News and Politics | August 12, 2008 | 22 comments

Obama VP hint in Dem Convention schedule

Image
bansheewail
Perhaps it's just a coincidence, but Barack Obama's campaign and the Democratic Convention organizers seem like they might be dropping a big hint about who's going to grab the No. 2 spot on the ticket.

The third night of the convention, Wednesday Aug. 27, will feature a prime-time speech from Obama's yet-to-be-named running mate. The day's theme is "Securing America's Future," which just so happens to be the name of Gen. Wesley Clark's Political Action Committee.

An representatives of the Obama campaign and Clark's PAC did not immediately respond to RAW STORY's request for comment on whether this meant Clark would be the Democrat's potential vice president, but so far it seems to be mostly coincidence:

For what it's worth, an aide to Gen. Clark could not restrain near-riotous laughter when asked if there was anything behind the connection.

"I don't think it's anything more than an interesting coincidence," the aide said in between convulsions. "It's just because his PAC was named so well!"

Still, it's not as though the party is randomly naming each day of the convention. The theme for Thursday, when Obama will speak, is the familiar-sounding "Change You Can Believe In."
Coincidence or no, the Wednesday night theme has launched some speculation that Clark will show up on the ticket.

A former NATO commander, Clark ran his own brief presidential campaign in 2004 and he remains popular among progressive activists. Observers see his national security credentials as a potential vital boost to the ticket.

Clark also has shown himself to be a capable political combatant. He refused to cower earlier this summer when Republicans drummed up outrage over his observation that Republican nominee John McCain's experience as a shot-down fighter pilot turned Vietnam POW did not alone make him qualified to be Commander in Chief.

Organizers of the Democratic National Convention on Monday announced themes and primetime speakers for each of the four days the party will gather to crown its nominee in two weeks.

As Time magazine's Jay Newton-Small notes, the theme on Wednesday seems to suggest Obama will pick a running mate with strong national security credentials.

The schedule also seems to eliminate the possibility that Hillary Clinton will be the next vice president. The former First Lady is slated for a prime-time speaking role on Tuesday night.

The Politicker's James W. Pindell opines, "While they probably did not intend it this way, the Democratic National Committee just stated that New York Sen. Hillary Clinton will not be Barack Obama's pick for vice president."

Pindell notes that the schedule's placement of Clinton on Tuesday and the veep pick on Wednesday inherently implies "[t]wo different people on two different nights. This does not preclude Obama from picking Clinton anyway though it would be a little odd that a convention he is essentially running on would reverse itself in such a dramatic way."

"From Monday through Thursday, our Convention program will highlight the people of this country who want positive change and who believe Barack Obama is the leader who will listen to their concerns and get our country moving in the right direction again," said Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebilius, a co-chair of the convention who is considered a top candidate herself for the No. 2 spot on the Democratic ticket.

The theme for the Aug. 25 opening night will be "One Nation," with a speech by Michelle Obama.

The Aug. 26 theme is "Renewing America's Promise" with a speech by Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama's chief rival for the presidential nomination.

The theme for Aug. 28, the night Obama formally accepts the nomination, is "Change You Can Believe In." Obama will speak at the 75,000 seat Invesco Field in Denver, while the rest of the convention will take place in the nearby convention center.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Politics Obama Barack Obama 5 more
  3.     
    |

22 comments // Obama VP hint in Dem Convention schedule

  • Bren589
  • SilenceNoMore
  • current89
  • SilenceNoMore
  • JohnA
  • Meaghan1126
  • damnneargenius
    • 0
      damnneargenius  
    • I like the choice of General Clark over anyone else Obama has mentioned yet.

      He was commander of NATO, that gives us a solid, well-connected person in terms of international security.

      Given Obama's less aggressive, more tempered diplomatic stance on the Russian invasion, I think General Clark would make a good "big stick".

      Speak softly and carry a big stick.

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • Image
    • Very bad idea.

      The guy who almost started World War III?

      From The Guardian, Tuesday August 3, 1999:

      "I'm not going to start the third world war for you," General Sir Mike Jackson, commander of the international K-For peacekeeping force, is reported to have told Gen Clark when he refused to accept an order to send assault troops to prevent Russian troops from taking over the airfield of Kosovo's provincial capital. - Robertson's plum job in a warring Nato

      No sooner are we told by Britain's top generals that the Russians played a crucial role in ending the west's war against Yugoslavia than we learn that if Nato's supreme commander, the American General Wesley Clark, had had his way, British paratroopers would have stormed Pristina airport threatening to unleash the most frightening crisis with Moscow since the end of the cold war.

      Mary Robinson, the UN human rights commissioner, said Nato's bombing campaign had lost its "moral purpose". Referring to the cluster bomb attack on residential areas and market in the Serbian town of Nis, she described Nato's range of targets as "very broad" and "almost unfocused". There were too many mistakes; the bombing of the Serbian television station in Belgrade - which killed a make-up woman, among others - was "not acceptable". No blood money by Richard Norton-Taylor on the moral confusion of Nato, which refuses compensation to the innocent people it bombed.

      Many more reasons why Clark is a very bad choice, at http://www.zpub.com/un/clark.html

    • 3 years ago
  • rube
    • 0
      rube  
    • If it is Clark, hes a good man- lots of experience,
      bright, understands the world and the problems facing it!

    • 3 years ago
  • thwayne92
    • 0
      thwayne92  
    • clark actually has endorsed kathleen sebelius as "the future vice president." im not sure it will be wesley clark as obamas pick, but i can tell you it wont be hillary clinton.

    • 3 years ago
  • BansheesMom
    • 0
      BansheesMom  
    • Clark was a leader during wartime. Just because there was some colateral damage, doesn't make him a war criminal. If that's the measuring stick, all of our fighting officers are criminals. BTW, Bin Laden was on the US payroll long before Kosovo. Bin Laden's not even the first rebel we have supported only to fight later. This "war criminal" piece is cherry picking the facts to make a weak arguement.

    • 3 years ago
  • redflyer
  • symn8
    • 0
      symn8  
    • This guy was taken out of the dem VP running along time ago . just another press/blogger trying to guess who the vp will be.

    • 3 years ago
  • hollowman218
  • AceHardchester
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • Image
    • hollowman218:

      The guy who almost started World War III?

      From The Guardian, Tuesday August 3, 1999:

      "I'm not going to start the third world war for you," General Sir Mike Jackson, commander of the international K-For peacekeeping force, is reported to have told Gen Clark when he refused to accept an order to send assault troops to prevent Russian troops from taking over the airfield of Kosovo's provincial capital. - Robertson's plum job in a warring Nato

      No sooner are we told by Britain's top generals that the Russians played a crucial role in ending the west's war against Yugoslavia than we learn that if Nato's supreme commander, the American General Wesley Clark, had had his way, British paratroopers would have stormed Pristina airport threatening to unleash the most frightening crisis with Moscow since the end of the cold war.

      Mary Robinson, the UN human rights commissioner, said Nato's bombing campaign had lost its "moral purpose". Referring to the cluster bomb attack on residential areas and market in the Serbian town of Nis, she described Nato's range of targets as "very broad" and "almost unfocused". There were too many mistakes; the bombing of the Serbian television station in Belgrade - which killed a make-up woman, among others - was "not acceptable". No blood money by Richard Norton-Taylor on the moral confusion of Nato, which refuses compensation to the innocent people it bombed.

      Many more reasons why Clark is a very bad choice, at http://www.zpub.com/un/clark.html

    • 3 years ago
  • NoGodsNoMasters
  • silverex87
  • thwayne92
    • 0
      thwayne92  
    • NoGodsNoMasters:

      i do NOT second that. why would clark cause obama to get less votes? republicans will win indiana anyway, even bayh cant turn that state blue, its just always been consistently red when it comes to presidents. if you want to think politically, then clark can help in virginia where one in ten people are war veterans. turning virginia blue is much more achievable than indiana in my opinion.

    • 3 years ago
  • Marilynn_Murray
  • cleansouth
  • bansheewail
more from News and Politics:

top videos