Sudan capitalises on food exports while receiving aid for starvation in Darfur
source: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/10/world/africa/10sudan.html?ex=1376107200&en=eaec57cfe1f5f4c...
-
-
- fountaingoats
- added this
...Why is a country that exports so many of its own crops receiving more free food than anywhere else in the world, especially when the Sudanese government is blamed for creating the crisis in the first place?
...
Take sorghum, a staple of the Sudanese diet, typically eaten in flat, spongy bread. Last year, the United States government, as part of its response to the emergency in Darfur, shipped in 283,000 tons of sorghum, at high cost, from as far away as Houston. Oddly enough, that is about the same amount that Sudan exported, according to United Nations officials. This year, Sudanese companies, including many that are linked to the government in Khartoum, are on track to ship out twice that amount, even as the United Nations is being forced to cut rations to Darfur.
Eric Reeves, a professor at Smith College and an outspoken activist who has written frequently on the Darfur crisis, called this anomaly "one of the least reported and most scandalous features of the Khartoum regime's domestic policies." It was emblematic, he said, of the Sudanese government's strategy to manipulate "national wealth and power to further enrich itself and its cronies, while the marginalized regions of the country suffer from terrible poverty."
-
- groups:
- News and Politics, World News, Current News UK
-
- tags:
- News and Politics, Economy, Current News UK, War, 13 more
-
-
khromadjo
-
The Sudanese government should exercise some accountability and take care of its' people first and foremost before seeking to accumulate personal revenues. If they take care of the people, perhaps provide them with tools and land to cultivate crops, they could potentially both feed them and achieve some level of prosperity.
- 3 years ago
-
khromadjo
-
-
LozRiva
-
It seems they have enough to support their own people, but will they if Aid is removed ?
- 3 years ago
-
LozRiva
-
-
Beta_Boy
-
A large proportion of the population in countries like Sudan survive on aid alone. Whilst I can see the school of thought that suggests holding back aid may encourage the country to sort out some of it's problems the reality is that it is the poor and needy who suffer.
The West has a social responsibility to do all it can to support those who do not even receive the basic conditions that we are all entitled to, health care, clean water, food in their belly and education. Failure to provide this should be embarrassing to us.
- 3 years ago
-
Beta_Boy
-
-
crababble
-
I will never understand how humans can be so vile towards one another.
- 3 years ago
-
crababble
-
-
Allorno1
-
No easy answers and no quick solutions. This is certainly happening in other places right now as it has in the past when our sanctions against Cuba backfired on us. What we need now is to worry less about sanctions on focus more on relaying international aid to the African Union. Also the U.N. needs to nut up and declare genocide so its forced to act on its obligation to prevent genocide as it declared it would at the 1948 U.N. convention.
- 3 years ago
-
Allorno1
-
-
abbym0308
-
-
Check out this Collective Journalsim pod with with two filmmakers spend a day with the Sudanese Liberation Army in Darfur, Sudan.
- 3 years ago
-
abbym0308
-
-
Kati_kat
-
Ah, but this is exactly whats wrong over there, the elitist government taking everything for themselves and leaving the people of the nation with nothing.
It's happening all over the world to some extent or another, and we will never see otherwise in our days here if we don't address the problems instead of the symptoms.
Even as this is happening in Sudan, Morales in Bolivia is being threatened with impeachment by the people profiting from resource extraction for attempting to redistribute wealth in his nation.
Things here aren't so dandy either, people living in obscene luxury while others cannot afford basic health care and education. Our own middle class is being systematically eliminated.
I don't propose that there are any easy answers, but can't we do better than this, really?
- 3 years ago
-
Kati_kat
-
-
Ayahuasca2012
-
I posted this about 10 hours ago...
At least one of ours got some attention...
- 3 years ago
-
Ayahuasca2012
-
-
dgold0101
-
Look up Amartya Sen. Aid won't work without a liberal government. It's pointless and just prolongs the fighting. Operation Lifeline Sudan, the biggest aid accord in the region, is routinely seen as a failure that prolonged the fighting.
- 3 years ago
-
dgold0101
-
-
Allorno1
-
Sudan's ill-response to its people's basic needs is obviously atrocious. That being said, its economy is almost completely based around its agricultural products (and oil, big surprise). Order cannot be restored to the Sudan region without the proper funding for the countless reclamation projects that will be needed in the future. To cut off aid would stunt an already damaged economy and almost guarantee an end to what little food assistance the people are getting right now. It would only throw fuel on the fire.
- 3 years ago
-
Allorno1
-
-
fountaingoats
-
Allorno1:
Thanks for such a well thought-out response. I agree that cutting off aid would make the problem worse. The article makes sure to point out: "United Nations officials have said that if they do not bring food into the region, the government surely will not." But how do we hold the nation accountable? What are your thoughts on trade sanctions?
- 3 years ago
-
fountaingoats
-
-
fountaingoats
-
Should Sudan continue to receive international aid even as it makes tons of money from food exports? It's not like they're helping to feed their own people, so what would happen if the aid stopped? I think there should be trade sanctions on Sudan until it agrees to help feed its people in Darfur. What are your thoughts?
- 3 years ago
-
fountaingoats
