Anarchy // Current TV

12 Reasons Why SOPA is Worse Than You Think

In yet another attempt to ‘ensure our liberties’, congress is currently... more

shanklinmike
added this
22 days ago
|
45 comments

The Antiwar Comic: In Response to Frank Miller

Tony D responds to Frank Miller's rant.

TonyDiGerolamo
added this
3 months ago
|
0 comments

Revealed – The Capitalist Network That Runs the World (New Scientist)

AS PROTESTS against financial power sweep the world this week, science may have... more

dryeraser
added this
3 months ago
|
2 comments

The Plight of Mariestown

When people cannot for some reason govern themselves – they turn to a small... more

shanklinmike
added this
3 months ago
|
51 comments

Objections To The Freedom Movement - A Voluntaryist's Response

Anarchist Artist Victor Pross takes on a few common objections to the idea of a... more

shanklinmike
added this
3 months ago
|
17 comments

Anarchy Is Choice

Anarchy is simply free choice.... more

Polochick09
added this
3 months ago
|
12 comments

;feature=youtube_gdata&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

As Parliament prepared for a crucial vote on additional austerity measures — including the most drastic cuts and reforms so far — renewed violence broke out on the streets of Athens. Without the vote, the Papandreou government would not have received the next installment of its EU/IMF bailout package and would have gone bankrupt next month.

In anticipation of the vote, a 48-hour strike brought the country to a complete standstill, while the single largest demonstration since the fall of the military junta sent hundreds of thousands of people into Syntagma Square and surrounding streets. For the first time, the communist party and union, KKE and PAME, joined the protests by blocking off Parliament so MPs would not be able to enter for the vote.

Carrying red flag sticks and wearing helmets, the unionists formed a human chain around Parliament. In the process, however, they ended up defending the state from the angry mob outside. Rather than turning their anger at the politicians, they protected them. Riot police were therefore happy to sit back and let the two sides fight each other. Dozens of people were injured in the clashes. One older man suffered a heart attack after being hit with a stone in the head. He died in hospital.

According to some rumors, police actually infiltrated the protests — either on the communist side or on the anarchist side, depending on whom you ask — to instigate the Leftist infighting. The truth, however, is that the Stalinist Left and the anti-authoritarian Left in Greece have a long history of antagonism. While this mutual distrust is understandable, the division itself remains a highly regrettable impediment to the creation of a united revolutionary front. Now, more than ever, we need to become and stay united.

Towards the end of the second video below, Stalinist union members can clearly be seen talking to police and telling them to attack anarchist protesters. There was a nauseating degree of collaboration between communists and police — a collaborative attempt to defend the last vestiges of the Greek state — that protesters were right to be angry about. But hurling stones and petrol bombs at fellow protesters? Following the death of three people in a bank arson last year and now the death of a communist union member, the time has come for the anarchists to revisit the use of escalating violence as a protest strategy.

http://roarmag.org/2011/10/anarchists-communists-strike-riots-violence-greece/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+roarmag+%28Reflections+on+a+Revolution%29;feature=youtube_gdata&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter As... more

sffsmessiah
added this
4 months ago
|
0 comments

Taxation Isn't Just Theft, It Is Also Armed Robbery and Kidnapping

Taxation isn't just theft, it is armed robbery and kidnapping. It is terrorism on... more

Polochick09
added this
4 months ago
|
103 comments

Occupy Wall Street: An Anti-State/Freedom Perspective

The hyphenated anarchists can be a combative bunch. I’ve done my share of... more

shanklinmike
added this
4 months ago
|
80 comments

99% The movie

This is made for the people! Please share... the music was composed by my son years... more

conijohn
added this
4 months ago
|
0 comments

Oil, Gas, and Government

After breaking $4 a gallon for a short time in may, the steady decline in gas prices... more

shanklinmike
added this
4 months ago
|
0 comments

Oathbreaker!

“I, David P Shirk, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the... more

shanklinmike
added this
4 months ago
|
64 comments

10 Years In The Middle East Is Far Too Long – AntiWar

October 7th 2011 will mark the 10 year anniversary of the war in the Middle East.... more

shanklinmike
added this
5 months ago
|
26 comments

Ribelle Civile: Governo? No, grazie ... Belgio docet

Parliamo del Belgio: Quattrocentocinquantadue … tanti sono i giorni di assenza... more

aldo1966
added this
5 months ago
|
0 comments

The Failed Policy Called Government

Methodology – a set or system of methods, principles, and rules for regulating a... more

shanklinmike
added this
5 months ago
|
46 comments

Audit: USPS spent $4M on 'nothing'

The U.S. Postal Service, which expects to lose $7 billion this year, spent $4.3... more

shanklinmike
added this
5 months ago
|
104 comments

Mark Schmidter & Julian Heiklen Arrested For Using Freedom Of Speech

Julian Heicklen was arrested and sentenced to 145 days behind bars. His offense?... more

shanklinmike
added this
5 months ago
|
48 comments

Economic Suicide: Why Easy Money Ends Up Being Worthless Money

Whoever would have thought in the 1980’s that a free market capitalist and a KGB agent would have arrived at the same conclusion being from opposite views and backgrounds? When I was pinging emails back and forth with Igor Panarin, I was attempting to find out more details on how he predicted the collapse of the U.S. Empire in 2012 – a stance he took as a KGB agent in the 80’s. What I found most interesting was that his claim was based largely on our economic policy combined with our foreign policy.

He mentioned that it was during the 80’s that the loss of economic power in Russia was realized due to the centralized monetary policy, and foreign policy of Russia. While Panarin is definitely no fan of free market capitalism (a fact he makes plain in his writings and speeches), he at the very least made it clear that a nation that employs a centralized monetary policy in the hands of private banks, will always carry negative impact to the host nation. And for the record, the free market capitalist was a much younger Ron Paul (and yes, they laughed at him then to).

One primary reason for this is that the banks that control the economic policies of the host nation have no real loyalty to that nation – their one goal will only be to bleed it dry before moving onto the next up and coming nation.

It always starts the same way. The banking board will assume control of the nation’s money policy claiming that they will both provide stability to its currency, and maintain a stable market atmosphere. Typically the nation that allows this has a good supply of gold. The banking board (in our case the Federal Reserve), will start out by basing the value of the nation’s currency off of the supply of gold it has (being that gold is the most highly valued of all common commodities). This is the beginning of what is known as a specie backed currency.

Over the following decade(s) of its implementation, the central banks realize that they will not be able to make much more profit should the fiat currency remain based on a set amount of specie. After all, specie itself is rare, and not easy to come by. So they tout to the host nation that for its lending to expand (and thus produce growth) to a meaningful extent, that a new economic policy must be adopted. The only way for the central board to maintain its hard valued income, is to use fractional reserve banking. This means that it no longer lends out only the money it has, but adds more money to the books, and only requires that the branch banks have 10% in reserve. Put even more simply, it means that for a branch bank to get 10,000 dollars to lend, it only needs 1,000 in its reserves.

Most people never even bother to think about this, and then wonder why this technique faces so much opposition. After all, they are told that the central banks allow for lending needed for economic growth. They are told that with this system, companies and individuals alike may borrow money, and use it to invest in a potential increase in productivity. Indeed having such available credit with little money down seems like a dream come true. Increasing the false feeling of prosperity is the rapid expansion that follows – usually due to a new technology or booming market sector. Thus people accept it as being the perfect system that allows a people to live civilly and comfortably at the same time. When this mindset is adopted, the damage starts and never ceases – here’s why.

People overlook the fact that in such an economic scenario, that the money lent out does not physically exist – and is nothing more than some entries on a ledger. These entries are not available for public view, and are only able to be tracked on the website as to the money supply in general. It is important to note that the amount of currency printed differs greatly from the money supply on the books. Our Federal Reserve is the perfect example of this full scenario.

Over this time, the host nations gold supply dwindles to a fraction of what it once was. War expenditures, payments to the private central bank for its services etc, have all contributed to this. Thus the next problem is realized for the red flag it should have been all along – that is the host nation now only has paper to pay its debts. Being that the gold supply is now insufficient to payoff these debts, the government of the host nation makes the blunder of taking the last remnants of its wealth off of the table completely, and bases its currencies value off of the nations productivity in general. It then crosses its fingers and hopes that the productive capacity of the nation stays high and maintains growth in line with the inflation of its paper currency. This is where things grow from bad to worse.

In a nation where people are comfortable in the idea that the government is comprised of worthy leaders, and looks to them to solve every problem under the sun from poverty to obesity to regulating entertainment, this gets very bad very quickly. As the host nations money is worth less, foreign goods that the people have come to value so much goes up in price. Ditto with energy as the nation relies on foreign oil etc. The people of said nation love their environment and equality regardless of merit, so they refuse to drastically cut taxes on businesses, as well as regulations on energy production here at home. After all, without all that funding, how on earth could their government continue to be benevolent to the poor and oppressed by the greedy capitalists here at home and the evil warlords overseas? Also the environment is in great danger, so we cannot possible allow for private entities to see to our energy needs on our own soil. So people do as they believe is right, and turn to their elected ‘leaders’ to help.

The leaders help alright. They cannot tax people enough to meet their current demand (let along future expenditures) without inciting a full blown revolution and wide spread riots, so they increase their amount of debt. Because the central bank has its false wealth tied up with the governing bodies, the lending in the private sector continues to lag – which is not usuall.....

.........Funny how we have claimed a free market system for nearly the last hundred years, but have actually had a de facto nationalized banking system at its core.....

http://peacefreedomprosperity.com/5562/ecomomic-suicide-why-easy-money-ends-up-being-worthless-money/Whoever would have thought in the 1980’s that a free market capitalist and a KGB... more

shanklinmike
added this
6 months ago
|
23 comments

S & P Downgrades US Treasuries, DOW Gets Pummeled: SOLUTION - Voluntaryism

Though many still like to scoff at the idea of a complete economic collapse, it does not change the reality that it will happen as no one in congress, the senate, or presidency will ever admit to the people that they messed up, and will have to drastically cut their payouts. In their eyes, it is the knowledge that it is either a major economic collapse, or a severe civil uprising. In the case of the prior, the blame game option is still on the table and more plausible. In the latter, it will have to admitted that it was the cause of the whole mess – a political mass suicide that none of them will ever want to go through.

First of all, we need to be honest with ourselves as a nation, and admit that what we are going through now is the general sum of failure in all systems; failure in economic, foreign, military, educational and domestic policies. If this can happen, the even more important question can be addressed – what now?

Well it’s actually pretty simple, and we can start with the idea of centralization. People tend to gravitate toward a centralized entity as it as seen as being the calm in the storm so to speak. This holds true in small meetings just as it does in presidential elections (as far as group thought anyway). In small arenas there is nothing wrong with centralizations as the collective is small and interests limited. This means that you have simplicity which makes any policy emitted as being understandable and thus easy to follow.

Expansion of either the size of the collective or its interest is where things start getting complicated. People can only have a reasonable understanding of so many various topics before they run out of room so to speak. For instance a laborer will understand labor, but would not be suited well towards building a communications network. Likewise a network engineer will have little understanding of how to lay a solid concreted foundation. Hence the more items or services you have used for the ‘good of the collective’, the less understanding the collective will have as to how things work. The one and only solution to this is by committing to expansion very slowly, so that the individuals that make the collective have time to develop an understanding of the new interest or social group.

In the interest of the above two points, there is nothing small minded or unenlightened about bending ones focus upon their locality. In actuality, it is the globalists who think themselves wise to the world that continue to overlook the obvious sink holes in their own backyard. The fact of the matter is that I cannot think of a single locality that is not only self sustaining but more than capable of establishing itself and prospering. The reasoning here is simple as well. In most localities you can have farmers markets, a local sewage treatment plant, etc. What one locality may lack in terms of natural fuels or other resources, they could easily trade to another locality for something else. It really is not hard at all.

As to money, it would take some time to adapt to a new system, but it is still easily possible. Everyone complains about the big evil banks, so why have them? Seriously, why have them? If local banks were in place, and you could use any currency you wanted to (or not all for those gifted in trading), then their failures would not have to translate into a tool of fear that can be used against you. In addition it..................

http://peacefreedomprosperity.com/5479/s-p-downgrades-us-treasuries-dow-gets-pummeled-solution/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHe4OQ4bY4o

http://www.revleft.com/vb/picture.php?albumid=210&pictureid=4877Though many still like to scoff at the idea of a complete economic collapse, it does... more

shanklinmike
added this
6 months ago
|
194 comments

S & P Downgrades US Treasuries, DOW Gets Pummeled: Problem

This post, the problem... next post, the solution.

http://peacefreedomprosperity.com/5474/s-p-downgrades-us-treasuries-dow-gets-pummeled-problem/

Last week was a bad one for Wall Street. The DOW got pummeled by over 500 points, Standard and Poor’s downgraded the rating on US treasuries, and now no one is quite sure what will happen. Now this is only the tip of the iceberg that many of us have been talking about for almost a year now, but I highly doubt most people even seem to understand the implications involved. Not being satisfied with third hand reports, I downloaded Standard and Poor’s report, and began to see just how messed up things really are.

First of all, the report often makes three assumptions to prevent further downgrading of debt. The first is that the bush tax cuts are removed (or rather allowed to lapse) in 2013. The second is that government spending slows down even more then the new so called budget deal. The third is that the fed raises interest rates. Unfortunately the main body of the report focuses on these things happening to bring forward a ‘best case scenario’. Unfortunately, neither can happen at this point.

To start with, congress didn’t have the backbone to cut spending before. Sure they slowed down the amount of spending taking a savings off of the proposed deal, but it was not nearly enough to meet the bond rating agencies wishes. This happened for two reasons. The first was that the immediate effect of a meaningful cut in deficit spending would mean that many people would not get the government hand outs they were promised – something no one wants to do on a good day – let alone so close to an election. The second was an equal method of political suicide – decreasing tax cuts to increase revenue enough to meet the promised expenditures. This will not change in the future either, so S&P’s idea that it is possible is naïve at best.

As to raising the interest rate, the SP report is very skewed within itself. It states that a plus would be to have the fed incur a loose money policy in a time of monetary tightening (their words not mine). This is foolish because by enacting another round of QEx, the easy money allowed to maintain what the SP sees as a good monetary policy during tight times, will mean an insane amount of money being injected into the bank balance books – on top of the QE2 which has still yet to take full effect as the bankers keep raking it in. Contrary to popular belief, the banks are not only tying up more money than all of the private corporations combined, but and even worse is that government has even more money tied up in promised payouts. This is something Standard and Poor’s did not address in their report.

What I take issue with the most is Standard and Poor’s inferences. It takes into account the slower than expected GDP growth and the increased debt burden. However instead of urging the government to reign in its spending, it encourages it, and follows through with a hint that we need to raise taxes. This is their biggest mistake of all.

What the SP either is forgetting or deliberately leaving out, is that many of our economic woes are from taxes – both corporate and private alike. If these taxes where ever raised to meet government expenditures, then the rate would be far higher than it is now – almost double; and that still would not cover everything. In addition, many businesses have moved their bases of operations overseas just to make it affordable to operate. Should taxes be raised yet again, then even more will go overseas – this creating an even bigger drop in job loss. Less jobs here is less tax revenue, thus making the idea of raising taxes undoable right out of the gate.

However damaging this news is to our bond holders (especially in the future when it gets downgraded again, which will happens as democrats will promise more spending as republicans sign off on it without allowing taxes to go up), it is still pretty petty compared to the much larger issues that will be adding fuel to this fire.

You see as government is able to fund less and less through bond sales, it will need money to cover the difference. QE1 and 2 have already aided in this effort, but still fell drastically short. In addition, the money has not gone to any productive source, but rather into government and big bank balance sheets so that they can keep the toxic assets on their books in an effort to maintain their high prices. This of course is very foolish, and has already allowed money to leak into the private sector allowing the prices to rise across the board. Once QE2 begins to finish piddling out over the next 3-4 months, QE3 will be enacted, and it.................

http://peacefreedomprosperity.com/5474/s-p-downgrades-us-treasuries-dow-gets-pummeled-problem/This post, the problem... next post, the solution.... more

shanklinmike
added this
6 months ago
|
36 comments

select your country

Community Spotlight

TAGS

tagged w/ Anarchy

top videos

find current on tv

find current online

recent comments

© 2012 Current TV, LLC All Rights Reserved

the basics

follow us online

tools

stay in touch

© 2012 Current TV, LLC
All Rights Reserved