News and Politics | October 09, 2008 | 1 comment

NYT: States' purges of voter rolls appear illegal

Image
khaosworks
Tens of thousands of eligible voters in at least six swing states have been removed from the rolls or have been blocked from registering in ways that appear to violate federal law, according to a review of state records and Social Security data by The New York Times.

The actions do not seem to be coordinated by one party or the other, nor do they appear to be the result of election officials intentionally breaking rules, but are apparently the result of mistakes in the handling of the registrations and voter files as the states tried to comply with a 2002 federal law, intended to overhaul the way elections are run.

Still, because Democrats have been more aggressive at registering new voters this year, according to state election officials, any heightened screening of new applications may affect their party’s supporters disproportionately. The screening and trimming of voter registration lists in the six states — Colorado, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Nevada and North Carolina — could also result in problems at the polls on Election Day: people who have been removed from the rolls are likely to show up only to be challenged by political party officials or election workers, resulting in confusion, long lines and heated tempers.

Some states allow such voters to cast provisional ballots. But they are often not counted because they require added verification.

Although much attention this year has been focused on the millions of new voters being added to the rolls by the candidacy of Senator Barack Obama, there has been far less notice given to the number of voters being dropped from those same rolls.

States have been trying to follow the Help America Vote Act of 2002 and remove the names of voters who should no longer be listed; but for every voter added to the rolls in the past two months in some states, election officials have removed two, a review of the records shows.

The six states seem to be in violation of federal law in two ways. Some are removing voters from the rolls within 90 days of a federal election, which is not allowed except when voters die, notify the authorities that they have moved out of state, or have been declared unfit to vote.

Some of the states are improperly using Social Security data to verify registration applications for new voters.

In addition to the six swing states, three more states appear to be violating federal law. Alabama and Georgia seem to be improperly using Social Security information to screen registration applications from new voters. And Louisiana appears to have removed thousands of voters after the federal deadline for taking such action.

(more at the link)
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Election 2008,   New York Times
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Election 2008 Voting New York Times 2 more
  3.     
    |

1 comment // NYT: States' purges of voter rolls appear illegal

  • extremepain
    • 0
      extremepain  
    • You just beat me to posting this. I find it very hard to believe there is nothing nefarious involved in this when it is only occurring in important swing states. I mean, isn't that just a little too coincidental? Why is there never a dispute in states that are never in doubt?

      I've never seen registration rejection in Kansas, but then again I have never seen Kansas go Democratic in the General Election.

      I don't think this meets the standard of Occam's Razor. Meaning the most obvious conclusion is the conclusion. And its just a bit too smelly that it's only in vital swing states for me.

    • 3 years ago
more from News and Politics:

top videos