News and Politics | August 03, 2008 | 15 comments

Oregon Health Plan won't pay for cancer treatment, but it will pay for assisted suicide.

Image
jubal
The Oregon Health plan made a controversial decision to not cover a cancer treatment for a patient that would cost $4000. They instead sent a letter telling the patient that they would pay for the medications for her to commit suicide.

What do you think about this?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Excerpt.....

SPRINGFIELD, Ore. -- Barbara Wagner has one wish - for more time.

"I'm not ready, I'm not ready to die," the Springfield woman said. "I've got things I'd still like to do."

Her doctor offered hope in the new chemotherapy drug Tarceva, but the Oregon Health Plan sent her a letter telling her the cancer treatment was not approved.

Instead, the letter said, the plan would pay for comfort care, including "physician aid in dying," better known as assisted suicide.

"I told them, I said, 'Who do you guys think you are?' You know, to say that you'll pay for my dying, but you won't pay to help me possibly live longer?' " Wagner said.

An unfortunate interpretation?

Dr. Som Saha, chairman of the commission that sets policy for the Oregon Health Plan, said Wagner is making an "unfortunate interpretation" of the letter and that no one is telling her the health plan will only pay for her to die.

One critic of assisted suicide calls the message disturbing nonetheless.

"People deserve relief of their suffering, not giving them an overdose," said Dr. William Toffler.

He said the state has a financial incentive to offer death instead of life: Chemotherapy drugs such as Tarceva cost $4,000 a month while drugs for assisted suicide cost less than $100.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Politics Health Care Cancer 6 more
  3.     
    |

15 comments // Oregon Health Plan won't pay for cancer treatment, but it will pay for assisted suicide.

  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • I am in favor of the Assisted Suicide law in Oregon, but for them the Oregon Health Plan to suggest a suicide over a cancer treatment is unconscionable.

      I believe people should have the right to end their lives when they want to.

    • 3 years ago
  • plusaf
  • jjmaster
  • Becky6378
  • jakes_green
  • quinnironhart
    • 0
      quinnironhart  
    • Dr. Mr. President... are you out of your mind? I really hope all these politicians are denied health care some day when they are diagnosed with terminal cancer and are instead offered anthrax to make the suicide process speed up.

    • 3 years ago
  • CHARMOSH
  • Elligirl
    • 0
      Elligirl  
    • If you pay the insurance premiums, you should be able to cash in on your plan and get what you paid for. The letter is a slap in the face, but the real issue is she is being denied a service that she has paid for. Health insurance companies/plans should be non-profits.

    • 3 years ago
  • Kewara81
    • 0
      Kewara81  
    • I'm not a biased advocate for National Health Care but actions such as this make a stronger argument for such a federally controlled program. These are the inevitable issues that arise when what should be a social program for health is instead handled like a business. Anymore, a health insurance company paying out for care makes a cost-risk analysis as if they're making an investment. The cost-risk is whether their expenditure to "fix" a customer will see a return when that customer is well again and likely paying a higher premium. As in the case of this article the cost-risk was too high so they declined to make the investment; but they did offer a buy out to end a contract.
      Some systems just can not function as a capitalist venture and properly provide the services they were designed for.

    • 3 years ago
  • queenofit
  • Enjoy_Cannabis
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • This is absolutely scandalous. Such cynicism, such contempt for individuals and life is unconscionable.

      Of course, this insurance would pay for assisted suicide - a dead person cannot pay anything any more.

    • 3 years ago
  • SDLN
    • 0
      SDLN  
    • I always make a distinction between suicide and euthanasia. Namely that suicide is a psychological issue, and euthanasia is a medical issue.

      The ethics of euthanasia, in my opinion, are that you would only euthanize someone with their consent in order to avoid unnecessary suffering when all other medical options have been exhausted (or something like that).

      Oregon's Health Plan needs to be revised. Killing patients, whether through euthanasia or absence of treatment, just to save money is unacceptable.

    • 3 years ago
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • No they aren't telling her they will pay for her to die; nooooo

      they are just telling her that they will not help her live, and in case you die we have some "comfort care" that you will just love.....

      I detest our health care bandits.....

      thanks jubal!

    • 3 years ago
  • mjsmith11
    • 0
      mjsmith11  
    • I do not see how suicide could be considered health care. Suicide is the opposite of health care. The last thing people suffering from cancer should need to worry about is money.

    • 3 years ago
  • MeganMcKenzie
  • kennymotown
    • 0
      kennymotown  
    • unfortunate for this individual, a true shame my sympathy to her and her family. Fix our health system now mr. government or you will have us to deal with.

    • 3 years ago
more from News and Politics:

top videos