Vanguard | November 19, 2009 | 59 comments

Prison Contraband

MitchKoss

watch more vanguard

Contributor Janet Choi goes inside a California state prison to investigate contraband smuggled inside the cells, and how cellphones are the new security threat.
  1. groups:
    Community,   On Current TV,   cultural film,   Best of TV US,   7 more
  2. tags:
    cultural film US Only
  3. credits:
    MitchKoss Producer, Doyle Esche Editor, Mike Horn Editor, more
  4.     
    |
    Embed video:
    |

59 comments // Prison Contraband // Video

  • Joseph_Giles
  • jos_louis
    • +1
      jos_louis  
    • What about a cell phone jammer? It would disrupt all cell phone signal inside the prison fence. It seems like that would be the simplest solution to the problem. Even if they smuggled cell phones in they would be rendered useless.

    • 1 year ago
  • theBrutalKremlin
    • 0
      theBrutalKremlin  
    • Sorry, fail. This is the most irresponsible reporting I've seen on this subject. Did anyone do any research on this subject before running out to Avenal with a camera? There's nothing new here, and all this film does is create a cheap Hollywood stunt of a documentary around a very complex subject. The low points begin with the overkill on the subject of rectal smuggling, with guards standing holding sausage-style condoms filled with tobacco, andrepeated comments about 'lube' being tossed around. Then, later in the film, you focus, yet again on rectal searches 'Keister' and then stoop to a new low by asking 'how did you find that?' Please!

      I work with young prisoners, and to try to punch-up a docu-drama, where you've only managed to broach very serious subjects (gangs, survival in prison, etc.) is more damaging than informative. What could have happened here is a serious dicsussion on the deplorable conditions people are incarcerated under in prisons. You did mention the overcrowding, but stop short of engaging any real subject manner.

      Are you surprised that people locked away in these violent, desperate conditions would want food, a cigarette or to be able to talk to people on the outside? Sure they should serve time, but under what conditions? ANd Sure you give a minute or two to the man who admitted to being lonely...that's where the film should have begun - the rest is daytime TV underproduction, and does little to inform the public on anything you can't find on 'COPS'.

      I hope you've satisfied your curiosity on anal smuggling and salacious reportage of desperate individuals. Perhaps you can research, re-edit and try again.

    • 1 year ago
  • MaryAnn_Seaman_Phillippe
  • SupaDawg
  • staycurrent
    • 0
      staycurrent  
    • 1) Some of these people are in prison for double murder...just be thankful it wasn't your mother ,father, sister or brother on the other end of that barrel.

      2) Prisoners have a right to an attorney

      Step One: Daily K-9 sweeps throughout the facilities.

      Step Two: Monthly polygraph tests for ALL prison guards, regardless of seniority.

      As far as the wannabe geisha journalist, I would have to agree. This aint no tea party, tell her to stay home and assign this to someone who is more qualified.

    • 2 years ago
  • laserdog
    • 0
      laserdog  
    • Image
    • staycurrent:

      > This aint no tea party, tell her to stay home and assign this to someone who is more qualified.

      From http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0158828/bio

      "Janet Choi graduated from the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University."

      Or did you have some other sort of qualifications in mind?

      > As far as the wannabe geisha journalist, I would have to agree.

      Thanks for letting me know you're just plan racist.

    • 2 years ago
  • ImissLaura
  • laserdog
    • 0
      laserdog  
    • ImissLaura:

      > So, you are saying she deserves the Pulitzer for this?

      Slippery slope much?

      > Would you suggest that she is in the same league as Kaj Larson, and other Vanguard journalists?

      It is true, I prefer all the other vanguard journalists to her, although in fairness a few of their very first pieces where a little rough (although not Mariana's, she was solid from the get go).

      That said, my bar for who I let present interesting stories to me on the internet is pretty low.

      If you want to criticize, be constructive?

    • 2 years ago
  • ImissLaura
  • laserdog
    • +1
      laserdog  
    • ImissLaura:

      Fair enough, I actually agree with everything you said.

      You'll recall my reply was to "staycurrent" whose complaint was that she was a "geisha", which is an unnecessarily racially charged term and that she was "unqualified".

      So maybe this is my bad for parsing the difference between "unqualified" and "not actually very good at journalism yet".

      I agree with you, I think the piece is fine for standard current fair, but it certainly doesn't rise to the level that all the other Vanguard pieces do.

    • 2 years ago
  • crispyfritters
    • 0
      crispyfritters  
    • staycurrent:

      That would be great if polygraph tests weren't complete bullshit. It's easy to say "we gotta get tough with these prisons!!" but running a prison is a lot more difficult than it sounds -- especially since these prisons have three times more prisoners than they were originally designed to hold.

    • 2 years ago
  • spitron31
  • crispyfritters
  • spitron31
  • donkeyfly69
  • DopeyT25
    • 0
      DopeyT25  
    • i was recently released from the roughest medium security prison in the NY state correctional system. I know firsthand all of the problems surrounding the correctional system. That story was surprisingly one-sided, and totally against any rights Prisoners may hope to receive in the near future. If you want to do a story about prison, it should be about how prisoners' rights are bieng violated on an hourly basis, not on bullshit propaganda about fucking cellphones. Cellphones aren't used for "making hits" or 'drug drops" or "gang related activivty". People just want to be in contact with their loved ones without bieng charged with the rates which are forced up us by a singular company which has a monopoly on all of the phone calls from prisons. Why do you think prisoners want their own cell phones? If you want to do a REAL story about prisons, send somebody in with A LOT more knowledge, and a lot less stupidity.

    • 2 years ago
  • Sandor_Stegeman
    • 0
      Sandor_Stegeman  
    • Funny thing is that the policy they have actually makes it a more vicous circle..for instance .If you allow tabacco to be solded, there would be less debt = less violence ....wtf is up it with the cellphones ? pretty easy to jam ? trace ? ,please make it a bit more convincing and ask the right q's

    • 2 years ago
  • o0kitsune0o
    • +1
      o0kitsune0o  
    • Ms. Choi,
      I really wish that you took this experience more seriously and kept your personal opinions out of the episode. I felt really annoyed with your constant giggling, jokes, and amused reactions. I feel like you were being really disrespectful and rude. Inmates are still people too; they're just trying to do what they can with their current situation.

    • 2 years ago
  • Crista_Gabrunas
    • -1
      Crista_Gabrunas  
    • o0kitsune0o:

      Kitsune

      seeing as I live in a town full of state prisons and the children that attend school here go on lockdown because of excaped convicts that murder the "bosses" that work for the prison system to excape and feel no remorse what-so-ever about that - my comment previously still stands. If you felt that I was laughing in my previous statement you completely misunderstood. It's not a joke - and human beings or not - they chose to take away other peoples rights - either by stealing, murdering, assaulting, raping, or other various things - so why should the tax payers flip the bill for them to have rights? As for me keeping my opinions to my self - if people don't want other peoples opinions then they shouldn't post things on the world wide web to get them

    • 2 years ago
  • o0kitsune0o
    • +1
      o0kitsune0o  
    • Crista_Gabrunas:

      Crista,

      I feel that all prisons face the same issues with security and contraband. I also feel like all towns with state prisons nearby face the same problems as well; because of escaped criminals and such. Cell phones are also one of the biggest enablers in organizing escapes as well as sneaking in contraband. If you don't feel safe where you live then maybe you should think about moving?

      You're right in that criminals have done really bad things in order to land themselves in jail. So would you then suggest the death penalty to them? What are you trying to achieve?
      I personally feel they should still have basic rights. You even mentioned one of them being freedom to practice a religion.

      Also, my statement was directed towards the host of this episode; not towards you. I am not ridiculing your for your opinions and I have no idea where you got that notion from.

    • 2 years ago
  • Davidod
    • 0
      Davidod  
    • OK, enough about with prison wallets and keistering. Why is it that everyone except Choi has heard about the hiding of contraband up one's ass? Not much integrity shown from a wanna-be journalist.

      While some of the story was interesting, some elements weren't mentioned (e.g. I'm still wondering how they pay their cell phone bills, and why enablers "on the outs" aren't held accountable), the overly-long attention given to keistering could've easily been edited out (unless they just needed space-filler, that is: who did the editing?).

    • 2 years ago
  • o0kitsune0o
    • 0
      o0kitsune0o  
    • Davidod:

      David,

      -If they have a phone the bill is usually being paid by their friends on the outside.
      -Unless they have actual video/witnessed evidence that someone who is visiting the inmate is an enabler... they can't do anything.
      -I agree with you on how much attention was given to the cavity storage thing. But the fact is that it is how maybe 98% of all contraband gets into and around the prison. So what else are they going to talk about in this episode?

    • 2 years ago
  • Davidod
    • +1
      Davidod  
    • o0kitsune0o:

      Irony being, what are they going to do to the enablers, aside from throwing them in jail? It's not as if CA already has a problem with prison over-crowding, and is forced to consider early-release... Perhaps a stiff fine might deter enabling, and divert some of that extra $$$ to keep a bunkie out of the cell, as well as off the cell.

      Broader issue: CA correctional officers are known to be the best-paid in the Nation, with a strong union fighting to protect their benefits, etc. The taxpayers need to ask if this is how they want their CO's spending their time. I dare say cell signal/wireless interruption boxes could shut down the whole concept by creating dead areas (although the FTC might have a problem with interfering/blocking cell signals, although needs of the community SHOULD outweigh).

      Fact is, since staff are SUPPOSED to NOT have cell phones inside, it's not like blocking would interfere with legit (authorized) users, since there is NO authorized use.

      Maybe it's just me, but it seems like there's got to be a better method of addressing the 'no cell phone' ban in prison. Kinda nice if a true hard-hitting investigation raised these types of questions, rather than giggling over keistering.

    • 2 years ago
  • Crista_Gabrunas
    • -1
      Crista_Gabrunas  
    • Davidod:

      True enough - I agree - there are a lot of dirty bosses - but there are also a lot of clean ones - trouble being is finding the dirty ones.
      As for the cell phone "jammers" you would think that it would be a great idea - unfortunately the "upper" bosses (LT, Srg, Warrdens and others use them as communication to each other during escapes - and they are the fastest way to get everyone where they are needed. Although you would think that prisons ran for many many years without them so they should be able to do it again.

      And yes - the way things are smuggled into prisons is not only by visitors (family and friends) bosses get paid on the side to bring stuff in for the inmates. Which is absolutely INSANE!!! but true

      There are so many issues to touch on about prison systems that you would think that cell phones would be low on the totem poll but aren't. Letters have been snuck out before and that made the system read all outgoing mail. But it seems "Freedom of Religion" got the inmates to deal with the Chaplin to get letters out before - Chaplins take them for their word and send the letter out anyway without reading them - there are so many tricky things that inmates think up it's crazy - of course they have nothing but time on their hands to think of new ways to "beat the system"

    • 2 years ago
  • o0kitsune0o
    • 0
      o0kitsune0o  
    • Davidod:

      David,

      You're right that they do usually just fine the enabler and ban them from visiting.
      I also feel that cell phone signal blockers are a good idea... but I wonder if that would interfere with any of the equipment being used in prisons. But you're right that staff aren't supposed to use/have cell phones at all in the prison. Because cell phones in prisons are indeed a problem.

    • 2 years ago
  • o0kitsune0o
    • 0
      o0kitsune0o  
    • Crista_Gabrunas:

      Actually, Crista, the staff aren't supposed to be allowed to use/have cell phones on the prison premise. If the "upper bosses," or anyone else working there for that matter, need to contact each other quickly they use a walkie talkie short wave radio. Its way faster then having to dial a phone.

    • 2 years ago
  • DopeyT25
    • 0
      DopeyT25  
    • Crista_Gabrunas:

      You have real issues which you need to deal with. No everyone in the prison system is a "Bad Person". It does no good to "punish" human biengs for things which they may not have even done. Instead, the focus should be on rehabilitation(which the current standard is far from). Learn your facts before you post about things you don't really know about!

    • 2 years ago
  • Mike_Zombek
    • +1
      Mike_Zombek  
    • Janet Choi's surprise and glee about anal cavity contraband is just ridiculous. Did she do any research whatsoever before walking into a prison to do a serious hour long piece on prison contraband. Hiding things in your ass while in prison is pretty common knowledge, didn't she ever see Pulp Fiction? ("Five long years he wore this watch, up his ass.")

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kngBtoylIVM

      This is really vapid journalism, I really thought current was supposed to rise above the status quo of TV news reporting. This piece could easily be cut down to fifteen minutes and tossed on Dateline without anyone knowing that it was supposed to be a hard hitting expose.

      On a very personal side note, Ms. Choi's complete ignorance on what can fit in the human rectum certainly reveals a lot, at least to me about her personal life.

    • 2 years ago
  • Crista_Gabrunas
    • -1
      Crista_Gabrunas  
    • Although some feel that inmates deserve the "right" to have all the benefits of those of us that are free - I feel that they have TOO MANY benefits. And YES- they should suffer as much as possible, that way maybe when they are released they'll realize that you have to EARN little things in life instead of it just being handed to them for free.

    • 2 years ago
  • artemis6
  • brownboyrocks
    • +1
      brownboyrocks  
    • Some may remember Janet Choi from her season of the Real World (I think it was San Francisco). While we should all be aware of what is going on in the US Prison system, I think it is time that Current Vanguard take some cues from some of the comments here. Choi's constant laughing, giggling, and lighthearted tone throughout the piece detracts from whatever lukewarm point she is trying to make about cell phones in prisons. There are no real critical thoughts presented other than prisoners use any means necessary to access the outside world. The seriousness of these people's lives within the panopticon of a prison deserves more respect from the "Vanguard" of journalism.

    • 2 years ago
  • Chicanabeauty16
    • +1
      Chicanabeauty16  
    • I don't think Ms. Choi saw the seriousness of prison life, I think she was the wrong 'contributor' for this Vanguard piece. The laughs and giggles were definitetly unnecessary, as it's nothing to laugh about. Nice try Vanguard but next time, try someone more professional.

    • 2 years ago
  • Carlos_Martinez
    • +2
      Carlos_Martinez  
    • Dear Ms Janet Choi - I'm a loyal Current TV 'consumer'. But you should have taken this 'investigation' more seriously. I understand your enthusiasm and passion for journalism but keep the 'joy' and 'laughs' behind the camera. Leave the 'reality show style' to other channels. If you want, I can send you the number of laughs at different inmates situations. They deserve respect, your audience also deserve respect. This is a constructive criticism and I hope you can keep your good work intentions.

    • 2 years ago
  • PlanetDahmz
    • -1
      PlanetDahmz  
    • Carlos_Martinez:

      Well, I think the 'joys' and 'laughs' was just her personality coming off on screen. As for the 'reality' style you don't seem to appreciate, that's what makes Current's raw style of journalism stand out compared to most, as well as more engaging in my opinion.

      Anyways, I like the fact that Choi went as deep into the story as she did, and that the majority of her reporting was on the specific idea of "cell phones". I don't think I would have gotten this story anywhere else.

    • 2 years ago
  • melaniekaye
    • 0
      melaniekaye  
    • you know the issue is not whether the officers were professional or not, or whethere the inmates committed a crime. These things are all obvious. The issue is how the inmates are allowed to live. What's wrong with them having goodies like music, tv, food and excercise. Do you want them to just live in a sensory deprivation chamber?
      Or perhaps they should be tortured as well just so they can learn their lesson.
      Jesus christ vanguard, leave people alone and stop criminalizing everyone.
      i'm getting sick and tired of the big brother like approach of this show. it's no longer about bringing truth and knowledge to the world, but more like being the world's narc
      i'm sick of this show, especially after seeing this particular show.
      let the prisoners have their goodies. it's not like they're happy about being in jail.

    • 2 years ago
  • danthemango
    • 0
      danthemango  
    • Prison guards are usually shown as inept people on 'the simpsons' or 'my name is earl', it is refreshing to see how professional they are in real life.

    • 2 years ago
  • worldi
    • 0
      worldi  
    • While I understand the challenges of a one-camera location shoot in a high-pressure environment, the camera work in this piece really threw me off. I also thought this was not up to the Vanguard standards, and found it long-winded without much punch. Where are all of these cell phones coming from if not from visitors? The guards have got to be complicit in this whole contraband economy - why wasn't this explored? Felt more like a puff piece for the prison guards than a true investigative story at the vanguard of journalism.

    • 2 years ago
  • hardknockxpert
    • 0
      hardknockxpert  
    • Waterboywalter and Medz87 made the exact points I wanted to make. Interesting documentary, but all of the adolescent giggling by Ms. Choi was nothing short of annoying and unprofessional.

    • 2 years ago
  • Shutchin
  • medz87
    • 0
      medz87  
    • I agree on the fact that some of the shoots we're quite unprofessional due to the laughing, and it wasn't the best documentary that we have seen from the vanguard crew. Even so, personally I had never seen an episode focused on the cell phone contraband of the California prison system, so at least I learned something new.
      Good job, and I hope the next one will respect your standards of professional journalism.

    • 2 years ago
  • waterboywalter
    • 0
      waterboywalter  
    • Thank you Vanguard for pushing the limit on journalism. You are real life heroes.

      I like the idea she is investigating prisons. People need to be more aware of prison living conditions. Some may reconsider committing crime if they knew what prison had in store for them.

      My cousin was just sent back to prison. He has been property of the state for more than 25 years of his life. Its unfortunate, but that is life. Who knows what he does to survive in prison? His life is not something to laugh at.

      Janet Choi ... giggles to much. I found it very unprofessional. 'Keistering' is a way of prison life. We can consider it odd but she should not giggle or laugh about it. People different from us are not for our amusement.

      Janet and production team - Great Work and Thank You for the contribution. I hope to see you improve the next time you are on screen.

    • 2 years ago
  • lizziehoffman
  • pandaman2105
  • benson5
  • Wharf_Rat
    • 0
      Wharf_Rat  
    • It was a good story, but it was a lot like the MSNBC Prison Documentaries. Before watching the episode, I already knew about cell phones being the new contraband for inmates. So I think, if Vanguard wanted to do a great story on the prison system, it should have been done on prison reform, overpopulation or on how states are privatizing the prison system.
      Don't get me wrong I did enjoy the program. I just believe it was not up to your usual standards.

    • 2 years ago
  • Ed_Freeman
    • 0
      Ed_Freeman  
    • Nice job of reporting, but for god's sake, will somebody please teach the cameraman how to shoot without flopping the camera back and forth like a flag in the breeze? Looks real amateurish...

    • 2 years ago
  • JeremyTG77
  • Peter_Soloshchenko
    • 0
      Peter_Soloshchenko  
    • well it's kinda seems that those prisons in Cali isn't a bad place to be , from a Russian citizen perspective of view , I like vanguard even though they are not the source of pure truth just an opinion .

    • 2 years ago
  • Wharf_Rat
  • Danny_Stringer
  • melaniekaye
    • 0
      melaniekaye  
    • You now I'm sick and tired of Vanguard trying to stop people from living their lives. Especially in prison. She seems to have a problem with them eating snacks and watching tv. What would you suggest Ms Choi, That they have no privileges and suffer as much as possible?

    • 2 years ago
  • bishopbunch2002
  • melaniekaye
    • 0
      melaniekaye  
    • melaniekaye:

      well this particular show sucked ass. i miss Adam Yamaguchi and his show on the environment..like global warming, china's new economy and it's environmental impacts, the tree that's used for extasy and is destroying rain forests just so we can get our kicks....that's the kind of vanguard that I miss. Sorry but the new commentators just aren't cuttin it for me any more.

    • 2 years ago
  • Peter_Soloshchenko
    • 0
      Peter_Soloshchenko  
    • wow, those inmates definitly have everything they want for money and by far this was the funniest episode of Vanguard, even though it's wasn't ment to be a comedy.
      Thank's Vanguard team , great job .

    • 2 years ago

top videos