Image
unimatrix0
"Protesters rally, march against gay marriage ban.

About 70 people rallied and marched from Capitol Hill to downtown Seattle today urging President-elect Barack Obama to overturn the federal Defense of Marriage Act and recognize same-sex marriages."

Would you march to defend human rights?
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Sex and Love,   Gay,   Humanism,   4 more
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Current News UK Sex and Love Law 8 more
  3.     
    |

45 comments // Seattle protests gay marriage ban

  • soleil10
    • soleil10  
    • This comment was removed by its owner.
  • FallenMorgan
    • 0
      FallenMorgan  
    • soleil10:

      America was not created as a tyranny of the majority, especially when the majority is so slim, as with Prop 8. The Supreme Court has, in the past, overturned laws that are deemed unconstitutional.

    • 3 years ago
  • soleil10
    • 0
      soleil10  
    • soleil10:

      Interesting, When Obama wins will even less % tnan Prop 8, he has a mandate. Hm

      The Supreme court is also wrong too.

      The constitution is very simple. It was not the intention of the founders to have citizens wait for the supreme court (9 people) to give a final say after they voted.

      The voters own the constitution, not these judges.
      The lawsuits after voters decided for a second time are totaly anti American and a disgrace to this country.

      We are not supposed to be a judgocracy.

      What a sad day

    • 3 years ago
  • FallenMorgan
    • 0
      FallenMorgan  
    • soleil10:

      Drink every time Soleil says something mean about judges.

      Soleil, the Supreme Court is there to protect the minority from tyranny of the majority, and the election was different from Prop 8. Obama did not take rights away from people because a slim majority support him.

      The same-sex marriage ban violated the equal protection clause in the California constitution.

      If the majority was free to oppress the minority, America would not be America.

    • 3 years ago
  • Commentor
    • 0
      Commentor  
    • soleil10:

      Exactly way its not a DEMOCRACY but a REPRESENTATIVE republic!!!

      To protect the LIBERTY of all -- you can't have LIBERTY if you don't also want it for people who believe different than you.

      To truly have freedom you have to want everyone to have as much freedom as you have with equal rights.

    • 3 years ago
  • FallenMorgan
    • 0
      FallenMorgan  
    • Soleil, you're talking about brainwashing? The Evangelicals and Fundamentalists do more brainwashing than schools. And also, the Supreme Court simply overturned a law that violated the constitution, so the asshole Prop 8 supporters decided to MAKE it constitutional.

    • 3 years ago
  • Teresa_likes_voting
  • creativesoul76
    • 0
      creativesoul76  
    • If the only way to protect the meaning of marriage is to deny it to a minority based on the argument that this minority is too immoral to be allowed into this exclusive club, then why doesn't the government deny straight people convicted of various sexually questionable behavior (i.e. prostitutes, johns, perverts in bathrooms, ect...) the right to marry? Even a convicted rapist or pedophile can marry as long as it's only to the opposite sex.

      There are people who get a power trip out of judging and looking down at others. As long as they can deny gay citizens the right to marry, its just one more thing they can wave a finger at and say, "see, we're better than you."

      The fact is they're just scared of looking inward at their own weaknesses and this power struggle allows them a comforting distraction from their own shortcomings.

    • 3 years ago
  • unimatrix0
  • charfman
    • 0
      charfman  
    • There was a time when you could be put to death for saying the Earth was round or it revolved around the Sun by people who were "doing God's work". Do we need to have people "doing God's work" today? I am not gay and the thought of me having a sexual relationship with another man is out of the question (actually... repugnent). But I think these people should be allowed to get married. At least it will not result in unwanted pregnancies.

    • 3 years ago
  • tursiops
  • jomahu
    • 0
      jomahu  
    • i hope that when same-sex marriage is available to all, the glbt community will take an interest in the struggles of their allies, as we have done for them.

    • 3 years ago
  • pjacobs51
  • Commentor
    • 0
      Commentor  
    • I just found out by watching this tv show ... it seems that all homosexual people can be healed and made heterosexual simply by removing a demon that is possessing them by praying ... I think that is how it goes.

      That being the case if all of them are just healed then gay marriage rights are not needed.

    • 3 years ago
  • unimatrix0
  • cheezynuts
  • FallenMorgan
    • 0
      FallenMorgan  
    • x12, nowhere did it say that the sexually immoral, idolaters, adulterers, or homosexuals should be FORCED to "inherit" the "Kingdom of God." I'm an atheist that looks at porn - I'm not going to inherit a fictional Kingdom. It's my choice to.

      And anyways...

      Marching doesn't help. The federal government doesn't care about us.

    • 3 years ago
  • Commentor
  • x12
    • 0
      x12  
    • 1 Corinthians 6:9 (New International Version)

      9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders

      I did not say it, God did.

    • 3 years ago
  • FallenMorgan
  • unimatrix0
  • letushavepeace
  • uroborus8
    • 0
      uroborus8  
    • Image
    • I was there today and can tell you that the point was to gather signatures for the open letter to Obama. The press missed that point because of the small turnout.

      Earlier this week the Seattle community faced a poison threat. An anonymous letter writer contacted 11 "gay bars" and said they were going to poison 55 gays on Saturday's in January. In response, thousands turned out to the city's largest pub crawl to support the establishments that received the letter.

    • 3 years ago
  • unimatrix0
  • freeus
  • eden49
  • fauxsherrrr
  • jubal
  • Commentor
  • jubal
    • 0
      jubal  
    • jubal:

      I am gay and I am not going anywhere. Are you? Except to march and chant and pray until the day the all gays can be free to be and have the right to exist without persecution.

    • 3 years ago
  • PropadataFilms
    • 0
      PropadataFilms  
    • I did march (at Seattle's first protest in Nov- with 1,000s of others), I will march again, and I'd applaud anyone else who'll join in.

      The march included every walk of life, and I was proud to be surrounded by a lot of other "allies" that realize the rights we've been given absolutely must become available to all....now, not tomorrow.

      nothing pointless there homie

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • @ Jammer - Marching is not pointless. It raises awareness for a cause and shows the government and society that people will still come out in numbers to support something they believe in. What could it possible "ruin"?

      I'd like to see a march organized in New York. It's about damn time we legalized gay marriage- I never thought Connecticut and Mass would do it before us. Hmm, I should really look into that...

    • 3 years ago
  • crispyfritters
    • 0
      crispyfritters  
    • DeliaTheArtist:

      Demonstration is a positive force, but what would really help the cause is assimilation into the political process, or to put it plainly, more gay congressmen.

      If you're gay, or support gay rights, run for office. That's how things get changed.

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • J_Jammer
  • fauxsherrrr
  • bishopobispo
    • 0
      bishopobispo  
    • Agreed unimatrix,

      With each passing generation, American society becomes increasingly liberal concerning social issues.

      There will be a day when our great grandchildren look at us and ask, "now why the hell would they want to ban gay marriage?"

      It's identical to the bans placed on interracial marriage before my lifetime. They're archaic, backwards, and bigoted. It would be hard to imagine myself living in that type of society.

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • jahbini
    • 0
      jahbini  
    • The homophobes will always be with us, but they should not have the right to dictate how anyone else should behave, think, or emote.

      Why should anyone want a gay man to marry a woman (or any combination of like that)? That's pure pain and suffering.

    • 3 years ago
  • Commentor
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • Commentor:

      Those who oppose gay marriage are the old and uneducated. The numbers are moving fast, and the haters, the homophobes, are losing. The old will die, the young will gain the vote, and the uneducated, hopefully, get an education.

    • 3 years ago
  • jomahu
  • soleil10
    • 0
      soleil10  
    • Commentor:

      The people never spoke.
      That is not true. The politicians in bed with the gay lobby
      took away the right of the citizens to vote.

      They are now busy brainwashing the kids in schools now.

    • 3 years ago
  • pjacobs51
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • more from the article:

      The march was organized by Join the Impact Seattle and the Queer Alliance Coalition.

      It's time to "take us out of the sheets and into the streets," said Juliana Shadlen during a speech on behalf of United Peoples Coalition, a Seattle Central Community College student group.

      The rally started outside the college around 11 a.m., and participants started marching toward Westlake Center at 11:30.

      Representatives from gay labor organizations and the transgender community, as well as Iraq war veterans, also spoke at the rally.

      Join the Impact organizers also collected signatures for a petition to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act. The group hopes to collect 1 million signatures across the country and present the petition to the president on Jan. 21.

      During his presidential campaign, Obama said he opposed a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and supported civil unions, but wanted to let states decide about marriage.

    • 3 years ago
more from News and Politics:

top videos