Monsanto's genetically-modified corn causes organ failure in rats
source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/19/monsanto-gm-corn-causing_n_425195.html
-
-
- jeffissleeping
- added this
These three types -- Mon 863, insecticide-producing Mon 810, and Roundup® herbicide-absorbing NK 603 -- have been approved for consumption in the US and several countries in Europe.
The finding that corn produced by one of the world's agricultural giants could cause organ failure has been met with obvious concern by food activists and consumers alike.
"Effects were mostly concentrated in kidney and liver function, the two major diet detoxification organs, but in detail differed with each GM type. In addition, some effects on heart, adrenal, spleen and blood cells were also frequently noted. As there normally exists sex differences in liver and kidney metabolism, the highly statistically significant disturbances in the function of these organs, seen between male and female rats, cannot be dismissed as biologically insignificant as has been proposed by others. We therefore conclude that our data strongly suggests that these GM maize varieties induce a state of hepatorenal toxicity."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/19/monsanto-gm-corn-causing_n_425195.html
-
- groups:
- Community, Green, Current Tonight, Upstream, 6 more
-
- tags:
- News, Green, Monsanto, Agriculture, 1 more
-
-
pvelectric
-

-
Jack Lessinger Phd talks about economics but he is a prophetic voic who has so many solutions if people would only listen to him more:
- 1 year ago
-
pvelectric
-
-
SalvadoreSouza
-
what was wrong with the food the earth provided again?
- 2 years ago
-
SalvadoreSouza
-
-
SalvadoreSouza
-
but wait! GMO's are just as safe as regular food..right? That's why they don't have to label them as GM, right? WRONG!
don't fuck with mother nature & years of evolution.
this make me sick.. - 2 years ago
-
SalvadoreSouza
-
-
zephyrwind
-
this isn't the only horrifying products from Monsanto...they must be stopped before they contaminate us all!
- 2 years ago
-
zephyrwind
-
-
Tyr
-
here in California the streets are littered with the dead and decaying bodies of people who have eaten GM corn, only those of us who have taken to our underground shelters eating only macrobiotic foods have been able to survive the onslaught of the food sold in supermarkets.
I think this may be a long range plan of Monsanto to kill all it's customers thus destroying it's source of income as well as so contaminating the entire earth with Frankenstein vegetation that all of the future generations of their own families will die a horrific death
- 2 years ago
-
Tyr
-
-
pvelectric
-
Food is too much junk and not enough nutrition, so we've gotten some acreage and now grow almost all our own vegetables. What extra we grow gets ttraded with neighbors so usually we have more food than we can eat.
my blogspot has some pics of this and my idea that it'd be better "solar electrify everything." - 2 years ago
-
pvelectric
-
-
Maven_25
-
RE: "I'm not a rat and I love GM foods."
Well then Jimmy... you obviously don't care much about yourself or your body. You are probably someone who is overweight and a couch potato. So, a little organ failure in your future is apparently not that important to you. Good for you...
- 2 years ago
-
Maven_25
-
-
jimmysemens [removed]
-
Maven_25:
I'm 5' 8'' and weigh 70 kilos and I don't have a TV. My body maintains a good homeostatic response , probably due to all those wonderful GM tomatoes I love, not to mention the perfect unblemished sweetcorn etc.
- 2 years ago
-
jimmysemens [removed]
-
-
Maven_25
-
Maven_25:
lol... relax, I was just kiddin' But, seriously, no one really knows the long-term affects GMOs will have on us or the environment for that matter. And Monsanto has a long history of doing a lot of damage to people and the environment for the sake of an extra dollar.
- 2 years ago
-
Maven_25
-
-
jimmysemens [removed]
-
I'm not a rat and I love GM foods.
- 2 years ago
-
jimmysemens [removed]
-
-
Lucretia_Gross
-
Watch: Food Inc. or The Future of Food or even The Botany of Design. All three of these documentaries give tremendous insight to the food industry and what's on our plates. All can be accessed through Netflix's "watch it now". Spread the Word!! Save the Food!!
- 2 years ago
-
Lucretia_Gross
-
-
Michael_Chance
-
And now a former top executive/lawyer/lobbyist from Monsanto is going to be heading the FDA?!
http://current.com/items/91975486_wearegreen-tv-blog-archive-former-monsanto-exe...
- 2 years ago
-
Michael_Chance
-
-
Boom_King
-
It is so phenomenally frustrating to be a scientist in this society. All indications point toward this study being vastly overreaching at very best, and fraudulent at worst. Science is not evil. Innovation is not inherently bad for us. Over the last 100 years life expectancies have risen dramatically thanks to guess what? Science.
- 2 years ago
-
Boom_King
-
-
Trauzer
-
Boom_King:
Amen. Could not have put it better myself. I want to seem GMOs evolve and become amazing, because there is a lot of potential there. I want to see all science move forward and progress, but there always seems to be huge roadblocks in the way. Mainly: Politics.
- 2 years ago
-
Trauzer
-
-
savagesun
-
Boom_King:
You sound like you work for one of these companies. Conscious people do not need to wait until a study is proven to be false or true. Conscious people know that most of us are born with (almost) everything we need to be healthy. Wisdoms have been lost along the way, but this fact is not made up for by the creation of genetically modified foods. Science "will not" create a better nutritional source than that which nature has given to us. You can argue this point but regardless of your argument, we should have the right to decide for ourselves if we want to eat foods that are being controlled by, and distorted by companies who have a proven track record of not caring for the health of people. It is strange when companies that control our food source also have been in the business of creating toxins. I refuse to bow to science, its a ridiculous concept. Science would not have been born if not for the human ability to master its environment and evolve over hundreds of thousands of years. Looks like science owes its life to ...? Thats right, human intuition and human spirit.
- 2 years ago
-
savagesun
-
-
Boom_King
-
Boom_King:
For the record, my salary is paid by the NIH and I study cancer. Statements about what science will or will not do are somewhat careless, don't you think? As for labeling - I totally agree that you should have the right to know what's in your food.
Obviously science, as we understand it, is completely born from human intellect and imagination. I don't know a single scientist that would disagree about that.
The frustrating part of this is how people only read what they want to. The article points out that this study was not peer-reviewed and was funded by greenpeace. In the science world, publishing without peer review makes you only slightly more credible than publishing on your blog. Being afraid of new technologies until they are proven safe is prudent, but please don't use garbage research like this to bash scientists.
- 2 years ago
-
Boom_King
-
-
Maven_25
-
Boom_King:
I can respect where you're coming from...
- 2 years ago
-
Maven_25
-
-
Brick_Swine
-
hmmm.... so what you're saying is we got a killer corn on our hands....sounds like a sci-fi movie but couldn't be more serious.... now scientists stop creating things that kill people or animals and be more careful with your toys....things are getting out of hand....why do we need genetically altered corn anyway....i want to eat it not the other way around....unless they give the corn...frog like legs where it jumps in my mouth...that would be awesome...get to work on that...food that works for you
- 2 years ago
-
Brick_Swine
-
-
ohnoitskristin
-
Although I agree with the whole idea of locally-grown, organic food there are a lot of people who do not have access to anything like that. The city I currently live in is an agricultural hub of California (and even the US) and we only have 1 farmers market which consists of very little produce. Many of the organic and locally-grown foods also are very high priced these days and many people cannot afford them (including myself). There has to be a big change in farming industry itself before we can get better, cheaper quality food readily available to the every day consumers.
- 2 years ago
-
ohnoitskristin
-
-
stephenthomson
-
I've seen 10 different articles on this, and nothing on the TV news.
something is wrong with this picture.
- 2 years ago
-
stephenthomson
-
-
Lucretia_Gross
-
stephenthomson:
that's because the corporations (like Monsanto) own the news stations and affiliations. The journalists are often gagged.
- 2 years ago
-
Lucretia_Gross
-
-
jimmysemens [removed]
-
stephenthomson:
Puhleeeeze!
- 2 years ago
-
jimmysemens [removed]
-
-
Lucretia_Gross
-
stephenthomson:
is that a rebuttle?
- 2 years ago
-
Lucretia_Gross
-
-
Animal_Chin
-
Other example that humanity has no business trying to "Save the Earth" when we can not even save ourselves. Once humanity is saved, the Earth will be just fine (with or without us).
- 2 years ago
-
Animal_Chin
-
-
Retrograde_Photography
-
Hopefully findings like these will start to change things a bit. Large companies like Monsanto have been doing more harm than good for a long time. Maybe the people in Washington will start to reconsider where all the subsidy money is going.
- 2 years ago
-
Retrograde_Photography
-
-
savagesun
-
I've read the comments all of you have been posting and most of you have really intelligent things to say, backed up with some understanding of this issue. I really feel like we have an opportunity here, where like minded people can come together and try to do something real to combat this serious problem. It isn't enough to share opinion and information (although great), we need to take some action. I suggest that we find a forum we can all discuss this further. For starters, maybe we could create a group on another site (facebook?). Also, feel free to connect with me on Current. Any ideas? One last comment: We don't need independent testers or further data analysis. This is for real. This is happening. We are being slow killed and our government is not protecting us. Don't believe it? Its your right to keep eating poison. I on the other hand, care about what I put in my body, and I also care about protecting my family. Let's not forget that Monsanto has produced DDT and Agent Orange. Remember these chemicals? Check this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto.
- 2 years ago
-
savagesun
-
-
JanforGore
-
savagesun:
I have and will discuss this in detail on my group for Sustainable Agriculture:
http://current.com/groups/sustainable-agriculture
I'm also planning something for June that involves Washington DC, but don't really know at this time what that will encompass or what form it will take. I am actually waiting to see how the Supreme Court case goes. You can find out more about that in the group as well.
http://current.com/items/91811507_current-sustainable-agriculture-group-2010-act...
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
pvelectric
-
The gene modified seeds yield as yet uncertain results, and therefore should be tested by independent, really independent, of governmental and corporate interests.
It used to be easy to control products and behaviors by having governmental agencies, usually associated with presidential, or executive that is, authority behind it to insure the public good be served.
But big government, and big business with its "think tanks" and paid to study and propagandize front groups, have so much money, compared to the amout prospective truth finding and publishing might garner, decideing what entity might best tell the truth is always daunting.
An interim solution to promote public safety would simply be to make posting gene modified information upon labels the norm.
- 2 years ago
-
pvelectric
-
-
Progresshiv
-
Finally- a reliable rat poison!
- 2 years ago
-
Progresshiv
-
-
stolenapples
-
I'd like to remind to everybody everything that Vandana Shiva is accomplishing against Monsanto in India.
- 2 years ago
-
stolenapples
-
-
Chapisbored
-
if you type in 'monsanto corn' on cnn.com you dont get anything but advertisements for gm products.
its scary to think how long its going to be before we know all things wrong with the pesticides and gm foods.
- 2 years ago
-
Chapisbored
-
-
tommic
-
let the buyer beware
- 2 years ago
-
tommic
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://current.com/items/91947912_supreme-court-to-hear-first-genetically-engine...
Here it is for anyone interested.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
Wow, this even made the homepage. Not quite though... still waiting for the expose' by Vanguard. But hopefully the Supreme Court case coming up which I posted about yesterday which has fallen off the radar already will be the vindication I and others have waited for. And BTW, where are the posters who trashed me in other threads for my "bitching about GMOS?"
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
stephenthomson
-
JanforGore:
it is crucial that Vanguard do a piece on this. I've read 10 articles or more about the organ failure findings but i've seen nothing on the news. Vanguard has the opportunity to be the liason between internet info sharing and mass media news outlets.
- 2 years ago
-
stephenthomson
-
-
Joshua_Nyholm
-
I have told people about this for years and it seemed no one cared, but finally the word is getting out and solid verifiable statistics are available to the public!!! Basically the pesticide is genetically modified into the corn so that when an insect ingests it, it dies!!! What is this doing to people??? Corn also has a massive range of cross-pollenization and can cross pollinate with other varietals of corn, this means that a farmer can plant a crop of corn without the pesticide genetically engineered into it and the next year a quarter to half his crop could contain the pesticide, and the contaminated source of corn which contaminated his crop could easily be 15 or more miles away! Insane!!! I don't think there is an uncontaminated source of corn left in this country, and if possible the corn with the pesticide should be burned, every last sheaf!!! This is a serious issue about the ethicality of manipulating plant genetics and should be addressed immediately but wait isn't that what the FDA and the department of agriculture are for??? In the southern part of my state there are only 2 inspectors for the department of agriculture and our state legislature is trying to cut them out of the picture completely!!! That means absolutely no inspections!!! And the FDA is only concerned when someone dies and not the purity/cleanliness of the food we eat!!! And FYI everyone the majority of corn grown in this country is grown this way, including corn products such as high fructose corn syrup and ethanol.
- 2 years ago
-
Joshua_Nyholm
-
-
Maven_25
-
It's about time something was published about the effects of Monsanto's GMOs.
- 2 years ago
-
Maven_25
-
-
mcjk
-
What idiot would ever think that an "herbicide-absorbing" plant is okay to eat?
- 2 years ago
-
mcjk
-
-
Lucretia_Gross
-
mcjk:
the sad thing is that most people don't know they're eating it.
- 2 years ago
-
Lucretia_Gross
-
-
animaladvocate
-
a non-gmo shopping guide: http://www.nongmoshoppingguide.com/documentFiles/209.pdf
- 2 years ago
-
animaladvocate
-
-
mindcruzer
-
The whole GM food thing was stupid from the get go. Food that has been genetically modified or broken down to its component parts and rebuilt into something new, isn't food! It doesn't get any better than the food we evolved on, and the fact that people think we can make better [imitation] food astounds me. Monsanto says that they will feed the world with GM crops by producing higher yields of food (like they actually give a shit). Well Monsanto must have skipped ecology class because increasing food production, increases the size of your population. It's not going to feed the world, it's just going to create more people to feed! Interesting how that particular situation seems to work out pretty well for Monsanto. As usual, profits are the only thing that matter to them, not you.
- 2 years ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
Trauzer
-
mindcruzer:
If that is the case, how do we feed the thousands of people who are dying of hunger each day around the world due to crop issues? Their governments are having great difficulties undertaking this task alone.
- 2 years ago
-
Trauzer
-
-
mindcruzer
-
mindcruzer:
Let them die. Happens in natural populations, why shouldn't it happen to us? Increasing the amount of food in the world is only going to increase the amount of people, not feed the starving. There will always be starving people. Remember, we are subject to the laws of nature too, no matter how much you want to deny it.
And yes, I'm kind of a bastard.
- 2 years ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
Trauzer
-
mindcruzer:
I have to say I'm impressed. You have a view and you stood by it. You didn't dance around the issue to make yourself appear "better" to those who would not agree with you. I appreciate the honesty.
(No sarcasm was intended in this reply; I know that tends to get confused via written communication sometimes. Just to clarify!)
- 2 years ago
-
Trauzer
-
-
Pawper
-
mindcruzer:
There's already enough food/seeds to feed the world. The problem is we can't get it to them (or they don't have the means/space to grow it). It's an accessibility issue, not a supply issue.
- 2 years ago
-
Pawper
-
-
mindcruzer
-
mindcruzer:
Ok so then if we have enough food, why are their starving people? Access is no argument because we don't make food for people who can't get to it. If we are making the food, someone is consuming it, and it isn't the starving ones.
"Or they don't have the means/space to grow it"
Otherwise known as, not having enough food (and increasing food production).
But possibly you are talking about spreading the existing food supply? Having everyone eat a little less and then their is enough food for the poor people? That would be the equivalent of increasing food production, which will only lead to more starving people.
- 2 years ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
Trauzer
-
I'd like to try and inject a differing point of view on this issue, and it seems not many here have a dissenting view on GM foods.
In the article, the research is scrutinized for its shortcomings. This one report hardly substantiates claims about the safety of GMs, one way or another. The lab research itself was done on one species, and done only once. And, taken right from the source article:
"Leading nutrition professor Dr. Marion Nestle wrote on her blog about the study, "I found the paper extremely difficult to read, in part because it is written in exceptionally dense and opaque language, and in part because it presents the data in especially complicated tables and figures." Monsanto claims that the study employed "non-traditional statistical methods to reassess toxicology data from studies conducted with MON 863, MON 810 and NK603 corn varieties" and that the IJBS paper reaches "unsubstantiated conclusions." "
I will concede that having a study showing rats with crippling organ failure after eating a diet of GM corn is not good. Not good at all. It shows we need more research into Mansanto and their science in order to improve the quality of their product (IE: Make it not lethal, if such is the case). Also from the article:
"While some groups like Change.org, see this study as a rallying cry for regulatory action and boycott, others on both sides of the GMO issue think the study results itself are not clear and shouldn't be accepted wholeheartedly. The IJBS is not a peer-reviewed journal, and the work was not an independent analysis of the effects of the GM corn on rats. Rather, it was a full interpretation of all of the samples of rats in the 90-day study that Monsanto itself sponsored. After analyzing the data, the European researchers came to the conclusion:"
I am not wholly convinced by this particular research study. If anyone sees a follow-up or has past research articles on Mansanto's corn dealings, please feel free to direct me to them. Knowledge is power.
- 2 years ago
-
Trauzer
-
-
JanforGore
-
Trauzer:
Look at the Monsanto tag here.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
savagesun
-
It seems that Monsanto doesn't care if you die as long as they take your money. They are based in St. Louis and I have heard that they have a stranglehold on soy beans, which is allegedly running traditional farmers out of business.
- 2 years ago
-
savagesun
-
-
Sexirobot
-
at least they make brilliant pr tv spots.
- 2 years ago
-
Sexirobot
-
-
conmeds
-
when is enough enough? All I hear about Monsanto are these horrific reports about their products and unethical business dealings. This is just ridiculous!
- 2 years ago
-
conmeds
-
-
Confucius
-
conmeds:
why is it ridiculous to expect that the corn you consume does not cause organ failure
- 2 years ago
-
Confucius
-
-
Agent_Alpha
-
-
"Thats what you get when you genetically modify corn too much."
- 2 years ago
-
Agent_Alpha
-
-
Chapisbored
-
Agent_Alpha:
thank you.
- 2 years ago
-
Chapisbored
-
-
CalgarC
-
monsanto is starting to have a harder time hiding their shit... they won't survive this decade!
- 2 years ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
hunzedog
-
CalgarC:
or we wont
- 2 years ago
-
hunzedog
-
-
raylinmarie
-
CalgarC:
I think a lot is going to depend on what happens with the EU ever since France called them out for lying.
- 2 years ago
-
raylinmarie
-
-
ColossalView
-
CalgarC:
I agree.
- 2 years ago
-
ColossalView
-
-
JanforGore
-
I agree. Outrageous that the media in this country is covering it up even though some of us have been writing about this for years.
http://current.com/groups/sustainable-agriculture
http://current.com/items/91593639_new-gmo-labelling-website-provides-information...
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
derk
-
Sick. Sick. Sick. People better start paying attention to these agrioplolists (yes, I made that up) and re-think their eating habits.
Locally-grown, organic food is the answer.
- 2 years ago
-
derk
-
-
CalgarC
-
derk:
since the story hit current, i think people are slowly starting to step up and fight it :D
- 2 years ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
UndoInfluence
-
derk:
Locally grown organic food doesn't mean crap for most areas of population in the world. Recent case: where's haiti to grow all their food? You can't ignore the global problems in food production just cause YOU happen to live close to a non-overpopulated fertile region.
We need to seek out real answers to these problems and have much more accountability for the companies that control the basic nutrients of our lives.
- 2 years ago
-
UndoInfluence
-
-
keviar
-
derk:
you want to give power to the corporations?
The ideal solution is to have locally grown food for everybody. This empowers the people, so that ideally if we can we should give a rake and spade then mass produced gm food.
- 2 years ago
-
keviar
-
-
derk
-
derk:
(to UndoInfluence) I am not sure what you mean by global problems in food production. But locally grown food is an irrefutable argument to fight agriopoly. I am aware that certain regions are overpopulated and their land infertile. But the solutions to both of those are: 1. population control; and, 2. teaching sustainable farming practices.
Expecting Mosanto or any other agri-business to grow a conscience is as futile as it is irresponsible.
- 2 years ago
-
derk
