News and Politics | January 19, 2009 | 32 comments

Civil Rights rights aren't over yet

Image
DeliaTheArtist
"Barack Obama's inauguration marks a profound manifestation of the Rev. Martin Luther King's dream, civil rights leaders say, but the movement would be foolish to drop its guard now.

King did not fight tirelessly and ultimately give his life so African-Americans could take office; he fought for the disenfranchised and downtrodden, no matter their color, said Charles Steele, president and CEO of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, which King and Steele's father helped found.

"President-elect Barack Obama is just a piece of the puzzle," he said. "This tells us that we are at a station, but it's not our destination. We've got to get back on the train."

Steele said he worries that those who espouse King's dream may grow lackadaisical because an African-American has taken the reins of the free world. But it is imperative, he said, that they "march now more than ever before."

This article is specifically about the Black civil rights movement, but let's not forget about the other movements out there that should also be inspired by Obama's ability to change the face of the nation! If you stand for something, stand proud and get your message out there! Obama represents great things, but we're not done yet!
  1. groups:
    News and Politics
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Obama US America 4 more
  3.     
    |

32 comments // Civil Rights rights aren't over yet

  • rick2740
    • 0
      rick2740  
    • Epiphany, By Richard R. Blackston

      Epiphany:
      Morality. Where has it gotten me? What good has it done for me? I’ve lived my life open and honest out among the throngs, warts and all! Now a sickening epiphany washes over me; I should have lied, deceived, and played the game of the self-righteous Christians.

      This is what bigoted Christians deserve from me, and from every gay man!
      Honest - foolish - piteous - Me!
      I was true to life, and everyone!
      The people will learn to love and understand me, I foolishly believed!
      BULLSHIT!
      If I had played the game like the other closet cases around me; married a woman, and had two point five kids, while sneaking off to make love to men.
      Then my job would be undaunted.
      No one would know the real me, and there would be no judgment upon my head; my life would not be so ruined!
      My life would be good! I shouldn’t have cared for anyone but myself!
      I’m but the fool of morality!
      Foolish - honest - pathetic - Me!
      I should have never been so openly gay at Wal-Mart! I should have lied when I was harassed, and said; I don’t know why these women are picking on me, or on anyone!
      I’m not gay!
      Then I would have a lawsuit and a huge settlement for having my hours cut illegally! For all their scams and torture that I suffered through for three years now!
      Foolish - forthcoming - moral - Me!

      I shouldn’t have been honest with the police in South Bend, Indiana when I was gay bashed. I should have lied and said I was drunk. I left the door open; this guy saw my expensive jewelry, so he must have followed me home, jumped me, and stole my jewelry and the money in my wallet!
      Then there would have been an investigation, and the criminal wouldn’t be scot-free!
      Foolish – honest - forthcoming - Me.

      I had to tell the truth! To police men in a state and city such as South Bend Indiana, that says no rights for gay people; ‘they are sin’! No protection, no marriage, no work rights! We can’t protect these people - No!
      Dumb - honest - big mouthed - Me!
      Too late now, because here I am - warts and all - naked before the throngs!
      No rights; no compensation; and no way out!!

    • 3 years ago
  • rick2740
    • 0
      rick2740  
    • I am writing this letter to share a few things about my life. I was beaten and left for dead in Indiana and the police did nothing because it was considered a hate crime. I was also harassed at work, while I was a jewelry associate at Wal-Mart stores, which resulted in the loss of my job. I believe these things happened to me because of my sexual orientation. There are insurmountable bills left unpaid, and I've lost everything I own, due to these horrific events. In Indiana an employer can fire an employee simply because the employer knows or suspects the employee is gay! South Bend, Indiana drops LGBT protection rights!

      Derek Deter, Erv Kuspa, Karen White, David Varner, Timothy Rose, support LGBT having no rights what so ever!

      Recently you requested personal assistance from our on-line support center. Below is a summary of your request and our response.

      Thank you for allowing us to be of service to you.

      Subject
      In regards to: Your letter to President Bush. . .
      Discussion Thread
      Response (Charles Schwindt) 11/18/2008 03:04 PM
      Mr. Blackston,

      Thank you for contacting the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

      Under the laws enforced by the EEOC, it is illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or employee because of that person’s race, color, national origin, sex (including pregnancy), age (40 or older), religion, or disability.

      In your email, you stated you believe you were terminated from your job due to your sexual orientation.

      The EEOC does not enforce laws pertaining to sexual orientation, however certain states and local government agencies do. Unfortunately, based on your location, your local state agency does not enforce sexual orientation discrimination laws.

      Do you believe you have been treated differently in a job situation because of your race, color, national origin, sex (including pregnancy), age (40 or older), religion, or disability?

      The EEOC only handles complaints related to these types of discrimination. If you believe you were treated differently for some other reason, it appears that you are not covered by EEOC.

      You may call the First Government, federal information line. They provide information to those in need of assistance from a federal agency but don't know where to start. You may reach them at 1-800-333-4636 (1-800-FED-INFO). Also their web site address is www.usagov.gov. You may also contact your local bar association and/or legal aid.

      If you do believe you have been treated differently under the laws listed above, which are enforced by the EEOC, and you would like to file a charge, our laws give you a limited amount of time. Depending on where the situation occurred, you may have 180 days or 300 days.

      If you have further questions or wish to discuss this with an intake information representative, please call 1-800-669-4000. If you are deaf or hearing impaired, the TTY number is 1-800-669-6820.

    • 3 years ago
  • SamuraiDave
    • 0
      SamuraiDave  
    • Here's a spiritual I remember being on Ken Burn's Civil War series. It's a poignant song about overcoming adversity and this doesn't apply only to African-Americans but all humanity struggling to reach some sense of peace.

    • 3 years ago
  • AreOh
    • 0
      AreOh  
    • This post is ripe with both ignorance and progressiveness. We still have a ways to go, but at the very least people are talking...

    • 3 years ago
  • allenray
    • 0
      allenray  
    • It seems everyone wants the believe all their problems relate to other people. Everyone wants to blame someone else instead of simply realizing that we all have our cross to bear. Our new president can only do so much and most of it will be for the people that help get him elected, not the people that voted for him. These same people will be out trying to tell you how much better off you are and want you to vote for him again just as they did with Bush. Face it people money and power run this country and win elelctions ---not votes. So grow up and quit letting everyone tell you to blame someone. Whether you are black, white, Mexican, Oriental, fat, ugly, tall, bald, blonde,Jewish or Muslim we all have been discriminated against. The only thing you can be sure of is your self.

    • 3 years ago
  • dabne
    • 0
      dabne  
    • Thank you so much Delia for the reminder! For a minute there I thought we could all just be friends.

      Could you let us know when it's over too?

      Thanks...

    • 3 years ago
  • KevinLionheart
    • 0
      KevinLionheart  
    • I took a sociology class in college, and the discussion of race and civil rights inevitably occurred. One young white student chose to make a comment, after watching a video about the civil rights movement, that started like this:

      "I can understand that. If I was alive back in the 40s, you know, when racism was still around..."

      I think a lot of whites feel this way, especially now with Obama's election. The irony with this student's statement was that the discussion occurred about a week after the incidents in Jena, Louisiana - where there was a veritable race war going on over which race deserved to sit under a certain tree on school property,

      Just look at some of the street interviews and footage showing white voters in rural American commenting on the election. Yes, it may be on the decline, but that doesn't equalize human rights for all. Look at the racial make-up of prisons. Look at the poorest parts of the country and what races live there. Look at school funding in poor districts compared to wealthy ones. The scars of slavery will forever haunt this country.

      A primary example is our nation's schools. i recommend everyone read the article "Savage Inequalities", by Jonathan Kozol. I'm sure it can be found online.

    • 3 years ago
  • damnneargenius
  • AreOh
    • 0
      AreOh  
    • damnneargenius:

      Interesting. So your preference is to deal with the symptom rather than the cause of such policies? It is my estimation that striving towards equality for all would remove the need for such things. I myself am not a fan of affirmative action, and it is not the best solution, but one cannot deny the need for it.

    • 3 years ago
  • ajiacoysancocho
    • 0
      ajiacoysancocho  
    • All people can go to all public places, that segregation problem is finished. The treatment of people that are foriegn to you still needs work. After the World Trade Center events, didn't all the people from the Middle East get shunned and insulted by others? Aren't hispanics as a whole getting frowned on as a result of some pathetic Hollywood thing? I think the media it at fault for this. Everytime a crime is commited by some ethnic group, the news should also state that those events do not in anyway represent the ethnic group. Heck, there is no such thing as an ethnic group. Everyone is different from each other,regardless of what they do share.

    • 3 years ago
  • dank420
    • 0
      dank420  
    • ajiacoysancocho:

      "Heck, there is no such thing as an ethnic group. Everyone is different from each other,regardless of what they do share."

      I think that there are enough common traits that groups of people have that make them distinct as ethnic groups. however, this criteria is not absolute and individual variation is something that is far too easily overlooked and very important to consider. i am an idahoan but that doesn't mean that i have the same interests, beliefs and so on as the majority of the states' population.

      the minority populations are still at a disadvantage to this day and this will continue. luckily more and more are becoming cognizant of the problems in our system and hopefully we will be able to correct the inequalities that exist and, one day, achieve true egalitarianism.

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • A Time to Break Silence
      By Rev. Martin Luther King
      In his "Beyond Vietnam" speech delivered at New York's Riverside Church on April 4, 1967 -- a year to the day before he was murdered -- King called the United States "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today." Time magazine called the speech "demagogic slander that sounded like a script for Radio Hanoi," and the Washington Post declared that King had "diminished his usefulness to his cause, his country, his people."

    • 3 years ago
  • whitepride
    • 0
      whitepride  
    • blacks have fought and died bravely since the start,and proud to call them americans!However,racism is still rampant from BOTH blacks & whites.One main reason is hyphanation(?),i.e. afriacan-american,mexican-american,muslum-american,and than just ...white.I'm a european-american ..ha!Let's not forget Obama is HALF WHITE! But nobody mentions that.He was also raised by his white mother after his black dad left them when he was born!!!!

    • 3 years ago
  • Highr0ller
    • 0
      Highr0ller [removed]  
    • Image
    • The Power of AIPAC

      Who Runs America?

      By Brian Crowley

      January 19, 2009 "Counterpunch" -- Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt were pretty close, politically and personally. They led the fight against fascism in the early 1940s, and although they had their disagreements they got on very well. They were both blunt in expressing their views, but there was no doubt who was the more powerful : Roosevelt called the shots, although Churchill had a lot of influence on him. But it would have been unthinkable for Churchill to have behaved in the way that the present (though not for long) prime minister of Israel did with the present (though not for long) president of the United States.

      Prime minister Olmert of Israel, who has been forced to stand down because of allegations of corruption, telephoned President Bush to make the latter alter his orders to his Secretary of State to support a mild resolution in the UN Security Council that called for a ceasefire in Gaza. The barely believable transcript of Olmert's boasting of his success is on public record. He said:

      "I [Olmert] spoke with him [Bush]; I told him: You can't vote for this proposal. He said: listen, I don't know, I didn't see, don't know what it says. I told him: I know, and you can't vote for it! He then instructed the secretary of state, and she did not vote for it."

      There is no other head of government in the entire world who could say such words to the president of the United States. And will Olmert's successor be able to speak with Bush's successor in the same way and with a similar result?

      We know the name of the next US president, but we don't know who the next Israeli prime minister will be. It looks as if it might be a choice between two steel-minded sadists, Tzipi Livni or Binyamin Netanyahu, both dedicated haters of Palestine, Palestinians and Arabs in general. So what might they be able to say to President Obama? Will they be able to pick up the phone and call him to suggest forcefully that he alter the voting intention of the United States of America in the UN Security Council? And what would he do, if they did?

      Given the commitment to Israel of Mr Obama and his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, as was obvious in their groveling speeches last year to the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, there is no guarantee that they will, either of them, ever utter a word in criticism of Israel.

    • 3 years ago
  • telcod
  • justadad
    • 0
      justadad  
    • On this Day of Martin Luther King, may his words of compassion forever resonate refreshment with afflicted that we may collectively renew in strength, liberty and freedom in journey of happiness within our gracious lands of opportunity.

      A nice production available at

      http://www.feelthedream.org/

    • 3 years ago
  • Gargaryun
    • 0
      Gargaryun  
    • Civil Rights= Human Rights...fight oppression wherever it's found.
      Freedom without responsibility is anarchy, & most of those who espouse anarchy would find themselves dead or enslaved quickly, were it not for Society's protection thru "Rule of Law"...the trick is ENFORCING "Equal protection under the Law", because without that , the Power Mad Bullying thieves take over.
      example: I recently had a Sherriff's Detective tell Me
      " The Law has nothing to do with common sense & decency"
      Without common sense & decency, the law becomes nothing more than the rationalizations of Political Whores with legal degrees as to WHY they should be able to STEAL what others have worked for.
      HENCE, The Civil(HUMAN) Rights Movement.
      Use the clowns head for a drum

    • 3 years ago
  • toreyray
    • 0
      toreyray  
    • Image
    • Raw Video: Prop 8 Protest In Los Angeles
      This is turning out to be a Civil rights Issue, I really think we are going to look back in 20 years and look at this ban like the way we look at Slavery.

    • 3 years ago
  • quixotic12
  • Cynic2
    • 0
      Cynic2  
    • We've come a long way--instead of 40 acres and a mule after slavery, we got 50 states and the White House (at least for 4 years). BUT--WE STILL HAVE A LONG WAY TO GO.

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • Indeed, Keith, we can feel the effects of slavery even today though many people want to deny it. Racism is still very present in today's society along with a lot of other discrimination, and I have heard people honestly say things like "Well, black people should be happy now that there is a black president", as if that was the only goal of the black civil rights movement.

      Now we have another great movement on our hands, the LGBT movement, which people are comparing to the black civil rights movement for a lot of reasons. Some people agree and some people are offended by the comparison, but I think it is a fair one- interracial marriage used to be illegal and black people were considered "sub human", the same mentality that is being spread today by calling homosexuality "sinful" and "unnatural"...as long as we continue to deny people basic rights under the excuse that they are somehow lesser than the majority, we have failed as a nation.

    • 3 years ago
  • keithponder
    • 0
      keithponder  
    • Thanks Delia,

      I'm glad that somebody has the courage and common sense to realize this.

      America has not rid her self of ghettos, injustice, illiteracy,police brutality, hatred, homophobia, and White male supremacy, just because the underclass,(those who has never been in power), came out in numbers and elected a Black President.

      Everybody's Talkin' About Peace, But No One Is Talkin' About Justice.

    • 3 years ago
  • cantucwearebrothers
    • 0
      cantucwearebrothers  
    • keithponder:

      "I never got anything for being white"...whoops on the grammar, but whatever.

      You got to not be instantly judged by the color of your skin.

      You got to not be stared at as if your going to steel something wherever you go.

      You got to be not denied a decent education.

      You got to not have to fight to use the fucking toilet or buy food in a restaurant.

      You got to not have to worry about your childrens well being.

      You got to...fill in the blank.

      So many freedoms you have enjoyed and apparently taken for granted as a white male.

    • 3 years ago
  • cantucwearebrothers
  • quixotic12
    • 0
      quixotic12  
    • keithponder:

      You cannot deny that white males still dominate most of the business and political world. Women still make less on average than men, and more men hold top positions than women. Things are changing, but they're not all the way there yet.

    • 3 years ago
  • dank420
    • 0
      dank420  
    • keithponder:

      "If I were to guess who is superior in this world, I would guess Indian men. They always seem to be very studious and become doctors etc."

      Even perpetuating stereotypes in a post about your disapproval of racism. Wow mutedmajority, I guess you didn't spot your own hypocrisy in the second grade.

    • 3 years ago
  • csmonut
    • 0
      csmonut  
    • mutedmajority,
      With freedom, comes responsibility. Responsibility to your neighbors (society).
      True freedom comes when people are not responsible for, or to anyone but themselves.
      But does that necessarily make for a better society?

    • 3 years ago
  • stopnoise
    • 0
      stopnoise  
    • The real issue about "freedom" and "liberty" that many fail to understand, is that "freedom" and "liberty" does not exits without responsibility, love, respect and value towards one another.

    • 3 years ago
  • csmonut
  • mutedmajority
  • ajiacoysancocho
    • 0
      ajiacoysancocho  
    • mutedmajority:

      Some people take communism, take away the parts that don't let you speak out against governments and label it freedom. I moved from South America when I was little, and I was baffled why was I supposed to pledge allegiance to a country I wasn't from. You don't walk into nations and become their pawn. I side with what I feel is correct and that's all. The U.S. isn't strict in the same ways as China or Russia, but it has its limits. Total freedom will probably lead to total ruckus and disorder however.

    • 3 years ago
  • quixotic12
    • 0
      quixotic12  
    • mutedmajority:

      I dunno. In Canada we don't do this pledge of allegiance crap. I love my country because if you happen to be a socialist people (i.e. pundits) don't start freaking out. Or even if you're fascist. It doesn't matter because we believe in the power of our democracy. I feel free here. Although if we don't shape up and kick Harper out I'm going to feel a lot more restrained soon. lol. Even then, we're mostly a pretty level headed country. I like to think so anyway.

    • 3 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • clownpuncher
  • quixotic12
more from News and Politics:

top videos