Upstream | December 26, 2011 | 30 comments

U.S. Voting Rights

Image
KB723
When the Constitution was written, only white male property owners (about 10 to 16 percent of the nation's population) had the vote. Over the past two centuries, though, the term "government by the people" has become a reality. During the early 1800s, states gradually dropped property requirements for voting. Later, groups that had been excluded previously gained the right to vote. Other reforms made the process fairer and easier.

1790 Only white male adult property-owners have the right to vote.

1810 Last religious prerequisite for voting is eliminated.

1850 Property ownership and tax requirements eliminated by 1850. Almost all adult white males could vote.

1855 Connecticut adopts the nation's first literacy test for voting. Massachusetts follows suit in 1857. The tests were implemented to discriminate against Irish-Catholic immigrants.

1870 The 15th Amendment is passed. It gives former slaves the right to vote and protects the voting rights of adult male citizens of any race.

1889 Florida adopts a poll tax. Ten other southern states will implement poll taxes.

1890 Mississippi adopts a literacy test to keep African Americans from voting. Numerous other states—not just in the south—also establish literacy tests. However, the tests also exclude many whites from voting. To get around this, states add grandfather clauses that allow those who could vote before 1870, or their descendants, to vote regardless of literacy or tax qualifications.

1913 The 17th Amendment calls for members of the U.S. Senate to be elected directly by the people instead of State Legislatures.

1915 Oklahoma was the last state to append a grandfather clause to its literacy requirement (1910). In Guinn v. United States the Supreme Court rules that the clause is in conflict with the 15th Amendment, thereby outlawing literacy tests for federal elections.

1920 The 19th Amendment guarantees women's suffrage.

1924 Indian Citizenship Act grants all Native Americans the rights of citizenship, including the right to vote in federal elections.

1944 The Supreme Court outlaws "white primaries" in Smith v. Allwright (Texas). In Texas, and other states, primaries were conducted by private associations, which, by definion, could exclude whomever they chose. The Court declares the nomination process to be a public process bound by the terms of 15th Amendment.

1957 The first law to implement the 15th amendment, the Civil Rights Act, is passed. The Act set up the Civil Rights Commission—among its duties is to investigate voter discrimination.

1960 In Gomillion v. Lightfoot (Alabama) the Court outlaws "gerrymandering."

1961 The 23rd Amendment allows voters of the District of Columbia to participate in presidential elections.

1964 The 24th Amendment bans the poll tax as a requirement for voting in federal elections.

1965 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., mounts a voter registration drive in Selma, Alabama, to draw national attention to African-American voting rights.

1965 The Voting Rights Act protects the rights of minority voters and eliminates voting barriers such as the literacy test. The Act is expanded and renewed in 1970, 1975, and 1982.

1966 The Supreme Court, in Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, eliminates the poll tax as a qualification for voting in any election. A poll tax was still in use in Alabama, Mississippi, Texas, and Virginia.

1966 The Court upholds the Voting Rights Act in South Carolina v. Katzenbach.

1970 Literacy requirements are banned for five years by the 1970 renewal of the Voting Rights Act. At the time, eighteen states still have a literacy requirement in place. In Oregon v. Mitchell, the Court upholds the ban on literacy tests, which is made permanent in 1975. Judge Hugo Black, writing the court's opinion, cited the "long history of the discriminatory use of literacy tests to disenfranchise voters on account of their race" as the reason for their decision.

1971 The 26th amendment sets the minimum voting age at 18.

1972 In Dunn v. Blumstein, the Supreme Court declares that lengthy residence requirements for voting in state and local elections is unconstitutional and suggests that 30 days is an ample period.

1995 The Federal "Motor Voter Law" takes effect, making it easier to register to vote.

2003 Federal Voting Standards and Procedures Act requires states to streamline registration, voting, and other election procedures.


Read more: U.S. Voting Rights http://www.infoplease.com/timelines/voting.html#ixzz1herf5tmS

"So we have done much to encourage Voting, I will also take into account that the decision as seen above in 1972, is also going to be a reason so many Americans will Not be able to Vote, how can you Vote when you have no Residency???"
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Culture,   32 more
  2. tags:
    Barack Obama Republican GOP Democrats 6 more
  3.     
    |

30 comments // U.S. Voting Rights

  • Truthitswhatsfordinner
  • KB723
  • remanns
  • KB723
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
    • +2
      COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM  
    • While all this seems good on the surface, I see it as nutshell game. While they are making you think they are living up to their responsibilities on one hand, they are gerrymandering, rigging elections, consolidating electoral college vote perverting power, and plotting voter disenfranchisement on the other hand. Call it bait and switch or just more corporate right fraud on America, our voting power is all illusion. The American People have no "effective" vote!

    • 1 year ago
  • KB723
  • bailey78
    • +1
      bailey78  
    • KB723:

      Good luck with that write me often from what ever prison they put you in. Or re-education camp as they may call it. When we deside to make a run on them it ha all in or it will fail. we are not there yet. Egypt is a good watch to set yours by. That and Mexico. when they deside to close the boarder to all traffic both in or out that is a sign to bury your weapons and sit back

    • 1 year ago
  • KB723
  • Leen61
    • +5
      Leen61  
    • Here in WI we have Walker. The Reps have rammed through some of the most restrictive voter regulations in the country. We are going backwards. The party of all regulations are bad....except for the 99%.

    • 1 year ago
  • KB723
  • Leen61
    • +5
      Leen61  
    • KB723:

      There will be a lot of work to do once he his gone, because of the trail of shit he leaves behind that the Assembly and GOP-controlled State Senate has already passed and the majority of both houses will need to switch back to the Dems for a lot of this crap to be undone.

    • 1 year ago
  • KB723
  • Leen61
  • KB723
  • cherry5000
  • Leen61
    • +4
      Leen61  
    • cherry5000:

      Yes we did, cherry and I hope you had the same. We did hear about the court's ruling on the SC voter ID law. That was great news and I hope that it sets precedent across the country and helps overturn WI's terrible voter ID law. Here's hoping for better things in 2012!

    • 1 year ago
  • Paratus
    • -3
      Paratus  
    • Leen61:

      Heard on the news today that the unemployment rate in WI has dropped in the passed year and instead of the 150K or so jobs lost in the previous three years something like 16k jobs, in the private sector, have been created. Sounds like Walker is on to something. Also heard that names such as Mickey Mouse and Adolph Hitler appear on the recall petitions and one person said he had signed some 80 petitions. That's a lot of petitions but it would not surprise me that it were true. Ditto the Mouse, Hitler info. One thing is for sure. Walkers opposition will cheat, lie and engage in fraud to do what they want, after all, the end justifies the means in their minds. Funny, with the results in WI seeming to be headed in the right direction you would think that Walkers opposition would, at least, accord him the same courtesy that Obummer and his supporters bandy around as truth: he inherited a mess and it will take more than a year (two, three???) to fix it. Doesn't seem to work that way now does it?
      If the people of WI have any sense they will leave Walker in office. Seems that the state is generally headed in the right direction. Next thing you know the NLRB will be making more idiot decisions in the same vein that they made in the Carolinas regarding Boeing (If I ran Boeing I would have built the 380 there and told the NRLB to pound sand. Someone needs to stand up to the tyrants.)
      Anyhow, I don't have a dog in the fight. WI can replace Walker and possibly revert to the same disasterous policies that got Walker elected in the first place or they can let him stay. Their issue, their problem. I live in a right to work state. Would not have it any other way.

    • 1 year ago
  • joeredford
    • +1
      joeredford [removed]  
    • Paratus:

      Really, Paratus. I guess you listen to Walker propoganda instead of the facts. Wisconsin lost more jobs than any other state and that's a fact that can be checked with any news organization in the country. Except of course the fantasy news stations you righties create in your own heads.
      Reality meet Paratus. Paratus meet reality.

    • 1 year ago
  • nikonwilly
    • +3
      nikonwilly  
    • The corporate owned media's demand for instantaneous election results have destroyed all credibility! Electronic ,computerized voting machines are never going to be secure enough to offer honest results...I care not who's running the show...I'll never trust this form of casting a vote! Some things will never be adaptable to modern technology because of mans inherent vulnerability to greed.

    • 1 year ago
  • KB723
  • MotherForTruth
  • KB723
  • cantucwearebrothers
  • KB723
  • Itsbatman_Durr
    • 0
      Itsbatman_Durr  
    • government by the people is a joke, and government FOR the people is a tragedy. anyone who participates in this rigged game is still falling for the lies, and is sadly just a naive puppet. the only way to change this system of corporate rule is overthrow the current system. all the votes for ron paul, or any other tool of the system, will do nothing. its put up or shut up time, folks and if you arent part of the occupation you are part of the problem.

    • 1 year ago
  • KB723
    • +1
      KB723 [removed]  
    • U.S. Voting Rights

      1972 In Dunn v. Blumstein, the Supreme Court declares that lengthy residence requirements for voting in state and local elections is unconstitutional and suggests that 30 days is an ample period.

    • 1 year ago
  • KB723
  • Itsbatman_Durr
  • KB723
  • KB723
    • +1
      KB723 [removed]  
    • U.S. Voting Rights

      "So we have done much to encourage Voting, I will also take into account that the decision as seen above in 1972, is also going to be a reason so many Americans will Not be able to Vote, how can you Vote when you have no Residency???"

    • 1 year ago
more from Upstream:
from the community

top videos