Upstream | June 27, 2010 | 2 comments

The New Field of Neurodiversity: Why 'Disabilities' Are Essential to the Human Ecosystem | | AlterNet

Differences among brains are as enriching -- and essential -- as differences among plants and animals. Welcome to the new field of neurodiversity.
June 8, 2010 |


This is an edited excerpt from Neurodiversity: Discovering the Extraordinary Gifts of Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia, and Other Brain Differences, by Thomas Armstrong, published by Da Capo Lifelong, a member of the Perseus Books Group.© 2010



Imagine for a moment that our society has been transformed into a culture of flowers. Now let’s say for the sake of argument that the psychiatrists are the roses. Visualize a gigantic sunflower coming into the rose psychiatrist’s office. The psychiatrist pulls out his diagnostic tools and in a matter of a half an hour or so has come up with a diagnosis: “You suffer from hugism. It’s a treatable condition if caught early enough, but alas, there’s not too much we can do for you at this point in your development. We do, however, have some strategies that can help you learn to cope with your disorder.” The sunflower receives the suggestions and leaves the doctor’s consulting room with its brilliant yellow and brown head hanging low on its stem.

Next on the doctor’s schedule is a tiny bluet. The rose psychiatrist gives the bluet a few diagnostic tests and a full physical examination. Then it renders its judgment: “Sorry, bluet, but you have GD, or growing disability. We think it’s genetic. However, you needn’t worry. With appropriate treatment, you can learn to live a productive and successful life in a plot of well-drained sandy loam somewhere.”

The bluet leaves the doctor’s office feeling even smaller than when it came in. Finally, a calla lily enters the consulting room and the psychiatrist needs only five minutes to determine the problem: “You have PDD, or petal deficit disorder. This can be controlled, though not cured, with a specially designed formula. In fact, my local herbicide representative has left me with some free samples if you’d like to give them a try.”

These scenarios sound silly, but they serve as a metaphor for how our culture treats neurological differences in human beings these days. Instead of celebrating the natural diversity inherent in human brains, too often we medicalize and pathologize those differences by saying, “Johnny has autism. Susie has a learning disability. Pete suffers from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.”

Imagine if we did this with cultural distinctions (“People from Holland suffer from altitude deprivation syndrome”) or racial differences (“Eduardo has a pigmentation disorder because his skin isn’t white”). We’d be regarded as racists and nationalists. Yet, with respect to the human brain, this sort of thinking goes on all the time under the aegis of “objective” science.

The lessons we have learned about biodiversity and cultural and racial diversity need to be applied to the human brain. We need a new field of neurodiversity that regards human brains as the biological entities they are, and appreciates the vast natural differences that exist from one brain to another regarding sociability, learning, attention, mood and other important mental functions.

More at the link:
  1. groups:
    Community,   Random,   Current Tonight,   Earth and Science,   8 more
  2. tags:
    Science Genetics human Disability 6 more
  3. recommended by:
    Monkey_Films
  4.     
    |

2 comments // The New Field of Neurodiversity: Why 'Disabilities' Are Essential to the Human Ecosystem | | AlterNet

  • Almibry
    • 0
      Almibry  
    • Oh, those analogies/metphors are just too rich!
      I used to work with some Dutch people, and I think "altitude deprivation syndrome" is as good a term as any... At least while they were in the states... rofl *sigh* good times *wipes tear*
      This article is full of gems: “serial killers are differently assertive”, "wetware", "drapetomania", I gotta stop now or I'll start typing some very inappropriate things and this is too touchy a subject for that... wetware... HA!

      Moving on now, I'm relieved to see that even though the "disability culture" is gaining momentum, there are (seemingly) more and more people expressing doubt about the necessity of labeling people and treating them for things we know almost nothing about. And going about it in an intelligent manner, no less. I've been wondering the same thing for years: Why should we drug these people out of their minds just because we don't understand them? They still have contributions that they can make, we just have to spend some time to find out what, and we'll never know if we don't give them a chance. They may need more help in some areas, but I bet they could "pay their debts" in other ways. I'll spoon feed you everyday if you come up with a work of insurmountable genius every now and then... Sounds fair.
      Even if they can't come up with a "work of insurmountable genius" what harm is there in focusing on the good? You'll only be giving them a chance at life instead of having them doped up and marginalized, like "being born is a sin" (thanks Jewel).

    • 2 years ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • 0
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • Interesting! So frequently we seem to have a "norm" for people to follow, and those who don't are diagnosed and prescribed medication. The brain is far more complex than we know, and nature far more strange. Thanks for the post!

    • 2 years ago
Monkey_Films
more from Upstream:

top videos