News and Politics | May 31, 2008 | 16 comments

9/11 like you've never seen it

source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE

VoyagerFilms
For anyone who still has doubts about 9/11, weigh up the facts and the overwhelming amount of evidence supporting the reality that the events were one big set-up.

This film exposes the lies and disproves every aspect of the bogus 9/11 commission report put forth by a corrupt government.

Judge for yourselves, but investigate the facts and evidence before jumping to a conclusion.

A comprehensive list of over 100 lies and omissions in the 911 commission report can be found in this link:

http://www.septembereleventh.org/news...

A very comprehensive listing of facts about 9/11 in this documentary. A must see!
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics,   WTF,   Random
  2. tags:
    News and Politics,  Politics,  WTF,  Not News,  17 more
  3.     
    |

16 comments // 9/11 like you've never seen it // Video

  • kalypso123
    • 0
      kalypso123  

    • do some more research, its definitely possible and its happened before.

      the impact hole on the side of the pentagon was no more 45ft wide, the towers didnt collapse from fire, the PA wreckage had no debris.

      just like the Bay of Tonkin in vietnam
      and WMD's in Iraq

      Your governemnt can and will manipulate you to satisfy a greater agenda.

      the truth is not what it seems.

      I hope I can get you to at least investigate for yourself and prove that you are right. If you aren't, the world has a much bigger problem.

    • 3 years ago
  • erikjh1972
    • 0
      erikjh1972  
    • kalypso123:

      i done plenty of research and these "theories" just do not make sense.

      1st. as for the hole in the pentagon, 45 ft. a cruise missle would have made a much smaller hole before exploding inside the pentagon, not to mention debris from the plane found there, not to mention the witness's who saw it hit.

      the tower did fall from fire due to the fact that an Airplane with a huge amount of fuel crashed into it. or didnt any body see that on t.v.

      the problem with all these "theories" is that there was a much easier way to do this without almost bankrupting the airplane industry.

      does anyone remember the first "terror" attack on the WTC, no nobody remembers that. how about the "terror" attack on the U.S.S. Cole?? anyone?? were these "cooked" up too??

    • 3 years ago
  • erikjh1972
    • 0
      erikjh1972  

    • 2 planes crashed into the wtc.....plane crashed in pa....plane crashed into pentagon......wackos thinking its the biggest cover-up since eve got blamed for the apple incident....Problem Solved.

      not to mention how many people it would take to keep their mouth shut if this were a big conspiracy...its just not possible....sorry to break your little hearts, now can you focus on something thats actually going to help the world. if you people put as much time and effort into to something worthwhile you could accomplish great things.

    • 3 years ago
  • VoyagerFilms
    • 0
      VoyagerFilms  

    • The fact is, the people responsible for these things are still with us and still in power - WE CAN'T FORGET until the problem is resolved.

    • 3 years ago
  • echoz
    • 0
      echoz  
    • VoyagerFilms:

      "with any luck?" and yet plusaf just got done linking me to his Falk's Fortieth Law: "It is IMPOSSIBLE to refute an argument from a conspiracy theorist, because they will never believe ANY argument to the contrary." why am I effectively limited to your range of questions on the subject plusaf, based on a flippant quote? because they're not sanctioned by Popular Mechanics? and actually it's you who could give a shit?

      At the least, nice avoidance I say...

      "save your powder" hell no! sound off I say...a lot more people could use the wake up call. I appreciated this post Voyager' and I hadn't seen this particular video either, so better than luck I hope may be a lil honest gratitude

    • 3 years ago
  • echoz
    • 0
      echoz  

    • "beating the horse?" y'know, it was someone else who hacked it to death and that's why it's dead.

      you're right huntre, I mean I'm "trying" to watch some of this anti-conspiracy "stuff" but they're telling me some of it is an optical illusion lol (could you make this stuff up?) due to some camera effect. and then they make the claim that controlled demolitions don't make as much of a mess as 9/11. Well, what about those hard drives that suggest insider trading and "dropping" or whatever the hell that was...? What the hell was that running metal? And why did some people take out million dollar insurance policies just days before the incident for terrorist purposes? And what of the BBC broadcast?

      Too many damn questions... Y'know if the government really wanted to lay all this to rest they'd let us see the "evidence" for ourselves. That flight 93 too? Is popular mechanics gonna solve that one too? There was nothing! A freakn hole in the ground. Not to mention some of those stupid phone calls that were supposedly people calling home to talk to loved ones on their last ride.

      Y'know they used to say, if it looks like a duck, smells like a duck, and quacks like a duck. But this isn't a duck is it. It's a big pile of something else... Even the fact that the "terrorists" were alive and well in other countries...OMG where do you start/stop with the bs???

    • 3 years ago
  • echoz
    • 0
      echoz  
    • echoz:

      pardon me, but that's stupid. There's still a lot of information that has been withheld from the American public. And I don't buy the national enquirer. And does vierotchka and jan4Gore believe the official 9/11 story??? hmmm... i might wonder about that.

      there's an easy way for the government to solve it, and that's to release all the information they have regarding the incident. Unfortunately although the culprits have already been named and we've started a g'dam war and suspended civil rights on top of everything else...I don't know how the hell you can expect people not to be pissed off about it. Given the track record of this administration, I'd have to say, you're probably in the minority on this one plusaf.

    • 3 years ago
  • jimmyp
  • VoyagerFilms
    • 0
      VoyagerFilms  

    • That's pretty interesting for sure huntre. Ya, the Popular Mechanics thing - I've a limited amount of respect for that publication for a number of reasons.

      It's REAL apparent to me from personal experience with racing engine tech the writers / scientist / researchers - whatever they are, lack the necessary mental acuity to seek truly qualified professionals or perform adequate testing to be of much value.

    • 3 years ago
  • huntre
    • 0
      huntre  

    • If anyone tries to tell me that it's all BS, I simply refer to both CNN and the BBC reporting the collapse of WTC building #7 (the one with all the federal agencies packed into it) ten full minutes before it actually happened.
      In fact, it's standing, plain as day, behind the BBC reporter just before her transmission signal breaks up.
      "Curiouser and curiouser", said Alice.

    • 3 years ago
  • echoz
    • 0
      echoz  

    • You know it's always funny to me that someone quotes Popular Mechanics as a source to defend this government lol I find that quite humorous

    • 3 years ago
  • huntre
  • stephenthomson
  • VoyagerFilms
    • 0
      VoyagerFilms  

    • Okay dankitti, maybe you have seen it, it was posted all the way back in 2006, but the rebuttal film is pure propaganda!

      I do have something here - and I want to keep in people's minds. Thanks for nothing.

    • 3 years ago
  • dankitti
    • 0
      dankitti  

    • You have got to be kidding. FWIW, I *have* seen it. Go to YouTube after this and see the rebuttal film, Screw Loose Change. Read the Popular Mechanics article on the 0/11 myths and then get back to me.

      I really thought you had something. bleh. :þ

    • 3 years ago
  • kalypso123
more from News and Politics:
from the community

top videos