News and Politics | November 07, 2008 | 99 comments

Obama's chief of staff choice favors compulsory universal service

Image
skyaddicted
Rahm Emanuel
Rep. Rahm Emanuel wants to force people 18 to 25
to labor for the government.
Rep. Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, President-Elect Barack Obama's choice for chief of staff in his incoming administration, is co-author of a book, The Plan: Big Ideas for America, that calls for, among other things, compulsory service for all Americans ages 18 to 25. The following excerpt is from pages 61-62 of the 2006 book:

It's time for a real Patriot Act that brings out the patriot in all of us. We propose universal civilian service for every young American. Under this plan, All Americans between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five will be asked to serve their country by going through three months of basic training, civil defense preparation and community service. ...

Here's how it would work. Young people will know that between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five, the nation will enlist them for three months of civilian service. They'll be asked to report for three months of basic civil defense training in their state or community, where they will learn what to do in the event of biochemical, nuclear or conventional attack; how to assist others in an evacuation; how to respond when a levee breaks or we're hit by a natural disaster. These young people will be available to address their communities' most pressing needs.

Emanuel and co-author Bruce Reed insist "this is not a draft," but go on to write of young men and women, "the nation will enlist them for three months of civilian service." They also warn, "[s]ome Republicans will squeal about individual freedom," ruling out any likelihood that they would let people opt out of universal citizen service.

As chief of staff, Emanuel will not be in a position to directly introduce public policy, but his enthusiasm for compulsory service, combined with Barack Obama's own plan to require high school students to perform 50 hours of government-approved service, suggest an unfortunate direction for the new administration.
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Politics Barack Obama Terrorism 6 more
  3.     
    |

99 comments // Obama's chief of staff choice favors compulsory universal service

  • bullpcp
  • HolyCity2012
    • 0
      HolyCity2012  
    • I love volunteering for my community and am always interested in doing more.

      Believe it or not but there are not many opportunities, not as many as there should be due to a lack of organization.

    • 3 years ago
  • Libertas
    • 0
      Libertas  
    • Compulsory service is forced labor; forced labor is slavery. To add insult to injury, the State is going to force young people to serve the State and then hand them a bill from the baby boomer politicians that bankrupted the country. They're going to be forced to serve and then pay through higher taxes and inflation.

      If people want to serve, they volunteer. Anything else is immoral, unjust and evil.

    • 3 years ago
  • glabadabadoo
    • 0
      glabadabadoo  
    • A bad idea is a bad idea no matter who it came from. Lets be honest or at least some what centrist, if George W. came up with this idea, this site would be overwhelmed with negative response. I do not want the govt. ordering me or my child at any age to do anything. Remember your rights will not taken all at once but a little at a time. Before your start goose stepping in lock step of the end of a cliff to a place you don't want to be,give it some thought.
      Just How much kool aid did you people consume?

    • 3 years ago
  • sillywabbit
    • 0
      sillywabbit  
    • glabadabadoo:

      Breed in Canada, then. What stopped you from serving your Lord and Master, GW?
      Take your Koolaid talking point and put it somewhere smelly inside your body. It's tired and it's sad. Is it said that conservatives drank the Koolaid for the past 28 years when you roll, lock-step, on the "patriotism" express? After 9/11, when everyone was talking about unAmerican behaviour, were you calling them "Freedom Fries" or does that not meet the qualifications for Koolaid drinking? Did you support war in Iraq even after the weapons inspectors found nothing, told us there was nothing in Iraq like the rest of your party? Did you support the war with anything other than your words?

    • 3 years ago
  • glabadabadoo
    • 0
      glabadabadoo  
    • glabadabadoo:

      Too cold in Canada. Ron Paul is my political lord and savior not GW.Never used the term freedom fries after 9-11 . I don't think anyone else did either since France didn't crash planes into the twin towers. You really are a silly wabbit. Never thought invading Iraq with ground forces was a good idea, unlike all of the republicans and so many democrats who voted to do so.If you want to do community service so bad, just volunteer, but let the rest of us live our lives with as little govt. intervention as possible. I hope in the future you will at least be given enough freedom to pick your favorite flavor of kool aid. Oh make sure you don't use artificial sweetener because in the quantities that you will, no doubt be drinking it has been known to cause cancer in rats, like you.

    • 3 years ago
  • glabadabadoo
    • 0
      glabadabadoo  
    • glabadabadoo:

      Too cold in Canada. Ron Paul is my political lord and savior not GW.Never used the term freedom fries after 9-11 . I don't think anyone else did either since France didn't crash planes into the twin towers. You really are a silly wabbit. Never thought invading Iraq with ground forces was a good idea, unlike all of the republicans and so many democrats who voted to do so.If you want to do community service so bad, just volunteer, but let the rest of us live our lives with as little govt. intervention as possible. I hope in the future you will at least be given enough freedom to pick your favorite flavor of kool aid. Oh make sure you don't use artificial sweetener because in the quantities that you will, no doubt be drinking it has been known to cause cancer in rats, like you.

    • 3 years ago
  • bloodhound
    • 0
      bloodhound  
    • This article makes Rahm Emanuel service idea sound like they would have young people on the chain gain breaking rocks.That's very slanted reporting I worked many years with Germans they give one year of service in what ever capacity they have,If gave them more self confidence, and it was a good program, was there consciences. Young Americans are fat and soft for the most part they stay at home to long, this would be a win win program.

    • 3 years ago
  • mcwally
    • 0
      mcwally  
    • good thing to happen..works well in most countries..perhaps there will be less crime as well as less drugs being pushed around...

    • 3 years ago
  • lotus_65
    • 0
      lotus_65  
    • not only is it a good idea, i think it's a must for the future of our union. assuming it was service within the united states and not overseas, i'm all for it.

      it should also be tied to post-secondary career planning and would give our national security agencies a fair shake at wooing the best talent available.

    • 3 years ago
  • ThatBastardBeej
    • 0
      ThatBastardBeej  
    • I hardly think it's tyranny to require everyone to do 3 months of CIVILIAN service to help and protect our communities and country - especially if there's college credit, job opportunities, etc. attached to it. It seems like a lot of people on Current.com like to talk about change and improving conditions in this country, but they don't like the idea of having to actually do it themselves.

      I'm past the ages they're talking about, but I'd do it anyway.

    • 3 years ago
  • anglcazn
    • 0
      anglcazn  
    • This actually doesn't sound too bad. I would understand some of the nervousness from people. But, after reading it further, it's not that bad. It would help people open up to help others instead of wallowing up in their own bubble.

      And from the way the original article described it, it's almost like they're trying to use fear to sway their audience against Obama and his decisions.

    • 3 years ago
  • ashcatash
  • anglcazn
  • AlbeeYap
    • 0
      AlbeeYap  
    • This is genius! i have friends and family procrastinating that they'll get up and help the community 6 to 8 years ago. They haven't done anything but sit on their couches. It's about time i can see them get up and start giving back to the community like me. I've been contributing back to my community solo for 4-5 years now. It's time for everyone to get involved!

    • 3 years ago
  • justright
  • PoisonTheMonkey
    • 0
      PoisonTheMonkey  
    • I actually agree, though I doubt it would get passed. It's a great way to solve joblessness and encourage people my age to get out and help peopple, as long as you are allowed to opt out (ie, if you want to go to college, or have a job, etc) and choose what you want to do. No being forced to join the army, instead you could join a community service or something.

    • 3 years ago
  • Jacques_of_Spades
  • poptart_invasion
  • kellysontheroad
  • ilmor
  • ilmor
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • IMMININT
    • 0
      IMMININT  
    • ilmor:

      ilmor...

      I'd like to reference two things...

      FDR after the depression... I believe it was a welfare work system... funny i think our country had a lot of progress because of it as well...

      and the link to USPSA I posted above...

      Thanks for playing! ;)

      (What hole do these kids come from? seriously...)

    • 3 years ago
  • mcjones
    • 0
      mcjones  
    • Good for kids that sit on their ass outside of graduation from high school...but I want to go to college. This is disappointing considering I've seen Obama speak twice and I am a very strong supporter of him

    • 3 years ago
  • StudiousNutcase
    • 0
      StudiousNutcase  
    • I don't really think this idea is all that bad. Coming from a teenager I personally think that getting my generation out of their computer chairs and doing something good for the world would probably benefit them as much if not more than those they would be serving. Not to mention the discipline learned from the training wouldn't be hurtful either... Go Obama!

    • 3 years ago
  • bloodhound
    • 0
      bloodhound  
    • This is a very good idea,and I hope it comes about. It would get young Americans involved in there Government,why cant the US look at Europe and see what is working there and do that here.it worked during the depression but were afraid of words like Socialism.All of us must stop being self serving.Its time to serve each other,please support this. And maybe learn from the past. We need a new deal type program to fix our crumbling infrastructure.

    • 3 years ago
  • neocongo
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  
    • "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country."-J.F.K.

      He was right and is still right today.

    • 3 years ago
  • ninepounds6
  • IMMININT
    • 0
      IMMININT  
    • Image
    • Just to silence the the conspiracy theorists and this sensationalist article and it's objectors...

      Here's what Rahm really supports...

      Stay informed Obama supporters, you'll be seeing a lot more of these garbage. The difference?

      Right-wingers have mastered the art of fear...

    • 3 years ago
  • current89
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • IMMININT:

      That's interesting that you mention fearmongering. Emmanuel is just picking up where the neocons left off with terror this terror that Homeland Security, Patriot Act and on and on. What's the difference? Haven't we had enough of that already.

    • 3 years ago
  • IMMININT
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • IMMININT:

      Let me grab you a fresh glass of that Obama koolaid because it sounds like you might be coming back to your senses. What flavor would you like today? Brainwash blue sound ok?

    • 3 years ago
  • IMMININT
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • Image
    • For all of y'all who think this is a good thing, why not volunteer at your local red cross? Take a class, learn CPR, become a trainer, learn how to handle emergency situations!

      There's no reason to wait for the government to force you to, right?

    • 3 years ago
  • current89
  • Allsunday
    • 0
      Allsunday  
    • DeliaTheArtist:

      Done that already, but this plan sounds like it'd be much more comprehensive than anything the Red Cross currently offers. Mandatory or otherwise, I'd be interested in seeing an outline of what we'd learn.

    • 3 years ago
  • lvk104
    • 0
      lvk104  
    • I think this is a GOOD thing. It fosters civic engagement and participation in government (which, despite the record voter turnout this time around, is sorely lacking). I'm all in favor of being more aware of how to cope with disasters...hey, it can't hurt to be safe.

    • 3 years ago
  • maasanova
  • IMMININT
    • 0
      IMMININT  
    • maasanova:

      Dude youre acting like this was a fuckin public service announcement.

      This was written in a book... its his opinion. Are you dense?

      There is a lot more to this, so please before you start jumping from the anti-bush to anti-obama to anti-2012 president elect, please wait until we see whether or not this is even an issue....

      This could potentially prove to be a good thing when all the details are worked out. Get a clue man.... we couldve been drafted to the army had McCain started WW3 w/ Russia Poland and Czech.

      And in light of how things are right now because of Bush, some these doughboys posting their responses need the training....

    • 3 years ago
  • Allsunday
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • maasanova:

      Right, this was in response to the poster who said this is normal in Germany.

      And compulsory military service is also law in Israel, and Germany if I'm correct.

      Also this type of plan is straight out of an early 20th century socialist society.

      And also Rahm Emmanuel is not making policy, but he will be able to influence Obama's policy making.

      And furthermore, America's big plan is Emmanuel's blueprint for the Democrats taking back the reigns of government policy making which is bad news because a lot of dangerous policies like this is going to get rammed through Congress, just like when the Neocons had control over the legislative body of government.

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • current89
  • Allsunday
    • 0
      Allsunday  
    • maasanova:

      Just because a concept has at some point been associated with a particular form of government does not mean that any country that finds value in such a concept must therefore have that form of government. Both Germany and Israel are democracies and it's simply incorrect to call either a "socialist country" just because they espouse mandatory service. You might as well accuse them of being part of the Roman Empire, since Romans were also required to serve.

    • 3 years ago
  • nbunce
    • 0
      nbunce  
    • In other countries this isn't all that uncommon. In Germany, youths are required to do something very similar to this. In fact I'd be all for this if you had the option to volunteer for a non-profit to fulfill your requirement, in addition to civil defense.

    • 3 years ago
  • glabadabadoo
  • maasanova
  • current89
  • glabadabadoo
  • knowles2007
  • damnneargenius
    • 0
      damnneargenius  
    • It's indoctrination anyway you look at it.

      The only problem is that could be used for good...and that can be used for bad too, so you need to be REALLY careful about defining such things and designing lots of checks and balances and loopholes into it.

      I'm actually for uniting America, but only if it TRULY to be used for good.

      What is the difference between nationalism and religion?

      What about freedom?

      Well, at least maybe we could use such a force to clean up the streets of America, in which case I'm all for it.

    • 3 years ago
  • IMMININT
    • 0
      IMMININT  
    • If I have my stories straight:

      There's actually more to this than meets the eye. Don't get swayed by right-wing media that's just trying to say "I told you so!"

      The democrats have been throwing around the idea that they will also offers degrees to those who have completed their civil service duties and allow them jobs working for the gov't.

      Thus, everyone from all income levels has a fair chance at public sector jobs (roads, environment,etc.) to make a decent living and provide for their families.

      Obviously, this was not included in this initial announcement, but I think there's going to be more to this than what you see. This would have been a great question for the Al Gore Q&A tonight.

      (I'll try to dig up a link, I heard about this on the radio)

    • 3 years ago
  • standingchair
    • 0
      standingchair  
    • I believe this is a step forward in rebuilding the pride of being an American. We should know what to do if their is an emergency in our own country. He's not, or doesn't appear tot be indicating military service, but on civil service.

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • standingchair:

      It doesn't matter if he says please....demanding service without request is not ok. Giving people incentives to do so is just like the Military with education. If that is wrong how is this better? Because someone says it is?

    • 3 years ago
  • damnneargenius
    • 0
      damnneargenius  
    • Change you can believe in!

      Ha. Now then, if it were my country and I were planning on running it as a military-type dictatorship (with me being the dictator of course) this seems like an excellent plan to brainwash people into believing whatever the hell I tell them.

      On the other hand, if this is a free society, and we have no reason to be at war or in fear of fighting, this seems like an extremely unnecessary step.

      Granted, I agree fully that the social fabric of large parts of American society has dissolved to unhealthy levels, but will 3 months of mandatory service actually make the bad people good people or the rich people care about the poor?

      Will it turn gangsta rappers and thugs into upstanding citizens? Would it put Paris Hilton in her place?

      F*ck if I know, but since I'm past the legal age of recruitment not unlike Emanuel, I'm really not that concerned about it.

      The one caveat might be the fear that you are unknowingly being trained by the bad guys to protect corrupt institutions that are ironically the last thing that should be protected.

      Was the war in Iraq really to protect our freedom or just to make money for a select group of opportunists that accidentally got handed the keys through lies and deceit?

      Alright, here's a different question for you...

      If the Bush Administration proposed such a thing in the current geo-political climate, would you buy it?

      They why in the name of God would you buy it from Team Obama instead?

      They are two different sides of the same coin kids.

      I'm not so sure about this one. I has pros and cons. If I trusted the government I would agree that this is an acceptable way of uniting the people towards a common goal, however, in light of the CRIMINAL BAILOUT and other such nonsense going on, it really scares the hell out of me that this new administration seems ready to capitalize on Obama's Hollywood-created celebrity to potentially chain our citizens into military-type roles that could very easily be pitted against one another within our own country.

      Hypothetically, if you are running the country into the ground that there could very well be a Revolution on the way, would you try to create some sort of propaganda-based civil defense force to brainwash as many people into defending the broken system as possible?

      Riot police versus well-intended protesters?

      Who are the real bad guys?

      Do you trust this guy? Why?

      I wonder what Ron Paul has to say about this. I wonder what Al Gore has to say. Seems very blue neo-conish if you ask me.

    • 3 years ago
  • glabadabadoo
  • monimoni
    • 0
      monimoni  
    • i like the idea. anyone who has ever done community service for school knows how great it feels to be part of society and the good part. having this would help enable those who voted for Obama to really participate in the government that they place and contribute to the America that they wanted.

      how to get change in america.
      1. right leader (*check)
      2. right citizens... this is where everyone chips in to make it happen.

    • 3 years ago
  • Allsunday
  • ninepounds6
    • 0
      ninepounds6  
    • current, you and everyone else here is talking about "encouraging" and "volunteering". That is great, using incentives such as college tuition and credit for community service is a grand idea... forced service is wrong!

      We just overthrew a regime that forced us into two wars, deregulation, bailouts, phone tapping... and we want to encourage the new regime to force service to the state?

      What is wrong with you people? We just get rid of a tyrant and you want to empower another?

      Encourage, reward, incentives, volunteer.. all good. Force, mandatory, compulsory... all bad! This is still a free society!

    • 3 years ago
  • bloodhound
  • HolyCity2012
  • J_Jammer
  • standingchair
    • 0
      standingchair  
    • J_Jammer:

      We already demand so much of the federal government I believe an American being trained to know what to do in a natural disaster and help out the National Guard is not so much to ask. He is not indicating military service.
      Have you ever filled a sandbag and built a dam in the middle of a hurricane to save lives? Would you feel confident in yourself? Do you know what to do if their is a chemical leak near your home? Wouldn't you like your children to be prepared? Wouldn't you like to be prepared?

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • Allsunday
    • 0
      Allsunday  
    • J_Jammer:

      I agree it's nice to have the choice, but you also have to consider that having even one person who's unprepared can drag down the whole community. It's not just about you, it's about how your level of civic responsibility effects everyone else.

    • 3 years ago
  • Setsfilia
    • 0
      Setsfilia  
    • J_Jammer:

      I don't often agree with you Jammer, but I have to on this one. While the idea of having large numbers of people trained in what to do in an emergency sounds wonderful, I can't support this being mandatory. It should be volunteer. However, it should have some reward/benefit that makes people WANT to volunteer.

    • 3 years ago
  • sillywabbit
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  
    • Oh yes, It's so horrible to encourage others (usually apathetic teens and college students) to participate in community service. I mean really, who wants a responsible, intelligent youth. Who wants a better community, a better state, or a better nation? Just those damn fascist, socialist, commies, right?
      It's all fascism I tell you.

      End of Sarcasm

      Everyone who is complaining dosent get Obama's policy. Or to put it in another way, they don't want to understand Obama's policy. It doesn't force anyone to do anything. In fact, it gives credit(money) to college students who do donate their time.

      Since I was 14 I volunteered in my community, I've planted trees, cleaned up trash, donated blood on a daily basis, and become the chairman of my City's Shade Tree Committee. I'm only 19 and I'm proud that I've accomplished something in my life. Teens my age need to learn how to help out and become responsible.The apathy level is disgusting in this nation.

      Roosevelt took us from the ashes and created a powerful phoenix out of this nation through the New Deal. And I believe Obama will also.

    • 3 years ago
  • numinant
    • 0
      numinant  
    • i like it. i also like the idea of universal conscription (military training and duty for everyone) because when everyone is responsible for national security, people are less eager to go to war.

    • 3 years ago
  • bluekangjoe
    • 0
      bluekangjoe  
    • This doesn't sound like a bad idea to me. It's just 3 months and I think it would help the country a lot. Not only would the results of the work be beneficial, but it would also be beneficial to those completing it. Being trained in how to assist during a disaster, that would have been useful during Katrina. In Israel 18 year olds have to join the army for I believe it is 3 years.

      I don't see a problem with it, it's essentially one summer and it would help you grow as a person, help the country, and you'd probably meet new people.

    • 3 years ago
  • junsumoney
    • 0
      junsumoney  
    • I not sure if I can trust this guy. I like the idea, but it can easily get out of hands, and shift too much powers into the federal government.
      In South Korea, they already do this, and it's going perfectly fine. The government isn't a tyrannical overlord.

    • 3 years ago
  • aswift1
    • 0
      aswift1  
    • that's right prof. funk- it's just an idea. Emmanuel has no authority to enact any of this... so people don't FREAK OUT!

    • 3 years ago
  • Allsunday
    • 0
      Allsunday  
    • I had to do a minimum of 25 hours of community service every year in high school. I helped run food drives, assisted homeless shelters, and picked up trash off the highways. Though I wasn't always up for taking time out of my day for work instead of play, the work was fulfilling and taught me a lot, and obviously it helped my community.

      Not only does 50 hours of high school community service not seem like a bad idea, but neither does three months of learning how to help your community in the event of some kind of attack or natural disaster. These are things we SHOULD all know. It's not a military draft, it's educating citizens in how to assist their community when things inevitably go wrong. How is that scary? Or a bad thing?

    • 3 years ago
  • fun_size
  • ProfessorFunk
    • 0
      ProfessorFunk  
    • Two points. This isn't so bad - it's clearly not a draft and in fact wants to raise a more aware and alert citizenry. Fair I say.

      Second - from what I understand CoS has no input to legislation so he won't be able to enact any of this.

    • 3 years ago
  • aswift1
    • 0
      aswift1  
    • Oh people are going to misinterperet this and FREAK OUT! I bet some people already are... it's a little socialistic, but what's wrong with that?

      As long as the government sticks to the three month term and doesn't turn this into a permanent thing I think it could be beneficial... but it would need strict guidelines.

    • 3 years ago
  • ninepounds6
    • 0
      ninepounds6  
    • This is completely outrageous! Not only is it too far-fetched, but every country on the planet will look at it as if it were some sort of Nazi indoctrination and make us appear to be a war mongering people!

      This is a baaaaaaaaad idea!

    • 3 years ago
  • aswift1
    • 0
      aswift1  
    • ninepounds6:

      I don't think it is possible to make our country seem more warmongering at this point...

      I think it is important to be prepared for another attack at home some day- even if it never happens. I'd rather live...

    • 3 years ago
  • Allsunday
    • 0
      Allsunday  
    • ninepounds6:

      "...where they will learn what to do in the event of biochemical, nuclear or conventional attack; how to assist others in an evacuation; how to respond when a levee breaks or we're hit by a natural disaster. These young people will be available to address their communities' most pressing needs."

      Training your citizens how to calmly and rationally react to a disaster is far-fetched and outrageous? I think it's much more far-fetched that someone should consider such a program "war-mongering." Civil service has nothing to do with war.

    • 3 years ago
  • ninepounds6
    • 0
      ninepounds6  
    • ninepounds6:

      Forcing citizens into mandatory ANYTHING is outrageous in a free society, and this WILL LOOK very threatening to the world, just as when Nazi Germany did the same thing in the 1930's with their youth.. none thought those little boys playing with balls and "serving their community" was anything different thn what it really was... there is just a very small step from this and military training.

      World history is very, very clear. This is a dangerous move.

    • 3 years ago
  • Allsunday
    • 0
      Allsunday  
    • ninepounds6:

      So paying your taxes is outrageous? It's mandatory.

      I think it's paranoid to say that the world would view such a move as threatening. Giving people comprehensive training in things like CPR and evacuation procedures is just one step up from earthquake or tornado drills in school. It's learning how to help and protect yourself and your fellow citizen - it's not indoctrination into any kind of philosophy.

    • 3 years ago
  • damnneargenius
    • 0
      damnneargenius  
    • ninepounds6:

      Yeah, and look where your tax dollars have been going lately...

      Do you seriously want to agree to sacrificing your life to that same system that seems FAR more about profit for a select few that the betterment of society?

      Of course they are going to sell the concept with pretty words...just like the Nazis...then, a "crisis" will hit and things will change. That common training could easily be used to force to to do whatever their bidding is, and I trust myself completely, but I have learned not to trust politicians.

      One word:

      BAILOUT

      I thought Obama was OK before that, but then he showed his true colors of toeing the line, not of the people, but for the power elite that got away scott free.

      That should make you think twice before agreeing to commit to such things.

      The way the Nazi ran things was actually quite impressive, yet at the same time the complete unchecked control created some seriously twisted policies, and if it can happen to them, it can happen to anyone.

      I'll gladly defend a cause I believe in with my life if necessary, but you have to convince me that is a noble cause, and the propaganda that is running Washington these days is pretty damn far from noble if you ask me.

    • 3 years ago
  • Allsunday
    • 0
      Allsunday  
    • ninepounds6:

      damnneargenius -

      No one is talking about sacrificing their life to the system. We're not talking about military service or even military training. We're talking about getting mandatory basic training on what to do in a natural disaster or in the event of an attack. We're talking about learning evacuation procedures and first aid. Frankly, it's just common sense.

    • 3 years ago
  • sillywabbit
    • 0
      sillywabbit  
    • ninepounds6:

      Actually, it forces families to consider which wars to support and which one to stay out of. If you or your child is serving time, you are definately less likely to willingly support the idea of sending them into a situation like, say, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Syria, China, Korea, or even to Brazil.
      Obama did say that he believes that civil service is more of an obligation.

    • 3 years ago
  • glabadabadoo
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Bruce Reed, another member of the Progressive Policy Institute that supported the Iraq war. So fitting they want our young people to get war training.

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • Of ALL places I heard about this first on 4chan (you don't want to know what they had to say about it.)

      This is interesting, but I've never heard Obama endorse something like this. Here is what the website says about community service:

      "Obama and Biden will set a goal that all middle and high school students do 50 hours of community service a year, and will establish a new tax credit that is worth $4,000 a year in exchange for 100 hours of public service a year."

      And

      "Obama and Biden will expand AmeriCorps from 75,000 slots today to 250,000 and they will focus this expansion on addressing the great challenges facing the nation. They will establish a Classroom Corps to help teachers and students, with a priority placed on underserved schools; a Health Corps to improve public health outreach; a Clean Energy Corps to conduct weatherization and renewable energy projects; a Veterans Corps to assist veterans at hospitals, nursing homes and homeless shelters; and a Homeland Security Corps to help communities plan, prepare for and respond to emergencies."

      I had to do community service in my freshman year and senior year. It was great, I got a lot of experience and it actually helped me get the job I have now.

    • 3 years ago
  • fun_size
    • 0
      fun_size  
    • DeliaTheArtist:

      lol heard it on 4chan huh? Spend a lot of time there Delia?

      Getting to the topic at hand, the community service thing doesnt sound like a bad plan at all. I had to do something like 25 hours in a semester to gradate from my high school so doing a mandatory 50 hours wouldnt have been much more difficult. Also, people who really enjoy community service as well as those from less privileged households have incentive to do more for their community in exchange for payment.

    • 3 years ago
  • Allsunday
  • IMMININT
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • fun_size
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • jh64487
    • 0
      jh64487  
    • in almost all things I oppose the government of Israel.

      However, i completely agree with 2 years of compulsory service for every american. I think it should include the option of military, health, social services etc.

      Not only would this make the majority of american's more aware of the activities and actions of the government but it would improve cultural relations within the US (in the same way the military has).

      This could be made into something very negative but it could also be extremely beneficial to America if implemented correctly.

    • 3 years ago
  • simplecj
    • 0
      simplecj  
    • Maybe this could be a good thing??? I mean get those lazy shits outta the living room and off their x-boxes and teach them some useful skills. I wouldn't mind... it'd be like summer camp or something!

      My main question is, would they be paid to participate? Also, what would the penalty be if they did not?

    • 3 years ago
  • ashcatash
more from News and Politics:

top videos