Five courts go the right way on voter suppression


It’s amazing. Nearly 50 years after the Civil Rights Act, we’re still struggling to ensure that everyone can vote. That’s why our number of the day is good news:

FIVE.

That’s how many court opinions about voting went the right way this week.

In Ohio, the court struck down a law that would have kept anyone besides military personnel from voting early in the three days before an election. A judge also said Ohio had to count improperly cast ballots if the mistake is caused by an election worker instead of the voter.

In Texas, the court said a strict photo I.D. law is unfair to poor and minority voters. The state also had a new, discriminatory redistricting plan halted.

And in a new state law in Florida, a federal judge barred provisions that restricted voter registration drives by third-party groups such as the League of Women Voters.

These are among many laws that have been appearing recently in several states. They don’t address any real voter-fraud issues, and they are transparent attempts to control and restrict the vote.

The courts that denied these laws helped protect not only the right to vote — but also the ability to vote.