News and Politics | June 14, 2008 | 28 comments

Wesley Clark on McCain's military 'experience'

benjaminV
A good insight into the military experience that McCain claims he has.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Election 2008
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Election 2008 John McCain Military 5 more
  3.     
    |

28 comments // Wesley Clark on McCain's military 'experience' // Video

  • 96thdayofrage
    • 0
      96thdayofrage  
    • Please, Grampers scored fifth from the bottom of his academy class. FIFTH FROM THE BOTTOM!!!!

      Let's just all join General Clark in telling the unembellished truth about Maveric, the Rage Barron. The only reason he even got a plane in the first place was because he was a third generation legacy of the Navy. That he didn't crash and kill himself is more of a miracle than his capture and torture is heroic. His capture and torture was not only the consquence of his academy class standing as a legacy, but a true testament of his service. T'is no wonder he never made it to admiral. Then he went on to be bested for the Presidency by an AWOL chickenhawk who evaded his ANG tour to get out of testing positive for coke.

      What a LOSER!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • benjaminV
  • crob80227
    • 0
      crob80227  
    • Paratus, if you still think that the majority of the people at GitMo are the "worst of the worst" then you haven't been following the news.

      Much to the ongoing embarrassment of the Bush Admin it's being revealed that, no, few (if any) of these guys being held at GitMo are hardcore terrorists. A shocking number are turning out to be totally innocent.

      Many of them were turned over for bounty -- for bounty! -- to the US by neighbors either who wanted the money or had an axe to grind.

      This idea that we're "capturing" armed rebels with extensive military training and high level contacts with serious terrorist groups and holding them at GitMo is a total fantasy.

      When McCain was tortured in Vietnam it didn't do a damn thing to help the Vietnames "defeat" the US military, did it? All it was was just a horrible experience that did nothing to help our enemies "win" in Vietnam. McCain was an actual soilder, but he didn't have any information that could be used to defeat the US army. The dudes we rounded up in GitMo, as you pointed out, aren't even offical soilders! And many of them aren't even connected in any, way, shape or form to any terrorist cells anywhere.

      So you'd think McCain would realize the folly of randomly rounding up (without evidence) Iraqi turned over to US soliders for bounty and then torturing them and randomly screaming, "Where's Osama?" It's inhumane and, more importantly from a strategic point of view, it's totally ineffective because these guys don't actually know anything.

      And yet because he fears he'd lose the support of his Republican base if he adopted such a "bleeding heart liberal" Democratic position on GitMo he is siding with Bush.

      I honestly don't think McCain agrees with the bounty, GitMo, the torture, ect. I think he's just going along with it because he feels it's the only chance he has to win the White House.

    • 3 years ago
  • Paratus
    • 0
      Paratus  
    • McCain had more experience in the Navy than just being a POW. I think those who criticise him for what happened while he was at the Hanoi Hilton should take a moment. Until we have walked that mile we know nothing about it.
      Wesley Clarke may make a good VP but Hussein Obama would not make a good P.

      crob80277, I see no POW's in Gitmo. Those in Gitmo are not soldiers of a nation state. They are terrorists. Some are there after being captured whil waging war against Americans. Some were released a while ago and returned to the business of killing Americans. They do not follow the Geneva accord and neither should we. The left wants Gitmo shut down, ok then. If we capture terrorists in the act in theatre I would suggest that the proper way to deal with them would be to agressively interrogate them at that time and then put a 5.56 in their head. No Gitmo, no problem.

    • 3 years ago
  • Neghie
  • timunuhe
  • shelchak
  • menmykoko
  • Johnny500
    • 0
      Johnny500  
    • Modern media is an unfortunate affair in regards to the disrespect those pundits exhibited while General Clark was trying to speak. One of the things I hate the most is their inability to allow someone to make a well defined concise point without barking like untrained dogs in the background.
      How many times does a well educated and experienced person have to say the same thing before those parrots realize whatever they are saying shows their ignorance. (sometimes it works the other way around)
      Really, for me, just the courtesy of letting someone speak is one of the foremost "good manners."

    • 3 years ago
  • crob80227
    • 0
      crob80227  
    • Being a former POW I am still shocked the McCain is utterly indifferent to the POW's Bush is keeping locked up in GitMo.

      Instead of being outraged based on his own personal experiences of being held without charges and "aggressively interrogated" McCain seems to be going along with it and deferring all his decisions to Bush -- a man who neither served in actual comabt conditions nor was ever a POW.

      Why?

      What the hell is McCain thinking?

      And then he proclaims (loudly and repeatedly) that he doesn't really care how long he keeps US troops mired in a civil war in Iraq. He just shrugs he shoulders and says -- so what? What's a few more dead bodies on either side?

      I we really sure this guy was ever in the military???

      Sure doesn't sound like it.

    • 3 years ago
  • Neghie
    • 0
      Neghie  
    • crob80227:

      Uh...yes he was...a POW no less, and even when he had the opportunity to leave, he stayed with fellow prisoners. Attack the man's policies, but give him the respect he deserves since he at least did serve his country. The man can't even lift his arms from the ordeal. If you're gonna make an argument, try not to be so biased.

    • 3 years ago
  • crob80227
    • 0
      crob80227  
    • crob80227:

      I am attacking his policies. If someone who had never served in the military and had never been a POW thought Bush's handling of the GitMo POW's was a good idea...I could accept that to a certain point. How can I respect McCain as a person when he has seen his fellow soliders tortured and held illegally and in violation of international law and yet he then agrees that do that to the GitMo prisoners? He knows from first hand expereince it's wrong and yet goes along with it. Being in the military is honorable, but it should not be twisted into a blank check wherein all actions and attitudes are forgiven. We should not be less critical of McCain's policies because of his POW's experiences but more critical. He knows first hand what it's like to be held in a prison camp and be tortured. How can someone so intimately familair with immoral acts condone them? If we're going to honor his service we must hold him to a higher moral standard. He KNOWS GitMo is wrong on a moral level not to mention an international one. Military experience should not be conflated into some kind of "free pass" on sensitive issues.

    • 3 years ago
  • Neghie
  • crob80227
    • 0
      crob80227  
    • crob80227:

      I see your point and agree somewhat. My concern is that his being a POW means we can't ask hard questions because that could be construed as somehow disrespectful. My question was a little sarcastic, but still legitmate. My comment was specifically directed as his position on the GitMO POW's we have in custody. Surely you can agree that McCain has a unique perspective on that issue in that he actually was a POW himself. And in being a POW one could assume that he was be against others being forced to endure the same experiences he went through. And yet, in the specific case of the GitMO detainees and Bush's absolute insistence that a) GitMo is necessary and b) the POW's should not be treated as POW's under the law (and thus exempt from torture) McCain is in agreement with Bush. I see where you're coming from but I think it is resonable to ask, "Why would a former POW agree with Bush's treatment with the POW's in GitMo?"

    • 3 years ago
  • Neghie
    • 0
      Neghie  
    • I've always resented the fact that our current President was so eager to go to war when he himself escaped his opportunity to serve. At the very least, McCain knows more than anyone first hand what war looks like, and didn't run even when he had the chance. Great perspective on the fact that it doesn't necessarily make you an effective leader or strategist, but it certainly tells you that he won't leave you hanging in the trenches. I think that would be a much better sell to me.

    • 3 years ago
  • sickinjersey
  • korourke
    • 0
      korourke  
    • Wesley Clark would make an excellent VP choice for the reasons he poinently outlined in this segment. He would do very well in debates, and could offer the military advice and leadership that would trump McCain's one "strength" going into the general election. I would be very excited to see either Clark, Hagel or Biden on the ticket w/ Obama...

      There is nothing better than seeing honest men with integrity elequently articulate the truth in the face of annoying, biased media; nicely done Wesley.

    • 3 years ago
  • chankina
    • 0
      chankina  
    • korourke:

      That's my thoughts, excellent choice! Someone that has an impressive resume and doesn't flip flop all over themselves. He's clear and concise, to the point and you can't help but admire how well spoken he is.

    • 3 years ago
  • chankina
    • 0
      chankina  
    • I applaud him McCain for serving America however, he wasn't the only one that was a hero in his era. Shell-shock describes him more accurately. Regardless of what one may say, the impact of the war has affected him negatively. To deny that it didn't is a problem you need to address with yourself. "A Lost is a lost".

      Again, if you didn't know the Bush-McCain show has been cancelled.

      Seriously,

    • 3 years ago
  • Marilynn_Murray
    • 0
      Marilynn_Murray  
    • He admitted to telling them the name of the ship he was on, how many planes it carried and where the rescue boats went to pick up people. Slightly more information than name rank, and number. I've found that several places on the web.

    • 3 years ago
  • gopsuxDOTcom
  • pigmonkey
  • Leonidis
  • chankina
    • 0
      chankina  
    • Leonidis:

      Yes, I happen to be a viewer of msnbc. They are objective and provides news and not slander. They put the facts out there and allows the public to make their own decisions, I have to like being given the choice. Besides, I thought that's what the media suppose to do. The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly is reported on msnbc, how could you not appreciate them?

    • 3 years ago
  • 515dsm
  • Marilynn_Murray
  • chankina
  • Scudettostarved
more from News and Politics:

top videos