Upstream | November 17, 2009 | 88 comments

Did airport slaughter scene get Modern Warfare 2 banned in Russia?

afitzgerald
I'll admit, I don't play a lot of video games. Nor do I blog about video games. I do, however, love to blog about Russia. And so it caught my eye this week when the two crossed paths. It was reported yesterday that Russia has apparently banned the sale of the game Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. The deal is this: the game takes place in a world where Russia is ruled by extreme nationalists. At one point in the game, you're an undercover Army officer who participates in a bloody slaughter of civilians at an airport. It's perpetrated by a Russian extremist cell and the scene begins with its leader telling everyone "No Russian."

Paul Tassi at True/Slant played through the level and described it as such:
"You walk out into the security gate at an airport, with lines full of people swarming to get through to their flights. I cocked my head while playing, as did all the civilians who turned to stare at us, and before I knew what was happening, Makarov and his men opened fire. My jaw hit the floor as I watched them mow down about thirty people in under five seconds. But then the level actually begins, and it’s one of the most disturbing things I’ve ever taken part in. The game forces you to walk at a snail’s pace through the airport, so you get the full effect of what’s happening. All around you, fleeing civilians are being mowed down by Makarov’s team, and you witness some crawling away trying to hide, and some sitting up against walls, nursing their wounds....The entire time the scene was unfolding, I was just thinking in my head “This is the Mumbai Massacre, I am playing the Mumbai Massacre.”

The Russians understandably took umbrage to the scene and yesterday the internet was afire with reports of the game's banning. Today, however, Activision says the game has not been banned in Russia, but that the controversial scene has been removed. I haven't found anything about the game in a cursory look through the English-language Russian press, but if you see anything send it our way.

FROM THE NEWS BLOG: http://blogs.current.com/news/2009/11/17/did-airport-slaughter-scene-get-modern-...

SOURCES: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-10399131-71.html
http://trueslant.com/tassi/2009/11/16/reflecting-on-modern-warfare-2s-airport-ma...
http://features.csmonitor.com/innovation/2009/11/17/modern-warfare-2-not-banned-...
  1. groups:
    Community,   Gaming,   Upstream,   Games,   1 more
  2. tags:
    Video Games Russia Putin activision 5 more
  3.     
    |

88 comments // Did airport slaughter scene get Modern Warfare 2 banned in Russia? // Video

  • BlaBla007
    • 0
      BlaBla007  
    • The problem relies mainly on the fact that video games can easily fall into the hands of children, yes, but also and more importantly in the hands of mentally unstable and inflencable people. Transposing the pleasure they get out of shooting people virtually into a real life situation becomes a fine line in their head. The depiction of the scene in this game is very real and realistic immersion being the gaming industries objectives, scenes with this feeling will come more frequent. It’s a growing concern. Not to you maybe, not to me…We are mature enough to know that it’s a game. Real life is when you turn it off.
      But all it takes is a couple of immature fragile people getting too much of their kicks out of this…to go out and try this in a school( !) or elsewhere.
      Sure we grew up with Rambo and Commando, but you have to admit the impression of shooting people has never been this real before.

      Do you think if we had lived without extreme violence in video games and movies, and the glorification of guns, sad events like the Colombine massacre (or the one in Montreal) would have occured ? I doubt largely.

      Now, should we ban this ? NO. Cause if we do, we should ban it all equally. Which is wrong.
      Should we insure extreme parental guidance ? Absoluetly.
      Should the required age for purchasing/renting/obtaining violent games be strongly enforced : MOST ABSOLUTLY !

      But even so. Will it stop influencable minds from crossing the line ? hmmm…
      My thoughts...

    • 2 years ago
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • What I don't understand is what self-respecting parent would let their child play this game? It's definitely not suitable for someone who's 13, yet I hear them all the time on this game. It's pretty disturbing, and not something I would choose to do.

      I think as long as you're 18 years or older, then you can handle the mature subject matter and violent images and rationalize it as virtual and fictional. Even then, there are some people over the age of 18 who can't handle the imagery, so I know 13 year old kids might not be ready to handle it.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • JulianCommongold
    • 0
      JulianCommongold  
    • OK
      To all that keep saying you can skip that level if you do not want to play it:

      THEY DO NOT TELL YOU THAT YOU WILL BE TASKED WITH WALKING THRU AN AIRPORT SLAUGHTERING INNOCENT MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN.

      Come people, if you want to have a legitimate debate, play fair and keep some perspective.
      EVERY ONE of you have said it was offensive in one way or the other.

    • 2 years ago
  • BoomChaka
  • conclusius
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • JulianCommongold:

      You can skip it at any time during the level, which means as soon as you see people shooting unarmed ADULT civilians(no children in the game), then you can skip it.

      It's offensive, but nothing more offensive that what was in 300 or any standard R-rated action movie.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • LozRiva
    • 0
      LozRiva  
    • JulianCommongold:

      I think it is important to say there are no children, lets still keep this in context. It isn't all that bad is it. I have watched movies that are much worse! In-fact i am off to play it right now!

    • 2 years ago
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • JulianCommongold:

      Because there are no children in the game, and people would get the wrong idea in assuming you're allowed to slaughter children.

      You are also not required to shoot anyone, and the people around you will still open fire on the crowd.

      Of course if this bothers you, you can always pause the game and skip the level at any time without penalty.

      However, if this game bothers you then you can just skip it altogether.

    • 2 years ago
  • LozRiva
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • JulianCommongold:

      Who cares if there were children or not? It is, after all, just a game. So what if you shot children. Why not babies? I think that pregnant women would please people that love abortion. Shoot 'em all.

      But make sure part of the game has you gassing Jews. Let's add to the "only game" mentality.

    • 2 years ago
  • LozRiva
    • 0
      LozRiva  
    • JulianCommongold:

      Yes but people are saying they are offended by the game depicting the shooting of women and children, but as you are saying it is just a game. If you aren't worrying about the difference of what it is you are shooting due to it not being real anyway then why be offended at all?

    • 2 years ago
  • conclusius
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • JulianCommongold:

      I can put whatever I want and call it a game. Shoot the President in the head with a cross bow and call it game and no one could do anything about it, because it's what? Just a game. I could have pedophiles raping children in the background and you will all be ok cause it's just a game.

    • 2 years ago
  • conclusius
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • JulianCommongold:

      Are those things too sensitive?

      I could release them as a game just fine. They are no different than what is being shown here. Illegal things going on that people are ok with. Did what I mention push your comfort zone? That isn't what keeps people from making games like this, now is it?

    • 2 years ago
  • conclusius
    • 0
      conclusius  
    • JulianCommongold:

      Wait, sorry, what? you think if this game had pedophiles gratuitously raping children in the background, people would still be defending it? once again, yeah, ok, because that makes total sense. that definitely still maintains the same sense of context as the airport shooting in the game.

      do you realize that the average teenager sees something like 1000 deaths on TV before they're 16? so should we just get rid of TV? you know what, I don't like the Mona Lisa, because her little smirk makes me think she just murdered someone. so we should take it down and put it in a vault right? The movie "The Hours" has the main character committing suicide in the first five minutes. so we should ban it.

      Mr. Jammer, please move to China or North Korea. maybe you'll find that sort of sheltered life much more comfortable.

    • 2 years ago
  • LozRiva
    • 0
      LozRiva  
    • @ the end of the day i think the very key point here it is 'just' a game. Take from it what you will, it isn't reality. Some people will be offended by the depictions in this game which is fine. That is exactly why you can choose to play the game or not...
      I think one good point in this we may be missing is that this is one of the very first games i have seen in which there a more than several warning on the content and you must tell the machine (more than once) you are willing to view these!

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • LozRiva:

      I don't like the phrase "It's just" because that's always a beginning of a lie. It is trying to belittle anyone who thinks it's more than just. Plus it is almost worse than "I'm just sayin' or in my opinion." It is a game and people can choose to play it or not, that much is true.

    • 2 years ago
  • QuestionGeek
    • 0
      QuestionGeek  
    • Lowshred, I say shame on the people that produce this trash. I have more respect for people like Jenna Jameson and Jeff Stryker than the inhuman trash that produces this junk seen in this video.

      Lowshred, what is pretend about the Columbine murders, and that other guy that shot up everyone on a college campus in Virgina, I believe?. I suppose you think 9-11 was pretend, too? Also there was another heinous crime played out at a police station that exactly mimicked a video game that they reported about on 60 minutes..

      It takes a moron such as yourself not to realize that there are lots of morons out there who try and imitate what they see in videos such as this.

      Why is it ok to fantasize about these activities and not do them? Video games, movies and such that depict such acts, are violence fantasy tools.

    • 2 years ago
  • erodut
    • 0
      erodut  
    • Look guys, if you do not like this portion of the game, don't play it. Or better yet, don't play the game at all. Don't try to censor it only because you don't agree with it. That would be like me trying to ban the bible and stop everyone from reading it because of all the creationist bs it contains.

    • 2 years ago
  • freshfish
  • Manu12
    • 0
      Manu12  
    • @JulianCommongold Of course, no offense taken. I know what your saying. I respect your thoughts and opinions.

      Peace!

    • 2 years ago
  • patochan
    • 0
      patochan  
    • Why are uptight people so hyper-sensitive when it comes to video games and music, yet films can depict far worse? Oh yeah, I forgot. The games and music companies have never had a Jack Valenti in D.C. to snuggle up to the hillbillies in Congress.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • patochan:

      8 minutes.

      8 minutes of slaughter of civilians....then some ones with guns.
      What movie shows 8 minutes of slaughter? Even horror movies don't spend that much time on that. Music, on the other hand, I think is worse in violence than video games and movies combined.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • BoomChaka
    • 0
      BoomChaka  
    • patochan:

      its nothing specific about videogames. its just that they relatively new and not really understood by many people. dont forget they were saying the same stuff about rock music a few decades back

    • 2 years ago
  • QuestionGeek
    • 0
      QuestionGeek  
    • patochan:

      Why, because as far as I'm concerned, we need more fucking and sucking in the world and we need to stop glorifying violence. Most people like me that are offended by this video game, are just as offended if not more by violent movies and tv shows.

      I have not seen a single episode of The Sopranos because of this. Nor do I ever care to see any episodes.

    • 2 years ago
  • QuestionGeek
    • 0
      QuestionGeek  
    • I'm sorry but you sickos that get entertained by playing this shit are beyond sick.

      I just watched this video game sequence from this post and I was beyond disgusted.

      I don't even watch movies with violence anymore, because I've become disgusted with it all.

      It's interesting how it's NOT ok to watch someone eat someone's pussy or suck someone's dick unless you're 18, but yet you buy violent crap like this at any age

    • 2 years ago
  • LowShred
    • 0
      LowShred  
    • QuestionGeek:

      Except this game is pretend, and it would take a moron to not be able to decipher virtual, from real life. It's rated M for a reason, I know several stores in my area that won't sell M rated games to anyone under the age of 17 unless a parent is present. No one actually filmed that and then sold it to kids.

      But hey, ya know, terrorism doesn't happen, and we live in a perfect world where there aren't people out there who will do this.

      I don't know where you're from, but seeing a triple homicide on the 6 o'clock news is no big surprise to me. Welcome to the real world duder. People like to control fake people who shoot other fake people who shoot back at fake people. Thats just how it goes.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • QuestionGeek:

      Pretend?So all those videos of those infamous guys that shot up the first school made were all pretend? What is sad is this: but seeing a triple homicide on the 6 o'clock news is no big surprise to me--
      That is not how it goes unless you're apathetic. Funny there's almost no need for the a in some cases.

    • 2 years ago
  • YSSMAN
    • 0
      YSSMAN  
    • In the context of the entire game, the level is critical for understanding the plot and letting it unfold in a dramatic way. Its not a comfortable thing to do, but they give you the option not to. So what's the big deal in Russia? Well, mostly that the franchise has been playing them off as the "bad guys" since the first, and it will be a trend that is likely to continue. The Soviet/Nationalist forces in Russia seek to re-assert their power globally, and with a few neat tricks by other outside parties, the Russians are on our front door. Yeah, its going to be offensive there. Yeah, they probably don't want their people playing it. But when Activision sold eleventy-billion copies on MW2 Day One, they aren't worried.

    • 2 years ago
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • I seriously doubt people would have this conversation if it was a scene in a movie.

      Remember, this is not real. It's only a game. Those "people" you "killed" are programmable polygon avatars, and those "bullets" you used to "shoot" them are binary codes.

      This was a very relevant scene to the story, as it sets up the upcoming conflict between America and Russia. The fact that you are even allowed to skip the mission mid-play shows that Infinity Ward was trying NOT to offend those sensitive to terrorist acts without sacrificing the negative impacts of war and violence.

      This was not a glorification; this was a demoralization. An act of evil that establishes the villain and sheds light on how the conflict between the two countries happened.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • lifestudentno83:

      Not real?
      Neither are plans to murder someone. For that moment it's just pretend...just like the Columbine prep. They weren't doing anything wrong cause it wasn't real.
      Any story that needs to take 8 minutes of redundant bloodlust to establish a villain isn't creative.

    • 2 years ago
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • lifestudentno83:

      Video games are not reality. Therefore, using a real-life situation and comparing it to a fictional game situations are comparing apples to oranges.

      And yes, using 8 minutes to set up a villian in an 8 to 12 hour game is perfectly acceptable. Movies take longer to do that, and no one was protesting Star Wars when Darth Vader blew up a whole planet of people. That's a whole lot more than a crowded airport.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • lifestudentno83:

      No one saw the people blow up. Speaking of Orange and Apples. And the videos of the Columbine boys didn't show them killing anyone. They were just playing and therefore it was just pretend and it meant nothing....just like video games mean nothing. Though funny about nothing---army use simulations that are similar. Huh..

    • 2 years ago
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • lifestudentno83:

      Yes, let's assume that Vader blew up an empty planet for the sake of an argument, despite the plot developments that dictate otherwise. I would highly suggest watching the movie before making baseless assumptions, because he most definitely blew up that planet with the people on it.

      I suppose people arguing against the visual content as opposed to the representation of death itself. Either way, what you see here could easily appear on an episode of 24, yet despite all the threats of death and references to terrorism, no on is railing against that. Yet, you manage to refer back to a REAL-LIFE event, and compare it to a video game. There is a difference between actually training in real life to go kill people with the intent to do so, and playing a video game with no intent to harm anyone.

      Yet and still, people think for some reason that video game will make mass murderers of us all. If this is true, then why are we not all dead yet? Because it isn't true. There are studies that support that video games decrease levels of stress and violent impulses that cause violent behavior. While there are isolated incidents of violence that may or may not occur because of influences of video games, the intention is not to create violent outburst. Rather, the video games are just a simulation of either reality or fantasy. While the Army may use training simulations on the computer to train soldiers for combat, it is not the only means of training they use, and is often used to help PTSD-prone troops cope with coming back home after leaving the battlefields. Perhaps it is less of a killing simulator and more of a stress reliever for those entering and leaving the battlefield.

      In closing, video games should not be held accountable for situations that are influenced by human responsibility no matter how violent they may be. In the end, we are all responsible for our actions and not a video game. Violence has been happening for many centuries before the invention of the television, so we should not blame an inanimate object or interactive experience for what deep seeded impulses people have buried deep in them. The game/video did not put them there.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • lifestudentno83:

      So those that abuse children and the children turn bad---tell the child that they are responsible for their own behavior and not to give you excuses? I never blamed video games for anything, that's you being defensive. They can contribute to problems. Trash in, trash out. AND Dr. Spock had backing and he said he was wrong.

    • 2 years ago
  • Eternalposer
    • 0
      Eternalposer  
    • As soon as I played this level I knew a s*#@storm was coming.
      It was given the mature rating for a reason. If people understood this and followed the ratings, there would be no "controversy."

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • If you don't not have boundaries you will not cross (even in entertainment) you are without standards and no standards makes for a weak mental person.

      --------------------

      Great graphics. That was stunning after the disturbing shooting.

    • 2 years ago
  • Thargor19
    • 0
      Thargor19  
    • omg i feel sick watching this. and to all you gamers out there who use such allegory as gta or any other violent game to justify why this is not absolutely horrific, this is different because you're in a room that makes you feel like you're actually there w/unarmed civis getting mowed down. i love games and play tons of violent ones...where the enemies aren't human (usually), and their ai emotions never reach convincing levels and at no point am I made to feel like I am actually committing the heinous act like I did when I first saw and subsequently played that mission. i feel like my karma is seriously hindered by experiencing this.

    • 2 years ago
  • somogibbs
  • LadyDaze
  • Cj_Koch
    • 0
      Cj_Koch  
    • I agrree that scene of the game was taken way too far. However, it is the player's choice to play that level. At the beginning of the game you are asked if you want to skip a level that could be very inappropriate to some gamers. Even after you click the option where you want to continue playing the game even with the "inappropriate" part in it, it asks you again if you want to skip it telling, tellilng the gamer that there is no reward for completing the level. It is all on the gamer's fault if they got offended. Besides...IT'S ALL MADE UP!

    • 2 years ago
  • JulianCommongold
  • Cj_Koch
    • 0
      Cj_Koch  
    • Cj_Koch:

      Yes, it doesn't tell you that you go through and massacre men and women (not children btw). But seriously, why would you get mad that it does not tell you this? Do you get upset when you go into a movie that is rated R and warns you about violence and then see innocent people being shot without the movie telling you it was going to happen? If so, then I can understand where you could be coming from. It didn't tell you what was going to happen because it would have taken away from the plot.

    • 2 years ago
  • jac1992
    • 0
      jac1992  
    • This outrage about the sequence is riduculous. if anything, the scene makes you aware of the appaling nature of such violence, and what it is really like.

      There are arts in the scene where the civilian is not fully dead, and so you or the terrorist will walk up and play his head off, or a live civilian will be dragging an injured one, and then they will both be gunned down.

      Anyone who says this scene glorifies violence obviously has not played it, and if you do, you will find no glory whatsoever in it.

      I did however, partake on the slaughter, not because i am a sociopath, or because I hate russia, or because I want ot do this for real, but becase it was a game, and it was part of the plot and as it turns out, a very important part of the plot.

      And so concludes my rant

    • 2 years ago
  • BoomChaka
  • jac1992
  • BoomChaka
    • 0
      BoomChaka  
    • even after 7 seasons of "24" this scene had a big emotional impact on me. That says a lot about the power of video games as an art form.

      but some people would be more content with the thrilling plotline of wii sports

    • 2 years ago
  • erodut
    • 0
      erodut  
    • BoomChaka:

      I agree. Sure, it's controversial, and most find it offensive, but this portion of the game is one of the most shocking moments I've experienced in a video game. I mean that in a good way. The effect it has on you for the rest of the game is just astounding.

    • 2 years ago
  • guerrilla_writer
  • artemis6
  • JulianCommongold
  • uszoninyc
    • 0
      uszoninyc  
    • Whoever 'nettle' is... I'm NOT Eric-ain't your frind, so why not get a fucking life and DO something other than sending stupid notes to people YOU DON'T KNOW?

    • 2 years ago
  • JulianCommongold
  • Nettle
  • JulianCommongold
  • erodut
  • BoomChaka
  • uszoninyc
    • 0
      uszoninyc  
    • I read what some of you wrote- saying how this is INTERGRAL to the game, or- 'oh, it's important to the game..,' or ANYTHING similar is being SOOOO de-sensitised- it's sickening.

      This- and ANY 'game' like this is ... beyond words. PLease; don't waste your time writing how to me, or saying; I must be too old, or too right wing OR too left wing. You know NOTHING about me. I ain't gonna read ANYTHING from anyone who tries to justify a 'game' where SLAUGHTERING is 'relevant.'

      I promise you- any of you 'players' sure wouldn't like having a REAL gun pulled on them in a stick-up (you'd probably take a dump in your pants and cry), much less be on the receiving end of this kind of firepower in a REAL situation. Seeing death- carnage in REAL life ain't gonna have you acting like this stuff's cool.

      To the guy who made some comment about parents being PARENTS to their kids- GOOD. Yeah, I know- and I also know- it's a 'free country,' you don't like it- don't look. BUT...this society is getting SO polarised, so extreme- in BOTH directions- it's outta control.

      I can't blame Russia, or anyone else being offended by this. I - as a human being, a citizen of the world - personally apologise to ANY Russian seeing this.

      It's ONLY a game, man... Right.

    • 2 years ago
  • conclusius
    • 0
      conclusius  
    • uszoninyc:

      the sequence in the game is doing something that it would do in any other art form: attempt to evoke an emotional response out of the receiver.

      so yeah, I don't know a lot about you. but I can obviously tell that you apparently think everyone playing this sequence in the game is thinking "WOO, THIS IS SO MUCH FUN, I LOVE SLAUGHTERING INNOCENTS!!" dude, er, um, SIR, MY BAD, some people were actually SHOCKED and maybe some even CRINGED. which is exactly what the scene was meant to do. if someone's playing the sequence trying to shoot everyone they can, the sequence OBVIOUSLY wasn't meant for them.

      If this whole video game was a movie, people would be paying $9 bucks to see it and walk out thinking it's a blockbuster.

      but you already said you aren't going to read anything from anyone else right? so everyone else's opinion is moot, I guess, compared to your almighty wisdom.

      get over yourself. learn to communicate WITH people. it's actually sometimes refreshing if the other person isn't a brick wall.

    • 2 years ago
  • Kamal_Elliott
    • 0
      Kamal_Elliott  
    • I think that infinity ward did a good job immersing the player into the game. After playing that level and witnessing what Makarov (the main bad guy) is willing to do to achieve his goals, makes you want to take him down. And that's exactly what you spend doing in the rest of the game. Just like in any action movie when the villain does something terrible in the beginning and the good guy spends the rest of it finding him.

      Your not supposed to have fun playing that level. Your supposed to get angry or shocked. Just like in books or movies.

      http://g4tv.com/videos/42694/Sesslers-Soapbox-The-Modern-Warfare-2-Airport-Scene...

    • 2 years ago
  • erodut
    • 0
      erodut  
    • For fuck's sake. Don't like the game? Don't fucking play it! That's it! I'm sick off the "controversy" this particular scene has created. Speak with your wallet if you find this offensive. Parent's, don't let your kids play this game. Simple no?

    • 2 years ago
  • JulianCommongold
  • erodut
    • 0
      erodut  
    • erodut:

      Well there lies the problem. In general, people do not research the products they buy. They make blind purchases and complain when they find something they don't agree with. This whole deal about the "No Russian" scene has been all over the news since the footage leaked a few weeks back. If you were going to purchase the game, perhaps it might have been a good idea to find just a little bit more information about it. Besides, read the the rating. It tells you what kind of material the game contains. Just because the scene is something that's never been done before doesn't mean it should not be done. Don't tell me that the consumer needs warning that they'll be shooting innocent people. Are movies any different? When you watch a Tarantino film, do they say: "careful, we decapitate people in the movie." No, they don't.

      Look, I honestly felt very awkward as I played through "No Russian." Blindly shooting hundreds of civilians is not my idea of fun (although it may be for some). However, I am very glad I played through it. It's a magnificent achievement in video game narrative and a very powerful tool for delivering the tension that the game embodies. I am angry because this story keeps spinning all over the world when it really shouldn't. It's not a big deal. You have the option to play the scene. Just skip it if you find the material offensive. I really don't understand why everyone refuses to acknowledge that the solution is simple. Don't play it if you find it offensive, just like you would not read a book, watch a movie or listen to a song that you found offensive.

    • 2 years ago
  • Nettle
  • JulianCommongold
    • 0
      JulianCommongold  
    • erodut:

      I am not fighting. Just happen to have a different view on this but I will not try and shove it down his throat. Impossible to use his logic of just looking at the rating when we are talking about one EXTREMELY offensive scene. And the last I looked they do not publish EVERY FUCKING level content on the box of the product.
      I will shut up now because I am starting to get pissed. The last time that happened I was banned.

      and it is my Mother Fucking right to complain about any fucking thing I please.
      just like it is your right to complain about complainers...however no one called you out like you are calling me out.
      it is my fucking 62.00 that was paid...
      If you dont want to hear it or read it then use your own logic and refrain from reading it or responding..

      it is a fucking forum.

    • 2 years ago
  • erodut
    • 0
      erodut  
    • erodut:

      I'm not aiming anything I said at you specifically. Actually, I clearly wrote: "in general." I honestly don't care if you don't understand my logic, and I do not mean to censor your own opinions on this site. I am only expressing my own and in no way made an attack on yours. Actually, you're the one who responded to MY comment my friend. I am angry at the issue not at what you or other people have said. Like you mentioned, it's just a forum. I don't care that you don't agree with me as much as you don't care that I don't agree with you. Relax, don't lose your temper, and in all seriousness, let's just chill the fuck out.

    • 2 years ago
  • Nettle
  • erodut
  • JulianCommongold
  • 402Chicago
    • 0
      402Chicago  
    • I'm a young adult and just as shocked. I'm not offended by the scene, i'm offended that they took it to such an extent. I think they merely could have showed this as a cut-scene, the terrorist attack, the framing of an American, and the game would have played out with the same plot as before. Making you walk through and have the ability to shoot innocent people was disgusting to me. I couldn't fire on them but friends i know shot them down like it was nothing, merely a game. To me video games are able to do one thing movies and books can't do because they make you yourself take part. If you read this in a book or saw this in a movie (or cut-scene) you would feel the emotional effect, in fact you might even shed a tear. A video game makes one harden themselves because they themselves are committing the action.

      If one merely watched this they would have felt emotional toward the scene. Since they are taking part though how can they condemn themselves? If I'm shooting them, then I'm the good guy. The mind doesn't want to incriminate itself or to consider itself evil, thus it makes false accusations about the victims being evil or altogether dehumanizes them. For people of a lower intelligence and ability to reason, such as children, this is a terrible thing. If they themselves are the terrorists then the civilians are the "bad guys", now they understand how a terrorist thinks and this can easily come to justify terrorism for them, since they do not understand perspective to its full extent. Yes, this is actually how terrorists see themselves (as justified), yet an adult understands the fact that this is an act that the majority of the world condemns.

      I do not find this part of the game necessarily bad in its own extent but because of its ability to come into the hands of children I think that they should not have added this level. Yes, they added a maturity stamp on it, but how many people truly follow those? Most parents are not up to date with the video game world to understand what will be in this game, nor will some have the will power to resist their begging children.

      Now is it the fault of Activision or that of the parents? Obviously the parents. But should Activision help out a little? Yes.

      I'm not saying they should ban or take this game off the market, in fact it's a brilliant game, but Activision should have made this level a movie-scene instead. What's done is done though, maybe next time.

    • 2 years ago
  • JulianCommongold
  • chiefgreendaddy
    • 0
      chiefgreendaddy  
    • If you cant play this level then you shouldnt play this game, gta or anything else out there that is violent, it's only a game, ban this then ban anything else where you kill innocent people.

    • 2 years ago
  • Manu12
    • 0
      Manu12  
    • Yeah, in the game you kill a lot of innocent people in the airport as part of the mission. The Russian guy in the game is a psycho you have to work with because the enemy of your enemy is your friend. He shoots you after the scene though. Its a game, and at no point does your character HAVE to shoot anyone. You are told before the disturbing past of the character who leads the gang.

      I'm an adult and this doesn't really shock or offend me anymore then the movie "Natural Born Killers"... if you don't like that sort of thing, don't play it.

      My advice for parents... as tough as it may be, act like a parent and not your kids friend. Do not allow them to play games rated 'M'... I know, I know, we were all kids and we find loopholes (i.e go to a friends and play), thats fine, but it doesn't mean you have to encourage it in your own home. Like MJB says, "No more excuses!"

    • 2 years ago
  • JulianCommongold
    • 0
      JulianCommongold  
    • Manu12:

      "I'm an adult and this doesn't really shock or offend me anymore then the movie "Natural Born Killers"... if you don't like that sort of thing, don't play it.'

      i am 48

      think that might qualify me as an adult also...
      i dunno

      If you were not shocked by Natural Born Killers or this level in the game....

      well.................

      I understand it is all fiction but ..............

      never mind.

      none of my business.

    • 2 years ago
  • Manu12
    • 0
      Manu12  
    • Manu12:

      @JulianCommongold

      Lol... I know where you're going... I might be a little sick in the head... lol... joking... I'm really desensitized to games, tv, and movies. I'm a bleeding heart left winger, who fully cares for individuals and all species in this wonderful planet.

      But these games are just the evolution of the things I did when I was young... I am 28, and played cops & robbers, and that sort of thing as a young child. I watched violent movies like Terminator and all kinds of horror movies growing up. The average age for video gamers are late 20's, early 30's. So my point is that adult entertainment is meant for adults... lol. When you look at the history of the violent games many of us played, this is the same thing with a different setting. Thats probably why its not shocking.

    • 2 years ago
  • 402Chicago
    • 0
      402Chicago  
    • Manu12:

      I have to agree with Manu. The game itself is not offensive or shocking and as an adult if you find it that way do not play it. The problem with this game is its ability to fall into the hands of children. Children have a much lower ability to reason thus they will come to wrong conclusions by taking part in games like this.

      For me it doesn't matter if you're an adult, we should not censor things just because they are offensive, if we did we would commit a crime against liberty.

      The problem is the children. This must be solved by the adults, it is the only way it can be. Parents must take it into their own hands to put restrictions on their kids. But I also think that Activision should help out a little, they know that this game is going to be on every young teen's wish list. They should have merely made the level into a movie-scene and not something that you can take part in, for the reasons made below in my own post.

    • 2 years ago
  • JulianCommongold
  • JulianCommongold
    • 0
      JulianCommongold  
    • I was appalled at that level when it came up. I wondered why, at the beginning of the game, it gave me an option to skip levels. I had never seen that b4 and I have gaming on PC for a decade.
      I just walked thru the level and did not shoot anyone. i was even trying to shoot the shooters to make them stop.
      I know the level had relevance to the game but I found it unnecessary.
      Not sure what the developers hope to prove with this.

      But on the flip side, It brought into perspective, for me anyway, that video games are truly violent. Strange it took the massacre of civilians to drive that home for me.
      I have never had a problem with it b4 until now.

      I see a psychological thesis somewhere in this dilemma.

    • 2 years ago
  • conclusius
    • 0
      conclusius  
    • spoilers y'all

      oh please. this is almost as ridiculous as when England was upset about that church being bombed in Resistance. or the "sex" scenes in Mass Effect.

      it's obvious that the game does not glorify the violence. I played the sequence and it doesn't force you to shoot any civilians either. it is, however, a crucial plot point in the game, as the result is the invasion of the US by Russia (for those curious, your player character is already known to be undercover by the antagonist Makarov and is shot and left behind; thus, Russian authorities find your body and discover who you are). and would it help to say that, in the end, the primary antagonist is an American general?

      this is just stupid. just silly and stupid.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • conclusius
    • 0
      conclusius  
    • conclusius:

      the game doesn't give you points for killing people, it's not even mandated that you kill people to maintain your cover in-game. so no, in fact, the game DOES NOT glorify the murder of hundreds of civilians.

      God you're ignorant. do you even understand the context the scene is in or how you can react to it? if I showed you a video where a man shot another unarmed man, what would your first reaction be? that it was cruel, right? what if I told you after that the unarmed man was a terrorist that has been behind numerous bombings? your perspective changes.

      I have to wonder if anyone who thinks this is controversial even realizes that it is FICTIONAL. if this airport massacre was a real event, and the creators simulated it and put it into this game, HELL YEAH I'd be offended! but it's not real, it takes place in a different Russia, in a different international situation.

    • 2 years ago
  • fun_size
    • 0
      fun_size  
    • Yeah i remember seeing that scene in the game trailers thinking it was just a cutscene in the game. I was quite surprised when it turned out to be a legit mission in the game. However the game gives you the option to skip it altogether so i dont understand why it should be banned at all.

    • 2 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • LozRiva
    • 0
      LozRiva  
    • fun_size:

      exactly, you are warned i believe 4 times that you are passing the warning screens when there is the level pass option... they didn't put it for nothing turns out.

    • 2 years ago
more from Upstream:

top videos