News and Politics | September 22, 2008 | 5 comments

What the 2nd Amendment is REALLY for...

source: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4069761537893819675&hl=en

echoz
Dr. Gratia-Hupp speaks to representatives, pulling no punches. Suzanna witnessed first-hand her parents shot dead by a "lunatic" and explains why she doesn't even blame the gunman, per se.

Who does she blame?

Watch this short clip and find out the silent gunman really is, and who Suzanna feels is ultimately responsible for the merciless death of her parents; and watch as Suzanna points out who we really need to protect ourselves from.

Spoken like a true American, and from someone who's honestly been there with something truly important to lose, as we all do.

...how does Brave'World do it? ... "PSSST! DO SOMETHING!" =)
  1. groups:
    News and Politics
  2. tags:
    News and Politics,  Gun Control,  US Government,  NRA,  6 more
  3.     
    |

5 comments // What the 2nd Amendment is REALLY for... // Video

  • echoz
    • 0
      echoz  

    • An interesting comment I think that bears quoting:

      The ten Amendments adopted make the so-called American Bill of Rights. The plain fact is that these Amendments do not confer any rights on anyone.

      These RIGHTS are INHERENT to all FREE MEN, bestowed on them by their CREATOR.

      I couldn't begin to tell you how many times I have made this exact point to people. The founders never claimed they were giving anyone any rights. If people would use their heads and their ability to reason they should be able to figure out that if one group of men can bestow certain rights on you by writing them down on a piece of paper then another group of men can take them away by writing contrary words on another piece of paper.

      "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end."
      --Lord Acton

      James Deffenbach posted on 2008-09-11 14:56:06 ET

    • 3 years ago
  • Chuck_st_chuck
    • 0
      Chuck_st_chuck  

    • oh boo hoo
      They always love to show the sad stories of people or were killed by guns
      but never show the stories of people saved by guns

      if he used a knife would she blame Genso knives
      or if he used a turkey leg will she blame butterball?

      it's the man's fault not the tools

    • 3 years ago
  • echoz
    • 0
      echoz  
    • Chuck_st_chuck:

      I'm confident most other people who *ahem* ACTUALLY watch this will see that Suzanna does advocate FOR the use of guns in self-defense...as you also seem willing to advocate. It seems she's actually pissed off at legislators for even debating our 2nd Amendment right.

    • 3 years ago
  • handshakeheartbreak
  • echoz
    • 0
      echoz  
    • Chuck_st_chuck:

      i agree about the ridiculous comparison to turkey legs et al, but to say guns are merely to harm doesn't tell all the story either. it's called an equalizer because there is surely an amount of deterence present in having one, great for self-defense and resistance to coercive or violent imposition, not unknown or uncommon in the real world.

      the 2nd Amendment, using guns as a means of force, was provided to protect us from the coersion and oppression of misguided or unreasonable government (ahem...as many are known to become, even if they great beginnings). Looking at the humble beginnings of America struggling to be free of English tyranny, guns were particularly useful if you wanted to resist British troops from taking over your house, eating all your food and otherwise helping themselves to whatever they needed at the expense of you and your family.

      Harm? hmmm... protection? AHHHhhh =)

    • 3 years ago
more from News and Politics:
from the community

top videos