What is a Retrosexual?
source: http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/04/new_retrosexual.php
-
-
- joshuaheller
- added this
"Till the 1950s, manliness meant action and a force for good," says Brett McKay, 27, a law school graduate turned blogger. Then, feminism disturbed that order. "A lot of men were confused."
Is this the result of Mad Men? What are the other cultural factors that make us want to return to the olden days?
-
- groups:
- News and Politics, Art and Style, Celebrity, Fashion
-
-
KDal
-
If it's primarily a fashion/slang/music thing, I'm there too. If it's as this one guy said-one guy's guess- and it IS about dealing with feminism? I'm out. I'm feeling that it's just fun to suit up and cruise.
- 2 years ago
-
KDal
-
-
dariusvons
-
emo, goth, hipsters, bros... whatever. “style” is for people with inadequate self esteem. Like body building, it’s for people who are overly burdened with an abundance of “I’m not good enough”. Also this was written by a feminist, she’s probably jealous that guys pull off the style better than she could (though some ladies look damn good in a suit and tie).
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
Rockfanatic1016
-
dariusvons:
i heart skramz
- 2 years ago
-
Rockfanatic1016
-
-
emarston
-
you can find this brand of hipster at any art show
- 2 years ago
-
emarston
-
-
UrbanGypsy
-

-
I think I am already one step ahead. I really like those old-time round rimmed 1920s sunglasses. Maybe I'll single handedly bring it back into style (perhaps with a little help from Johnny Depp in Public Enemies).
- 2 years ago
-
UrbanGypsy
-
-
Armageddon_Now
-
Finally, a group of guys hearkening back to the days when equality among the sexes was a pipe dream!
- 2 years ago
-
Armageddon_Now
-
-
Darevalo
-
people who are un happy with their currently lives typically adopt an attitude of how another time was better for any number of reasons. but... it always seems to stem from some kind of discontent with their current situation or with society.
why cant they exert manliness in normal clothes? they can... but its more fun to wear vintage suits.
- 2 years ago
-
Darevalo
-
-
cztheday
-
The anti-feminism thing isn't working for me. But to the extent it means a return to the sexual heat generated onscreen in the best movies by Carey Grant, Katherine Hepburn, James Stewart, Audrey Hepburn, Marilyn Monroe, James Dean, etc...count me in!
- 2 years ago
-
cztheday
-
-
sgwhites
-
cztheday:
Hear, hear!
I'll keep my feminism, thank you very much, but if we could bring back the 1940s and 1950s fashion, I'm all for that.
- 2 years ago
-
sgwhites
-
-
shutter318
-
sgwhites:
I agree - I want the fashion not the attitudes! There is nothing wrong with bringing back fashion but there is a problem when one does research to bring back everything from that era. People are just trying too hard to be different now a days.
- 2 years ago
-
shutter318
-
-
randallr01
-
sgwhites:
Me too! I *love* their fashion and style.
- 2 years ago
-
randallr01
-
-
remanns
-
Hmmmm,.I'm thinking-
Either Scooby doo,...or someone who likes to say "Scooby dooby doo";
"Steangers In The Night" type of fellas. " Ruh-ro,,,retro". - 2 years ago
-
remanns
-
-
CarolineS
-
This is just dressing in vintage, and i dont think feminism has anything to do with it.
- 2 years ago
-
CarolineS
-
-
dariusvons
-
CarolineS:
it only implies chauvinism to feminists, to everyone else it looks sharp.
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
janemarie
-
I'm not gonna lie. I do think the way they dress is kinda sexy. But yea that whole feminism disturbed the order stuff is BEWSHEET.
- 2 years ago
-
janemarie
-
-
Jpwhoregan
-
Fukken Retrosexual...... How do they work?
- 2 years ago
-
Jpwhoregan
-
-
Darevalo
-
Jpwhoregan:
need a time machine to have sex.
- 2 years ago
-
Darevalo
-
-
dariusvons
-
Darevalo:
hell yeah, go back to when rug burn was they worse you'd get!
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
booninvailable
-
I'm confused, aren't these people just hipsters in their sophisticated mood?
- 2 years ago
-
booninvailable
-
-
violintastic
-
"Then feminism disturbed that order".
Yeah, it must have been so confusing coming across women that actually respect themselves and *gasp* don't fall for sexist bullshit! Oh, the horror!
"Relating to women" in the fifties meant calling them "doll" and insisting to stay in the kitchen and make them a sandwich.
- 2 years ago
-
violintastic
-
-
Ron_Geremy [removed]
-
violintastic: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Ron_Geremy [removed]
-
-
violintastic
-
Ron_Geremy:
Your usage of "slut", do you mean women that take charge of their sexuality and reject bullshit standards on female sexuality? If you meant that, yes, we are all "sluts".
Oh, speaking of standards: What makes women that hook up with someone in a bathroom a "slut", but when you do it, you're still a self respecting man?
- 2 years ago
-
violintastic
-
-
pyrexscholar
-
Ron_Geremy:
fucking your hand while taking a shit between dance dance revolution sessions is not the same as being in a club having anal sex. sorry braahhh. also, you spelled ron jeremy wrong...idiot.
- 2 years ago
-
pyrexscholar
-
-
dariusvons
-
violintastic:
bullshit standards? hooking up in a bathroom (to me) shows a total lack of standards.
yes, as it may be a double standard that makes a lady a slut, and a man a stud... but the fact is, to get laid, all any woman has to do is say "yes, lets do it", while a man has to work his ass off just for a DATE, he has to buy dinner, be clean and well kept, have money, a nice car, play music, be witty, be charming, be funny.... otherwise he has to pay some gross cum dumpster prostitute... ALL the while any woman can walk up to almost any guy and just say "lets do it". only real proof is that there are plenty of fat disgusting slobbish sluts out there, but not a single fat disgusting slobbish stud.
- 2 years ago
-
dariusvons
-
-
veronaaa
-
AWESOME.
although.. the 'sexual' part of the word, makes it feel..
well homosexual. unless thats the point...? - 2 years ago
-
veronaaa
-
-
lordsbassman
-
veronaaa:
sub-genius metrosexual
- 2 years ago
-
lordsbassman