Salon.com contributor Professor Paul Campos tells Cenk that part of what caused confusion over the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the Affordable Care Act was that the case text focused a lot on the dissent. But, Campos explains, that wording might have been intentional, not an editing error. “I think that the four dissenting judges are so angry that they decided not to edit that and leave that in as, essentially, a tell,” Campos says,” letting everybody know that, in fact, Roberts — in their view — stabbed them in the back at the last moment.”
