Upstream | September 10, 2012 | 23 comments

Shell delivers death blow to the Arctic

Image
JanforGore
After a day of slower-than-expected preparations in the Chukchi Sea, Shell Alaska officially began drilling into the seafloor above its Burger prospect at 4:30 a.m. Sunday,

The action marks the first drilling offshore in the Alaska Arctic in two decades and is being closely watched by Alaskans and the oil industry -- and criticized by environmentalists.

A YouTube video posted by Shell shows the drill bit, labeled Shell Burger "A" and dated Sept. 8, creeping down from the ship's center into the gray sea as the operation got under way Saturday. The drilling machinery clanked and whirred.

By 6:30 a.m. Sunday, crews had drilled more than 300 feet into the ground for a narrow pilot hole that will eventually be about 1,400 feet deep, Shell spokesman Curtis Smith said. It's used to check for unexpected natural gas pockets, oil or obstructions before a wider hole is drilled.

The actual drilling was supposed to begin mid-day Saturday but Shell and its contractors took time to reposition the drilling apparatus and make other adjustments, Smith said. A tool attached to the drill bit will allow Shell to collect data on the formation, density, pressures and other key attributes.

"Everything just took a little bit longer than they thought. There was certainly no rush," Smith said. "There was a collective thought that they were going to double- and triple-check everything."

Greenpeace, which earlier this summer had a research ship near the prospect site, said Shell's drilling began "after a summer of near-disasters and costly delays."
Shell began to drill almost two months later than planned because a key safety vessel, the oil spill containment barge Arctic Challenger, wasn't finished. It remains at a shipyard in Bellingham, Wash. It is scheduled to leave the dock Sunday evening for two to three days of inspections at sea by the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement.

The Interior Department granted Shell a drilling permit that requires it to stop far short of oil-rich zones until the Challenger is in place. Shell also notified regulators it couldn't meet some limits on air pollution emissions specified in an Environmental Protection Agency permit. The EPA issued a one-year order allowing Shell to operate, and said overall emissions should fall under the already approved cap.

In July, Shell's Chukchi drilling rig, the Noble Discoverer, dragged anchor while at Dutch Harbor. It wasn't damaged, and the Coast Guard cleared the ship to head to the Arctic.
Shell won't be able to complete a single well in the Chukchi Sea this year unless the Interior Department grants its request for an extended season. It still is waiting to hear back. As it stands, Shell must stop drilling into oil-rich zones by Sept. 24.

"Whatever Shell is able to do in the narrow window between now and when the sea ice returns, it won't erase the clear evidence we've seen in the past two months that there's no such thing as safe drilling in the Arctic," Dan Howells of Greenpeace said in a written statement.

Read more here: http://www.adn.com/2012/09/09/2618404/shell-begins-drilling-in-chukchi.html#stor...=cpy

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/09/10/blogs/shell/shell-blog480.jpg
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Green,   Culture,   22 more
  2. tags:
    Environment Climate Change Oil Pollution 9 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

23 comments // Shell delivers death blow to the Arctic

  • artemis6
  • SFirman
  • dugdog47
    • -3
      dugdog47  
    • They should find a way of melting the ice up there to make drilling easier. Then they could get year round oil, like in the gulf.

    • 8 months ago
  • Incredulous
  • JanforGore
  • ankab
    • +2
      ankab  
    • dugdog47:

      Are you kidding us? Haven't you been following Jan's articles about the ice melt in the Artic at all. You don't mean the melt is just fine as long as Shell makes money from it?

    • 8 months ago
  • dugdog47
    • 0
      dugdog47  
    • ankab:

      Hello ankab. Yes, I read current on a daily basis, and was just being sarcastic. Sometimes people think I'm serious, however, not this time.
      This oil will not even be used in America. It will be sold on the global market to the highest bidder. We will still be importing all the oil we use from the middle east. We might even go to war with Iran to protect the petro $.
      Oil from the Arctic will be pure profit for the oil barons. Will it help prices here go down? Maybe, but I dought it. Heh, heh, maybe they'll figure out a way to pipe it into Texas! That would be awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! For them

    • 8 months ago
  • Gravity_Man
  • ankab
  • dugdog47
  • dugdog47
    • +1
      dugdog47  
    • Gravity_Man:

      Nah, I think we should give up on had. What I had in mind was kinda a tesla coil, but in reverse. Bear with me now.................the reverse tesla coil would then actually generate electricity! But thats not the best part.

      Once you get the reverse tesla coil working, you basically have an intimate power source. But the electricity is NOT what powers the car. The electricity is used only to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen. Thats the key,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, then all you have to do is figure out how to compress the hydrogen and make out work in a motor.

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • tverdell
    • 0
      tverdell  
    • The sad part is that we NEED to drill baby drill. But this only emphasizes the emergency of moving to alternative energy. Peak oil is upon us, extraction costs will continue to increase as we try to become more and more creative in getting oil out of the ground, tar, sand, rocks and the oceans. I am not even considering the environmental impact since that seems to be on the bottom of everybody's list.

      This alone should alert everyone that we are in trouble.

    • 8 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • artemis6
  • Gravity_Man
  • JanforGore
  • artemis6
  • Incredulous
    • +3
      Incredulous  
    • When you stop to take stock of all the products that are derivatives of oil, it is staggering. The dependency created to displace other safer, renewable alternatives has been so wide-spread, and so intentional, I sometimes wonder how the whole world could have so naively fallen in step behind this life consuming machine. Every aspect of our lives has been overtaken by oil-based products, and we wonder why we have floating garbage islands and cancer everywhere. What will it take to stop this death march? I don't know.

    • 8 months ago
  • tverdell
  • JanforGore
    • +3
      JanforGore  
    • Incredulous:

      "I sometimes wonder how the whole world could have so naively fallen in step behind this life consuming machine."

      Psych ops. Giving the illusion it is cheaper and bountiful to make people feel secure and make them think they will have more money using it when neither is true. Is there any place on this Earth we humans can't just leave the h*ll alone? Notice the silence about this as well...

    • 8 months ago
  • artemis6
  • JanforGore
    • +5
      JanforGore  
    • Too bad the DNC is over. They could have showed this death blow to the Arctic to show that some people have jobs! Had this happened while Bush was pResident the same people so obviously supporting the destruction of our Earth now as long as Obama's Interior Dept. gives the approval would be apoplectic. Again, we see partisan politics working to destroy any semblance of reason. Half the ice in the Arctic is now gone due to burning fossil fuels because the human species is addicted and refuses to admit it. So we will seek out any toe to prick in order to satisfy that addiction and sickness as a false choice regardless of the damage it does to the whole. And sHell even taped it all for you to watch.

    • 8 months ago
more from Upstream:

top videos