Election Fever Abroad

CJCollectiveWorks
They say the President of the US is the leader of the free world, and while the rest of the free world doesn't really get a say in who's elected to the office, they certainly have opinions. With the world watching the high stakes 2008 US Elections, the pressure is on for the candidates to address some of the past foreign relations catastrophes and look ahead to a more amicable future. The US image abroad is lower than it has ever been and the next president will have the large task of fixing the nation's reputation.

In this pod, Collective Journalism contributors from around the world weigh in on which candidate they'd prefer to see in the White House and why. We hear wide ranging opinions from the UK, France, Germany, Egypt, Israel, India, Thailand, and Australia.

Collective Journalism, Current's citizen journalism program, works by combining perspectives from contributors like you around the world. All month until Election Day, CJ will be airing special investigations into the most important issues of this election.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   On Current TV,   Collective Journalism,   Election 2008,   2 more
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Barack Obama UK On Current TV 15 more
  3. credits:
    CJCollectiveWorks Producer, afitzgerald Producer
  4.     
    |
    Embed video:
    |

35 comments // Election Fever Abroad // Video

  • monimoni
    • 0
      monimoni  
    • it is interesting that people can say that Obama uses the word change a lot and not seethe change that he has help the united states already in this election. more than ever in history is the youth out there registered and involved in the election. it is no longer just ma and pa voting anymore, change is happening and we'll see how much change americans want tomorrow.

    • 3 years ago
  • DrGlass
    • 0
      DrGlass  
    • It is interesting to see how all the misinformation filters through around the world. Doesn't seem like we broadcast much of what the candidates WILL do but what the "HAVE" done.

    • 3 years ago
  • allIknowis
    • 0
      allIknowis  
    • DrGlass:

      You mean what they SAY they WILL do". How about what they CAN do? That is based on ability to work with the other party, and inform us of what they want. They both have been week on that.

      Change? Change what, everyone seems to have their own definition of what he means by that. Never really heard him say what he means by that, and i've listened to a lot of his speeches.

      the one thing Obama promises a lot is social health care, I doubt I'll ever see that, and if we do, well, go to a free clinic or an Indian clinic and see the "health care" you get there. Hang around a post office all day or the DMV, that'll give you a preview of social health care.

      What they HAVE done, shows what they are capable of doing. That's why acquaintances are important, as well as past records. Sure having been a POW is not in and of itself adequate criteria for being President, but it shows determination, and abilities, and to perform under great pressure. More pressure and adversities than being a "community organizer", what ever that is.

    • 3 years ago
  • lfm
  • ashcatash
    • 0
      ashcatash  
    • How can you upload videos like that? When i link to a video with my Make Current! button, all it does it copy the URL. I can't find anywhere to help me.

    • 3 years ago
  • div
    • 0
      div  
    • johnA, why are you so against people from around the word giving you their perspective? if you didn't want to get their perspective, you didn't need to click on the story. The title isn't so deceptive that you can't figure out what the story's about.

      A little global perspective never hurt anyone. True, we can't vote in your elections, but we can voice an opinion. Don't tell me you've never had an opinion about another country's elections...

    • 3 years ago
  • Tara0406
    • 0
      Tara0406  
    • I think it is extremely interesting to hear the prospective of other people around the world. I makes me realize how self-centered our country is.

    • 3 years ago
  • Katmai512
    • 0
      Katmai512  
    • John, America controls most of the elections in the world via the CIA and other tools. For instance, in the Philippines the newly elected President pretty much waits for the blessing from the USA (the US mouthpieces will state that the election was fair, etc.) If the new leader tends to be against US interests or are considered useless, guaranteed he'd have a People Power Revolution or, worst, get assassinated.

      America's primary interests are for her rich barons out to exploit resources of other countries. It's all just an image game, like the oil companies declaring how "green" they are when the bulk of their biz is still in the grease industry.

      Frankly, I'm not expecting any major shifts any time soon amidst all the rhetoric in the air right now. Even if the head changes, the bodily system remains the same. Unless there's a significant overhaul, this "change" everyone seems to talk about won't have much dent.

    • 3 years ago
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA  
    • I wonder how they would feel about us voting in their elections. We don't get a say in their elections either (if they even have them), get over it.

    • 3 years ago
  • allIknowis
  • ansleypansley
    • 0
      ansleypansley  
    • I'm not surprised to hear the Israelis aren't Obama supporters. Obama is seen as a threat to both the Israeli community and the Jewish American community because he isn't 'strong enough' for Israel and calls for a redrawing of the Jerusalem borders of the late 1940s - halving the city into Palestinian and Israeli. When I was there this summer, most Israelis seemed to mainly support McCain, but it was the American Jewish people I met there who were fanatically anti-Obama and pro-McCain. I was told "If you support Obama, then you hate Israel." Granted everyone was drinking, so tempers ran high, but I was shocked to get such a reaction. Like I said, the Israelis were much more mellow to the issue, like they are to most things.

    • 3 years ago
  • Bananezz
  • UWAZell
    • 0
      UWAZell  
    • Personal opinion, someone having been a 'prisoner of war' should not be a criterion in which a person bases his choice for president on.

    • 3 years ago
  • Ihatethemall
  • tngirl
    • 0
      tngirl  
    • I have respect for McCain being a war vet/ pow but in my eyes that definately doesnt make him the best choice. So to me its funny that the few people for McCain in that video only mention his military background.

    • 3 years ago
  • caliprogressive
    • 0
      caliprogressive  
    • Here's the thing. Some people do not believe Obama will deliver on "change" but the truth is, he already has. He has run a much less divisive and more inclusive campaign than Republicans have in probabably decades. When I see the Republican rallys, there's alot of snark and sneering and sarcasm. Not so much with the Obama campaign. He's not telling America that only some of America counts. He's put alot of effort in States previously ignored as only "Republican". Now, that's change I can believe in.

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • 2muchinfo
    • 0
      2muchinfo  
    • I find it amazing how the rest of the world knows when the U.S is have an election. Over here in the U.S we Americans don't care about the elections they might be having in another country.

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • The funny thing is that Obama is only stating the obvious with the word change.

      As is people who stated they wanted him because he would have a new perspective. Technically anyone who is new in the white house will have a different perspective from the previous....mainly because they have different eyes and experiences.

      The past friends thing is a stickler for Obama and something that's in the back of people's minds, apparently. Whether or not it's true that such friendships are a curse well...it matters not. The fact is that people will look at someone who has friends like that in the world (not for President) and think ill of them just via association. Is that wrong?

      Not really...it's more along the lines of keeping oneself safe from dangers that the person might present.

      It's not a road I'd want to travel down and not something I would use to against someone too much....but it's odd. As much flack as John McCain gets for doing that...it's the one thing that people can't forget.

      I like the pod. It was a very good idea and interesting.

      Though I think the world opinion matters not. They don't have America's best interest at heart. Their opinion is nothing more than Cotton Candy at the dinner table. Sweet, tasty but not at all healthy.

    • 3 years ago
  • CalgarC
  • matlaroche
  • 3oc
    • 0
      3oc  
    • The current President of the United States is a threat to the free world and more recently has become a threat to his own people. Only time will tell if McCain or Obama will be substantially any better on either front.

      The world is in trouble and nothing will be achieved whilst the people are divided on political, racial or ideological grounds. What is needed is a new paradigm that encompasses real issues from the ground up not just a new leader spouting promises.

    • 3 years ago
  • LostAngelino
    • 0
      LostAngelino  
    • We have to realize that we don't live on an island. The Earth is an Island and the choices this country makes will eventually affect everyone else. Lets hope for a better tomorrow and tackle the serious problems the earth is facing.

    • 3 years ago
  • Matericia
    • 0
      Matericia  
    • This is interesting because of the reasons people gave for their choice. The pro-McCain people valued his military experience, (like that's going to help anything except make more wars).
      The pro-Obama people just like him as a person and want the change he represents.

      None of them seem very informed, but the all seem more informed than the Americans that are lining up to see Sarah Palin.

    • 3 years ago
  • joefac3
  • hella_cereal
    • 0
      hella_cereal  
    • I've been living in New Zealand for the past 10 weeks and have found that New Zealanders seem much more interested in American elections than their own. I have heard overwhelming support in favor of Barrack Obama because they are eager to see somebody fix America's stupidly f'ed problems.

      I know exactly what they mean and have come here to seek temporary refuge from the toxic paradoxes of the states.

    • 3 years ago
  • SilverHineko
  • BenK
  • myaccentfromnowhere
    • 0
      myaccentfromnowhere  
    • I am frankly surprised by the substantial percentage of people in this small pool of interviews who were pro mccain, but it's interesting to see the outsider's perspective. Maybe I'm just surprised because I'm currently in France where the general consensus seems to be about the same as that little kid shouting OBAMAAAAAAA!

    • 3 years ago
  • RaceBannon
    • 0
      RaceBannon  
    • myaccentfromnowhere:

      33% in France, weird. I just got back from Paris a few days ago and I couldn't find a single person who liked McCain. I was staying at my cousins in Invalides and even those yuppies were for Obama. When the news wasn't talking about Sarkozy on the financial warpath, it was covering the american elections to the very minute. On another note I did like the reactions I got on the metros when I wore the now infamous obey Obama shirt.

    • 3 years ago
  • myaccentfromnowhere
  • magicasper3
  • necrotized
  • sarahbelle
    • 0
      sarahbelle  
    • Image
    • A Pew Research poll of people around the world shows Obama heavily favored over McCain with exceptions in Middle Eastern countries like Jordan.

    • 3 years ago
  • ashcatash
more from News and Politics:

top videos