Greenberg invokes his Fifth Amendment right
source: http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/15/news/companies/greenbergfifth_boydband.fortune/index.htm
-
-
- Conniepae
- added this
Hank Greenberg declines to answer questions in civil case about his role in a transaction with General Re that resulted in convictions of others.
By James Bandler and Roddy Boyd
NEW YORK (Fortune) -- Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, the legendary former chief executive of AIG, declined to answer questions Saturday from the New York Attorney General's office about his role in a controversial transaction between AIG and another insurer. Instead, Greenberg invoked his Fifth Amendment rights, his defense lawyer confirmed.
Questions about the deal led to Greenberg's forced retirement from the once-mighty insurance giant three years ago. Since 2005, lawyers on Greenberg's civil defense team had insisted that their client was eager to testify about the transaction, a reinsurance deal that AIG made with Berkshire Hathaway's (BRKB) Gen Re unit.
They said repeatedly that as long as he was provided with the results of AIG's internal investigation of the deal - which he eventually was - he would answer all of state regulators' questions.
Greenberg's chance to testify finally came on Saturday, but he declined. It was a stunning turnaround for a man who along with associates has spent just shy of a quarter of a billion dollars in legal and public relations fees to tell his side of the story and clear his name.
The questions involved Greenberg's role in a phony $500 million reinsurance transaction with General Re that masked a problem with AIG's loss reserves. The transaction generated intense regulatory scrutiny and resulted in then-New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer suing Greenberg and his former chief financial officer Howard Smith for civil fraud. The civil case is now being pursued by Spitzer's successor, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.
In February, federal prosecutors in Hartford and Washington, D.C. won criminal convictions of four senior Gen Re managers involved in the transaction, including the company's former chief executive and former chief financial officer, as well as a close Greenberg AIG associate, Christopher Milton.
Greenberg's lawyers say that any wrongdoing happened on the General Re side. Greenberg, 83, insisted to Fortune that he merely initiated the idea of a legitimate deal, moving on to more pressing matters shortly after he broached the subject. (Greenberg was the subject of a recent Fortune feature, "Hank's last stand.")
The New York office of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Greenberg a so-called Wells Notice in May of this year, an indication that the staff was strongly considering recommending civil charges be filed against him in connection with the deal.
Settlement talks break down
The issue of whether Greenberg would or would not testify in the New York Attorney General's case was hotly debated by his criminal and civil defense teams.
His civil defense lawyers, led by Boies, Schiller & Flexner's David Boies and Nicholas Gravante, had supported their client's desire to testify, arguing that a refusal to talk would hurt his chances in ongoing civil litigation. Robert Morvillo, his criminal lawyer, argued that testifying increased Greenberg's chance of indictment.
By James Bandler and Roddy Boyd
NEW YORK (Fortune) -- Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, the legendary former chief executive of AIG, declined to answer questions Saturday from the New York Attorney General's office about his role in a controversial transaction between AIG and another insurer. Instead, Greenberg invoked his Fifth Amendment rights, his defense lawyer confirmed.
Questions about the deal led to Greenberg's forced retirement from the once-mighty insurance giant three years ago. Since 2005, lawyers on Greenberg's civil defense team had insisted that their client was eager to testify about the transaction, a reinsurance deal that AIG made with Berkshire Hathaway's (BRKB) Gen Re unit.
They said repeatedly that as long as he was provided with the results of AIG's internal investigation of the deal - which he eventually was - he would answer all of state regulators' questions.
Greenberg's chance to testify finally came on Saturday, but he declined. It was a stunning turnaround for a man who along with associates has spent just shy of a quarter of a billion dollars in legal and public relations fees to tell his side of the story and clear his name.
The questions involved Greenberg's role in a phony $500 million reinsurance transaction with General Re that masked a problem with AIG's loss reserves. The transaction generated intense regulatory scrutiny and resulted in then-New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer suing Greenberg and his former chief financial officer Howard Smith for civil fraud. The civil case is now being pursued by Spitzer's successor, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.
In February, federal prosecutors in Hartford and Washington, D.C. won criminal convictions of four senior Gen Re managers involved in the transaction, including the company's former chief executive and former chief financial officer, as well as a close Greenberg AIG associate, Christopher Milton.
Greenberg's lawyers say that any wrongdoing happened on the General Re side. Greenberg, 83, insisted to Fortune that he merely initiated the idea of a legitimate deal, moving on to more pressing matters shortly after he broached the subject. (Greenberg was the subject of a recent Fortune feature, "Hank's last stand.")
The New York office of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Greenberg a so-called Wells Notice in May of this year, an indication that the staff was strongly considering recommending civil charges be filed against him in connection with the deal.
Settlement talks break down
The issue of whether Greenberg would or would not testify in the New York Attorney General's case was hotly debated by his criminal and civil defense teams.
His civil defense lawyers, led by Boies, Schiller & Flexner's David Boies and Nicholas Gravante, had supported their client's desire to testify, arguing that a refusal to talk would hurt his chances in ongoing civil litigation. Robert Morvillo, his criminal lawyer, argued that testifying increased Greenberg's chance of indictment.
-
- groups:
- News and Politics
