tagged w/ Philosophy
-
-
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozemL3Oq21w
http://www.archive.org/details/LesVisibles-TheBigTicketItem
Heretic Productions presents "How Can so Many People be so Incredibly Blind? (The Big Ticket Item)
Download mp3 of this essay on politics and free speech
http://www.archive.org/download/LesVisibles-TheBigTicketItem/LesVisiblesBigTicketItem..mp3
You ask yourself, just how twisted, indifferent and malevolent can some people get before the universe begins to construct an international gallows franchise everywhere there needs to be one. Each day we see unknown wannabees and the usual suspects, vying and competing to see which of them can be registered and remembered as one of the greatest assholes of our time.
You’ve got Olympics scale competitors, like Janet Nazipolitano and Skull Chertoff. Even their own criminal associates have passed an inflexible law that these two are not allowed to breed. Of course, if you know more about them, you would realize that restriction is unnecessary. There are all kinds of rich people like Jane Harman, Jay Rockefeller, John Kerry, John McCain and others who weren’t satisfied to just spend their spouses or parent’s money and live high on the cannibal hog. They needed, through some terrible compulsion, to also be able to fuck with the lives of others for personal amusement. Why else would you go into public service if you already possessed the payoff for which people go into public service?
Of course there is the vanity of public exposure and personal importance and when you look and act like the serial killer version of Lyle Lovett or a poor man’s Hannibal Lector in Depends, then I guess Nature is telling you, you gotta do what you were designed to do, badly, or worse. There are a few who go into it just for the celebration of pure evil, like Joe Lieberman or Chuckie Schumer but they got those Satan does vaudeville genes.
Sometimes, I sit back and ask myself; where are and who are the good guys? Maybe Ron Paul is a good guy, maybe. We are damn well going to see whether he is now or not because he is in the catbird seat for where his caterwauling has led him. I guess I’d like him better if he didn’t sound like a perpetual member of the Vienna Boy’s Choir, which leads me to Dennis Kucinich, as a logical progression, I think. I begin to think the testosterone shortage is ubiquitous until I get a load of Jessie Ventura. He could be the real deal if he doesn’t turn into a TV personality to the extent he forgets what he came here for.
Alex Jones is not a good guy and neither is Noam Chomsky. I used to think that Chicago prosecutor might be good guy but apparently not. Back in the day, I thought Bill Clinton was a good guy, just to show you what a Holden Caulfield sort of callow youth I was. When he got chummy with George, (Hail Satan!), Bush Senior, I got the message. I mostly think Jimmy Carter is a good guy but everyone stops short of telling it like it is and most of you who read here and at the other fine emporiums of what’s actually going on, know what it’s all short of. I’m not obliquely referring to Kucinich here so, don’t think that. Get it? Never mind, cue Randy Newman.
Contwww.youtube.com/watch?v=ozemL3Oq21w... more
-
-
A thought provoking essay by Les Visible at Smoking Mirrors Blog entitled "How Can So Many People be So Incredibly Blind?" (subtitled "The Big Ticket Item") .
www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzkuak7QN-A
Dog Poet Transmitting…….
You ask yourself, just how twisted, indifferent and malevolent can some people get before the universe begins to construct an international gallows franchise everywhere there needs to be one. Each day we see unknown wannabees and the usual suspects, vying and competing to see which of them can be registered and remembered as one of the greatest assholes of our time. They’re looking for immortality in all the wrong places, while imagining its location is a suite at The Plaza, followed by a cameo appearance as an ornate urn in the remake of “The Loved One”.
Sometimes, I sit back and ask myself; where are and who are the good guys? Maybe Ron Paul is a good guy, maybe. We are damn well going to see whether he is now or not because he is in the catbird seat for where his caterwauling has led him. I guess I’d like him better if he didn’t sound like a perpetual member of the Vienna Boy’s Choir, which leads me to Dennis Kucinich, as a logical progression, I think. I begin to think the testosterone shortage is ubiquitous until I get a load of Jessie Ventura. He could be the real deal if he doesn’t turn into a TV personality to the extent he forgets what he came here for.
Alex Jones is not a good guy and neither is Noam Chomsky. I used to think that Chicago prosecutor might be good guy but apparently not. Back in the day, I thought Bill Clinton was a good guy, just to show you what a Holden Caulfield sort of callow youth I was. When he got chummy with George, (Hail Satan!), Bush Senior, I got the message. I mostly think Jimmy Carter is a good guy but everyone stops short of telling it like it is and most of you who read here and at the other fine emporiums of what’s actually going on, know what it’s all short of. I’m not obliquely referring to Kucinich here so, don’t think that. Get it? Never mind, cue Randy Newman.
Cont...
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=16152A thought provoking essay by Les Visible at Smoking Mirrors Blog entitled "How... more
-
-
In yet another attempt to ‘ensure our liberties’, congress is currently debating Stop Online Piracy Act – aka SOPA. The very fact that their current laws are unenforceable due to a lack of personnel and funding, congress apparently feels that more laws are the answer…again. In their twisted heads, they seem to believe that by denying a dns (domain name service) entry onto the web via its ISP (Internet Service Provider), they can somehow save money. Just a few minor holes into this thing that I would like to shoot down right now.
1 – Smaller ISP’s are to be more impacted by this than the larger ones – small wonder as to why the big dogs in the major Companies support this nonsense (for a list of supporting companies, go t......
http://peacefreedomprosperity.com/6151/12-reasons-why-sopa-is-worse-than-you-think/In yet another attempt to ‘ensure our liberties’, congress is currently... more
-
-
REALLY deep Rogan rant.
One of those times when one wonders if there are any answers....or are there only questions?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2xzIgdD_XAREALLY deep Rogan rant.
One of those times when one wonders if there are any... more
-
-
For all our Libertarians!
by William K. Wolfrum 11/26/2011 - 11:22 am | Humor & Satire Politics
There are no great libertarian thinkers. Libertarianism is the absence of thought.
Lately, libertarianism has gained some weird popularity in the U.S. Sort of like Garbage Pail Kids did, but more offensive and less intellectual. Somehow, a growing group of maniacs has decided that things like paying taxes and making sure their handicapped grandma doesn’t die is an affront to their personal liberty.
I used to go by the theory that there are no homeless libertarians, but now I realize that was in error. The homeless are the quintessential libertarians, with no freedom-sapping things like shelter or clothing taking away from their personal freedom of licking the cheese off a three-day-old McDonald’s wrapper.
Libertarianism is like Scientology in that it’s a huge scam with a cult following of people who have completely lost the ability to think for themselves. Also, both libertarians and Scientologists believe in space aliens and that “Battlefield Earth” was Barry Pepper’s best work.
In the U.S., libertarians are under some bizarre fantasy that State governments somehow are better than the federal government. This fantasy is formed by being utterly ignorant to the current plight of states and the stupidity of state laws. Hell, why stop at States. How about we just live under City laws. Or better yet, let your neighborhood make all the rules. That way, you can have neighborhoods that have legalized dog fights and pedophilia. You know, Liberty.
And don't even start with the, "Well, the Founding Fathers said ... " stuff. As soon as you have writings of the Founding Fathers talking about a nation of 300 million people with 50 states and run by mega-corporations, we'll talk.
Libertarianism is a lot like the movie “Human Centipede” in that everyone involved is completely full of shit and it’s never actually been done in real life
Libertarianism was originally known as Anarchist Communism, because it essentially takes the worst of two hideous and failed ideologies, smooshes them together and calls it a philosophy. Human civilization has never tried libertarianism as a ruling ideology because humans aren’t, by and large, selfish and soulless monsters. Also, because it’s the type of ideology a 13-year-old comes up with when they’re angry that their parents make them mow the lawn.
Libertarians believe that masturbating in front of a mirror is the purest form of sex because it’s all you, baby.
Libertarians essentially believe that those who fall through the cracks of capitalism will be taken care of by charities. Because God knows, the majority of Americans who work 18-hour days for $2 an hour will spend their off hours working at soup kitchens and giving free appendix surgery to those who need it but can’t afford it. A libertarian regime would just mean we’d need to get used to wading through dead bodies to get to work. Because it would infringe upon our liberties to bury anyone who’s not you.
Libertarians believe the purest form of death is putting a bullet in your own head. Because you were free to own a gun and eat a bullet to get away from the nightmare of libertarianism.
Libertarianism is the belief that the poor of the United States aren’t suffering enough.
That so many people have seen how capitalism and unfettered free markets affect the common person and yet still consider it a perfect economic system can only mean one thing – that libertarians are just Republicans that have grown embarrassed in calling themselves Republicans. It’s not an ideology. It’s a way for rich people to sit back, feel superior and enjoy watching poor people fight to the death over a scrap of gristle.
Libertarians don’t have any idea what in the hell liberty or freedom mean. They are just a bunch of assholes who don’t want to pay taxes and want to get stoned and watch people who earn less than them wither and die.For all our Libertarians!
by William K. Wolfrum 11/26/2011 - 11:22 am | Humor... more
-
-
Today holy Palli was prepared and decorated by Shri Hirenbhai and young team of Varahi Yuvak Mandal amidst huge crowd.There remains 160 holy Diyas over 15 feet high and 170 Kgs weighted Palli. The main attraction of Palli rests on the unripe Mangoes which remained tied at Palli and is offered as the Prasadam from Vaghri Community.
As per my point of view nearly 2 Lac people takes philosophy of Holy Palli on this day. Till date today, so many Muslim community women were arriving in Mandvi Chowk, just taking Mother’s Garbi at their heads. At early morning 5.00 IST this holy Palli will be taken to the Verai Mother’s Temple by Isanpur’s Mukhi Family’s Bhuva ( A holy Saint ) Shri Dashrathbhai Patel and family.Toay he offers social services as a Ahmedabad's Municipal Councellor for Isanpur area.Today holy Palli was prepared and decorated by Shri Hirenbhai and young team of Varahi... more
-
-
This film and book project is a collaboration of evolutionary philosopher Brian Thomas Swimme and historian of religions Mary Evelyn Tucker. They weave a tapestry that draws together scientific discoveries in astronomy, geology, and biology with humanistic insights
concerning the nature of the universe.
PBS National Broadcast Premiere coming this December.
Click here for listings nationwide. WNET Ch. 13 in New York City will broadcast the film primetime on December 7th, 8:00pm.
More at the linkThis film and book project is a collaboration of evolutionary philosopher Brian Thomas... more
-
-
Slavoj Zizek .......... 1989 marked not only the defeat of the Communist State-Socialism, but also the defeat of the Western Social Democracy. Nowhere is the misery of today's Left more palpable than in its "principled" defence of the Social-Democratic Welfare State: the idea is that, in the absence of a feasible radical Leftist project, all that the Left can do is to bombard the state with demands for the expansion of the Welfare State, knowing well that the State will not be able to deliver. This necessary disappointment serves as a reminder of the basic impotence of the social-democratic Left and thus push the people towards a new radical revolutionary Left. http://www.makeahistory.com/index.php/recent-news/43024-only-communism-can-save-liberal-democracySlavoj Zizek .......... 1989 marked not only the defeat of the Communist... more
-
-
worrg
-
added this
-
3 months ago
- |
-
When people cannot for some reason govern themselves – they turn to a small group of people to do it for them. They lack the belief in their own abilities to fix something, so they turn to an outside force to level the playing field. The irony here is that the playing field itself was never tilted to begin with. As such, it is the idea that everyon
http://peacefreedomprosperity.com/5785/the-plight-of-mariestown/When people cannot for some reason govern themselves – they turn to a small... more
-
-
Anarchist Artist Victor Pross takes on a few common objections to the idea of a stateless society, philosophical anarchism. Those objections remain the same, forever spinning out on a hamster wheel, repeatedly and persistently: “What about the roads? What about the poor? What about violent crimes? What about theft?”
Listen to this video for a different perspective to the nature of the issue.
http://peacefreedomprosperity.com/5782/objections-to-the-freedom-movement/Anarchist Artist Victor Pross takes on a few common objections to the idea of a... more
-
-
-
There are few philosophers whose very name provokes more violent responses than Karl Marx.
His stern face, framed by a mass of gray hair, symbolizes for many Americans the costly battles of the 20th century: battles against communism, socialism, and authoritarianism fought in defense of democracy and free-market capitalism. As successive generations of Americans waged those fights, the philosophical disputes at the core of the conflicts embedded themselves into the American soul. So much so that when the "evil empire," whose seeds sprouted from Marx's doctrine, died as a result of the revolutions of 1989, the ideological battle did not.
Though the Soviet Union is but a memory, and that other communist behemoth -- China -- has mutated into a capitalist autocracy, the specter of Marx himself remains as potent as ever in 21st century U.S. political discourse. Since 2008 especially, with the fall of financial markets and the rise of Barack Obama, the charge "Marxist" has been hurled like toxic sludge against politicians seen as ready to redistribute wealth (to the advantage of most Americans), expand social safety nets, or ensure that all children receive a good education. Critics say these steps are merely the first along a slippery slope that inevitably ends in outright state control. Amid these warnings, the communist horrors of the 20th century float like dark apparitions, reminding us of the bad old days.
But I wonder how many of those who invoke the name of Marx in order to stifle political debate actually believe their own propaganda. Or are they conjuring up a convenient bogeyman at a time of great uncertainty. Do they raise Marx's image in order to deflect attention from slightly warmer bodies (Marx has been dead for 128 years)in positions of political or economic power who are actually more pernicious? I also wonder whether those who use Marx's name, and those who tremble at the thought of him, actually know much about the man. Are they reacting to Karl Marx or those things done in his name? I believe it is the latter. I also believe it is time to understand Marx so that we are no longer made to fear him.
When I began working on a biography of Marx's family in 2003, I was well acquainted with his theories. I knew, as most do, the history of the governments formed to reflect the state he had supposedly envisioned. I knew of the atrocities committed by those said to be his followers. I had not, however, been properly introduced to the man himself. What I discovered was not what I expected.
Karl Marx was a middle-class philosopher, economist, and journalist (whose main employer was a New York newspaper). He was also flawed in the extreme. He drank excessively, behaved shamefully in his home life, and worked obsessionally, though he produced little that earned him money or recognition during his lifetime. These flaws, however, made him more interesting because, despite being in a state of near constant personal crisis, he was able to accomplish what he set out to do -- he changed the world.
Marx began his opposition activities as a youth in Prussia against an absolute monarch who could not see, or perhaps chose not to see, that society was changing. The industrial revolution was spreading eastward and Prussian businessmen were eager to expand with it. But the old system of government would not allow for such progress. The king would not allow the democratic reforms that were the handmaidens of the new industrial order.
This was Marx's first battle, to expose the contradictions between the centuries-old monarchical system and the world as it existed in the first half of the 19th century. According to Marx, it was only natural that as the means of production changed -- in this case a move from an agricultural base to an industrial one -- society would be altered. And if, as he believed, a government's sole function was to serve the people, then government must also change. Marx saw this social evolution as inevitable. It only became revolution when the kings and their minions refused to reform.
(read the rest at link)There are few philosophers whose very name provokes more violent responses than Karl... more
-
-
-
The hyphenated anarchists can be a combative bunch. I’ve done my share of arguing from an Ancap perspective, against sects of the movement I believe wish to achieve freedom- so long as it is done their way. Tired and stale as the news on it may be, the Occupy Movement lends itself well to unification behind a few vital, strategy-related principles for pushing back the state. Libertarian and anarchist circles have reacted to the Movement in a number of ways, ranging from complete dismissal to complete embrace. The implications of the current Movement, which has now spread to Europe, are too large not to take advantage of, but in a measured way. Because the Movement presents an opportuni.......
http://peacefreedomprosperity.com/5749/ows-an-anti-state-perspective/The hyphenated anarchists can be a combative bunch. I’ve done my share of... more
-
-
After breaking $4 a gallon for a short time in may, the steady decline in gas prices over the last five months has come as a breath of fresh air to commuters and consumers everywhere. The current average is hovering around $3.46 a gallon.
In such times it is far too easy to look at the current price and gain false hope in a recovering market. For example in July 2008, gas prices were pushing $4.12 a gallon. In a highly unusual dip the prices fell to nearly $1.60 a gallon in less than 6 months – something that has never happened in at least over 7 years.
Why? Well, the price of light crude on the WTI at the time was at an all time high in July, and made a very sudden decline from $133/barrel monthly average to $41/barrel monthly average in less than 5 months – right before elections. While it was noticeable at the time, it was hardly used then as a political stateme
http://peacefreedomprosperity.com/5738/on-oil-and-gas/After breaking $4 a gallon for a short time in may, the steady decline in gas prices... more
-
-
I used to resist the idea of calling life unfair. Being a non-conformist, I resist cliché. This works against me sometimes, because clichés can be accurate.
Now when it comes to calling life unfair, I burn with the passion of the converted. I look back at my ultra-naïve youthful self and laugh: "You once believed in the Tooth Fairy. Even worse, you clung to the idea that life could be fair!"
What brought me to this point? Forgive me for using a cliché, but it was a straw that broke the camel's back (for a more cruelty-free comparison, it was a drop that burst a hole in the bucket.)
So what was the small event with the big impact? I caught a foul ball at a pro baseball game. I wasn't that excited to get it and I'm still not that excited to have it. Contrast that with the complete insanity with which people catch (or try to catch) foul balls or balls thrown into the stands by players, "ball girls," etc. Just this past summer, baseball souvenir mania seemed to hit a fever pitch (Is that another cliché or a pun? Or both?):
1. First, a man tragically fell to his death going for a souvenir ball. (Link.)
2. Then Major League Baseball pushed hard on the story of the guy who caught Derek Jeter's 3000th hit, almost as if to quickly move on from the dead guy story, IMHO. (Link.)
3. Then another guy almost died. (Link.)
There is no shortage of other shocking incidents involving the rabid quest for baseballs:
* There was the woman who stole the ball from the kid. (Link.)
* Bartman: the bizarre, almost fable-like story of a fan who is blamed for his favorite team losing. (Link.)
* Just as this was going to "press," there was this incident: a man drops his child while trying to get a ball. (Link.)
The very first story hurts the most. How can life be fair, when a man falls to his death trying to get a ball thrown to him by a player? Absolutely nothing and no one involved in that incident was cruel or reckless or part of the "struggle for survival," any of the usual descriptions we use to explain away a horrible situation. If that incident doesn't prove life is unfair, then nothing does.
We all know that when you want something, you have to walk at it backwards, pretend you're not looking, then spin around and snatch it. The moment fate realizes you want something, it's going to dangle it in front of you and pull it away quickly, like a jackass on the playground who grows up to be a jackass at your job.
Or maybe that's backwards. Maybe we want what's hard for us to get, because if it's easy, we get it. Simple as that. So it's inevitable that something among all the things we desire will be difficult to obtain. And for the things we get easily? Shrug.
So what does this have to do with baseball? I presented all the examples of souvenir ball nuttiness for a reason. Those people clearly desired a ball strongly. They struggle and most fail to get it. As for me, I have very little interest in baseball and yet, of the very few games I've attended, without even trying, I caught a foul ball. With my ass.
No jokes, please. Oh hell. Okay, jokes are permitted.
Here's my story:
Everyone knows someone who promises you sports tickets like this: "My job gets awesome tickets for visiting VIPs but when no one is visiting, they give them out. If I can get them, you can have them!" And of course such gifts are free maybe once every five hundred years.
I suspect upper management is swiping them most of the time, but no matter. Such a five hundred year window opened during my teen years, so I ended up in some good seats a couple dozen rows from third base. It was a daytime, weekday game and not televised.
The date was August 9, 1983 [game stats]. Greg Gross [info] (at the time playing for my team, the Philadelphia Phillies, now their hitting coach) knocks a pitch foul. Everyone around me stood up. I felt confident it wasn't going to come near me, but I stood up anyway, so as not to get hit in the head, just in case. As the ball entered the crowd a few rows in front of me, everyone was shoving and grabbing for it. The ball hit the back of someone's seat and took a crazy bounce. The feeding frenzy was on. People scrambled and flailed trying to snag the ball. In the chaos, the ball tumbled closer. Two or three more weird bounces and/or collisions with bodies and/or chairs, and just like that, the ball landed in my seat. To protect it, I sat down on it.
And that's how I caught a foul ball with my butt.
Totally awesome, right? Well yeah, I guess. Once the foul-hunters sat down again, I grabbed the ball and stood up with it triumphantly. That's tradition, right? Besides, I wanted to be on the jumbo screen, or on TV. But this game wasn't televised and whoever was running the camera for the jumbo screen didn't care to show me.
But so what? You're saying. You caught a foul ball. True, but I was thinking: hey, why aren't I on the jumbo screen? Because that's what I would really have enjoyed.
After the game, I gave the ball to my dad. He's the baseball fan. I've always been a follower of faster-moving sports, like... well, like anything.
After years of my dad holding the foul ball he finally insisted I take it back. You caught it, he said, you should have it. So I have it. Shrug.
I can hear you now: you could sell it on eBay. I could. eBay has created a reason for people to collect anything and everything, because surely someone else will pay more for it than you did, even if it is intrinsically worthless. What's that? No, I didn't intend that as a critique of "investing" in gold, but yes, it does serve as one. Can't a piece of junk just be a piece of junk anymore? Is nothing sacred?
I guess I could sell the foul ball and donate the money to charity, but no. It means something to me now: a reminder that sometimes clichés are universal truths, that life is unfair and the grass is always greener on the other side.
=
Larry Nocella writes the blog ROFL: Random Outbursts From Lar! at LarryNocella.com. He's the author of the novel Where Did This Come From? The world's first CarbonFree(R) novel according to Carbonfund.org. The book is available as an Amazon Kindle eBook. It is also available for reading online. P.S. You don't need a Kindle to read Kindle eBooks. Download the FREE Kindle app for PC, Mac and smartphones. You can then purchase Kindle books or download free ones. Enjoy!I used to resist the idea of calling life unfair. Being a non-conformist, I resist... more
-
-
“I, David P Shirk, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” – August 8, 1998.
If there is one regret I have had in my lifetime, it was the utterance of those words. My intentions were good, after all, I wanted to protect people and serve them – just as so many I knew and respected who came before me. What I didn’t know at the time was my countries history (great job public school system), and the full actions taken by the government since its founding.
Before 9-11, I started seeing my job as having no real point. I was good at it to be sure, but could not see its use. We were not under attack, and the US seemed to be doing okay without using us. Then 9-11 happened, and everything changed. At first, I was eager to find the people responsible, and go earn my pay. Thank goodness my name was never called up for the task. I never would have thought at the time that the attack on the towers was the result of foreign meddling for the better part of 50 years.
Yet that one event set off a red flag in my head, and it was during that time tha.......
http://peacefreedomprosperity.com/5734/oathbreaker/“I, David P Shirk, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the... more
-
-
I recently had a conversation with a friend who happens to be an Atheist. I did not want to be so aggressive as to push my viewpoints onto him spiritually or culturally. As I listened to him speak I began to feel a great void of loss he must be experiencing. To deny God is deny all his many blessings, the spiritual knowledge that is essential for maintaining a healthy lifestyle, most of all how could he know where he is going spiritually if he doesn’t know where he came from.
My Spirit began to move my mind in the direction of Light and I had the most splendid idea. Explain it to him, as an energy! There is only one thing in life that everything contains: energy. It is the God Force. This Source Energy makes everything appear, move, and exist. You cannot use the body’s senses to verify Source Energy, yet we know it’s there. It’s a very powerful tool when utilized. As a matter of fact any accomplishment, creation, idea, or thought all needs an energy to manifest.
If man’s will is to create or manifest anything, it is still a reflection of God or the Source Energy. The origin of energy used today, is the same energy derived from the source of the universe since before creation. God is the source of ALL. Our thoughts, ideas, actions, creations, possessions, children, pets, country, planet, world, universe, all there is, is a reflection of Gods source energy. It is manifesting and vibrating on different scales, dimensions, and planes through us and all within and around us.
Everything is energy; including you and me in all its many and multiple external forms shares the same internal energy. From your car, to you’re clothing to the plants and trees outside. Forms of matter can be energy as well as organic materials. There is no such thing as energy of man and energy of things. It is all energy. In the studies of the ancients they explain this energy in the forms of many examples operating on different planes simultaneously.
http://rtruth.blog.com/2011/08/13/%e2%80%9cunderstanding-energy-is-understanding-god%e2%80%9d/I recently had a conversation with a friend who happens to be an Atheist. I did not... more
-
-
mab001
-
added this
-
4 months ago
- |
-
There are ancient Principles that embody the truth that there is a harmony, agreement, and correspondence between the several planes of Manifestation, Life and Being.
This truth is a truth because all that is included in the Universe emanates from the same source, and the same laws, principles, and characteristics apply to each unit, or combination of units, of activity, as each manifests its own phenomena upon its own plane.
http://rtruth.blog.com/2011/10/04/%e2%80%9cunderstanding-reality%e2%80%9d/There are ancient Principles that embody the truth that there is a harmony, agreement,... more
-
-
mab001
-
added this
-
4 months ago
- |
