Upstream | June 06, 2010 | 12 comments

Marijuana: Study Finds Minimal Changes in Driving Performance After Smoking | Stop the Drug War (DRCNet)

Image
Monkey_Films
The head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, drug czar Gil Kerlikowske, is pushing a campaign targeting drugged driving and has singled out marijuana as a main problem. But if the latest research findings on stoned driving are any indication, the drug czar may want to shift his emphasis if he wants to (as he claims) let policy be driven by evidence.

http://stopthedrugwar.org/files/checkpoint.jpg
According to clinical trial data published in the March issue of the Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, subjects tested both before and after smoking marijuana exhibited virtually identical driving skills in a battery of driving simulator tests. Researchers in the double-blind, placebo-controlled trial tested 85 subjects -- 50 men and 35 women -- on simulated driving performance. The subjects had to respond to simulations of various events associated with vehicle crash risk, such as deciding whether to stop or go through a changing traffic light, avoiding a driver entering an intersection illegally, and responding to the presence of emergency vehicles. Subjects were tested sober and again a half hour after having smoked a single medium-potency (2.9% THC) joint or a placebo.

The investigators found that the subjects' performance before and after getting stoned was virtually identical. "No differences were found during the baseline driving segment (and the) collision avoidance scenarios," the authors reported. Nor were there any differences between the way men and women responded.

Researchers did note one difference. "Participants receiving active marijuana decreased their speed more so than those receiving placebo cigarettes during (the) distracted section of the drive," they wrote. The authors speculated that the subjects may have slowed down to compensate for perceived impairment. "[N]o other changes in driving performance were found," researchers concluded.

Past research on marijuana use and driving has yielded similar results as well, including a 2008 driving simulator clinical trial conducted in Israel and published in Accident, Analysis, and Prevention. That trial compared the performance of drivers after they had ingested either alcohol or marijuana. "Average speed was the most sensitive driving performance variable affected by both THC and alcohol but with an opposite effect," the investigators reported. "Smoking THC cigarettes caused drivers to drive slower in a dose-dependent manner, while alcohol caused drivers to drive significantly faster than in 'control' conditions."

Something to keep in mind when lawmakers in your state start pushing for zero-tolerance "per se" Driving Under the Influence of Drugs laws that want to label people impaired drivers because of the presence of a few metabolites left over from last week.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Random,   Current Tonight,   Upstream,   14 more
  2. tags:
    Marijuana Control Smoking Performance 5 more
  3.     
    |

12 comments // Marijuana: Study Finds Minimal Changes in Driving Performance After Smoking | Stop the Drug War (DRCNet)

  • nursediesel
    • +1
      nursediesel  
    • Before I read the article I was ready to dispute the headline with my personal experience.... now I see the article verifies my experience ....
      I love to drive, am very safe at it having been very safety minded and a head injury RN...this said: as a teen I have driven after a few 'tokes on a doobie' and found that I drive like a 'little old lady'...slow as hell....so I never did it again, ever. I felt driving below the speed limit, though very carefully, was still not careful enough to jeopardize others lives.

    • 1 year ago
  • streetwires
  • toyotabedzrock
  • streetwires
    • 0
      streetwires  
    • toyotabedzrock:

      One problem, The link is for a study that only links the accidents to marijuana by presence of THC in the blood.The presence of THC and THC metabolites remain in the body and can be detected in the blood for up to 30 days after use. Therefore it can be argued that the connection between accidents and marijuana use is not proven due to the fact that the effects of marijuana only last a matter of hours. There is no evidence that the people these statistics are based on were under the influence at the time of the accident.

    • 1 year ago
  • toyotabedzrock
    • 0
      toyotabedzrock  
    • How many times do i have to repeat this. Here is a quote from the study that stopthedrugwar references

      "This study enhances the current literature by identifying distracted driving and the integration of prior experience as particularly problematic under the influence of marijuana."

      You all seem to sit around all day posting misinformation online. And you don't bother to read what you use to support your stance!

    • 1 year ago
  • Monkey_Films
  • noxidereus
  • streetwires
    • -1
      streetwires  
    • The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety reports that speeding contributes to 33 percent of all traffic-related deaths in the U.S. The majority of car accidents are caused by irresponsible driving behavior. Statistics also show that 98 % of car accidents involve a single distracted driver. Drunk driving: It is estimated that every 30 minutes, a person dies in an alcohol-related crash
      Reckless drivers: Drivers who drive recklessly or unsafely cause accidents through their aggressive driving. this may come as a result of improper or excessive lane changing, speeding, or improper passing on the road
      Automobile defects: A car accident may occur because of a defect in a driver's car, Poorly maintained roads, Malfunctioning traffic signals, and Other highway defects

    • 1 year ago
  • hunzedog
  • acontradiction
  • Monkey_Films
  • noxidereus
    • 0
      noxidereus  
    • acontradiction:

      so of most/all the rear-ending accidents on SoCal freeways involved people high on weed? really? care to prove that? of course that is a rhetorical question because we both know that it isn't even currently possible to test if someone is currently high on weed, so in other words you and i (and everybody else) knows that you are totally full of...

      you can't just invent your own reality, acontradiction... nay, afantasy.

    • 1 year ago
more from Upstream:

top videos