should genetically modify humans to withstand plants with a high residual pesticide content. Hell, why stop there?

    • 3 years ago
  • uroborus8
    • 0
      uroborus8  
    • European governments are not stacked with Monsanto lawyers and lobbyists (yet). Justice Clarence Thomas was once a Monsanto lawyer, for example.

      Check out Millions against Monsanto for more information about this corporate "terrorist."

      I also attached a video called "The World According to Monsanto." Scary!

    • 3 years ago
  • 75thDeadMan
  • cubbingabout
  • jefftego
  • Dmitri_Molotov
    • 0
      Dmitri_Molotov  
    • Interesting. If I keel over and die from this I'll let you know. I'm getting tired of technophobic organic only people (BTW organic is bad for the environment) getting in the way of biotech, an extremely beneficial and optional field of science. You want to cure world hunger? Vat grown beef and ultra-hardy wheat is the way to go.
      (Vat grown meat is also completely cruelty free)

    • 3 years ago
  • echoz
    • 0
      echoz  
    • it's freakn insane! it's encroaching without any debate is what I see happening here in the states; our FDA has been so overtly infiltrated that there is no more real concern for public safety where Monsanto has any interest to benefit from.

      Maybe Europe is more careful about testing anything GE for safety? (where the hell is phillyphil...he knows a lot about this crap)

    • 3 years ago
  • cubbingabout
    • 0
      cubbingabout  
    • Yeah echoz its not just the fact that it is genetically engineered its the fact that it has been engineered to take the huge doses of Monsantos Round up which not only get into the water table and pollute the soil but large traces stay in the food!
      They get you both ways

    • 3 years ago
  • echoz
    • 0
      echoz  
    • now granulated sugar is going GE??? =( ...thanks for the heads up, cubbing'! they're pushing this Monsanto crap on us everywhere we turn =(

    • 3 years ago
  • cwc_agent
    • 0
      cwc_agent  
    • The response to GE plants is so much more promising in Europe than it is here. There is hardly even a debate here over it at all, and when there is, it's proponents go to such extents to marginalize those against it, its ridiculous.

    • 3 years ago
more from News and Politics:

top videos