News and Politics | October 16, 2008 | 35 comments

Math Bad For Democracy?

This video is no longer available.
Image
clemwilson
Does our vote really count? This witty and thought provoking short by filmmakers Chris Metzler and Josh Kurz contemplates the logic of voting.

While the famous economist Gordon Tullock explains why he doesn't vote, the film goes on to suggest a deeper purpose for exercising this essential democratic right.

Check out more of Tilapia Film's work here: http://current.com/people/Tilapia
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics,   On Current TV,   Election 2008,   2 more
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Politics Economy On Current TV 11 more
  3. credits:
    clemwilson Producer, clemwilson Editor, VSiskos Editor, more
  4.     
    |

35 comments // Math Bad For Democracy?

  • tbowman131
    • 0
      tbowman131  
    • the most important math when it comes to voting isn't arithmetic, it's calculus. although our individual votes are statistically negligible, the sum over millions of them determines our elections. this is the very same principle of calculus and it's concept of nature as a sum of an infinite amount of infinitesimally small pieces called differentials. i.e. take away enough of these differentials and our concept of a coherent reality will break down.

      so, if you convince enough people in a democracy that their vote does not matter, it too will "break down" and give us exactly what we've seen: a government whose sum is less than that of its parts.

    • 3 years ago
  • AdrianBikes
  • Commentor
    • 0
      Commentor  
    • Voting does matter ....

      If its not important to you on a national level ...

      You have a great deal of say in your local area - If you and your like minded friends get together you can actualy affect change locally

      Besides ... the USA is supposed to be a Represetive Democratic Republic that means that you're really supposed to vote for someone from your district to help make the governtmental decisions.

      Then again ... People also should want to be on juries and use the power juries have to be the ultimate check on the government ... rather than try to avoid it. The jury doesn't have to find someone guilty/innocent it can also find that a law is unjust etc.

    • 3 years ago
  • cathyd
    • 0
      cathyd  
    • For a supposedly smart guy, this is idiotic. It's also so out of touch. American Idol anyone? If you can vote on your favorite star on Dancing with the Star, maybe, maybe you might want to have a say in the president who has your $$ and even your life and even your environment in his hands. Ridiculous! This is some of the worst logic (and terrible math, btw) that I've seen.

    • 3 years ago
  • Eat_Disco
  • meaganlynn
    • 0
      meaganlynn  
    • Why is there so much pressure for everyone to vote when we really do not have much of a say in the outcome? We only do it because we can.

    • 3 years ago
  • MrRah
  • CalgarC
  • MrRah
    • 0
      MrRah  
    • Oh yea...voting is bigger than just the presidential election. There are smaller elections that are settled by a few votes. The theory seems to only hold up on the Macro scale.

    • 3 years ago
  • oliholmes
    • 0
      oliholmes  
    • "Democracy is the BEST form of government" ...
      WHAT A DOOSH hahahaha.
      Aristotle once said that there is no one best type of government, just governments that work in their situation. I believe Aristotle more than this little American dope.

    • 3 years ago
  • MrRah
    • 0
      MrRah  
    • What he said is statistically true, however, that is not my reasons for voting. I vote so I can complain. :) If you do not vote and something does not go your way, well:

      Passive-aggressive behavior refers to passive, sometimes obstructionist resistance to following through with expectations in interpersonal or occupational situations. It can manifest itself as learned helplessness, procrastination, stubbornness, resentment, sullenness, or deliberate/repeated failure to accomplish requested tasks for which one is (often explicitly) responsible. It is a defense mechanism, and (more often than not) only partly conscious. For example, suppose someone does not wish to attend a party. A passive-aggressive response in that situation might involve taking so long to get ready that the party is nearly over by the time they arrive.

      Common signs

      There are certain behaviors that help identify passive-aggressive behavior. [3]
      Ambiguity
      Avoiding responsibility by claiming forgetfulness
      Blaming others
      Chronic lateness and forgetfulness
      Complaining
      Does not express hostility or anger openly (e.g., expresses it instead by leaving notes)
      Fear of authority
      Fear of competition
      Fear of dependency
      Fear of intimacy (infidelity as a means to act out anger): The passive aggressive often can't trust. Because of this, they guard themselves against becoming intimately attached to someone.
      Fosters chaos
      Intentional inefficiency
      Making excuses
      Losing things
      Lying
      Obstructionism
      Procrastination
      Resentment
      Resists suggestions from others
      Sarcasm
      Stubbornness
      Sullenness
      Willful withholding of understanding

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive-aggressive_behavior

    • 3 years ago
  • 5thElement
    • 0
      5thElement  
    • I am pretty sure this is just a way for republicans to get people not to go vote for Obama.They just already know everyone wants him to be president, Well most people anyway. Im sure that guy is really a secret undercover republican and this is just another tactick. Sneeky, Sneeky. I don't care if that fat old lardy doesn't want to vote. I am voteing. becuase I have that right wether it counts or doesn't count. In my heart it counts.

    • 3 years ago
  • JeffreyW
    • 0
      JeffreyW  
    • Doesn't address the whole electoral college thing but it still makes a good point. Voting is important but not for the reasons most would assume...

    • 3 years ago
  • amoderateperfection
    • 0
      amoderateperfection  
    • Speaking to the cost-benefit analysis point in the video: Are the benefits we reap from our 20 mins of voting that bountiful? Some people argue that protesting and demonstrating doesn't do anything; that's there's little to no benefit in that. But I argue that taking 20 mins to vote for 1 of 2 candidates and expecting them to get the issues that are important to us right is what really has little benefits. What if all the energy and money we poured into elections went into something other than elections? What if our money funded direct causes that we think are important? What if the free time we spend watching SNL parodies and debates and complaining about politics was spent participating in direct action, protests, and rallies for the things we're for or against? Would the benefits be even greater? Expecting candidates to listen to us because we take 20 mins out of our lives every 4 years to show our support for them hardly demonstrates them the power of the people or democracy.

    • 3 years ago
  • jonny2times
    • 0
      jonny2times  
    • first off, i vote.

      i understand that the man doesnt believe that 20mins every 4 years isnt worth the investment to have .000000001% of a chance in swaying an election.

      but he also believes the glass is half empty.

      my .000000001% chance stacked with all the others that agree with me may overpower your .000000001% stacked with your buddies.

      my glass is half full.

      my 20mins is worth it.

    • 3 years ago
  • chapelthrill21
  • oneandone
    • 0
      oneandone  
    • Why do the filmmakers (& economist) assume that voting = voting for president? You may not tip a national election over to your candidate, but state and local elections can be swung by a very small number of voters - even in relatively large places. And state & local laws have a greater & more immediate impact on your daily life. Recognize the multiple scopes of your vote, and every reason for doing it is rational.

    • 3 years ago
  • asherp
    • 0
      asherp  
    • oneandone:

      That's an excellent point, which I thought that the film made that point with the explanation of "division."

      Local government allows for the most power for the individual. Yet strangely, most people don't pay attention to this level of government which affects them more directly than federal policy.

    • 3 years ago
  • derrock313
  • 10ft
    • 0
      10ft  
    • I vote to try and keep the Democrats out of office and if enough people vote that way, we will keep them out. Pretty simple to me, how about everyone for the Democrats staying home and everyone for Republicans voting.

      Now that should be enough to get the Democrats to the polls.

    • 3 years ago
  • Elevator
    • 0
      Elevator  
    • 10ft:

      I vote to keep them both out of office or at least to make sure they don't have total power. For instance I think Barak Obama is by far the better candidate but I might vote Republican so that Democrats wont control both legislative and executive branches.

      Either way the real problem is that government has too much power. As long as there is a central authority which decides policy allocates resources all peoples will forever fight for control of that authority. In this way some one will always lose. However instead we could once again allow each individual to do with him self and with his property as he sees fit, as it was when the Union was founded. In this way everyone wins.

    • 3 years ago
  • asherp
  • Earth_Corporation
    • 0
      Earth_Corporation  
    • This is plainly ignorant. Not smart or coy in any way.

      I feel that you should pull this from your network. If you want to get REAL, get it right - NOT STUPID.

      The reason a vote seemingly doesn't matter is more to do with the lack of governmental control over corporations than anything else. Watch films on the subject if you don't understand this.

      Intense energy and focus has been put into trying to get first time voters to register in the U.S. This has MULTIPLE benefits both from a real world and symbolic perspective.

      Really what this video is exhibiting to me is the apathetic, non passionate and numb tendencies in humans our culture breeds through media.

      If you want to know if you vote matters. Hey does anything I do in the life matter? I mean there's plenty of others doing things so in fact (hypothetically speaking) - So why should I even try??? That's my friend is the road to nowhere.

    • 3 years ago
  • asherp
    • 0
      asherp  
    • Earth_Corporation:

      Voting is not the end of democracy.

      Voting is only the BEGINNING of your duties as a citizen.

      You need to pay attention to policy, you need to keep up on what your representatives are doing in your name.

      You need to organize, you need to lobby.

    • 3 years ago
  • Elevator
  • cheller1820
  • jennaskarzenski
    • 0
      jennaskarzenski  
    • I found this very interesting. I mean technically our vote doesn't matter, and its pretty obvious that it doesn't, mathematically. The way I see it, voting is so much more than statistics. It's the clearest way of seeing what the people want, and that's the most important thing in a democracy.

    • 3 years ago
  • asherp
    • 0
      asherp  
    • jennaskarzenski:

      We don't live in a Democracy.

      We live in a Democratic Republic-- where there is a Constitution and Individuals have RIGHTS.

      "Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner."-- Thomas Jefferson
      "And tort is the sheep sueing the wolves for damages." -- Ralph Nader

    • 3 years ago
  • growupman
    • 0
      growupman  
    • By its self, a single vote does not matter. Collectively, votes add-up. As our civil rights are being stripped away, we must sieze what little power we have, this power being the right to vote. If every person in the U.S. voted in every election, I am sure we would not be in a foriegn war, we would not be facing economic recession, and everyone who needs healthcare would have it.

    • 3 years ago
  • Commentor
    • 0
      Commentor  
    • growupman:

      If more people were willing to serve on Juries we wouldn't be here either

      http://www.fija.org/

      The primary function of the independent juror is not, as many think, to dispense punishment to fellow citizens accused of breaking various laws, but rather to protect fellow citizens from tyrannical abuses of power by government.

    • 3 years ago
  • asherp
    • 0
      asherp  
    • I really liked this a lot.

      However, elections are not division, but cumulative.

      Either way, I agree-- the REASON for voting should be to put into the public record what you think about the issues.

      Which is why I am voting Nader.

    • 3 years ago
  • smartgranny
  • eiberri
  • jonny2times
  • pvl1
more from News and Politics:

top videos