Chinese // Current

Chinese Hotel Workers Blast Hyatt

Chinese Hotel Workers Blast Hyatt... more

YouthOutlookMultimedia
added this
5 days ago
|
0 comments

The Chinese Are Even Bootlegging Condoms?

Think condoms mean safe sex? Think again. London's Times newspaper reports that... more

doggeman
added this
9 days ago
|
1 comment

Chinese Sex Causes Stock Market Rise 中國股市上升

This true story demonstrates how the Chinese make love and money at the same time! -

NewWarriorMan
added this
19 days ago
|
1 comment

Those naughty naughty fruits

Fruit magic with some of its very best stars, they are five of your five a day, hand... more

1978jamesb
added this
1 month ago
|
0 comments

United Kingdom Talk Video Saturday 10th October 2009

Saturday's edition of my three times a week talk show.Watch the show here on CURRENT... more

ChrisReardon
added this
1 month ago
|
0 comments

Empire state building lights up for China

The Empire State, a symbol of New York City and its tallest building, has created... more

arsenal32291
added this
1 month ago
|
0 comments

The Truth of the Life of the World ( Free Book & Movies )

What is the life of this world but play and amusement? But best is the home in the... more

baspren
added this
1 month ago
|
0 comments

Greed and fear trump American companies' commitment to free speech. Surprised?

Item 1: When it appears in the coming months, look carefully through Yale University Press' new book The Cartoons That Shook the World. It is a scholarly account of the controversy that surrounded a Danish newspaper's 2005 publication of 12 cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed. The author, Jytte Klausen, argues, among other things, that the controversy was manipulated by Danish imams who showed their followers false, sexually offensive depictions of Mohammed alongside the real ones, which were not inherently offensive. She consulted with several Muslim scholars, who agreed. Nevertheless, you will not find the cartoons themselves printed in the finished book.

Item 2: Pick up a copy of the U.S. edition of September's GQ. Buried deep inside, you will find an article titled "Vladimir Putin's Dark Rise to Power," by Scott Anderson. The article, based on extensive reporting, argues that Russian security services helped create a series of bomb explosions in Moscow in 2000—explosions that were blamed on Chechen terrorists at the time. Read it carefully, for you will not find this article in GQ's Russian edition. As of this writing, you will not find this article on GQ's Web site, either: Condé Nast, the media company that owns GQ, has ordered all its magazines and affiliates around the world to refrain from mentioning or promoting this article in any way.

Item 3: If your knowledge of written Chinese characters is up to it, type the word Tiananmen into Google.cn. I am reliably informed (not knowing Chinese myself) that your search will retrieve little or no useful information on this subject, nor will it tell you much about Taiwan or Tibet or democracy. This is not an accident: In 2006, Google agreed to a modicum of censorship in China, in exchange for being allowed to operate there at all.

These three incidents are not identical. Yale's press refused to print the cartoons because the university fears retaliatory violence on its campus. Condé Nast refused to promote an article on the Russian secret service because it fears loss of Russian advertisers. Google refuses to let its Chinese users search for Tiananmen and other taboo subjects because Google wants to compete against Chinese search engines for a share of the huge Chinese market. All three companies exhibit greatly varying degrees of remorse, from Condé Nast (none) to Yale's press (a lot) to Google (ambivalent: Google founder Sergey Brin initially argued that the company would at least bring more information to China, if not complete information).

Nevertheless, the three stories lead to one conclusion: In different ways, the Russian government, the Chinese government, and unnamed Islamic terrorists are now capable of placing de facto controls on American companies—something that would have been unthinkable a decade ago. In a world that seems more dangerous and less profitable than it did in the past, greed or fear proved stronger than these companies' commitment to free speech.

More to the article at the link.Item 1: When it appears in the coming months, look carefully through Yale University... more