Homosexual // Current

Rachel Maddow interviews Maine's Governor about No on One

I was in the room here while this was going on.

asherp
added this
17 days ago
|
1 comment

"Yes" Wins Question One in Maine with 53%

PORTLAND, Maine – Maine voters repealed a state law Tuesday that would have allowed... more

asherp
added this
17 days ago
|
0 comments

There's a law against homophobia, in the US

In Italy, the law against homophobia didn't passed, while in the US president Barack... more

bibabiba
added this
19 days ago
|
5 comments

Tegan And Sara Interview: Gay Rights, Public Service And The Music Industry

Identical twin Indie duo Tegan and Sara have been busy winning awards and producing... more

carolkras
added this
23 days ago
|
7 comments

Reid Baer rips Harry Reid for Prop 8 comments

Harry, you’re supposed to be a believer. A true Mormon would stand with his LDS... more

NewWarriorMan
added this
1 month ago
|
3 comments

The Damage of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

Sixteen years after passage of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law, there is reason to hope that the military is edging away from its destructive opposition to allowing gay men and lesbians to serve openly. At the very least, a prize-winning essay in a prominent military journal suggests that the issue is open to debate and even dissent.

The essay, which won this year’s Secretary of Defense essay contest and was reviewed in advance of publication by the office of Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was published in Joint Force Quarterly. It was written by an Air Force colonel who researched the impact of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” The law was enacted in 1993 after President Bill Clinton tried to lift an existing policy against homosexuals serving in the military and met strong resistance from military and Congressional leaders.

By cementing homophobic military policy into law, Congress made a bad situation worse. It reached a so-called compromise by which homosexuals could serve — but only if they did not acknowledge their orientation or act on it. If they did, they could be discharged. About 12,500 service members have been forced out, including many with distinguished records or invaluable language and intelligence skills.

The author of the essay, Col. Om Prakash, effectively demolishes the primary, wrongheaded rationale for the law: that unit cohesion would be harmed if homosexuals served openly. Several other countries, including Australia, Canada, Israel and Britain, have lifted bans on homosexuals serving openly with no adverse effects on military performance or readiness.

Colonel Prakash argues that the law has undermined unit cohesion, in part by compromising the integrity of homosexuals who have to dissemble and by posing a moral quandary for commanders — look the other way or risk discharging a valuable service member. He judged the policy a “costly failure” because of the lost manpower and the administrative costs of recruiting and separating homosexuals. He urged the Obama administration to examine how to repeal the ban.

We agree strongly with Colonel Prakash, and urge the Pentagon to press ahead with changes in its regulations to make implementing the “don’t ask” law more humane. Ultimately, Congress must repeal the 1993 statute. We are not confident that the Senate has enough enlightened members to overcome a filibuster. But if the military can show an open mind, surely lawmakers can summon the courage to end this sad chapter in history.Sixteen years after passage of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law, there is... more