George Bush // Current

Hidden History: Do you understand the symbols you're using?

~y2009m11d14-Hidden-History-Do-you-understand-the-symbols-youre-using

shawnehamilton
added this
6 days ago
|
0 comments

George Bush's new "Lieberry"

Who deserves to have their own public, Presidential Lieberry more than George?

laughingcrows
added this
7 days ago
|
6 comments

George Bush - Motivationalizing Speaker

A fast and funny spoof at George's expense.

laughingcrows
added this
9 days ago
|
9 comments

Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein: "I'm Doing God's Work."

Goldman's reputation is suddenly as toxic as the credit default swaps and other... more

atomiclegion
added this
13 days ago
|
5 comments

George W. Bush secretly visits Ft. Hood victims

The Bushes entered and departed the sprawling military facility in secret, having told... more

ibrake4rappers13
added this
13 days ago
|
122 comments

For a genuine presidential war on the press, see the one FDR waged in the 1930s.

How touchy can you get?

The White House fires a few pop-guns in the direction of Fox News Channel, and suddenly everybody from Louis Menand in The New Yorker to Michael Scherer in Time to Charles Krauthammer in the Washington Post is heralding the Obama administration's declaration of war on Rupert Murdoch's cable station.

The direct declaration came not from Barack Obama, but underlings Anita Dunn, who called Fox the communications arm of the GOP; David Axelrod, who said Fox isn't really a news station; and Rahm Emanuel, who invoked the president's views to say, "It's not a news organization so much as it has a perspective." The closest His Obamaness has come to criticizing Fox on the record was in June, when he complained of "one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration."

o get a genuine picture of what a war on the press looks like, you can't fan the pages of Nexis for grouchy things George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, or even Richard Nixon said about reporters, newspapers, and networks. You've got to go back to the 1930s, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt raged against the press like noisy clockwork.

Roosevelt's fury couldn't have been more displaced, in part because newspapers and reporters received him like a conquering hero after his 1932 election, reports Graham J. White in his 1979 book, FDR and the Press:

The initial victory of Franklin Roosevelt over the Washington press was swift and glorious. Demonstrating a virtuosity that amazed them, the new president took the Capital correspondents by storm, winning, from the outset, their affection and admiration; securing, over the crucial early stages of the New Deal, their allegiance and support.

Roosevelt especially disliked "interpretive reporting," which Time and Newsweek were popularizing, writes Betty Houchin Winfield in her 1990 book, FDR and the News Media. Roosevelt recoiled when a reporter asked him what interpretive angle the president would take if he were to write a piece about the Democratic Party's 1934 landslide victory. "I think it is a mistake for newspapers to go over into that field in the news stories," Roosevelt said. His prescription for what reporters should do for readers: "Give them the facts and nothing else." (One can almost see Dunn and Axelrod giving Fox the same advice.)

The president reserved his greatest disdain for press proprietors, whom he blamed for what he considered unfair and distorted coverage. "It is not the reporter" who is responsible for "colored news stories and the failure on the part of some papers to print the news," Roosevelt said in December 1935. "It goes back to the owner of the paper."For a genuine presidential war on the press, see the one FDR waged in the 1930s.... more