McCain cash linked to lobbyists
source: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/28/us/politics/28IRI.html?ex=1374984000&en=a54f90570e8f9076&e...
-
-
- sheamus
- added this
Serving foreign and special interest:
"Among those clients is the government of Colombia, which has paid the firm at least $590,000 over the last 18 months. One issue Mr. Madigan has been pushing on behalf of the Colombians is a pending free trade agreement with the United States. Several weeks ago, Mr. McCain traveled to Colombia and, in keeping with his views on trade, spoke about the need for the accord.
Another board member is the McCain campaign’s chief foreign policy adviser, Randy Scheunemann. Until March, he was registered as a lobbyist for several foreign governments, and he represented the government of Georgia last January when the institute sent election monitors there. Since joining the institute in 2004, Mr. Scheunemann has spoken with Mr. McCain or his Senate aides at least 42 times on behalf of his foreign lobbying clients, Justice Department records show. ...
In its responses to written questions, the campaign said that the presence of lobbyists on the institute’s board did not pose a conflict, and that Mr. Madigan and Mr. Scheunemann “recused themselves from I.R.I. decisions regarding the countries they represented.” The campaign also said donations to the institute had never been linked to Mr. McCain’s Senate activities.
But at least one donor apparently saw it differently — Philip Morris stopped giving to the institute after Mr. McCain began urging stronger tobacco regulation — and many had an interest in issues before Congress. For example, CTIA — the Wireless Association, a national lobbying group representing the cellphone industry, has been a consistent donor to the institute and often had an interest in legislation Mr. McCain sponsored or shaped.
In 2003, when Mr. McCain’s Commerce Committee was considering legislation to regulate e-mail spam, wireless companies were worried that it could cause problems if applied to spam text messages received on cellphones. CTIA sent an update to its members noting that Mr. McCain had “raised the wireless-specific issues and pledged to work to resolve them,” and he eventually co-sponsored an amendment instructing regulators to study how best to apply the new rules to cellular devices."
-
- groups:
- News and Politics, Election 2008
-
- tags:
- News and Politics, Election 2008, McCain, Election
-
-
rube
-
The lessor of two evils gets the pragmatic vote.
The GOP has all but destroyed our nation.
Obama is not a career politician as Mccain is.
Mccain's pockets are coated with lobbyist/corporation money, Obama has run a grassroots campaign.
I understand the idea to vote for a third party- but the nation is not there yet! Get off your butts and vote in November or Mccain might go over the top! You think Bush Jr. was bad! Mccain, Leadership you can believe in- my ass!
OBAMA! - 3 years ago
-
rube
-
-
jjmaster
-
They are all intertwined! We are controlled by their greedbreeding power hungry whims... Vote third party!
- 3 years ago
-
jjmaster
-
-
Paratus
-
Between McCains lobbyists and Comrade Obama eschewing public funds in favor of 527 money sounds like both are driving down the same street. We need to abandon both the Democrat and Republican parties in favor of a Constitutional Party.
Ron Paul for president - 3 years ago
-
Paratus
-
-
eldamon
-
In addition to this McCain got $1.1 million from big oil for flip flopping on his position for offshore drilling. There's "change" you can believe in.
- 3 years ago
-
eldamon
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
Lobbying should be banned or atleast severely limited and replaced with government funding for the political parties. We'd need requirements, of course, like a petition or something with a certain amound of signatures.
That way, all parties can have a chance.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
M_Pavlov
-
I don't think that lobbying (or even the practice of companies contributing to political campaigns) is necessarily a bad thing. For one it means that my tax dollars aren't going to someone's campaign that I completely disagree with. And two is that it is the company or groups money after all, they should be able to donate, contribute, build or whatever else they want to do for a candidate.
The system that is currently in place though allows for severe (or at least what I perceive to be severe) imbalances in the way that money is allowed to impact the political process. This process is what needs to be focused on, not who what where how the money got into Joe Candidates presidential fund.
- 3 years ago
-
M_Pavlov
-
-
Leonidis
-
the lobbyists run this country.
- 3 years ago
-
Leonidis
-
-
SonicSubculture
-
Lobbyists are funding McCain's campaign? That makes sense, because nobody else wants him in office.
- 3 years ago
-
SonicSubculture
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
Vote for a third party, not the two big assholes.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
omordn
-
But McCain promised!!! Lol. I'm not surprised. Every politician is known to do this.
I no longer consider myself democrat... nor will I ever turn to the Republicans. I'm not voting either. I'm sick and tired of this BS.
- 3 years ago
-
omordn
-
-
Saladin
-
omordn:
Then you've lost the game.
Republicans depend on you not voting, that was their main strategy in '04.
Just because things are terrible doesn't mean you should throw away the only power you have.
- 3 years ago
-
Saladin
-
-
bss05g
-
What?! A politician who did not tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth? But then again he is super old maybe he just forgot about it
- 3 years ago
-
bss05g
-
-
FallenMorgan
-
Most lobbyists who give politicians the big bucks don't have the people in mind, though.
- 3 years ago
-
FallenMorgan
-
-
Capt_America
-
Let's be careful. Lobbying does NOT need to stop. Lobbyists giving money to polticians needs to stop. Lobbying for a cause is a good thing. Lobbyists are a form of our voices to the government....some good and some bad.
I am a lifelong member of the NRA and believe that they are my voice in the lobbying department to maintain the gun freedoms and our second amendment rights. I do know that they dump tons of cash into political campaigns and support specific candidates...and I think that is wrong. I want the NRA to be my voice in the politicians ear...not the cash in their pockets.
- 3 years ago
-
Capt_America
-
-
Kewara81
-
Capt_America:
Yes, I was too general. I do want people with a cause to have a voice. I just think its unethical to be able to pay politicians along with that voice.
- 3 years ago
-
Kewara81
-
-
Kewara81
-
Agreed. Lobbying, no matter where its going or where its coming from, needs to stop. No corporation or business should have the ability to control or even have a say in politics. This is just one way that the rich keep getting richer, the middle-class gets poor, and the poor are forgotten and die. If a corporation/business wants to influence politics it should have to do it through it's customers by proving to them that they are worth keeping around.
- 3 years ago
-
Kewara81
-
-
Gtarfr3ak
-
Just another nail in John McCain's campaign Coffin..
- 3 years ago
-
Gtarfr3ak
-
-
Capt_America
-
Why is it that the media hypes up Lobbyists when the Republicans do it? We don't hear them slamming organizations like Moveon.org or critisizing the Clintons or Al Gore for the amount of money they receive through lobbyists.
I am all for political independence free of lobbyists giving piles of money to politicians. I am a firm believer that lobbyists have their place in our society to push their causes (some good/some bad), but I don't think they should be allowed to dump money into a candidate or party. Allowing anyone to "give" to a campaign basically comes down to indirect bribery.
Campaign reform is long overdue and needed more now than ever. We have the capability to get to know candidates better today than any other time in our history, yet it isn't happening.
Vote for campaign reform.
- 3 years ago
-
Capt_America
-
-
sic_n_tired
-
A presidential candidate taking money from special interests? Shocking. Even Obama rejected 'public' ie taxpayer funding for private funds. Now that is change I can believe in.
- 3 years ago
-
sic_n_tired
-
-
orangeseverywhere
-
the amount of money spent to "buy" a political office is mind-boggling. the more we are exposed to political ads concerning a particular candidate, the more the public become influenced, whether we realize it or not.
maybe the solution would be to put a cap on spending -- regardless of where the money comes from.
- 3 years ago
-
orangeseverywhere
-
-
Robroy1
-
This system is so corrupted with payola it is pathetic. These people call payola special intrest and that makes paying into someone's account for favors legal. Wow what a system, in the music or entertainment business they would be jailed but congress gives themselves a special name and it all becomes legal. Until thi corruption is stopped there won't be any honesty in government. This government needs change, big time, they have taken all the illegal activities and turned them legal, the lottery or the numbers racket, booze or moonshine, gambling or bookmaking and payola or special intrests or pac's. The people need to start putting people in prison. How much more corrupted can it get? Ane then there is Bush and Co. just plain murderer's and greedy crooks that no one is willing to prosecute. All anyone has to do is look at thier approval rating's Putin has better approval ratings. I can't believe this system is this corrupted and still functioning as a government. It really makes a person wonder what one of these politicians needs to do to be inprisoned. I think they are also jailproof. A good percentage should be in prison instead they are the ones heading up the running of America as a democracy that tourtes, kills and spies on people in the name of freedom and democracy. I hope the world court does step in and jail these people.
- 3 years ago
-
Robroy1
-
-
ihateyou
-
Things will only change in this country when we stop picking democrats or republicans, its like people are playing einee menee minee mo when they pick a canidate. I for one will not be apart of this charade anymore,
my choices are between nader, barr, and mckinney
yes i know none of them have a chance - 3 years ago
-
ihateyou
-
-
Nettle
-
ihateyou:
I absolutely agree with you. Do you know more people like us? We ought to do stuff.
- 3 years ago
-
Nettle
-
-
Cherish_Liberty4_All
-
and the show begins.....bring it on!!!
Cherish
- 3 years ago
-
Cherish_Liberty4_All
