News and Politics | October 09, 2008 | 46 comments

9/11 plane defies the laws of physics

celestialceiling
Watch this footage of the 2nd plane seemingly teleport before it hits the building at an unbelievable angle, then pauses for dramatic effect before causing the fireball which it disappears into.

"Photos show the spectacular flames vanished quickly, and then the fire remained restricted to one area of the tower and slowly diminished. After a few dozen seconds the building was quiet, stable, and motionless."

The massive 110 story building then stood intact for 56 minutes before it suddenly was reduced to powder. Defying all scientific reason.

The official account was that the buildings collapsed due to the impact of the airliners plus the intense heat of the fires.

The fires could not have reached temperatures higher than 1,600 degrees F, and were most likely in the range of 1,200 to 1,300 F. To melt steel would require heat in the range of 2,770 F, which could only be produced by some special device, such as an oxyacetyline torch, or say... carefully planted thermite explosives.


[some information quoted from or paraphrased from THE NEW PEARL HARBOR by David Ray Griffin]
http://www.amazon.com/New-Pearl-Harbor-Disturbing-Administration/dp/1566565529/r...




  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Unexplained,   9/11
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Lies 9/11 Stupid 4 more
  3.     
    |

46 comments // 9/11 plane defies the laws of physics // Video

  • jbone1983
  • rainbowryan420
  • celestialceiling
    • 0
      celestialceiling  
    • On September 11, 2001, all evidence was removed and destroyed, all but the proof that was shown on Televsion. This video breaks down the inconsistencies of the reports and shows all the coverage that displays reporters seeing no plane but reffering to "an explosion inside the building" This is dedicated to the victims and their families who are seeking answers, who KNOW they've been lied to. [this is part 1 of 9]

    • 3 years ago
  • sneakabean
    • 0
      sneakabean  
    • BTW, I had friends there when it happened and do you know what they watched? Planes flying into the buildings. I go with what someone I personally know says over videos and theories from people who weren't there any day.

      Go do work in the world.

      Leave it better than it was when you got there.

      But please stop spreading lies and fear.

    • 3 years ago
  • sneakabean
    • 0
      sneakabean  
    • Get a life. I've been watching CURRENT since its inception. Just because I have a life and don't usually give time to this kind of thing does not make me a troll. I find it increasingly sad and maddening that there is so much negative misinformation spouting from everywhere in this "age of info". You are a disgrace...Investigations are only perfect in the movies. This life we lead is not a movie. It is organic and flawed. Even if we had everything completely record on video, we wouldn't beleive it, because what happened was so completely outside the realm of our reality at the time. There are a lot of unanswered questions about the events of 9/11, but the majority of claims by unqualified speculators are totally and completely bunk. Fear creates paranoia. SImple as that.

    • 3 years ago
  • Johnny_Danger
  • celestialceiling
    • 0
      celestialceiling  
    • The Gov't is the one that needs to do the explaining. The truth movement is led not by the curious minds, it is led by the victims and their families.

      The case to stop questioning out of respect to the familes is so far off the mark. The familes have been demanding it for years and they have not been adressed.

      The 9/11 comission was a scam, and they deliberatly left out testimonies that they did not match their version of the story.

      There are mountains of evidence on this matter, but most people choose ignorance, rather than facing something so ugly.

    • 3 years ago
  • sneakabean
    • 0
      sneakabean  
    • All you conspiracy clamoring idiots that claim that the tragedy on 9/11 was doctored, faked, perpetrated by our government or whatever else; need to explain where the hundreds of passengers that died on those planes went. People like you that disregard the very real PEOPLE that died that day need to be euthanized. You are the problem with this world, are not thinking with calm sanity, are eager to devour sensationalism, are weak and desperate for attention. You should just STFU! Go get an education, get a job, find someone to love, and contribute to the positive movement of yours, and the lives of those around you. Evolve.

    • 3 years ago
  • Johnny_Danger
  • rainbowryan420
  • HolyCity2012
  • celestialceiling
  • celestialceiling
    • 0
      celestialceiling  
    • Bush caught lying about September 11th

      "You're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my chief of staff, Andy Card -- actually I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on, and I use to fly myself, and I said, "There's one terrible pilot." And I said, "It must have been a horrible accident."

      "But I was whisked off there -- I didn't have much time to think about it, and I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my chief who was sitting over here walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower. America's under attack."

      There was no live video coverage of the first plane hitting the tower. There couldn't be. Video of the first plane hitting the tower did not surface until AFTER the second plane had hit World Trade Center 2.

      [www.whatreallyhappened.com] had the opportunity to talk with Principal Gwen Rigell of Booker Elementary school for about twenty minutes. ... I asked her if in fact the President had been watching the events of 9-11 unfold on TV before he went into that classroom and she told me "Absolutely not". There was no TV in the corridor or anywhere near that classroom.

    • 3 years ago
  • Johnny_Danger
  • celestialceiling
  • celestialceiling
    • 0
      celestialceiling  
    • Image
    • Brief Overview of the Evidence for No Plane at the South Tower

      1) Near impossible flightpath for amateur pilot-- and remote control plane would have taken more direct path without last-minute course correction (extreme banking)

      2) Overwhelming evidence that the videos showing either "UA175" do not show a Boeing 767, were manipulated or are fraudulent:
      a) clear airframe abnormalities seen in images of the plane
      b) plane is too small for 767 in some videos
      c) aircraft attitude/flight path discrepancies between videos (even more apparent with photos)
      d) bizarre/unreal/unlikely camera pans/zooms
      e) "nose-out" video fakery phenomenon in Fox 5 video
      f) lack of a plane in long zoom out shot of Fox 5 video
      g) linkage of many videos to video animators

      3) Impossible crash physics upon contact with the tower
      a) no slowing as plane enters
      b) no explosion as plane enters
      c) no part of plane breaks off despite fact that entry hole doesn't accomodate all of wings and tail
      d) no deflection in the plane's path as it enters
      e) no deflection/distortion of wings as they impact the tower
      f) almost no deflection of debris backwards
      g) impossibility of plane acting indestructible as it enters but then undergoing complete destruction after it goes in

      4) Lack of plane debris clearly matching a Boeing 767 and no black boxes officially recovered

      5) Evidence of planted plane debris
      a) engine under canopy
      b) fuselage piece on top of tower debris on WTC5 roof

      6) Witnesses who were in a position to see the plane but never did

      http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/07/brief-overview-of-evidence-for-no-p...

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • The second plane was quite visible on the great many amateur videos taken by ordinary people that day. Are you trying to imply that they too doctored their videos?

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
  • celestialceiling
  • jc911truth
    • 0
      jc911truth  
    • Hello Celestial, Your theory is just another distraction. What value does this have? Videos have been doctored? OK, maybe but I doubt it.
      How are you going to prove that. What difference does it make? Don't get me wrong. I like the subject matter and discussing it but there are so many more important and well established facts and questions surrounding the 911 attacks.
      Please post websites you like on this subject.

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
    • 0
      celestialceiling  
    • jc911truth:

      I've been researching this for years now. This not my theory, this is what I come across over and over. We know 9/11 was a lie, but the lies go even deeper, The media was involved. I don't know of any good websites on this subject but do a search, It's a common topic, I'm not making it up.

      I suggest taking the time to go through all these videos, and look around on the web. Remember, No plane hit the pentagon.

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
    • 0
      celestialceiling  
    • According to a 767 pilot: "I don't believe it's possible for a terrorist, so called terrorist to train on a 172 then jump in a cockpit of a 757, 767, glass cockpit and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it's design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high speed, high bank turns, exceed pulling 5, 6, 7 G's. The aircraft would literally fall out of the sky. I couldn't do it and I'm absolutely positive they couldn't do it."

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
    • 0
      celestialceiling  
    • celestialceiling:

      9/11 : THE GREAT TV HOAX
      It is now a proven fact that we were shown
      doctored images on TV on 9/11.

      The cover-up story was that the blurred object that seems to eject from the left side of the building is dust. The video then cuts to black.

      This video analysis shows that it is most likely a computer doctored silhouette of the plane which went past it's mark before stopping abruptly, which was probably why the video was cut.

      It looks like the plane nose, intact, comes out the other side of the building, stops, then disappears. The official story claims this to be "ejected dust" more like a TV fakery Oops.

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
    • 0
      celestialceiling  
    • look at some of the above videos where there is very clear footage of an explosion but no plane.

      You are exactly right, Maasanova, the faked plane footage is purposely planted disinfo to lead americans into believing the official story.

      Various shots of the plane hitting the second tower shown on television do not match up.

      The truth will be coming out soon.

    • 3 years ago
  • jc911truth
  • celestialceiling
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • I don't agree with the no planes theory. I've taken a look at a lot of the tv fakery videos and while they present compelling evidence, I'm convinced that this is purposely planted disinformation.

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
  • celestialceiling
  • celestialceiling
  • damnneargenius
    • 0
      damnneargenius  
    • Using logic as the only foundation, why would they crash one plane but not a second one? That makes absolutely no sense.

      God only knows what brought down the towers, but I would say just because you don't see the second plane hitting the second tower from various angles doesn't mean it didn't happen.

      I don't think this theory holds water, although many of the other scenarios around the incident do.

      When in doubt, go with what makes the most sense.

    • 3 years ago
  • jc911truth
    • 0
      jc911truth  
    • I agree with vierotchka. 2nd plane or no 2nd plane so what? Some of the real important questions are where was NORAD? Who made mad money as a result? What about Marvin Bush? What about the explosions at the base of the building? Why was building 7 imploded that afternoon? Why did the Bush administration fight any investigation at ground zero? Why are they fighting efforts to re-open w/independent investigation? Molten metal in basement? Evidence of cordite? 18 second free-fall? Squibs? Here's the one that blows my mind...the buildings were PULVERIZED...reduced to DUST then swiftly scooped-up and disposed of in China. If they collapsed as claimed in the official story you would find tons of building rubble in the streets below. DUST, tons of dust everywhere. How can 2 massive buildings be reduced to dust without cordite which is commonly used in demolition? All we've got is unanswered questions?

    • 3 years ago
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • My nephew lives in Manhattan and worked very close to the WTC. He saw both planes hit both towers, first hand, and not on the TV. The "no planes" theory thoroughly discredits those who seek the truth in a serious manner, even though they do not ascribe to it.

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
    • 0
      celestialceiling  
    • Vierotchka:

      I don't understand the whole situation because there are countless videos with no plane, there are many videos with planes that are each different. Many eyewitnesses saw an explosion and no plane. And many witnesses saw a fighter jet with no passenger windows fly in low and fire at the building. And then others have memory of seeing the plane go in. Something doesn't make sense.

    • 3 years ago
  • WorldPeaceTV
    • 0
      WorldPeaceTV  
    • the whole thing needs more investigation...why was bush's family member in charge of wtc security? why number 7? The cia knew something was coming and had no clue. Why were sop/cia forces told not to carry out a mission, actually several missions to kill Osama when they had him cornered? too many 'why's'...

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
    • 0
      celestialceiling  
    • Bush Insider Dr. Reynolds exposes 9/11 TV fakery on FoxNews. Calls it a "fake cartoon display"

      Former Cheif Economist to the Bush Amin: "I encourange everybody to do a frame-by-frame penetration of the South Tower, and what you will see is a fake cartoon display. Because an aluminum plane cannot go through a building like the South Tower was as if it were thin air, glide right through"

      You're suggesting that there's some kind of cartoon animation, you're suggesting that the news media was a part of it?

      "Yes I am... There was only one so-called "real time" film. Most of those were subsequent tapes and they are contrived."

      "What we can do is point to WTC building 7, which was clearly a controlled demolition, and the Twin Towers were clearly an inside job in that they were blown to kingdom come"

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
    • 0
      celestialceiling  
    • "It just blew up" says WTC survivor

      B-1 Basement worker helped man injured by a blast in the Basement of the World Trade Center. BBC reported. After he was outside, "the second building went off" "I saw it. It just blew up. Big explosion. People started running..." The witness never mentions any planes.

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
    • 0
      celestialceiling  
    • The doctored footage plays live on television and the studio reporters read from the script, but the reporter on site sees no plane. "I didn't see a plane go in, that just exploded."

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
  • phillyharper
    • 0
      phillyharper  
    • That first video is fake, it's simply a case of comparing that one particular piece of footage to the dozens of other camera angles to see if it happened on each one. Which it didn't.

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
  • celestialceiling
    • 0
      celestialceiling  
    • Live broadcast shows explosion but no plane hitting the 2nd tower.

      note that the reporter says, "we've just had another explosion" and NO PLANE can be seen.

    • 3 years ago
  • celestialceiling
more from News and Politics:

top videos