News and Politics | August 24, 2008 | 37 comments

Australian diver Matthew Mitcham wins gold, NBC snubs gay community

Image
DefenderOfPants
NBC has never shied away from using Olympic athletes' love lives as sub-plots and conversation fodder for their announcers, but when it comes to Matthew Mitcham, an openly gay athlete, NBC takes a more "don't ask, don't tell" approach.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Entertainment,   Sports,   Gay,   1 more
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Entertainment Sports Media 6 more
  3.     
    |

37 comments // Australian diver Matthew Mitcham wins gold, NBC snubs gay community

  • parisinla
  • NickerBocker09
    • 0
      NickerBocker09  
    • Its more than he was simply gay. He had the highest dicing score in Olympic history in the final round, he stopped the Chinese and stunned the entire nation of China, he actually had a real story of love (he couldnt afford to get his partner and mom to the games).

      Him being gay is more about "ohh cool hes gay". Its about a hero, and image. He basically slapped all the stereotypes in the face. Hes an inspiration to tons of young gay athletes now. China, a nation that dislikes homosexuality was stopped by a homosexual from getting a sweep of golds in diving. He went through depression and almost quit the sport entirely.

      NBC already knew about his homosexuality, it was on their website even. BBC, Australian news networks, and other internation networks talked about it, yet NBC didnt. His story was real, a true Olympian story, a story of someone who really faced challenges.

    • 3 years ago
  • parisinla
    • 0
      parisinla  
    • I think this is worth mentioning. I read that the IOC would not pay for Matthew's partner to come to the games (i dont know what policy is on spousal travel privilages for the IOC) so his sponsor Johnson&Johnoson took care of those arrangements for them to be able to be together at the games.

      while i get that they didnt mention it and i get that they covered alot of athletes stories, i dont necessarily see any evidence of censorship. But i still think its worth mentioning. I rooted for Matthew and am extremely happy that hes brave enough to have come out, but foremost hes an athlete and in the context its not as necessary to cover this...

      On the other hand i do feel a bit jaded at the fact that NBC didnt cover this and sort of just swept it under the rug and ignored it, especially since we know how many butthairs are on michael phelps ass (none btw). Thanks NBC. They did really shy away from ANY controversy. Pansy bitches.

    • 3 years ago
  • menmykoko
    • 0
      menmykoko  
    • Yeah, it's definately a double standard. It's only news if they are gay AND dangerous. If they are a positive role model then that's not important and definately shouldn't be aired on tv.

    • 3 years ago
  • pogo5
    • 0
      pogo5  
    • Someone asked "Do you care that he's gay,... a lot of people don't".
      Answer: Yes, I do care that he's gay, in the sense that none of the progress made for gays in the last 30 years could have happened if everyone had stayed in the closet. Visibility is what made people change their minds about the false stereotypes they had about gays - and that visibility includes knowing that your sports idols are gay.

      If people aren't told, the automatic assumption is that they are straight. Mitcham was the FIRST and ONLY gay to come out before these games, but he is certainly not the only gay who participated in them. If the world knew who the others were, it would help fight homophobia and at the same time allow other gays to identify and be proud.

      Black people are proud when one of their own wins, Canadians (or whoever) are proud when one of their countrymen wins. Well, why shouldn't gays all over the world be given the chance to be proud each time a gay athlete wins? It shows the world that gays can be rough, tough, the best, and would certainly force some people to change their negative attitudes. Isn't all of that reason enough for the news journalists and others to care?

      As for Mitcham, it was very brave of him to come out before the games. So many great athletes get subsidies and prize money or contracts with sportswear conglomerates if they win the games. (Phelps has been promised $2 milllion by Adidas.) Mitcham had no means of knowing in advance whether coming out might hurt him financially because some companies might flinch at using a gay man in their ads... but he decided to out himself anyway. Such courage SHOULD be rewarded, and credit SHOULD be given where it is due. 'Nuff said!

    • 3 years ago
  • erikjh1972
    • 0
      erikjh1972  
    • pogo5:

      ummm...so whos fault is that that they dont come out? seems like your balming everyone but the gay athlete who either does or doesnt want to come out. in my opinion its not nbc's job to further the self promotion of any one lifestyle gay, straight or otherwise.

    • 3 years ago
  • Mafioso
    • 0
      Mafioso  
    • pogo5:

      Well when your career depends on you not "coming out of the closet", what would you choose to do? Most athletes, especially those competing in the Olympics, train their whole lives for that one chance to just qualify, but being a "best bet" contender to win gold or medal in the events, makes the stakes that much higher.

      Maybe you don't have a problem with him being gay, but that doesn't mean he didn't or still isn't getting harassed or talked down to for being gay.

      The reality is, because he is gay and open about it, he risked sponsors dropping him and also risked not being covered because of his lifestyle.

      You may be right about it being up to the athlete to "come out" or not, however, this world makes it a lot easier to stay in than it does to "come out".

      And you may not think it is the job of NBC to promote any one lifestyle, however, that is what they do everytime they highlight someone's (a straight athlete's) relationship and credits that relationship with being the reason that particular athlete is doing so well, or also making comments about how Michael Phelps is gonna be getting so much more pussy now that he has won 8 gold medals. They promote straight lifestyles on a daily basis, if you choose not to show one type of lifestyle then you should not be allowed to show any.

      If you are speaking about responsibility, then it should go both ways.

    • 3 years ago
  • erikjh1972
    • 0
      erikjh1972  
    • pogo5:

      all im saying is that this is not a cut and dry story. its every person's choice whether they want to come out.
      your right, i have no problem with the way people are or what they do.
      unfortunatly nbc is a private company and can cover how they want to.
      is that right--no. and if i ever owned them i would cover things equally.
      as far as sponsorship goes--thats why every athlete has to make their own choice and shouldnt be condemned by the "outed" community for not doing so. their the ones who have to live their life and make a living.
      hopefully someday we will live in a world where people wont care what sex they prefer but i wont hold my breath.

    • 3 years ago
  • parisinla
  • erikjh1972
  • teddy14
  • Mafioso
    • 0
      Mafioso  
    • NBC can suck it... Who cares if they support gays or not, I don't need their approval or promotion to live my life. Don't take it as a snub, take as proof of their policy and just don't watch, or just watch the really good shows and nothing else.

    • 3 years ago
  • IAMROBOT
    • 0
      IAMROBOT  
    • If they shy away from one athlete's love life, than they should avoid the subject all together for all of the athletes. Anyway you slice it, it's simply not fair and lends credence to the underlying belief that a gay person's relationship can never be as important as a straight person's

    • 3 years ago
  • CHARMOSH
    • 0
      CHARMOSH  
    • I agree that is about the athletes ability,
      but its true that when someone does win they show their happy loved ones...

      wheres the love?

    • 3 years ago
  • DefenderOfPants
    • 0
      DefenderOfPants  
    • it's not so much a question of whether or not NBC should make his personal life a topic of interest, it's more a question of whether or not NBC decided to avoid the subject altogether.

      yeah, i guess it would be nice if NBC focused more on the athletics and less on the personal lives of the athletes. but they don't. announcers will talk about anything that they consider of interest. that usually includes the personal lives of stand-out athletes. i mean, you can only talk about the scoring system of gymnastics so many times.

      i didn't really expect them to make a mini-movie about his being gay to show in-between dives. but i do think the fact that he is the only openly gay athlete to compete at the Beijing Olympics is something worth noting. especially considering that, by winning gold, he upset the Chinese from sweeping the diving competitions. it's kind of a big deal.

      they didn't even show his family and boyfriend in the audience cheering for him.

    • 3 years ago
  • SilenceNoMore
  • pogo5
    • 0
      pogo5  
    • DefenderOfPants:

      I knew nothing about him before his winning. it was the way various people greeted him afterwards (other divers giving him kisses on the cheek which is not typical in Anglo culture) and the way he was flapping his hands around after winning that clued me in to his being gay. I'm not sure, but it seems that they showed a male come over to comfort him (he was crying in joy) who also kissed him - perhaps the boyfriend? But maybe that's not what they were showing on NBC... I was watching Eurosport.

    • 3 years ago
  • Mafioso
    • 0
      Mafioso  
    • DefenderOfPants:

      SilenceNoMore, I agree that we should not care about the sexual preference and that it should be about their ability, but let us be real. The same way you say that it should not matter, there are many people who would say that it does (both for right and wrong reasons).

      How else would we get to the point where our next generation of young people (who will eventually be our leaders) really will not think of homosexuality a big deal, if we cannot even hear it mentioned on television in the form of commentators talking about his (Mitchams) support team, which may include a significant other of the same sex.

      I would think the same way you argue it is not a big deal that they did not mention him being gay because that should not be what is important during the Olympics, then it should not have been a big deal if they had.

      Point is, they did not cover the personal lives of any athletes that may have been gay because they did not want to offend anyone. The fact that they would assume it would offend a viewer proves that it is more wrong not to cover someone's personal life because they are gay, when they (commentators) spent alot of time discussing the personal lives of other athletes who were straight.

    • 3 years ago
  • marpunk
    • 0
      marpunk  
    • I watched him win that gold on T.V. it was very exciting but I don't remember seeing his family/friends support. He's an extraordinary athlete and the Olympics don't really give medals to you for who you have sex with. Maybe they will show that he is gay in order to appeal to other LGBT viewers.

    • 3 years ago
  • pogo5
    • 0
      pogo5  
    • There are two reasons why NBC should have mentioned it.
      First, because TV often tells background stories on an athlete's life... like the weightlifter whose wife died in an accident a year before the Olympics, and he held up her photo while on the podium. Or the French female swimmer whose love life was told to everyone around the world (she changed trainers - both were her lovers). If background about other athletes is OK, then THIS athlete's background should also be acceptable.
      Second... it's NEWS! He is the FIRST Olympic athlete to be out of the closet BEFORE going to the Olympics... he made history twice, therefore, by winning AND by being out. This also makes him the perfect model for other gays, and a perfect model for straights who think in stereotypes.

      And for those who are interested, he actually gave up diving for a while, and it was his boyfriend who helped him find the strength to get back into it.

    • 3 years ago
  • erikjh1972
  • Mafioso
  • NickerBocker09
    • 0
      NickerBocker09  
    • pogo5:

      Well this is a difficult thing to assume. He came out long before the Olympics but it wasnt until his media interview in which he mentioned his partner did everyone suddenly talk about it. Because he never officially mentioned it, but he wasnt hiding it.

      And hes not the first, there were 10 lesbians in the 2008 olympics. However, he is (I believe) the first gay MALE athlete going into the olympics open.

    • 3 years ago
  • UWAZell
    • 0
      UWAZell  
    • Why should the public be privy to his public life. Not everyone wants to have their private life displayed to the world. We Australians are much more private than you yanks and maybe it was a decision on his part not to make his entire diary available to all of America.

    • 3 years ago
  • Mafioso
    • 0
      Mafioso  
    • UWAZell:

      For me it is not about the athletes personal decision to be out or not or display his thoughts publicly, it is about pretending there is not a bias when it comes to what is mentioned about an athletes personal life during sports events.

      To say they should not have to mention that he is gay, while they continue to use the personal lives of other athletes to give people a more personal look into the athlete and the sport while neglecting those that may be "offensive" to some viewers, is a convenient argument for never airing anything about an athletes personal life if they happen to be gay.

    • 3 years ago
  • Jacques_of_Spades
    • 0
      Jacques_of_Spades  
    • Perhaps they didn't mention his orientation because it wasn't special. The examples of relationships talked about such as the love triangle between French and Italian swimmers, Walsh's wedding ring debacle and Sanya Richards' relationship are all stories. Perhaps being gay isn't that big of a deal these days.

    • 3 years ago
  • SilenceNoMore
    • 0
      SilenceNoMore  
    • i only really remember hearing about traenor and walsh's love life, and then the italian swimmer.......where are you getting that they talk about all of their love lives? Beyond that, hes australian, and perhaps nbc felt the american people wouldnt care as much about an aussie person that no one knows about as much as the americans. I think your reaching on this one

    • 3 years ago
  • Mafioso
    • 0
      Mafioso  
    • SilenceNoMore:

      They also kept making tons of comments about all the ass Michael Phelps and other male athletes will be getting, how important the spouses of other athletes were in their success. Or how they have children and are still world class athletes. Or what about the skimpy bikinis during volleyball, and the girls being nearly naked while the men are completely covered. I cannot believe you missed all that, but then again "straight" coverage is the norm, so not surprised you did not notice how biased it is.

    • 3 years ago
  • TDubs
    • 0
      TDubs  
    • NBC has no implicit or explicit impetus to talk about anyone, or parts of anyone’s life that is a competitor in these Olympics. More than in years past, most of the coverage focused on the competition. I am in favor of more sports and less Bob Costas! I saw tons of women compete and no mention was ever made of their family or personal life, just their competition history and preparedness. Maybe his being gay is not that compelling a story and NBC should not feel pressure to cover his personal life. Let's hope they just talk about how great a diver he is and if people seek out his personal life later maybe they will learn more about themselves than if NBC said 'oh, and he's gay!' Sounds like a handicap now doesn't it??

    • 3 years ago
  • Mafioso
    • 0
      Mafioso  
    • TDubs:

      Are you deaf? Or did you just not pay attention to what was being said? Oh I forgot, it is all about the sports to you... Well then maybe you should have run the coverage of the Olympics, because the coverage was biased and did mention the personal lives of some athletes.

    • 3 years ago
  • parisinla
  • mintyness
    • 0
      mintyness  
    • I agree, TyMarshal, it's should only be about the sports, not the athletes' personal lives.

      Unless, of course, they're American (and straight, natch'), in which case we need to see everything about them -- instead of watching something else, something other than synchronized diving, women's beach volleyball or Michael Phelps. But I think those are the only Olympic sports left... at least according to NBC.

    • 3 years ago
  • TyMarshal
  • Mafioso
    • 0
      Mafioso  
    • TyMarshal:

      Well then how do you explain all the clips and stories about the straight athletes' personal lives during the Olympic coverage? Let us not be hypocrites. It is real easy to say it is not important to cover their personal lives when they are gay, but when they are straight, the majority of Americans want to hear all about it.

      So if your logic applies to homos, then it should apply to breeders too.

    • 3 years ago
  • disembedded
    • 0
      disembedded  
    • Thanks to DefenderOfPants and to Brockie,

      Well, I have a big, big story coming out about Matthew Mitcham in just a few minutes. A very detailed article, with a number of stunning photographs of Matt, plus two videos (the 10m platform diving finals, which includes Matt's amazing performance; and the Gold Medal Ceremony).

      With my very best wishes!

    • 3 years ago
  • Brockie
    • 0
      Brockie  
    • I (sadly) can understand NBC for their actions. I'm sure if they did a story on him and his private life that the loonies from the religious right would have gone crazy. Then there would have been boycots of sponsors products. petitions, hate mail and threats. You know how they are. All those religious zealots think they have the right to control everyone else and how they think and live.

    • 3 years ago
  • stephenthomson
  • JaetheFirst
  • parisinla
    • 0
      parisinla  
    • Brockie:

      sadly enough stephen, "we" pander to them because they pay the bills, statistically we're outnumbered. But that dosent excuse the peacock network that proudly carried Will & Grace, is part of the family of companies that includes Bravo and makes millions off our adbuys and fandome to have ignored.

    • 3 years ago
more from News and Politics:

top videos