Surveillance // Current TV

The Continually Expanding Definition of Terrorism

The Continually Expanding Definition of Terrorism

Public Intelligence

Though the United States has been engaged in a Global War on Terror for more than a decade, the U.S. Government surprisingly does not have a standardized definition of terrorism that is agreed upon by all agencies. The State Department, Federal Bureau of Investigation and a number of other government agencies all utilize differing definitions of what constitutes an act of terrorism. This lack of agreement has allowed individual agencies to present different and, in some cases, far more inclusive definitions of terrorist acts enabling the use of expanded investigative procedures that might not be applicable in other agencies.

The FBI utilizes a definition of terrorism based upon the agency’s general functions under 28 CFR § 0.85. Under this regulation an act of terrorism is defined by “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” The USA PATRIOT Act expanded this definition to include domestic acts within the definition of terrorism. Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act modified the legal definition of terrorism (18 USC § 2331) to include a category of “domestic terrorism” that is defined by “acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State” intended to “intimidate or coerce a civilian population”, “influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion” or “affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping” that are conducted primarily within the jurisdiction of the U.S. At the time, this expansion of the definition of terrorism was decried by the ACLU as “broad enough to encompass the activities of several prominent activist campaigns and organizations.”

One of the defining features of terrorist acts has always been a component of violence. Even under the expanded definition of terrorism created by the USA PATRIOT Act, there must be an act that is “dangerous to human life” indicating some form of physical harm to others could arise from the action. However, the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which created the Department of Homeland Security, extended the definition of terrorism further by including any act that is “damaging to critical infrastructure or key resources.” Though this definition differs from the legal definition of international and domestic terrorism under 18 USC § 2331, the modified definition is currently used by DHS as the basis for their own activities and intelligence products that are disseminated to federal, state and local law enforcement. The modified definition of terrorism is presented in a revised Domestic Terrorism and Homegrown Violent Extremism Lexicon published last year by DHS:

Any activity that involves an act that is dangerous to human life or potentially destructive to critical infrastructure or key resources, and is a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any state or other subdivision of the United States and appears to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion, or to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.

Notice that the statement “potentially destructive to critical infrastructure or key resources” is part of a disjunction, indicating that the act need not be “dangerous to human life” for it to be considered an act of terrorism. This means that, according to DHS, a non-violent actor could be capable of committing an act of terrorism simply by engaging in “potentially destructive” behavior towards some part of the nation’s critical infrastructure. Due to the fact that large sections of domestic infrastructure, including everything from banks to bridges to milk processing plants, are now considered critical infrastructure, a wide range of “potentially destructive” actions could be investigated by DHS or any one of the dozens of fusion centers around the country as potential acts of terrorism. The DHS Domestic Terrorism Lexicon states that the definitions presented in the document are designed to “assist federal, state, and local government officials with the mission to detect, identify, and understand threats of terrorism against the United States by facilitating a common understanding of the terms and definitions that describe terrorist threats to the United States.”

A recent report from the Congressional Research Service states that this ambiguity in the definition of terrorism can create confusion “in the investigative process regarding exactly when criminal activity becomes domestic terrorism.” The report also notes that the government often uses the terms “extremist” and “terrorist” interchangeably creating further ambiguity as to what exactly constitutes an act of terrorism. A 2009 study from Syracuse University found that U.S. Federal District Courts, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division and federal prosecutors all rely on different criteria to determine whether or not specific cases involve terrorist acts. This lack of agreement has led to widespread failures to obtain prosecutions of suspects recommended for charges by investigative agencies. In fact, the study found that from 2004-2009 “assistant United States attorneys all over the country declined to bring any charges against two out of every three (67%) of the thousands of terrorism matters that the investigative agencies had recommended for criminal prosecution.” The Syracuse study ends with a warning about the ambiguity surrounding the definition of terrorism:

The strong evidence that various parts of the government do not share a common understanding about terrorism has important consequences for all Americans. Those most immediately affected are the thousands of people whom the investigative agencies each year incorrectly recommend for prosecution in federal court. But to the extent that the investigators systematically waste their time targeting the wrong suspects, the chances increase that they will fail to identify the real terrorists who right now may be seeking to plant bombs, spread poisons or otherwise harm a much larger number of innocent people.

To solve these problems the study offers a surprisingly straightforward solution: come up with “a clear and understandable definition of terrorism.”The Continually Expanding Definition of Terrorism Public Intelligence Though the... more

entropyincarnate
added this
3 days ago
|
0 comments

Doubts About Scouts, Part III: EXCLUSIVE -- Vatican Air Force Surveillance Photos Of Soviet-Style Girl Scout Encampments In Cuba and North Korea

Scandal grows

mfb1949
added this
10 days ago
|
0 comments

Pandora’s Box: Predator Drones over America

The privacy issue should be of paramount concern in this new front of law enforcement,... more

StewSteve
added this
14 days ago
|
0 comments

Who Voted For CISPA?

H.R. 3523: Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (On Passage of the Bill):... more

Radical_Centrist
added this
24 days ago
|
0 comments

Reality Check Half Hour Special on CISPA and other Internet Piracy Bills, Part 2

Ben Swann takes a look at SOPA, PIPA, CISPA, ACTA and even the so called Legal... more

Radical_Centrist
added this
24 days ago
|
0 comments

Reality Check CISPA 30 Minute Special, Part 1

Ben Swann takes a look at the issues with CISPA and where it stands in Part 1 of this... more

Radical_Centrist
added this
24 days ago
|
0 comments

CISPA: Explained In 2 Minutes (Or Less!)

CISPA is the new Internet spying bill going to a House vote in Congress later this... more

Radical_Centrist
added this
1 month ago
|
0 comments

UK Proposes Monitoring Every Email, Call, and Text Message

Law enforcement would have access to IP addresses, email addresses, when you send an... more

Paisano1
added this
1 month ago
|
10 comments

World Surveillance trade shows give Local Police an International Edge

"The technologies for sale at ISS World conferences are so sophisticated and... more

DeliaTheArtist
added this
1 month ago
|
1 comment

Tuaregs had completed a military push aimed at creating the state of Azawad and declared victory

BAMAKO – DESERT rebels have launched a revolutionary war in the Sahara. The... more

worrg
added this
1 month ago
|
0 comments

1984 Orwellian ALERT- HDTV Watching You Watch It !!!!!

Samsung UN65ES8000; group photo ©iStockphoto.com/Jennifer Byron

Samsung’s 2012 top-of-the-line plasmas and LED HDTVs offer new features never before available within a television including a built-in, internally wired HD camera, twin microphones, face tracking and speech recognition. While these features give you unprecedented control over an HDTV, the devices themselves, more similar than ever to a personal computer, may allow hackers or even Samsung to see and hear you and your family, and collect extremely personal data.

While Web cameras and Internet connectivity are not new to HDTVs, their complete integration is, and it’s the always connected camera and microphones, combined with the option of third-party apps (not to mention Samsung’s own software) gives us cause for concern regarding the privacy of TV buyers and their friends and families.

Samsung has not released a privacy policy clarifying what data it is collecting and sharing with regard to the new TV sets. And while there is no current evidence of any particular security hole or untoward behavior by Samsung’s app partners, Samsung has only stated that it “assumes no responsibility, and shall not be liable” in the event that a product or service is not “appropriate.”

Samsung demoed these features to the press earlier this month. The camera and microphones are built into the top if the screen bezel in the 2012 8000-series plasmas and are permanently attached to the top of the 7500- and 8000ES-series LED TVs.

A Samsung representative showed how, once set up and connected to the Internet, these models will automatically talk to the Samsung cloud and enable viewers to use new and exciting apps.

These Samsung TVs locate and make note of registered viewers via sophisticated face recognition software. This means if you tell the TV whose faces belong to which users in your family, it personalizes the experience to each recognized family member. If you have friends over, it could log these faces as well.Samsung UN65ES8000; group photo ©iStockphoto.com/Jennifer Byron... more

figgdimension
added this
2 months ago
|
36 comments

Supreme Court Decision on GPS Surveillance Ripples

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision has been lauded as a landmark ruling and the... more

Paisano1
added this
2 months ago
|
5 comments

The NSA Is Building the Country’s Biggest Spy Center (Watch What You Say)

The spring air in the small, sand-dusted town has a soft haze to it, and clumps of... more

joeeddy
added this
2 months ago
|
2 comments

Digital Posse Comitatus: Generals Obfuscate and Inveigle Congress

9/11 opened the floodgates to the world of warrantless wiretaps and surveillance... more

Paisano1
added this
2 months ago
|
2 comments

The CIA Wants To Spy On You Through Your TV

Devices connected to internet leak information CIA director says these gadgets... more

rodstradamus
added this
2 months ago
|
9 comments

The Police State: The Militarization of America

Since 2001, the Department of Homeland Security has spent $635.9 billion. In 2001,... more

StewSteve
added this
3 months ago
|
1 comment

A Declaration of the Independence of CyberSpace

Governments of the Industrial World, you weary giants of flesh and steel, we come from... more

R3zn8D
added this
3 months ago
|
0 comments

Wall Street’s Secret Spy Center, Run for the 1% by NYPD

by PAM MARTENS On September 25, 2011, just eight days after the Occupy Wall Street... more

Fishinflick
added this
3 months ago
|
0 comments

Get The Grand Prize!

A shiny new dime for the person who invents a machine to shoot down unmanned drones!

Progresshiv
added this
3 months ago
|
17 comments

The Radiation Database - Nuclear Plants, HAARP devices, and Lasers OH MY! Google Earth

The Radiation Database is an attempt to document the world’s most powerful RF... more

R3zn8D
added this
4 months ago
|
0 comments

select your country

Community Spotlight

TAGS

tagged w/ Surveillance

top videos

find current on tv

find current online

recent comments

© 2012 Current TV, LLC All Rights Reserved

the basics

follow us online

tools

stay in touch

© 2012 Current TV, LLC
All Rights Reserved