Upstream | September 15, 2009 | 20 comments

"Seven Myths About Alternative Energy"

Image
lookatmypix
I THINK:
Biofuel from corn Ethanol is a joke!

A catastrophic joke!
It will destroy our Nature before our eyes if it becomes the next world's form of energy taking oil's place.

Excerpts:
"As the world looks around anxiously for an alternative to oil, energy sources such as biofuels, solar, and nuclear seem like they could be the magic ticket. They're not."

"Renewable Fuels Are the Cure for Our Addiction to Oil."
Unfortunately not. 'Renewable fuels' sound great in theory, and agricultural lobbyists have persuaded European countries and the United States to enact remarkably ambitious biofuels mandates to promote farm-grown alternatives to gasoline. But so far in the real world, the cures -- mostly ethanol derived from corn in the United States or biodiesel derived from palm oil, soybeans, and rapeseed in Europe -- have been significantly worse than the disease."

"Researchers used to agree that farm-grown fuels would cut emissions because they all made a shockingly basic error. They gave fuel crops credit for soaking up carbon while growing, but it never occurred to them that fuel crops might displace vegetation that soaked up even more carbon. It was as if they assumed that biofuels would only be grown in parking lots. Needless to say, that hasn't been the case; Indonesia, for example, destroyed so many of its lush forests and peat lands to grow palm oil for the European biodiesel market that it ranks third rather than 21st among the world's top carbon emitters.

In 2007, researchers finally began accounting for deforestation and other land-use changes created by biofuels. One study found that it would take more than 400 years of biodiesel use to "pay back" the carbon emitted by directly clearing peat for palm oil. Indirect damage can be equally devastating because on a hungry planet, food crops that get diverted to fuel usually end up getting replaced somewhere. For example, ethanol profits are prompting U.S. soybean farmers to switch to corn, so Brazilian soybean farmers are expanding into cattle pastures to pick up the slack and Brazilian ranchers are invading the Amazon rain forest, which is why another study pegged corn ethanol's payback period at 167 years. It's simple economics: The mandates increase demand for grain, which boosts prices, which makes it lucrative to ravage the wilderness."

I THINK:
Corn?
What?
Does that word sound familiar to me?
The Evil corn, the one that comes from MONSANTO, genetically engineered.
Did occur to anyone to link biofuel and Monsanto?
Monsanto already leads the seed market with its deadly genetic engineered food, it won't take long until he will become the major if not the only energy source provider in the world supposing corn ethanol takes oil's place.

Let's read more of the article now, an other shocking passage:

"Even if the United States switched its entire grain crop to ethanol, it would only replace one fifth of U.S. gasoline consumption.
This is not just a climate disaster. The grain it takes to fill an SUV tank with ethanol could feed a hungry person for a year;"



At the article nuclear energy cannot fix climate crisis, reasons are timing and cost.

Last passage is:

"After all, the developing world is entitled to develop. Its people are understandably eager to eat more meat, drive more cars, and live in nicer houses. It doesn't seem fair for the developed world to say: Do as we say, not as we did. But if the developing world follows the developed world's wasteful path to prosperity, the Earth we all share won't be able to accommodate us. So we're going to have to change our ways. Then we can at least say: Do as we're doing, not as we did."

I THINK:
We need to focus mainly on solar power as it is the only futuristic, potential form of energy, that could save the world one day.

We need to readdress our way of thinking towards solar power.
I will try to explain a new direction, working to post it soon.


Join Organic:
http://current.com/groups/organicgreen/
  1. groups:
    Community,   Green,   Current Tonight,   Upstream,   3 more
  2. tags:
    News Green Environment Economy 21 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

20 comments // "Seven Myths About Alternative Energy"

  • 4and3and2and1
  • Amber_Taylor
    • 0
      Amber_Taylor  
    • OK pretend I am an alien with a far advanced intelligence beyond humans and have come to your planet. - The Earth gets it's energy from the sun, all life forms have evolved to harness this power source. The base of the food chain is plants, which we evolved to eat all powered by the sun.

      Logical conclusion the Sun has more power it 1 hour that the Earth would need in a year. We have figured out a crude method for converting it to electro-magnetic energy which will work for now. We will evolve the technology, and in hundreds of years from now will look back and think people today were idiots for even thinking about using non-renewable technologies when our planet and it's evolution and all life in the cosmos uses the sun. Yes the sun, the most efficient power plant ever created.

      Let science determine the fate of our power needs not Corporation who will derail the human advancement.

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • SAVE THE WORLD by George Harrison

      We've got to save the world
      Someone else may want to use it
      So far we've seen
      This planet's rape, how we've abused it
      We've got to save the world

      The Russians have the biggest share
      With their long fingers everywhere
      And now they've bombs in outer space
      With laser beams and atomic waste

      Rain forest chopped for paper towels
      One acre gone in every hour*
      Our birds and wildlife all destroyed
      To keep some millionaires employed

      We've got to save the whale
      Greenpeace they've tried to diffuse it
      But dog food salesmen
      Persist on kindly to harpoon it
      We've got to save the world

      The armament consortium
      They're selling us plutonium
      Now you can make your own H-bomb
      Right in the kitchen with your mom

      The nuclear power that costs you more
      Than anything you've known before
      The half-wit's answer to a need
      For cancer, death, destruction, greed

      We've got to save the world
      Someone's children they may need it
      So far we've seen
      The big business of extinction bleed it
      We've got to save the world

      We're at the mercy of so few
      With evil hearts determined to
      Reduce this planet into hell
      Then find a buyer and make quick sale

      To end upon a happy note
      Like trying to make concrete float
      Is very simple knowing that
      God in your heart lives

      We've got to save the world
      Someone else may want to use it
      It's time you knew
      How close we've come
      We're gonna lose it - We gotta save, we gotta save
      We gotta save the world

    • 2 years ago
  • futuregen
  • lookatmypix
  • futuregen
  • lookatmypix
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • From article: "Atomic energy is emissions free"

      This is a most dangerous misnomer that is driven into the public's mind by pro-nuclear advocates. All nuke plants routinely give off radioactive gases during operation and all radiation gives off radioactive gases as it decays. There is a constant stream of radioactive gases released into our air which is why zero release is never attainable (they also dump radioactivity directly into our water supply). Emissions travel through the air directly to our lungs, or fall to the ground. Rainfall usually brings the particles back to land. This may be land in use for agriculture, where green leafy and other vegetables absorb the radiation and are then sold in stores, leading to eventual consumption by humans. the land may be used for grazing cattle. the grass absorbs the radiation, which is consumed by the cattle. Radioactive iodine-131 and iodine-129 is concentrated in the cow's milk. the milk is then sold at the store. Pregnant and nursing mothers consuming the milk endanger the fetus or baby as the radioactive Iodine eventually deposits into their thyroids. There it can disrupt the production of growth hormone, causing spontaneous abortions, hyaline membrane disease, low birth rate babies and poor growth and development. Deposits in the brain lead to mental retardation, etc. the fetus and the growing child are much more susceptible to the effects of radiation than is the adult.

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • This is something I came across:

      "Why have we been kept in the dark about concentrated solar power which can make coal&Nuclear = History"

      "Concentrated Solar Power (CSP), a cheap, simple, safe and clean parabolic, mirror-based technology that is capable of replacing and outlasting oil, gas, coal and nuclear.
      The basic technology is extremely simple. The Ancient Greeks used it to try to set fire to enemy warships. Concentrated Solar Power uses parabolic mirrors to concentrate the suns heat (not to be confused with PV Photovoltaic which uses the suns light to generate electricity). It is quite possible using even a small parabolic reflector to have a point at the centre hot enough to melt metal. One sq. mile of Concentrated Solar Power mirror field can generate the same amount of energy as one hundred sq. miles of the best growing biomass crop."

      "We have 100,000 terra watts beaming down on us and human beings might only use 15 terra watts. In fact we have so much solar sunlight that it would be the equivalent of an 8-inch deep layer of oil everywhere on the planet annually (Khosla, 2006)."

      More at the link:

      http://www.katharinehamnett.com/Campaigns/Concentrated-Solar-Power/REPORT

    • 2 years ago
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • I'm glad to see Amory Lovins made it into this article.
      "Nuke plants are supposed to be expensive to build but cheap to operate. Unfortunately, they're turning out to be really, really expensive to build; their cost estimates have quadrupled in less than a decade. Energy guru Amory Lovins has calculated that new nukes will cost nearly three times as much as wind -- and that was before their construction costs exploded for a variety of reasons, including the global credit crunch, the atrophying of the nuclear labor force, and a supplier squeeze symbolized by a Japanese company's worldwide monopoly on steel-forging for reactors. A new reactor in Finland that was supposed to showcase the global renaissance is already way behind schedule and way, way over budget. This is why plans for new plants were recently shelved in Canada and several U.S. states, why Moody's just warned utilities they'll risk ratings downgrades if they seek new reactors, and why renewables attracted $71 billion in worldwide private capital in 2007 -- while nukes attracted zero."

      The Republicans say they hate "socialism" but they sure want those government handouts for their nuke plants don't they. They are still trying to subsidize coal and nuclear - no change.

    • 2 years ago
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • From article: "Even if the United States switched its entire grain crop to ethanol, it would only replace one fifth of U.S. gasoline consumption." This is a totally untrue statement. America could produce enough alcohol for the whole world's needs if our leaders would consult David Blume. He already has the plan but is being stifled. He knows how to feed the world with food and supply their energy needs sustainably, without genetic alterations and without poison.

    • 2 years ago
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • The midwest is aware of David Blume's work but the corporations block any progress. David says all cars should be run on 100% ethanol (the feds require an additive so people won't drink it. David is working on a non-poisoning additive). Even diesel's can be converted to run on alcohol. David states the yields per plant is greater with alcohol than biodiesel (I.e. extracting the starch yields more than extracting the oil). You can produce all heat and electricity needs for a house using a car engine in your basement run on alcohol. That's why this cash for clunkers program was so bad. And I'll dare say Ray LaHood did it on purpose. All those engines could have been used to produce electricity. But the electric companies want to keep you dependent on them and their coal/nuclear and spying smart grid.

    • 2 years ago
  • good_stuff
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • I would suggest the author contact David Blume for info re: alcohol as a gas. What is not mentioned in this video is that kelp can be grown offshore in nets (Japan is currently doing so) and would supply all the needs of the world. No more war. And you wouldn't have to use any land. Existing pipelines for oil could be used instead to transport ethanol from the coast (I.e. gulf coast and California). The kelp would lower the water temperature, stopping hurricanes in their tracks as well as re-oxygenate the dead zones, rejuvenating the natural habitat. If you want to use land, David advocates using high starch plants that are natural to the habitat (not Monsanto corn). Unfortunately big business is in charge at this time so no reason is getting through. We are currently using Monsanto corn in the mid west because corporate power has a stranglehold on ethanol policy.

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
  • Twitchr
    • 0
      Twitchr  
    • You should really look up compressed air powered cars, I remember reading an article years ago that described how in France, these cars could be our answer to daily commuting, and were more efficient than electric cars.

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
  • Vierotchka
    • 0
      Vierotchka  
    • Twitchr:

      I've been rooting for Guy Nègre's air-driven cars for many years now. An Australian engineer has also come up with an air-driven car using a different approach to Guy Nègre's approach - both systems are viable and very interesting.

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • I felt the need to address this in the Organic group as I take biofuel from corn ethanol a dangerous, alarming threat to our Nature. If it becomes reality, this would contaminate our soil and water more than we could ever imagine, also creating more deforestation, desertification,water scarcity,wild life extinction and future disease.
      This is the antithesis of an Organic thinking, an Organic solution that is allied with our Nature.

    • 2 years ago
more from Upstream:

top videos