Darfur // Current

Genocide by Wilkine Brutus

Genocide performed in the renowned Ronnie Scotts in London.

wilkinebrutus
added this
15 days ago
|
0 comments

JWW solar stoves prevent Darfuri rapes (and other inspiring works via Goodstock)

~y2009m11d5-JWW-solar-cookers-prevent-Darfuri-rapes-and-other-inspiring-works-via-Goods... more

davidfcooper
added this
18 days ago
|
0 comments

Darfur movie uses real rape victims to act in rape scenes

This is the first trailer for Uwe Boll's film about the Genocide in Darfur. "Yes,... more

harlequin_girl
added this
21 days ago
|
0 comments

The Obama Strategy on Sudan:

he United States has a clear obligation to the Sudanese people -- both in our role as... more

ArtNetwork
added this
1 month ago
|
0 comments

Obama pursues middle ground with Sudan

A nod to human rights with renewed sanctions and condemnation of “genocide,” another to the regime with incentives for cooperation—the new Sudan policy is classic Obama. Eliza Griswold on whether the middle line will work.

After months of contentious deliberation over U.S. policy in Sudan, President Obama has announced his administration’s long-awaited position on the largest country in Africa. In a statement released on Monday, Obama said…well, not very much, really. Carefully calibrated not to further enrage the Khartoum regime or the human rights activists irate over the softening approach the Obama administration has appeared to be taking on Sudan, the president’s missive offered a nod to both.

The Obama administration calls Darfur a “genocide” while offering to engage with the regime that perpetrated it. Middle ground or no, that’s a difficult line for anyone—even Obama—to pursue.

In one breath, Obama called Darfur an unqualified “genocide” and announced the U.S. would renew the sanctions, called the “national emergency,” now in place against Sudan. In the next, he talked about engaging Khartoum and even mentioned “incentives” if the Sudanese government cooperates with the U.S. (In an interview with The Washington Post last month, the U.S. special envoy to Sudan, retired Maj. Gen. Scott Gration, called such incentives “cookies” and “gold stars,” much to the chagrin of advocates who oppose such engagement.)

Beneath the din of these sound bites, however, the administration’s new policy does offer something more substantive and promising: a renewed commitment to the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement, which north and south Sudan both signed. Lest we forget, before 300,000 people were killed in Darfur beginning in 2003, at least 2 million lost their lives in decades of civil war between north and south Sudan.

And without U.S. pressure, the north would never have signed the 2005 peace deal, which, for all its flaws, did indeed bring an end to much of the fighting between north and south—for the time being, at least. Over the past four years, the Comprehensive Peace Agreement has largely been forgotten as the U.S. has turned its attention to the conflagration in Darfur. Now it’s time to return our attention to the whole of Sudan as the Khartoum-based cabal continues to wage attacks against its margins—west, east, south, and even north, in order to hold onto power.

The Darfur conflict began in February 2003 when ethnic African rebels took up arms against the Arab-dominated Sudanese government in Khartoum, claiming discrimination and neglect. U.N. officials say the war has claimed at least 300,000 lives from violence, disease and displacement.

More @ link

Obama Issues New Plan For Darfur
http://current.com/items/91223566_obama-issues-new-plan-for-darfur.htmA nod to human rights with renewed sanctions and condemnation of “genocide,”... more