Tea Party Heckler Calls Elizabeth Warren a "Socialist Whore"

She would have to be better than Obama, no doubt.

President Obama will serve a second term and he will kick the teaparty to the ground.

If he does it will be more than the tea partiers that will be forced to the ground.

I never got past the first page that you can use as rolling paper to make a really big spliff.

He is the Teaparty incarnate.

If you believe that that person is an "example" of the tea party, then you've sadly been misled and apparently believe you're not regulated or "taxed enough already.". . hmm?

This jerk is a perfect example of the tea-party and you seem to emulate him perfectly.

Yes, he was/is a jerk, and although I may agree with the sentiment, it is not emulation... and seriously dude, who the f**k are you to speak of who I am, as far as I'm concerned you're probably just another useful tool of the welfare entitlement sycophants.

I'm worth a fortune... so to buy and sell me 100 times over must put you well in the 1%...

The Republicans and the Tea Party have said and done many things I find shameful. The American people have moved along to the wrongs, for too long. No more just saying it and moving along. We need to recognize the actions, which deserve shame. Stop acting as though it doesn't matter. Crude, rude and offensive aren't virtues we should accept.

I agree with you that crude, rude and offensive aren't virtues we should accept... from any "group, cause or political affiliations"... and please don't be disingenuous and claim purity of thought, action or ethics as exclusive attributes of the liberal party, as there is much to much evidence to the contrary...

I'm not being disingenuous, I think people should be held accountable for their words and actions, regardless of party. Just accepting it because the other party does it, is wrong too.

Our leaders, lead by example and the guy who stood up and interrupted President Obama's State of the Union, calling out 'you lie', should have had consequences. Instead we just 'moved along', making people think that is acceptable. When their leaders do it with no consequences, what more can we expect?

True, I agree... and thank you for sharing your thoughts with diplomacy.

He does lie. Shouldn't there be consquences for that?

Nah, just like George W., we can't look at the past. I guess if we are going to hold people accountable for lying, we must look back at the most damaging lies of the Century. I think that would be leading us into a war using fixed facts and forged documents. Many people died when Bush lied. I guess if we moved along to that, we can move along to anything.

I didn't vote for him either.

I know that, I have read it in the past. No one should be afforded the luxury of a lie. Honesty should be more than an option. It's should be a requirement of all those who are elected to serve. They should all be held accountable.

My point was the outburst during the State of the Union. There are places to challenge lies. During the State of the Union, was not the place. That was a bad example of disrespect!

I would like to bring up Senator Kyle to make a point. Senator Kyle stated 'out loud' on record, a blatant lie about Planned Parenthood. Later when challenged with facts, his answer was 'It wasn't meant to be factual'. Why wasn't he held accountable? Isn't there anything in their 'Oath of Office' requiring honesty? If not, that's a change which should happen immediately! It should be against the Oath of Office to knowingly lie. We should be able to 'trust' what they say out loud. They should know there are consequences if they lie. Not meant to be factual, means he knew he was lying. He was lying with purpose.

Thankfully we have the freedom to foolishly call someone a fool, but quite often wind up exposing ourselves to be just that.

Are you at all cognizant of the pending collapse of Greece, Italy, Spain et al?
. . . in essence the whole of western Europe is caving under the collective debt of 'entitlements' that there is no way in hell is it any longer to possibly fund.
. . . yet you and undoubtedly the ideology you enshrine are hell bent on emulating what is quite inevitably failing. . . all built on the premise and promises of altruism. . . but in the end, what you'll eventually have is forced austerity.

The consequences of bad decisions will aways end in bad results.

Btw way, my "Masters" are common sense and reasoning, not demagoguery.

Yeah right.

A lot of words with zero substance. Borrowers re-negotiate loans all the time and ratings agencies are virtual subsidiaries of those whom they analyze.

Agreed, GrouchoMarxist. A complete and utter load of garbage.

Good lord man! Why not try some ducoset sodium?

Nice post. Perhaps you should share your opinion on Ron Paul. I'm kind of curious as to what his take would be on this whole debacle.

lol!!!

There are certain things that I find myself agreeing with him on but most of his political philosophy seems to be a bit too rigid and lacks any real humanity. He also seems aloof to the realities of self-governance and unable (or unwilling) to accede to any demonstrable proposition that a viable structure is essential to the common good. Those who created our 'living constitution' took a quantum leap in that their prescience recognized that both individual human rights and civil liberties also needed to be tempered by the recognition that the populace in any true civilized society must be responsible for each others welfare as well. I don't feel that Dr. Paul truly understands that.

good answer....+^d

Thank you.

Great, four more years of the second great depression, wonderful, can't wait.

Live with it.

He apologized. When was the last time any teabagger ever did that or even admit that they were wrong about anything?

Right on... once again you've nailed the liberals hypocrisy... and need we mention the foul vitriol spewed from the left about Sarah Palin?

Are you proud to be so shallow?

He aspires to it.

Have you noticed that there has suddenly appeared a gaggle of new (at least a half dozen or more) "hecklers" sniping away at any comment outside of the liberal progressive mantra... and these pathetic tools dare call anyone outside of their brainwashed circle-jerk sheeple?

I blame both sides, don't get me wrong. One is as bad as the other.

Here's the problem we face people. Huey made a good point here, I will take part of his comment and in the exact way, express the problem we thinking people on the Right have with those on the Left:
"Fucking idiot. I am growing tired of these ignorant, uninformed, easily led fools from the (insert: flea baggers, etc). They are a shining example of what is grossly wrong with this country."
*****
Now, with a divide like this, how the hell are we ever going to get our nation back together? The majority does not want a failed Marxist state with misery for all, so, somethings gotta be done. You won't get those who are paying all the bills agree to pay more, anymore than those on the dole would agree to give up a little, so I would think that compromise is in order, or we can just flush the whole nation down the toilet and to hell with our kids' and grandkids' futures. Is this really what y'all wish and dream for?!?

You comment history exposes you as a hypocrite and that is the best that can be said.

"Joe the Locksmith".

Ha, good one!

It's "HEAR", Einstein.

LOL! And as for "truth", that poster sure seems to be bereft of any understanding of the word. Typical baggertroll pest.

Yes fer shure! Hey, that's one of the best pix of the Marxist in Chief I've seen yet. Can I frame that?

Absolutely.

He forgot to go to make-up on this day before doing his daily teleprompter reading.

report the profile, don't respond as that is what they fear most - irrelevance.

What about the argula and the dijon?

You're entitled to you own opinions, not your own facts.

I think your Mom's calling you to dinner.

LMAO

Good point.

Heh. . . and try as you might, you'll not keep me in it. . . Bwahahahaa!

Relevant to what? . . an inane article about a distraught person calling a disingenuous self serving politician a socialist whore. . . yeah right, as if that isn't a common tactic frequented by progressives? . . just the pot calling the kettle black.

You're making a bigger fool of yourself than I thought possible.

Is it that much of a surprise, Mossad?

Don't you have a right wing talk show to listen too? Go away!

The mindless Leftists get all worked up into a lather when their spokes mouths are attacked. It was great that the guy did what the loons on the Left always resort to. It's time that we start fighting fire with fire. Take it to the streets!

And yet the idiot who's out of work will keep voting for the Republican pigs in office and because he listens to right wing fat heads on the radio he will continue to think it's the socialist that did it to him. Bice try! :)

kennymo, surely you know by now that I have no use for partisan flower-throwing. . . whereas each are agreeing and patting themselves on their backs how smart they are and how stuck on stupid the "other" side is. . . and not taking a look for even a moment at their own heinous warts.
It is not from those that I agree that gives me deeper understanding, but from those whom I do not. . . go figure, huh?

Go figure someplace else!

Ah shucks. . . am I upsetting a lefty love fest here?

Go take a hike and bring your congoboy sock with you clowny. And by the way:

"National Restaurant Association: '.. we are willing to waive the confidentiality of this matter and permit Mr. Bennett’s client to comment."

Buh BYE Herman!!!

http://current.com/community/93526447_buh-bye-herman-national-restaurant-associa...

heeeeheeeeheeee!!!

Hey Kenny! I know there's a lot of passion out there about the financial problems, if one is not pissed off, there is something wrong with them for sure! So, I've been doing some objective research to find out all the reasons for the melt down. Below is a clip from an article written by James F. Davis, published on 10/14/08, on AIM. Shoot the messenger if that's the reaction, but there's plenty of facts to back this up.
**********
"A huge portion of the increased mortgage loan defaults are what are referred to as ‘sub-prime’ loans. Most of the sub-prime loans have been made to borrowers with poor credit ratings, no down payment on the home financed, and/or no verification of income or assets (Alt-A’s). Close to 25% of sub-prime and Alt-A’s loans are in default.
These loans increased dramatically as a 9/30/99 New York Times article explained, “In a move that could help increase homeownership rates among minorities and low income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corp. is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.”
Why would banks make such risky loans? The answer is that the Clinton administration pressured the banks to help poor people become homeowners, a noble liberal idea. Also the Clinton Justice Department threatened banks with lawsuits and fines ($10,000 per application) for redlining (discrimination) if they did not make these loans. Also ACORN (Obama’s community service organization) was instrumental in providing borrowers and pressuring the banks to make these loans."
********

Right on! Kenny's one of the few on the Left who posts on Current that has some good points from time to time!

More garbage.

Nah, your just showing your ignorance! It's great entertainment for some, but quite boring to others!

How old are you, 6?

It's called Regulators and out of controlled Derivative speculation, Ms. Warren is helping to re-regulate the financial sector wherever she can. I know you hate regulations but blaming Clinton in 1999 for crap that was an out of control financial system for the entire Bush administration when they got rid of as many regulations and regulators as possible to keep the sham going is the real reason for the entire financial meltdown. Agree?

WTF, what space craft did you just get off of? Wow. Brilliant!

Hey, I'm not saying that dirtbags on Wall Street had no contributions, they all jumped on board the movement to move those mortagages around as nothing more than "junk bonds" that were insured by all of us. We've been the ones paying for this all along. Yeah, some of the deregulations that baby Bush put in place, given the problem that they all knew about for as long as the CRDA has been around (Carter signed it, Clinton expanded it), were certainly careless and nothing more than payback for donations. There should be at least one very large federal prison filled up with ceos, traders, politicians (ie Barney Frank and Chis Dodd).

There's a lot to the issue.

Answer his question. Your comments read like they come from a prepubescent.

kennymo, ignorance is not examining beyond the limits of self imposed certainty, steadfastly refusing self examination and the validity of oppositional points of view. . . therefore call us ingenuous if you will, but since there are those who refuse to accept the status quo, how then do you substantiate that they suffer from ignorance... because they disagree with your ideology?

Simply agreeing to the Right Wing politico's is enough for me to brand someone ignorant!

There is a lot to this issue, but Acorn? You are kidding right?

... and you are certain that socialism is faultless?... ah yes, simple unfettered ignorance rears its ugly head again.

Where is that written?

He has no answer to that question. He isn't old enough.

In his fevered brow.

Call me ignorant if you want. . . but I actually do "get the big picture." As so succinctly stated by Bonfire of the Absurdities:

“A system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.”

. . . yeah, I "get it," I advocate independence and self determination. . . rather than govt co-dependency (which is a convenient misnomer for 'socialism').

It is neither you or nor me that will decide what fate awaits the country, but we shall see! Possibly on some battlefield we will meet, the future is going to be very interesting for Capitalists and their supporters.

Very intellectual post. Perhaps you should take your own advise, QUIET. Maybe you can come back when you have something to say with those pretty and puffy lips.

You never fail to prove your ineptitude, clowny.