Debates // Current TV

Get It Together Or Move Over

I just witnessed sickening coverage of the Obama/Biden ticket on CNN. The Republicans... more

futuregen
added this
3 years ago
|
1 comment

Open Debates.

Six things you can do to open the debates.

futuregen
added this
3 years ago
|
2 comments

The Invisible Man

Open the Debates for true Democracy!

futuregen
added this
3 years ago
|
0 comments

Debates: Rhetorical Questions

Who will win the presidential debates? What does each candidate’s use of words... more

lecoke
added this
3 years ago
|
0 comments

Do You Want Bob in the Debates?

Please call the Commission on Presidential Debates at (202) 872-1020 and politely... more

shortbusgeek
added this
3 years ago
|
5 comments

Ralph Nader plans rally to get into debates

Ralph Nader, the consumer advocate who is running as an independent for president,... more

mjsmith11
added this
3 years ago
|
28 comments

Campaign Update 08/05/08

The House is revolting, John McCain and Barack Obama are debating, and everybody is... more

Brett_Erlich
added this
3 years ago
|
12 comments

Should We Rid The Mind of God? A Debate - Part 1/8

"Professor Alister McGrath and Professor Peter Atkins debate on whether or not we... more

c4chaos
added this
3 years ago
|
0 comments

Can Clinton win?

Tonight Barack Obama clinched the majority of the pledged delegates. If for some... more

ikeula75
added this
4 years ago
|
1 comment

Health Care: Basic Human Right or Privilege

"A two hour public forum held October 13, 2007 in New Haven, Connecticut entitled... more

c4chaos
added this
4 years ago
|
0 comments

You Decide: Challenge your assumptions.

"Nothing about the issues facing the candidates and American voters in 2008 is... more

c4chaos
added this
4 years ago
|
0 comments

Nader v. Obama

On Meet the Press on May 4, Senator Obama told Tim Russert that he was willing to... more

Pwdrskir
added this
4 years ago
|
50 comments

How to Write Strong Arguments

The goal is to write strong arguments (funny ones welcome too, sometimes). You will... more

Mr_Costello
added this
4 years ago
|
2 comments

I’m going to contend that the following positions do not equate to a journalist in the academic/accredited sense: Washington Correspondent, Commentator, Host, Moderator, News Anchor, Political Advisor/Analyst.

The questions posed to the candidates at the PA. debate were in poor taste, and a disgrace to Edward R. Murrow. They were delivered in predominantly derogatory tone and the all-too-familiar cadence of modern broadcast television news.

I think we’ve grown tired of the ‘pitting them against one another’ bit. I’d prefer to hear what the candidates have to say regarding their plans for helping America. Isn’t that what we all want? To help America? I don’t think these questions are going to help people still living in FEMA trailers in New Orleans, but hey, maybe i’m wrong. Use airtime to inspire people, not gorge on trashy tabloid trivialities.

The first question was about who would be number two on the ticket, which seems trivial and i’ll only say that my advice to both candidates is that I expect either one of them to be more than happy to have the honor of being vice-president. Hey, they both (I hope) would have a better job of restoring integrity and the public’s faith in the senate and congress.

And then later came the most infamous, inane question of the debate; what I believe we will be seeing replays of for years to come, when arguments against the corrosive effect of broadcast ‘news entertainment’ are levied; ”Do you think Rev. Wright loves America more than you?“

Seriously? Seriously?! You won’t find better political satire on ‘The Family Guy’ or ‘The Daily Show’

Are the ‘hosts’ qualified journalists who’ve read and understand the SPJ Code of Ethics? http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp Lest we forget, a qualified journalist a TV news anchor does not make. This is why I find it disappointing when programs, in this case hosted by Charles G. and George S., promulgate low-brow television ‘news entertainment’ that is divisive and corrosive in nature.

TV news comes in a variety of sizes. Two of the most recently popular in modern times are the data grazers/infographic enthusiasts/media accountants, giving you data and ample miscellany facts. Then, mostly on cable news, you have speculators/spinsters, pontificating about, in most cases, the salacious scandal of the day, to increase ratings and viewership. Clamoring for attention to accomplish these last two objectives has degraded the integrity of modern journalism. It leads me to what I argue are the three main components of late 20th century/early 21st century (1950-now) network broadcast news; 1.) Cadence 2.) Format/Schedule 3.) Sensationalism.

Some broadcasters may not realize the strong effect of their actions; how the choice of wording and the delivery of a sentence carries enough weight and purpose to reshape thought and interpretation, to reinforce myths and stereotypes, to corrode civic discourse or inspire it, and to influence, validate and strengthen public perceptions and belief systems.

Most broadcast network affiliate news stations employ show producers; they write the copy that goes in the teleprompter. There is usually one for every show; so for instance, if where you live, the local station has a morning or noon show, then a 5, 6 and 11pm newscast, there would be one person for each of those shows who handles the copy for the main anchors. It may or may not be a requirement to have a degree in journalism for this position.

For the most part, they're people like you and me. They get up, go to work, come home, and are generally good souls. But in the case of broadcast news, they are more than likely under tight deadlines, where innocently-written, haphazard sentences have a greater chance of making their way to to the lips of the person reading the local news on your TV. But don't forget, they’re also reading to millions of people; mass communication in a familiar, hypnotic cadence that carries the weight of ‘authority’ and ‘fact’.
I’m going to contend that the following positions do not equate to a journalist... more

shampton
added this
4 years ago
|
7 comments

The Campaign Spot on National Review Online

I don’t like Hillary Clinton. But I respect her as an adversary. And every once... more

aharvath
added this
4 years ago
|
0 comments

Newsblast! 02.27.08

Clinton vs. Obama. Microsoft vs. Europe. And a mayor's racy photos vs. the town... more

infoMania
added this
4 years ago
|
4 comments

Obama, Clinton throw down in debate

Hillary Rodham Clinton had her last, best chance to slow Barack Obama before the March... more

woodywoodbeck
added this
4 years ago
|
21 comments

Obama, Clinton rumble in Texas debate

Sens. Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois faced off in a... more

woodywoodbeck
added this
4 years ago
|
45 comments

Candidates to debate on Science issues?

The growing movement to host a presidential debate focused on science has reached a... more

woodywoodbeck
added this
4 years ago
|
4 comments

What went down in the FINAL Republican primary debate?

Mitt Romney John McCain Mike Huckabee Ron Paul The republican presidential... more

woodywoodbeck
added this
4 years ago
|
34 comments

select your country

Community Spotlight

TAGS

tagged w/ Debates

top videos

find current on tv

find current online

recent comments

© 2012 Current TV, LLC All Rights Reserved

the basics

follow us online

tools

stay in touch

© 2012 Current TV, LLC
All Rights Reserved