Vanguard | November 16, 2010 | 37 comments

Marijuana Wars, Part 1: Vanguard Trailer

Adam_Yamaguchi

watch more vanguard

In this two-part episode, Vanguard executive producer and correspondent Adam Yamaguchi embeds with a task force working to take down Mexican drug trafficking organizations operating in the U.S.

California has become one of the leading producers of marijuana in the world--most of it produced by Mexican drug trafficking organizations. And the proceeds from marijuana have become a cash cow for traffickers, generating greater profits than cocaine, methamphetamine and heroin combined.

"Marijuana Wars Part 1" premieres Monday, November 22 at 9/8c on Current TV.

"Vanguard," airing weekly on Current TV Mondays at 9/8c, is a no-limits documentary series whose award-winning correspondents put themselves in extraordinary situations to immerse viewers in global issues that have a large social significance. Unlike sound-bite driven reporting, the show's correspondents, Adam Yamaguchi, Kaj Larsen, Christof Putzel and Mariana van Zeller, serve as trusted guides who take viewers on in-depth real life adventures in pursuit of some of the world's most important stories.

For more, go to http://current.com/vanguard.
  1. groups:
    Make Marijuana Matter,   Current Video,   Vanguard,   Vanguard Weekly Special,   4 more
  2. tags:
    Marijuana Drugs California Mexico 8 more
  3. credits:
    Adam_Yamaguchi Correspondent, Adam_Yamaguchi Producer, dmfoster Producer, more
  4.     
    |
    Embed video:
    |

37 comments // Marijuana Wars, Part 1: Vanguard Trailer // Video

  • Billy_Alvarez
  • Billy_Alvarez
    • 0
      Billy_Alvarez  
    • I could not stop laughing at the ignorance and lies of the Police Officers. They sound more like Nazi Officers. They only enforce the law against none whites, they go after Hispanics and Blacks. WHITE POWER>>>>>

    • 11 days ago
  • ninetyseven
  • Calgarycmmc_Cmmc
  • KellyK70
    • 0
      KellyK70  
    • "They use DANNNNGEROUS chemicals on their crops" What, just like the factory farms do on our food, legally? "Umptynine million dollars can be made in the marijuana trade". There's the problem... the gov't wants their share of that. I love that they talk about how violent these farmers are and then brag about the 2 they shot and killed the night before. I don't know whether to laugh or be pissed off at all of the hypocrisy.

    • 6 months ago
  • tangocharlie
    • 0
      tangocharlie  
    • “Decriminalization” is like “don’t ask, don’t tell”, it is a way of avoiding the issue. It doesn’t solve the problem in any meaningful way. It is not a solution but a way for politicians to avoid making real decisions. The Vanguard productions “Marijuana Wars” offer inaccurate data and help to exacerbate the problem by glorifying the war on marijuana as if it were a noble cause. US policy on marijuana is not a policy based on facts. As with so many issues it began as a function of the sanctimonious, and it continues now as a function of profit. The “war on drugs” is now an industry making lots of people lots of money. Marijuana represents the biggest portion of that profit. For an easy education about what we are up against, see the documentary “The Union: The Business Behind Getting High”.

    • 10 months ago
  • ninetyseven
  • happythoughts
    • +1
      happythoughts  
    • We don't have to legalize it. Just decriminalize it. This war on drugs is a complete fail. Just because it would be decriminalized doesn't mean more people would smoke it. In countries where its decriminalized the amount of teens smoking it is the same as it is in the states if not less. Decriminalizing it would take it out of the hands of the bad guys which would cripple them since weed makes up so much of their income. Also I dont agree with what someone said about being high, comparing it to being drunk. Just because when some people are high they are completely blitzed doesn't mean everyone is. Some people function normally when high. In fact a lot do. Someone also was talking about a drink after work being different from smoking a joint after work because if you smoke a joint you're high. First of all smoking is like drinking.. 1-hit is like 1 beer. Its a gradual thing. They don't have to smoke a whole joint. They could only take a few hits. Secondly, so what if someone wants to get stoned at the end of their day anyways? If they have nothing else to do and they want to get stoned and go to sleep why can't they? Its healthier then someone having a few drinks every night after work.

      And if you couldn't tell yes, I do smoke weed. I'm a senior in high school and I'm graduating half a year early. I'm in summer school right now to get further ahead and I'm starting classes at a community college in the fall as well as starting my last semester of high school simultaneously. I smoke everyday and I've managed that. Marijuana is not the terrible drug people make it out to be. When used correctly its a wonderful thing. It also helps a lot of people medicinally. I think the fact that people can get a medical marijuana card and having a black president shows that the hippie generation didn't fail. They raised awarness and set everything in motion to change. Now we are starting to see this change. The only thing we've lost is some of the love. Its still there but there's a lot of hate and greed. But beyond that I say the hippie generations work was a success.

    • 10 months ago
  • ninetyseven
  • zychowski
    • 0
      zychowski  
    • Prohibition did not work on alcohol and will not work on drugs, legalize and tax. How many will die before the law changes and it will.

    • 1 year ago
  • VindowsXP
    • 0
      VindowsXP  
    • It makes me sick. Cigarettes kill people daily. How about grabbing some weapons and going after Phillip Morris? This is insane. Leave the corporate murderers alone and put these poor farmers who just want to make a few bucks to feed their kids in prison for ten years? WAKE UP PEOPLE.

    • 1 year ago
  • ninetyseven
    • 0
      ninetyseven  
    • Great show...both parts.
      I see old posts here...hmmm...guess i missed the original show
      in November ? but it is airing again in my part of the nation.

    • 1 year ago
  • OverMountainMan
    • +1
      OverMountainMan  
    • I had to grit my teeth watching this ??? Hit piece ! I equate this show as the reefer madness of the two thousands, There were so many lies thrown out for the public to ingest I almost lost what I had digested, One simple example was that growing marijuana hurts the wildlife to wit deer eat it and become sick, I can tell you beyond any shadow of doubt that deer will not eat marijuana , No more than they would eat poisionous mushrooms, They know what plants will hurt them and which won't, And while Marijuana won't hurt them it will give them a buzz and they know it thusly avoiding it !!

      Please Current, provable facts only in documentrys !!

    • 1 year ago
  • OjoGringo1
    • 0
      OjoGringo1  
    • This has always been the edge I've expected from the Vanguard program. Will this series be available online at some point? A lot of us are off cable, seem to recall that you guys used to offer all your documentaries streaming here...

      Thanks for the solid work, really enjoy the original journalism. There are few thought-provoking works in the weeds for the time being, even less on this particular subject. Look forward to seeing it.

    • 1 year ago
  • hunzedog
  • brinna
  • veeger
    • -5
      veeger  
    • brinna:

      I am guessing by your statement that there is no difference between alcohol drinking and marijuana smoking. I beg to differ. Let me explain.

      You must first ask yourself, "What is my intention?" Society accepted that drinking is a social intent. One can have a hard day at work and decide to drink a beverage that will assist in relaxation. Drinking can be controlled to avoid becoming "drunk". It is accepted as a recreational activity for adults who enjoy the beverage.

      Consequently, the primary objective of smoking a joint is to get stoned. After the first hit, you become high. The following hits do little in escalating the level of being high. The social consideration is that becoming high instantly can do nothing but cause chaos in society. The social dynamics are totally diametric, or opposite. Being high promotes laziness and impairs memory, promotes sleep and overeating.

      An example would be: going to the Dentist to have a tooth pulled. In the first case. Novocain is used. In the second case, a much more powerful drug is used. Under Novocain, the patient is numb in a specific area. The patient can drive themselves home without assistance. The second, both are drugs, has a deeper affect on the patient. The patient is not able to take themselves home due to the affect of the drug.

      Now, if you equate the two by comparing marijuana to "being drunk", you now have another situation completely.

      Alcohol has been proved to provide control to the mature adult and is easily detected by the police. There will always be those who lose control with anything and suffer the consequences.

      One more thing: Although the proceeds from the black market alcohol sales did find their ways to organized crime, almost all of the marujna sales are being used to support terrisom.

      So here is my point. What is more relative in todays world? The sales of alcohol sometimes supporting organized crime which was heavily monitored by the government, or sales of marijuana which is supporting the biggest danger the USA faces today? The answer is a no brainer.

      Any ex-hippie will tell you, if they are honest, that the movement of the 60's failed. The young people, who I was one, denied the existence of evil in the form of exploitation and corruption. The belief was, if everyone smoked, then peace and love would exist throughout the world, when in fact, the hippies were used and abused by those who exploited the ignorance for their personal gain.

      You will find ex-hippies existing is the world today, but only located very far away from the dangers I speak of. They remain in their own little world, completely isolated from many, if not all of the evils of human nature. If they truly believed in what they preached, they would be accepted in the toughest areas of America. But, deep inside they know better.

    • 1 year ago
  • brinna
    • +5
      brinna  
    • veeger:

      @veeger
      Since you took the time to respond reasonably to my comment, I will return the favor. I believe you are truly trying to grapple with the difficulties of prohibition, and what it really means for a society.

      From my perspective, there are a couple of assumptions in your statement that I would draw your attention to:

      Firstly, I believe you were reading a little more into my comment than I actually meant. Specifically, I was merely speaking to the fact that calling it a "War on Drugs" rather than a "Prohibition War", is a strategy intended to make people believe that the violence we are seeing is drug-related, instead of prohibition-related.

      Whatever you may believe about marijuana vs. alcohol, you must see that regardless of the substance being prohibited, prohibition itself, by making the trade in the substance illegitimate, forces those who are trading it to resort to violence to settle their disputes, since the normal, non-violent course of action (i.e. tackling the dispute through the court system) is denied to them.

      Secondly, you made an interesting statement, which I shall paraphrase slightly, that people drink alcohol to socialize and relax, and can do so without getting "drunk", whereas people who smoke do so only to get "high." Perhaps you have never smoked marijuana, so you are basing your position on what you believe a "high" to be.

      Speaking from my own experience, the so-called "high" from marijuana is rather on a "sliding-scale", much like alcohol, ranging from a simple sense of relaxation (like that first drink of wine during a meal), graduating to an enhancement of the senses: i.e. brighter colors, more intense experience of music, visual arts or dance. This is often accompanied by a sense of creative revelation or insight. Certainly, one can overdo it, and taken in excess quantities, it has a soporific effect, leading to sleep. Actually, medically, it is used that way to induce sleep when one is plagued by insomnia.

      In addition, there are different "qualities" of "high" experienced, depending on the particular strain of cannabis used. There is the so-called "body high" which is less of a change in mental perception, and can be likened to an intense relaxation. Again, medically, this is used for spastic conditions like those in occurring in people with MS. Muscle spasms, or chronic pain, or neuropathic conditions are ameliorated. This is why, for many people, it can allow people to resume activities, like cleaning and cooking, that they were unable to do prior to using cannabis. This "body high" usually occurs when one ingests an indica strain.

      The sativa strain provides more of a "mental high." It tends to lift the spirits, and can be useful in treating depression.

      One other factor is the balance of THC and CBD (two of the main cannabinoids in marijuana). A good balance of THC and CBD can result in a mildly euphoric experience (hence the laughter which often occurs in a social setting.)

      In strains with an over-abundance of THC (like the pure THC found in marinol), the effect tends to be more intense, and are not quite as pleasant, though some prefer it, because it can intensify the thought process, though many don't really like it.

      Clearly, some people simply should not use cannabis. Just like some people simply should not drink alcohol. That is only common sense.

      With regard to the "hippie" question: having been there, and done that, I would say, again from my perspective, that the movement succeeded. We raised the issues of sustainability, recycling, taking care of this planet we all live on, sharing resources, being honest in relationships, letting go of "being right." This is a movement which has entered the mainstream. You can see it all around you. And, it is a good thing.

      Finally, your comment about marijuana sales fueling terrorism speaks exactly to my point, that by driving commerce around marijuana underground, we have made something that would normally have the agricultural value of parsley into something that can make someone very wealthy with little effort. By taking away social oversight (because if something is prohibited it cannot be controlled), we not only lose the economic benefit that the society as a whole would have enjoyed, but we turn over all that benefit to cartels and the like.

      Of course, all I have said is open to debate, but I wanted to share a different perspective with you.

    • 1 year ago
  • hunzedog
  • hunzedog
  • hunzedog
    • +1
      hunzedog  
    • veeger:

      you said "Drinking can be controlled to avoid becoming "drunk". It is accepted as a recreational activity for adults who enjoy the beverage."

      i say "12,000 people die every year because they think they are in control of a car but they aint."

      where is your stats for people dying from cannabis..driving? OD?... period...

      none, never, case closed....

      booze kills what ? 80,000 ? 100,000 ? what about lost wages and spousal abuse

    • 1 year ago
  • veeger
    • +1
      veeger  
    • brinna:

      You make your point in an intelligent manor. There are so many shades of grey in place here that I often confuse myself. It seems that the experience of smoking varies dramatically from person to person, however, I did not see this during my youth. I smoked very often, but it was always, "instant high". After only one hit. Any more after that did relatively nothing.

      Even as a young man, I did not see how adults, or anyone in authority, could get anything done while being high. My experience was, in this order, get high, become paranoid, laugh, get dry mouth and red eyes, laugh more, figure out some sort of complex social issue, forget what I just figured out, eat a lot, then sleep.

      So, even though you make some interesting and thought provoking points, I am still fighting the urge to say; "go ahead and make it legal". Again, too many shades of grey.
      I do find it difficult poking holes in your position. I will just continue to give the subject more thought.

      Thanks for the interesting give and take.

    • 1 year ago
  • veeger
  • hunzedog
  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  
    • veeger:

      deaths from marijuana vs deaths from alcohol
      its really that simple

      actualy really negative impact on us as individuals and as a collective vs that of alcohol.

    • 1 year ago
  • Valence
    • +1
      Valence  
    • veeger:

      Why even bring up the Subject of Someone Performing some sort of action that is important, in a sense to the operation and maintaining of a "System", Nobody is saying " Hey, I'm gonna smoke and go to Work today" or"Hey,I'm gonna drink and go to Work Today," Nobody sensible at least.

      In my Opinion, it is more of People(Those that i know that smoke) are saying that " I can Legally Smoke a Pack of Newports or take 14 Advil and die, but i can't roll up a joint,in the privacy of my home without the Police trying to Lock me up."

      I can Understand a War On Safety, Stopping people from willfully harming themselves to reach some sense of Mental Altitude above that of which is Normal, but "If Alcohol, Tobacco and Prescription Drugs are legal, Why is Marijuana illegal?"

      Just some Info on me. 17 years old, High school Junior, Smoke Occasionally,Currently Stoned. I haven't seem the world yet but if at my age i can Understand the difference between Marijuana and Cocaine, it must mean our Government is ran by a bunch of Morons.

    • 1 year ago
  • GroMasters
  • veeger
    • -1
      veeger  
    • GroMasters:

      Supporting terrorism is nothing to brag about let alone profit from. If you don't agree, educate yourself. Take your business to Mexico and save the shipping charges.

    • 1 year ago
  • SpicyCatz
    • +1
      SpicyCatz  
    • A complicated matter, if you legalize or regulate weed, gov't will get lots of tax money, help our debt, help prison overcrowding, stop giving money to gangs, have cops focus on more important stuff, calm retired people, and open new business opportunities like bakeries, smoke shops bars etc.

      On the other side, were gonna see allot more coke and meth, people out for a profit will do what they do. Weed could lose its value from having too much out there, and a stoned nation would probably not function as effectively, but will do so happily.

      Legalizing it will solve allot of problems, but will open doors to new ones.

      So what is the correct answer?

    • 1 year ago
  • hunzedog
  • tangocharlie
  • callshadow
    • +1
      callshadow  
    • this makes me sick, really they spend all the tax payers money on this shit, here is an idea spend it on fixing real problems like rape and murders.

    • 1 year ago
  • veeger
    • -2
      veeger  
    • callshadow:

      The rapes and murders are a direct result of the illegal drug trade. California is a total mess without this problem. Things will only get worse. The illegal drug kindpins are using the desparate Mexican citizens to run their operations. If they fail, it would mean death not only to the workers, but also their families. We should spend as much as needed to put a serious dent in this business and to keep it under attack.

    • 1 year ago
  • hunzedog
  • hunzedog
    • +1
      hunzedog  
    • veeger:

      weve already spent billions trying..but cannabis is more popular than ever....
      maybe because its the best medicine on the planet and we dont believe people like you anymore...with your lies and propaganda...
      have you ever heard of science ? i have....
      cannabis cures
      hemp will save the planet...

    • 1 year ago
  • freecrack
  • Summer_Randolph

top videos