Upstream | April 13, 2011 | 14 comments

Farm Animals Could Be Off Limits to Photographers/Videographers

Image
EthicalVegan
NPR Morning Edition...

Livestock Farms Could Be Off Limits To Photos


Click on Link to Listen to the Story by Kathleen Masterson


April 13, 2011

Animal rights activists have secretly filmed the inner workings of livestock farms, which has led to some bad press for the industry. Bills introduced in Florida and Iowa would make photographing animal operations without the owner's permission a felony. Supporters say that would help prevent activists from fraudulently being hired. Opponents argue the bills would prevent current employees from reporting abuse.


Transcript...

STEVE INSKEEP, host:

In Iowa and in Florida, big livestock operations are supporting bills that would forbid animal rights activists from going undercover to take photos and document conditions at big farms. Activists are asking what the industry has to hide. From Iowa Harvest Public Media's Kathleen Masterson reports.

KATHLEEN MASTERSON: If livestock industry groups get their way what happened at this farm would be considered a crime. Here in central Iowa amid an expanse of cornfields, Rose Acre Farms has six huge hen houses, each the length of a football field.

Last February, an undercover activist from the Human Society got a job here. He wanted to get inside and film the workings of the facility that houses about a million chickens. He stayed here only two weeks.

Then three months later, the Human Society held a news conference and splashed a video on the Web. It shows scenes filmed at Rose Acre Farms and another company's farm. The footage shows chickens living in cramped cages and some dead birds whose carcasses were left so long they'd been mummified.

Unidentified Woman: The crews just shoving them in the cages, sometimes they'll get their legs slammed in the door or their wings.

MASTERSON: The pending Iowa law would make filming this video without the owner's permission and the mere possession of it a criminal offense, punishable by up to five years in jail.

At Rose Acres, farm manager Andrew Kaldenberg says while the video did show some footage of their farm, the abuses didn't occur there. The media were invited out to their barn within hours of the video being released.

Mr. ANDREW KALDENBERG (Manager, Rose Acres): We welcome reporters, you know, what have we got to hide? If we're not treating our animals right, they ain't going to produce. They're not going to produce, we're out of business.

MASTERSON: So I asked him to show me around the hen houses.

Mr. KALDENBERG: In this house we are ten rows wide, five tier high. That means that we have five cages stacked on top of each other.

MASTERSON: Kaldenberg says the activists' motives are to promote an agenda which is vehemently against how the industry produces food, with thousands of birds living in row after row of small cages.

Rose Acre Farms and other large chicken, hog and cattle organizations say the pending Iowa legislation is being mischaracterized. They say it isn't about stopping whistleblowers from reporting abuse, but argue it's about keeping people who misrepresent their true purpose from getting hired.

Kevin Vinchattle is the executive director of the Iowa Egg Council.

Mr. KEVIN VINCHATTLE (Executive Director, Iowa Egg Council): People are trying to characterize the livestock folks as trying to hide things. We're not. We don't want any animal to be abused. And if it's truly a case where a person thinks that abuse is occurring, that needs to be reported immediately, not six weeks done the road or months later in a video released for PR efforts to raise money for an organization.

MASTERSON: But a whole section of the Iowa bill explicitly bans photography.

There's a similar bill under debate in Florida. Kansas and Montana already have laws that ban taking secret photos of an animal facility if the intent is to damage the owner. And other states across the country are also considering similar legislation.

Humane Society's Paul Shapiro says the bills are an attempt to shield America's food production system from public scrutiny. He says their exposes have been done legally and resulted in convictions for animal cruelty, as well as meat recalls over food safety problems. Without undercover videos, activists say their claims wouldn't be taken seriously.

In Iowa, State Senator Matt McCoy, a Democrat from Des Moines, said a bill like this would set a dangerous precedent. He argues the multibillion dollar livestock industry wants to operate with less oversight.

State Senator MATT MCCOY (Democrat, Iowa): They view animal welfare groups and individuals that take undercover video and release it to the public as a threat to their livelihood.

MASTERSON: Neither side in this fight appears willing to budge yet on a key sticking point, whether secretly photographing farm animals should be considering a criminal act.

For NPR News, I'm Kathleen Masterson in Ames, Iowa.

(Soundbite of music)
  1. groups:
    Community,   Green,   Culture,   Random,   17 more
  2. tags:
    Animal Rights Animal Protection animal cruelty veganism 43 more
  3.     
    |

14 comments // Farm Animals Could Be Off Limits to Photographers/Videographers

  • sammykatz
  • Wicks934
  • EthicalVegan
  • truckah
    • -3
      truckah  
    • as i'm eating a nice dinner of meatloaf and potatoes i have to wonder ... are people effin for real? critters are for eating.

    • 2 years ago
  • PressCore
    • +3
      PressCore  
    • I hope the day isn't far off when they invent some breakthrough
      discovery that makes conventional the protein sequencers
      you see on Star Trek Enterprise. I wouldn't mind in the least
      eating some vegetable protein that tastes like beef or pork or
      turkey or chicken. Saturated fat and LDL are very vicious,
      insidious killers of humans. Anticipating that day will come
      in my long, long lifetime is very calming. It lets me know that
      someday, animals won't be enslaved for food, or money or
      sport, or idle curiosity. Being mammals, pigs are very sentient
      beings and make good pets. Once humans overcome their
      vain conceit as the imaginary center of God's universal
      creations, we'll live in a much less violent world.

    • 2 years ago
  • littlwarrior
    • +4
      littlwarrior  
    • Sure because its so tragic for random farm animals to be filmed. Look if you are not doing anything wrong then you have nothing to hide so this law is only making it harder to show abuse of animals and easier to hide it. This seems like a great idea.

    • 2 years ago
  • moodyblue
    • +6
      moodyblue  
    • "yet on a key sticking point, whether secretly photographing farm animals should be considering a criminal act."

      I think abusing animals is a criminal act.. Photographing some one abusing animals.. not so much. I dont see how anyone with an IQ over 60 and an ounce of compassion can not see this for what it is. Abusers wanting to continue what they are doing without fear of consequence.

    • 2 years ago
  • EthicalVegan
  • madammarsh
    • +4
      madammarsh  
    • Factory farming of animals is an ongoing crime and the criminals are rich and powerful. Hours after a report is made, the farm has a friendly media tour where everything is neat and tidy, no mummified or injured chickens, nothing to see here. We love our animals and pet them every day. Uh huh. I say, if they are so welcoming of scrutiny, publicly invite media people to stop in any time for a little look-see and the media should take them up on it. With all the budget cuts, there will be even fewer FDA and other inspectors to see to it that our food supply is safe and free of needless cruelty. If you eat meat or eggs, you should at the very least look at this matter from a health standards viewpoint.

      If you read carefully, this is also a First Amendment issue, because if these laws pass, you can go to prison for up to five years for merely POSSESSING the type of film in question. It's obvious these people don't have even the most minimal concern for animals, and their interest (and that of the legislators working for them) in the Constitution is on the squishy side too.

      I hope there is a hell. If there is, I am certainly going there, but I accept it as long as these people go with me.

      Thanks, EthicalVegan!

    • 2 years ago
  • MAssappeal
    • +3
      MAssappeal  
    • madammarsh:

      good point this is about much more than the mere taking of photography, or concealing your reason for seeking a job the possession thing is what worries me. Also, it seems like they've made a real effort lately to prosecute intent on a number of issues not merely related to animal welfare and have consistently overstepped acting like their interpretation of a defendant's intent is a charge in itself. Ever since they passed the aeta the veil of impartiality of the law toward animal exploiters has gotten mighty thin methinks.

    • 2 years ago
  • MizPiz
    • +4
      MizPiz  
    • "Supporters say that would help prevent activists from fraudulently being hired."

      That's supposed to be a legitimate reason for this?

    • 2 years ago
  • zeropiate
  • gump
  • EthicalVegan
    • +6
      EthicalVegan  
    • I'd like to thank madammarsh for advising me of this morning's radio show.

      If there's nothing to hide (hah!), then why not allow photos and videos?

    • 2 years ago
more from Upstream:

top videos