Africa Rising: Carbon credits save Sierra Leone's Gola Rainforest

-
-
- coolplanet
- added this
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/Africa-Monitor/2011/1209/Africa-Rising-Car...
Fifteen years ago, Sierra Leone’s Gola Rainforest was at the heart of this West African nation’s brutal, decade-long civil war. Five years ago, the forest was under threat from mining companies that were looking for diamonds and iron ore beneath the fertile soil.
But as of Saturday, the Gola Rainforest, which lies within one of the world’s most important biodiversity hotspots, is now a national park. And it could soon bring Sierra Leone, one of the world’s poorest countries, a new income stream from the sale of carbon credits.
“We wanted to make Gola a conservation area, not a production area,” says Kate Garnett, an assistant director in Sierra Leone’s Forestry Division.
The government’s Ministry of Mines issued two mining licenses inside the Gola Forest between 2005 and 2007, but Ms. Garnett says those licenses are not valid because they did not receive the Forestry Division’s approval.
“Whatever licenses that were given have been canceled,” she says.
Instead, the government hopes to generate some revenue from the forest by cashing in on the carbon that’s locked up inside all of those trees. They have calculated that, beginning in January 2013, the sale of carbon credits could generate about $1 million per year, which would be enough to cover the park’s annual operating costs.
Carbon financing “is a win-win for the environment and for economic development,” Sierra Leone’s president, Ernest Koroma, said on Saturday at the official opening of the national park in Lalehun, 15 miles from the Liberian border.
“By protecting our forest we can generate substantial income while retaining all of the natural benefits that a living, breathing forest provides,” he said.
Scientists estimate that nearly one fifth of global greenhouse gas emissions come from deforestation. Schemes selling carbon credits for “reduced” or “avoided” deforestation have cropped up around the world in recent years, although many of those projects have come under fire for shoddy accounting or lax enforcement.
But carbon financing in the Gola Rainforest will be “a gold standard project,” says Jonathan Barnard, the head of the tropical forests unit at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, a British conservation group that has long supported Sierra Leone’s conservation work in Gola.
“The government has set the bar very high here. They’re aiming for what are currently the best standards out there for these sorts of projects,” Mr. Barnard says.
Carbon dollars aside, the Gola Rainforest has plenty of value. The park’s 175,000 acres are home to some 500 species of butterfly, 300 species of bird, and 45 mammal species, including chimpanzees and the endangered pygmy hippo.
The Gola Rainforest is also Sierra Leone’s largest remaining tract of forest within the Upper Guinea Forest ecosystem, which Conservation International has deemed one of the world’s 34 biodiversity hotspots. Locally, the rainforest is an important source of water purification for the residents of the nearly 500 villages that lie near the park’s boundaries.
“The costs of losing what’s there are absolutely enormous,” Barnard says.
-
- groups:
- Community, Green, Upstream, Sustainable Agriculture, 2 more
-
- tags:
- Africa, Rainforests, Carbon Credits
-
-
Milieu
-
Hey, anything that keeps more forestland alive and growing and not being "a crop" is a good thing for all of us.
- 6 months ago
-
Milieu
-
-
coolplanet
-

-
the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations
- 6 months ago
-
coolplanet
-
-
coolplanet
-
Deforestation in Sierra Leone
- 6 months ago
-
coolplanet
-
-
JanforGore
-
What polluters abroad bought the credits to keep polluting?
- 6 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
TaGgInUrBlOcKuP [removed]
-
JanforGore:
Thats what I never understood. How is it helping by making others pay to pollute? They are still polluting!
- 6 months ago
-
TaGgInUrBlOcKuP [removed]
-
-
coolplanet
-
JanforGore:
Good question.
All I know is this is a good start. It's similar to cap and trade which greatly reduced acid rain in the U.S. during the 90s.
The way I see it preserving forests is the first priority not only for climate, but wildlife, topsoil and the watertable. - 6 months ago
-
coolplanet
-
-
coolplanet
-
TaGgInUrBlOcKuP:
Since forests remove carbon from the atmosphere (among many other important things) it is far better to have to protect forests to pollute than it is just to pollute.
The loss of rainforests is much worse than pollution. - 6 months ago
-
coolplanet
-
-
JanforGore
-
coolplanet:
It is if the ones buying the credits also decrease emissions within an adequate cap to even it out and don't then own the forest and in turn get to displace the indigenous people who live there. That's why I don't believe in carbon offsets and market mechanisms, but certainly agree the pollution needs to be taxed at the source. Allowing the people who live there to maintain their forests is also working because their livelihoods depend on it. A shame at this point that our moral courage is so weak that we need to pay people to do what should come naturally, and then not know if the right people are even being compensated.
I read a story not too long ago, I think it was in Mali, where carbon credits were sold to a forest there as well - to Coca Cola who then in turn was using it to take ownership of a certain percentage of the farmer's fruit crops to put in their fruit drinks. It's good and imperative now to see forests preserved, but I just don't like the corporate/market ownership angle of it. Of course it also comes to us. Rapacious consumption of wood and other products with palm oil etc. and also deforestation by corporations to use land to grow GM crops is a big part of the problem. Ecuador had a good idea regarding being compensated for the oil under their soil and in return they preserve the forests and the atmosphere. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/17/your-chance-save-ecuador-rainforest?... Rich nations aren't going it for it though even though it more than likely would have been used by us. Would be a good way to utilize the Green Fund partly through carbon taxes to fund it. We need a way to preserve forests whlle holding polluters truly accountable as well.
- 6 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
coolplanet
-
-
JanforGore:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6pHgBdBB4o
I completely agree. Big Money seems to poison everything it touches.
But there is a positive side as presented in this clip:Using Carbon Trading to Save Africa's Forests
- 6 months ago
-
coolplanet
-
-
KB723
-
Save the Rainforest!!!
- 6 months ago
-
KB723
-
-
coolplanet
-
KB723:
We sure needed some good news!
- 6 months ago
-
coolplanet
-
-
KB723
-
coolplanet:
That's for sure coolplanet, and sooner than later...
- 6 months ago
-
KB723
-
-
coolplanet
-
-
KB723:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8CibAuvZM4
If a tree falls in the forest does anybody hear?
- 6 months ago
-
coolplanet
-
-
KB723
-
coolplanet:
Sorry I missed this coolplanet, I musta been watching Dexter, thanks for the video... =)
- 6 months ago
-
KB723