Echo And The Bunnymen have canceled their forthcoming North American tour. The band were due to tour the States beginning November 15 but have had to pull all their dates due to tax issues.Echo And The Bunnymen have canceled their forthcoming North American tour. The band... more
the benson tea party
Smart people remember history's mistakes so as not to repeat them.
In the past, the King of England, wanting money and tired of hearing the Colonists complain about taxes and other abuses of their "inalienable rights," passed exorbitant taxes and a stamp tax on newspapers. If the King's man, the tax collector, didn't like the content of the newspaper regarding the King's taxation, no stamp would be issued. Censorship through government taxation could not be tolerated by our Founding Fathers. The tax stamp act gave rise to the Boston Tea Party and was the catalyst for the American Revolution.
Today the King's man is Nathan J. Hochman, the Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department's Tax Division. He announced "TAXDEF" for the express purpose of "prosecuting those who take concrete action to deny the fundamental validity of the tax laws."
William J. Benson took concrete action to deny the fundamental validity of the tax laws. He uncovered the cover-up of the false and fraudulent ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment pertaining to income taxes, spoke about it on his website and urged people to exercise their FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS to require the government to obey the law. If the Sixteenth Amendment was not properly ratified, then the federal income tax is unconstitutional.
Here is how "TAXDEF" and today's tyranny works: In United States v. Benson, Case No. 1:04-cv-7403 (N.D.Ill., 2004), the government asked the court to issue an injunction to prevent Benson from making his research available over the Internet and to require him to give to the IRS a list of everyone who obtained his research, so those people could be investigated.
Benson attempted to defend by submitting evidence of the truth of what he was saying. That evidence consisted of official, certified government documents he personally obtained by visiting Washington, D.C. and the capitols of the forty-eight states that were in existence at the time. That evidence conclusively proves Benson's statements were correct. The government's declaration of ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment was fraudulent. Unable to contest the contents of the certified government documents, a federal district court judge became "TAX DEAF," threw out all of Bill's evidence and found him guilty. Every single judge in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals thinks this is OK.
Such conduct, of course, is precluded by the First and Fifth Amendments, which our Founding Fathers decided were necessary to keep the King—and all the King's men—from:
No. 1 - Acting as invincible tyrants who can censor and punish speech because it proves wholesale government theft; andNo. 2 - Charging someone with illegal conduct and refusing him the ability to defend against those charges.Just as with King George in the 1700s, the king today believes it can once again censor speech through tax laws and use his henchmen judges to prevent a defense. Alexander Hamilton once put a stop to this atrocious conduct in the Peter Zenger seditious libel trial. We need to put a stop to it today.
The pleadings in the federal district court in Chicago and in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals may be viewed at www.jeffdickstein.com. We have nothing to hide.
Another way in which "TAXDEF" is designed to work is the now pending criminal case of United States v. Hirmer, Case No. 3:08-cr-70 (N.D.Fla., Pensacola Div., 2009) wherein thirteen people have been charged with several felonies for promoting "anti-government" views on taxation, such as the Sixteenth Amendment was not ratified in accordance with the requirements of the Constitution. There too a "TAX DEAF" judge refused to address proof of the truth. See www.jeffdickstein.com/hirmer.aspx.
It's time for another tea party—the benson tea party
Benson has filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States. We need to let the King know we want the petition to be heard.
We've made it fast,the benson tea party
Smart people remember history's mistakes so as not to repeat... more
Offshore tax shelter? Check. Income hidden from tax authorities? Check. New IRS unit specifically set up to target taxpayers with tens of millions or dollars? Check.
IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman told the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Monday that the agency has set up a unit specifically set up to deal with rich Americans who are hiding assets.
"We will take a unified look at the entire web of business entities controlled by a high-wealth individual," Shulman said. "At least initially, we will be looking at individuals with tens of millions of dollars of assets or income."Offshore tax shelter? Check. Income hidden from tax authorities? Check. New IRS unit... more
If you want to understand how to fix today's health insurance system, you'd be smart to look first at how it was born. How did Americans end up with a system in which employers pay for our health insurance? After all, they don't pay for our groceries or our gas.
It turns out there never was any central logic at work. The evolution of the American health care system began in the 1920s, when choices boiled down to which crazy cure you preferred.
Dr. John Brinkley, for instance, was a huge hit in American radio with his health advice shows. For whatever problem folks had, Brinkley had one fabulous solution: transplant a goat gland into your body. He pitched it as being perfect for everything from dementia to impotence to flatulence. But if, somehow, a goat gland didn't cure your ills, you could always use Bonnore's Electro Magnetic Bathing Fluid or Clark Stanley's Snake Oil Liniment.
Before the birth of modern medicine, hospitals were poorhouses where the indigent went to die. Then came the advent of effective medicines, especially antibiotics, along with a revolution in medical schools.
Suddenly, says economic historian Melissa Thomasson, "hospitals are marketing themselves as places to have babies." The professor at the Miami University in Ohio says that in the early part of the 20th century, hospitals were able to focus on happy outcomes.
Health care became much more effective, and much more expensive. Clean hospitals, educated doctors and real pharmacological research cost money. People proved willing to pay for care when they were really sick, but it wasn't yet common to go for checkups or survivable illnesses.
By the late 1920s, hospitals noticed most of their beds were going empty every night. They wanted to get people who weren't deathly ill to start coming in.
"The war economy is an entirely different ballgame," Thomasson says. The government rationed goods even as factories ramped up production and needed to attract workers. Factory owners needed a way to lure employees. She explains that the owners turned to fringe benefits, offering more and more generous health plans.
The next big step in the evolution of health care was also an accident. In 1943, the Internal Revenue Service ruled that employer-based health care should be tax free. A second law, in 1954, made the tax advantages even more attractive.
Thomasson cites the huge impact of those measures on plan participation. "You start from 9 percent of the population in 1940 to 63 percent in 1953," she says. "Everybody starts getting in on it. It just grows by gangbusters. By the 1960s, 70 percent [of the population] is covered by some kind of private, voluntary health insurance plan."
Thus employer-based insurance, which started with Blue Cross selling coverage to Texas teachers and spread because of government price controls and tax breaks, became our system. By the mid-1960s, Thomasson says, Americans started to see that system — in which people with good jobs get health care through work and almost everyone else looks to government — as if it were the natural order of things.
But to Thomasson and other economic historians, there's nothing natural or inevitable about it. Instead, they see it as the profound result of historical accidents.Accidents Of History Created U.S. Health System
If you want to understand how to... more
(Reuters) - The U.S. Internal Revenue Service is probing more than 100,000 doubtful claims of a tax credit meant for first-time home buyers, the Wall Street Journal reported on its website on Tuesday.
The $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was passed in February to help prod the U.S. economy back to life.
Lawmakers have expressed concern that significant number of claims might turn out to be fraudulent, the paper said.
The IRS was investigating 167 "criminal schemes" involving the credit, according to the House Ways and Means oversight subcommittee, the paper said.
The IRS was not available to comment.
(Reporting by Sakthi Prasad in Bangalore; Editing by Dan Lalor)(Reuters) - The U.S. Internal Revenue Service is probing more than 100,000 doubtful... more
Thousands of wealthy Americans have volunteered information about unreported income hidden in overseas accounts ahead of the deadline for a U.S. government tax amnesty program, the U.S. tax commissioner said on Wednesday.
Roughly 7,500 Americans have taken part in the amnesty program, more than double the participation reported a few weeks ago, Doug Shulman, commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, told reporters during a briefing. The amnesty program ends on Thursday.
The IRS is expanding its offshore tax crackdown and will open new criminal offices in Beijing, Sydney and Panama, Shulman said. "The IRS has new momentum in this entire area and in the coming months our efforts will only intensify," he said.
Under the amnesty program that began in September, tax cheats can declare offshore income, pay reduced fines and get general immunity from criminal prosecution. The program turned up undeclared income from offshore accounts ranging from $10,000 to more than $100 million, Shulman said.Thousands of wealthy Americans have volunteered information about unreported income... more
Joe Louis donated $1 Million to a government charity only to be taxed the full amount and ran into IRS debt slavery for nearly his entire life. His IRS debt ran up as high as $1 Million to a point where each year’s interest accumulated to over $100,000. The IRS literally taxed Joe Louis to death.
***This article has been chosen as a discussion topic on PFP Movement Radio, http://www.blogtalkradio.com/pfpmovementradio Friday night at 6pm-8pm. Please Call In To The Show, 347-633-9636. COMMENTS will be included in the show so feel free to discuss or ask questions here on current.com as they will be addressed during the show. This article will also air on Freedom Hour Saturday at 9pm-10pm on Movement TV http://www.peacefreedomprosperity.com/?page_id=36***Joe Louis donated $1 Million to a government charity only to be taxed the full amount... more
Where is Microsoft based? Redmond in Washington State, you might say. Except that when it comes to licensing its software, apparently that all happens from an office in Reno, Nevada. At least, that's where it records its software licensing revenue.
Seem odd? Certainly. Why? Because it means it doesn't pay a tax on software licensing, which Washington State applies. And according to Jeff Reifman - who has written a devastating blogpost rectifying this bit of tax, er, avoidance* (because Washington State is facing a deficit of $430m in its biennial budget) could balance the state's budget:
Over the past thirteen years, I estimate that Microsoft has avoided paying more than $707 million in taxes on sales of its corporate software licenses (see Citizen Microsoft and Microsoft's $528 million Washington tax break). Although the majority of its software development is performed in Washington State, Microsoft records its estimated $18 billion in licensing revenue per year through a corporate office in Reno, Nevada where there is no licensing tax.
To quote the Northern Nevada Business Weekly (linked from the Microsoft Licensing site):
A good-sized piece of Microsoft's $58 billion in revenues in its last fiscal year touched ground, however briefly, in the company's licensing operation in Reno.
And a Microsoft executive says the operation is likely to continue growing at about the same pace as the rest of the software giant headquartered at Redmond, Wash.
And among the things that Microsoft identified as being needed to be a great community, according to Chris Weber, a Microsoft vice-president, in that interview, is
Community involvement. People want to work for a company that gives back to the local community, Weber said.
Perhaps it depends which "local" community you're talking about. As the Microsoft Licensing site says, "It's amazing what you can do here". Why, yes, it is. Like cutting your tax bills by millions of dollars. That's pretty amazing in anyone's books.
Back to Reifman:
Under [Washington] state's 0.484 percent software royalty tax(lowered from 1.5 percent in 1998 after industry lobbying), I estimate that Microsoft should have paid more than $90 million in 2008 and $87 million in 2009 in state taxes.
Those aren't trivial amounts. Reifman suggests that Microsoft has been doing this for 13 years, and that the back taxes owed amount to $707m. (It would have been $2.8bn if the software royalty tax hadn't been lowered following industry lobbying, he calculates.)
As he also points out,
Since Microsoft began operations in Reno in 1997, it has enjoyed record-setting revenue of more than $446 billion and profit of more than $124 billion. If it paid its actual tax bill in full today, it would still have more than $24 billion in cash holdings.
Still puzzled? Reifman set out how it works in an earlier article in Crosscut (linked above):
Here's how the practice works: Microsoft's product teams, based mostly in Redmond and Issaquah, build software products such as Windows Vista, Windows Server, SQL Server, and Office. But sales of these products to PC manufacturers and corporate customers are conducted from a License and Operations office in Reno, Nev., where there is no corporate income tax. Microsoft records the revenue for these sales (traditionally about 31 percent of overall revenue) in Nevada and does not pay the Washington business and occupation tax required on software reproduction.
Mm. I'd say Microsoft has some questions to answer. Reifman has also blogged about peoples' responses (often justifications) for Microsoft's practice - with his own analysis, which could be boiled down to "sure, Microsoft might move if the Washington State attorney applies this. But it might not." (He's more eloquent though.)
Of course, the directors of a company have a responsibility to shareholders to organise their business in the most tax-efficient way possible while remaining inside the law.
The queWhere is Microsoft based? Redmond in Washington State, you might say. Except that when... more
Government-sponsored nonprofit health care may seem like a worthy alternative to the public option – but it doesn’t really guarantee lower costs for anybody.Government-sponsored nonprofit health care may seem like a worthy alternative to the... more
Declan McCullagh of CBS News uncovered provisions while plowing through the more than 1,000-page Democratic House bill that would allow startling privacy intrusions. The innermost secrets of people's personal lives would be made available to thousands of government bureaucrats. (It's about time network TV did something)Declan McCullagh of CBS News uncovered provisions while plowing through the more than... more
Rich Americans are turning themselves in to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in droves as the US tax authority steps up its hunt for tax evaders.
Lawyers reported getting hundreds of calls from clients with offshore bank accounts that they have not declared to the IRS, seeking advice on whether to take advantage of an amnesty on tax cheats.
The IRS has given customers of UBS, the Swiss bank, until September 23 to own up to secret foreign bank accounts in return for a financial penalty and the promise of no jail time.
The tax authority underlined how aggressively it intends to pursue non-payers and their agents when the Department of Justice (DoJ) indicted Hansruedi Schumacher, a Swiss banker, and Matthias Rickenbach, a Swiss lawyer, for helping Americans hide their assets from the IRS.
The charges were based on confessions obtained from UBS clients suspected of cheating on tax, according to John DiCicco, acting assistant attorney general of the DoJ’s tax division.
He said: "We encourage foreign banks to come forward and disclose their conduct immediately, before we learn about their criminal conduct from US taxpayers".
Asher Rubinstein, an attorney at Rubinstein & Rubinstein in New York, said that he was advising clients, ranging from those with straightforward cash accounts to others with gold bullion, stock and other securities stashed offshore, to take advantage of the amnesty.
"Many more people are coming out to the woodwork now," he said. "More people are realising that there won’t be secrecy any more."
Doug Shulman, Commissioner of the IRS, declined to say how many people had identified themselves to the taxman under the amnesty but described the response as "unprecedented".Rich Americans are turning themselves in to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in... more
Many of those legendary “secret” Swiss bank accounts are soon to be viewed by the IRS..Many of those legendary “secret” Swiss bank accounts are soon to be viewed by the... more
The $8000 first time home buyer tax credit is quite a bit of money. But you must meet all the guidelines and restrictions.
Here are some of the little known restrictions, from the IRS:
1. Your income exceeds the phase-out range. This means joint filers with modified adjusted gross income of $170,000 and above and other taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income of $95,000 and above.
2. You buy your home from a close relative. This includes your spouse, parent, grandparent, child or grandchild.
3. You stop using your home as your main home.
4. You sell your home before the end of the year.
For the rest of the top 8 restrictions you should know, follow the link to the full article at thinkglink.com.The $8000 first time home buyer tax credit is quite a bit of money. But you must meet... more
It had to happen: With $8,000 in free cash available to first-time home buyers (and those who haven’t owned a home in the past three years), somebody had to take advantage of the situation.
The Internal Revenue Service announced this morning its first successful prosecution related to fraud involving the first-time homebuyer credit and warned taxpayers to beware of this type of scheme.
According to the IRS statement, last Thursday, a Jacksonville, Fla.-tax preparer, James Otto Price III, pled guilty to falsely claiming the first-time homebuyer credit on a client’s federal tax return. Price faces the possibility of up to three years in jail, a fine of as much as $250,000, or both.
The IRS has to date executed seven search warrants and currently has 24 open criminal investigations in pursuit of potential instances of fraud involving the credit. How are they catching taxpayers who misuse the $8,000 first time home buyer tax credit? Apparently, the agency has a number of sophisticated computer screening tools to quickly identify returns that may contain fraudulent claims for the first-time homebuyer credit.It had to happen: With $8,000 in free cash available to first-time home buyers (and... more
If you bought your first home in 2008, you may have qualified for the $7,500 first time home buyer tax credit that has to be repair in equal $500 installments. But if you bought your home in 2009, you don't have to repay the $8,000 first time home buyer tax credit except in certain circumstances.
The IRS has issued form 5405, which you will need to fill out if you're going to take the $8,000 first time home buyer tax credit. But Form 5405's instructions include information on who can take the credit, how much can be taken and under what circumstances the credit must be repaid. Look through the details so you don't run afoul of IRS rules.
This article goes through the rules for knowing when you have to repay the tax credit, so you don't run afoul of IRS rules. It also answers questions like:
Can I Take the First Time Home Buyer Tax Credit?
What Are The Residency Requirements For the Tax Credit?
Who Cannot Claim The $8,000 Tax Credit?
Do I Have to Repay The $8,000 Tax Credit?If you bought your first home in 2008, you may have qualified for the $7,500 first... more
An effort by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service to revamp the way employers and workers account for personal cell phone use is intended to save companies money, an IRS official said on Friday.
A law dating to 1989 requires companies seeking to deduct worker cell phones as an expense to track personal use with painstaking documentation of minutes. The IRS says a notice issued this week is intended to make it easier for employers and workers to comply with the law.
"Minute by minute documentation really doesn't make any sense — we've been hearing all about it, and we said yes it makes no sense," said a senior IRS official, who was not authorized to speak for attribution.
Proposed changes issued by the IRS are intended to "reduce how much employers have to spend trying to comply with the tax law," the official added.
Under current law, workers are required to pay tax on personal cell phone use on a work phone as a fringe benefit.
The IRS this week issued a notice seeking public comment on ways to revise the current system. Options include letting employers deduct the entire sum of a worker's cell phone use if a worker can establish she uses a personal phone for some period, and letting employers use statistical sampling to generalize about usage.
Another idea is for employers to assign a set rate for business use, 75 percent proposed by the IRS, with the remaining treated as personal use.
"For employers we thought we should give them alternative ways to take these deductions," the IRS official said.
The agency will take public comment on the proposals until September 2, 2009.
The IRS effort could add impetus to an effort by the cell phone industry and business community to scrap the law entirely.
"The policy rationale of the late 1980s when this law was passed was a time when cell phones were a luxury," said John Taylor, a spokesman for Sprint Nextel Corp. "Think about the all you can eat rate plans we offer. For an employer that is a burdensome record-keeping requirement."
Lawmakers last year came close. The U.S. House of Representatives passed a repeal and the Senate got 60 sponsors for its bid.
The measures, which have bipartisan backing, have been reintroduced again this year.
The cell phone industry, the Chamber of Commerce and others last week wrote leaders of the House and Senate committees that would take up the bills to lobby for its passage.An effort by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service to revamp the way employers and workers... more
Immigrant advocates say they've seen nothing like it before or since: A prosecutor looking for illegal immigrants seized thousands of confidential tax records from an income tax preparer popular with Hispanics in this northern Colorado city.
The October seizures led to identity theft and criminal impersonation charges against more than 70 people, and prosecutors allege that as many as 1,300 suspected illegal immigrants were working using false or stolen Social Security numbers.
But the American Civil Liberties Union said the documents of as many as 4,900 people were seized, many of them legal residents, and that the probe was the "equivalent of a house-by-house search of innocent homeowners in order to find a suspect believed to be somewhere in the neighborhood."
Two judges have agreed, ruling that Weld County District Attorney Ken Buck had no probable cause to seize the records. Buck is appealing, however, and a ruling in his favor could open up a new avenue for prosecuting illegal immigrants.
The charges have been ironic for immigrants like Horacio Arturo Cervantes. The 42-year-old father of four from the Mexican state of Chihuahua said he had been honest about paying taxes, even though he was in the country illegally, because he was hoping for a path to U.S. citizenship.Immigrant advocates say they've seen nothing like it before or since: A prosecutor... more
DETROIT - An agent used surveillance cameras to confirm a smelly suspicion: Someone had been urinating in a freight elevator at an Internal Revenue Service data center in Detroit.
Authorities filed a criminal charge Tuesday against Michael Hicks. In an affidavit, treasury agent Delmaria Scott said she interviewed Hicks in January 2008 and he admitted urinating in the elevator for months.
Scott said Hicks did it "because he felt he could get away with it." It cost $4,600 to clean the elevator.
Hicks, who was a contract employee at the IRS, was charged with damaging federal property. A defense lawyer was not listed.
Gina Balaya, a spokeswoman for prosecutors, says the government was unsuccessful in trying to resolve the case without a criminal charge.DETROIT - An agent used surveillance cameras to confirm a smelly suspicion: Someone... more
Last election season, 31 ministers in 20 states set out to break a federal tax law prohibiting nonprofit religious institutions from endorsing political candidates.
The Sept. 28 "Pulpit Freedom Sunday" was organized by the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian legal group that advocates for conservative causes. The event challenged Internal Revenue Service rules that forbid partisan politicking by institutions accepting tax-deductible contributions.Last election season, 31 ministers in 20 states set out to break a federal tax law... more
Title: To amend title 31, United States Code, to reform the manner in which the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is audited by the Comptroller General of the United States and the manner in which such audits are reported, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Paul, Ron [TX-14] (introduced 2/26/2009) Cosponsors (100)
Related Bills: S.604
Latest Major Action: 2/26/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
100 CO-SPONSORS ALPHABETICALLY:
HR 1207 Co-Sponsors (as of 4/29/2009)
Rep Kagen, Steve [WI-8] - 2/26/2009
Rep Bachmann, Michele [MN-6] - 2/26/2009
Rep Bartlett, Roscoe G. [MD-6] - 2/26/2009
Rep Jones, Walter B., Jr. [NC-3] - 2/26/2009
Rep Rehberg, Denny [MT] - 2/26/2009
Rep Posey, Bill [FL-15] - 2/26/2009
Rep Broun, Paul C. [GA-10] - 2/26/2009
Rep Poe, Ted [TX-2] - 2/26/2009
Rep Burton, Dan [IN-5] - 2/26/2009
Rep Abercrombie, Neil [HI-1] - 2/26/2009
Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. [CA-6] - 2/26/2009
Rep Garrett, Scott [NJ-5] - 3/5/2009
Rep Chaffetz, Jason [UT-3] - 3/6/2009
Rep Kingston, Jack [GA-1] - 3/6/2009
Rep Young, Don [AK] - 3/6/2009
Rep Rohrabacher, Dana [CA-46] - 3/6/2009
Rep Stearns, Cliff [FL-6] - 3/6/2009
Rep McClintock, Tom [CA-4] - 3/6/2009
Rep Heller, Dean [NV-2] - 3/6/2009
Rep Duncan, John J., Jr. [TN-2] - 3/6/2009
Rep Taylor, Gene [MS-4] - 3/6/2009
Rep DeFazio, Peter A. [OR-4] - 3/9/2009
Rep Alexander, Rodney [LA-5] - 3/10/2009
Rep Price, Tom [GA-6] - 3/10/2009
Rep Petri, Thomas E. [WI-6] - 3/10/2009
Rep Foxx, Virginia [NC-5] - 3/10/2009
Rep Grayson, Alan [FL-8] - 3/11/2009
Rep Marchant, Kenny [TX-24] - 3/11/2009
Rep Wamp, Zach [TN-3] - 3/16/2009
Rep Blackburn, Marsha [TN-7] - 3/16/2009
Rep Buchanan, Vern [FL-13] - 3/17/2009
Rep Castle, Michael N. [DE] - 3/17/2009
Rep Fleming, John [LA-4] - 3/18/2009
Rep Akin, W. Todd [MO-2] - 3/19/2009
Rep Platts, Todd Russell [PA-19] - 3/19/2009
Rep Peterson, Collin C. [MN-7] - 3/19/2009
Rep McCotter, Thaddeus G. [MI-11] - 3/19/2009
Rep Lummis, Cynthia M. [WY] - 3/19/2009
Rep Burgess, Michael C. [TX-26] - 3/19/2009
Rep Sessions, Pete [TX-32] - 3/23/2009
Rep Deal, Nathan [GA-9] - 3/23/2009
Rep Franks, Trent [AZ-2] - 3/23/2009
Rep Miller, Jeff [FL-1] - 3/24/2009
Rep Blunt, Roy [MO-7] - 3/24/2009
Rep Stark, Fortney Pete [CA-13] - 3/26/2009
Rep Culberson, John Abney [TX-7] - 3/26/2009
Rep Paulsen, Erik [MN-3] - 3/30/2009
Rep Gingrey, Phil [GA-11] - 3/30/2009
Rep Terry, Lee [NE-2] - 3/30/2009
Rep Carter, John R. [TX-31] - 3/31/2009
Rep Capito, Shelley Moore [WV-2] - 4/1/2009
Rep Wittman, Robert J. [VA-1] - 4/1/2009
Rep Fallin, Mary [OK-5] - 4/2/2009
Rep Smith, Lamar [TX-21] - 4/2/2009
Rep Westmoreland, Lynn A. [GA-3] - 4/2/2009
Rep Lucas, Frank D. [OK-3] - 4/21/2009
Rep Lamborn, Doug [CO-5] - 4/21/2009
Rep Ehlers, Vernon J. [MI-3] - 4/21/2009
Rep Bilbray, Brian P. [CA-50] - 4/21/2009
Rep Pence, Mike [IN-6] - 4/21/2009
Rep Manzullo, Donald A. [IL-16] - 4/21/2009
Rep McCaul, Michael T. [TX-10] - 4/21/2009
Rep Cole, Tom [OK-4] - 4/21/2009
Rep Roe, David P. [TN-1] - 4/21/2009
Rep Herger, Wally [CA-2] - 4/21/2009
Rep Bishop, Rob [UT-1] - 4/21/2009
Rep Baldwin, Tammy [WI-2] - 4/21/2009
Rep Olson, Pete [TX-22] - 4/21/2009
Rep Latham, Tom [IA-4] - 4/21/2009
Rep Luetkemeyer, Blaine [MO-9] - 4/21/2009
Rep Doggett, Lloyd [TX-25] - 4/21/2009
Rep Rooney, Thomas J. [FL-16] - 4/22/2009
Rep Massa, Eric J. J. [NY-29] - 4/22/2009
Rep Johnson, Sam [TX-3] - 4/22/2009
Rep Thompson, Glenn [PA-5] - 4/22/2009
Rep Brady, Kevin [TX-8] - 4/22/2009
Rep Smith, Adam [WA-9] - 4/22/2009
Rep Shimkus, John [IL-19] - 4/22/2009
Rep Graves, Sam [MO-6] - 4/22/2009
Rep Jenkins, Lynn [KS-2] - 4/23/2009
Rep Gohmert, Louie [TX-1] - 4/23/2009
Rep Inglis, Bob [SC-4] - 4/23/2009
Rep Kaptur, Marcy [OH-9] - 4/23/2009
Rep Johnson, Timothy V. [IL-15] - 4/23/2009
Rep Brown, Henry E., Jr. [SC-1] - 4/28/2009
Rep Biggert, Judy [IL-]On record so far on www.thomas.gov
Title: To amend title 31, United States Code, to... more
