tagged w/ 9/11 Commission
-
During a town hall event in Portsmouth, OH on Wednesday, John McCain was asked by a member of the audience whether his links to the parent organization of the Project for a New American Century explain why he has been reluctant to support calls for a new investigation of 9/11.
During a town hall event in Portsmouth, OH on Wednesday, John McCain was asked by a... more
-
-
It is now a proven fact that we were shown
doctored images on TV on 9/11.
The SEPTEMBER CLUES video series (part1-9)
is an 80min analysis of all the inconsistencies of
the broadcasts aired on that fateful day.
The attached "NOSED OUT" video is a trailer of
sorts for SEPTEMBER CLUES. It demonstrates
beyond any reasonable doubt that the FOX live
shot showing "Flight175" hitting WTC2 is a computer
generated forgery.
The myriad of theories surrounding 9/11 have served
the perpetrators well for over 6 years, giving the false
impression freedom of speech was alive and well but
ultimately spreading an almost mindnumbing confusion.
As most theories have built on the false assumption
that one or more airliners were hijacked, the 'plane
myth' has held strong - in spite of the widespread
understanding no plane crashed at the Pentagon -
nor in Shanksville. There is, in fact, no evidence
of the existence or remains of any of the 4 planes.
The misheld belief that 'thousands of Newyorkers' saw
passenger planes crash into the twin towers is upheld
solely by the relentless pounding of the mainstream media,
the higher levels of which evidently have complied to the
requirements of this military false-flag operation.
Virtually all firsthand witnesses to the first "plane" were
newspeople as shown in SEPTEMBER CLUES part4.
As for the second 'plane', most witnesses on the street
reported 'a small aircraft' or even 'a missile' - or merely
'explosions in the tower'. These reports were actually aired
on the day and never again.
Only about 36 videos exist depicting an airplane silhouette
impacting the towers. Some of those turn out to be cropped or
rotated duplicates of the same shot, while most disqualify each other by
the way of unconcilable differences : trajectories, angles, pitch,
yaw, speeds, lighting, hues - you name it. The few clips showing
the actual 'plane' penetration depict an object penetrating the steel-
frame tower effortlessly without as much as a rear aileron breaking off.
Most still photographs show only the fireball and no plane. A dozen
stills - purportedly shot by amateurs - do feature the 'plane' : all
12 depict the 'plane' in its last 1 or 2seconds of flight, with tower nicely
lined up and both (tower and plane) in sharp focus and zero motionblur.
The current reluctance of most people to recognize and accept this
research has many motives, the foremost being the conditioning power
of the images from the newsmedia. However, the many mistakes made
by the authors of those forgeries will not stand the test of time. This branch
of 9/11 truth research is naturally being vigorously attacked and billed as
"disinformation" - as it contains the only tangible and repeatable proof of
this very sad and murderous hoax : no one is going to prove HOW the
towers fell or that a Norad standdown WAS ordered. The latter is what the
perpetrators are counting on. We may only hope that no decent human
being will allow this lie to live on unchallenged.
I am an audio-video professional who has spent many years researching 9/11,
only to realize in early 2007 that I could contribute actively to the truth with my
video-editing and audio processing skills.
My full research
SEPTEMBER CLUES (part 1-9+Epilogue)
911 AMATEUR (part1-3)
FOXED OUT (part1-2)
NOSED OUT
CHOPPED OUT
can be viewed here :
http://www.livevideo.com/socialservice It is now a proven fact that we were shown
doctored images on TV on 9/11.
The... more
-
-
DEFINITIVE PROOF OF TV FAKERY
The newsmedia aired forged broadcasts on 9/11
THIS IS A VIDEO ANALYSIS of 4 so-called "amateur" shots
of the strikes on WTC2 on 9/11 2001.
THE SHOTS ANALYZED ARE CREDITED TO :
1 : Evan Fairbanks
2 : Luc Courchesne
3 : Michael Hezarkhani
4 : Tina Cart
MOST RELEVANT POINTS TO FOCUS ON
IF YOU WISH TO DISCUSS THIS RESEARCH :
SHOT 1 : (Evan Fairbanks) This video has many oddities. One is that the airplane melts into the tower with NOTHING - not even the aft assembly – breaking off. Another is the impossible reflection in the car windshield : this incredible blunder establishes the ineptitude of the authors of this forgery - or the courage of a whistleblower.
SHOTS 2 & 3 (Courchesne and Hezarkhani) : Both these shots clearly show, on 'plane' impact, two explosions on the tower (over and under right wingtip). If these are not shape charges planted in the tower, what could they possibly be ? Please do not suggest “fuel in the wingtips exploding” …
SHOT 4 : (Tina Cart) The stripes on the World Trade Centers are extremely bright - even though they are in shade. This ALONE exposes this shot as a forgery. If you should disagree, please explain.
The ineptitude of the "911 video forgery team" may be a difficult thing to take in. How could such incompetence go undetected in a presumably well-funded operation ? Yet this is what we have and what emerges from the close scrutiny of these images, repeatedly broadcast on TV.
This “911 AMATEUR” series is the sequel to my
wider analysis of all the 9/11 TV footage which
has well over a million views on the internet :
"SEPTEMBER CLUES" (part1-8)
English version : www.livevideo.com/socialservice
italian subtitles : www.livevideo.com/tricky1975
spanish subtitles : www.youtube.com/user/jesudel
DEFINITIVE PROOF OF TV FAKERY
The newsmedia aired forged broadcasts on 9/11... more
-
-
THE ULTIMATE PROOF
NO PASSENGER JET HIT WORLD TRADE CENTER 1
An analysis of the Naudet brothers' footage
of the first strike on World Trade Center 1.
If someone asks you to see a video of the WTC exploding with no plane in it, here's your best choice. The Naudet WTC1 footage is maybe the most famous of all the 9/11 images.
My analysis here has consisted - as usual - in slowing down the video, check it frame by frame and occasionally crop (enlarge) some shots to view the fine details. (As ever, I have of course NOT altered one single pixel of the material ).
The graphic object diving into the tower appears to be transparent : I call it 'THE GLASS PLANE'. It really is a poor graphic insertion. No video compression will make a block of pixels change color entirely depending on the background it is cast against. But more, much more importantly :
EVIDENCE OF MISSING AIRPLANE :
We may observe that the visible right side of the tower remains intact until 6 seconds after impact . Indeed, we may see 30% of the (righthand) wall still INTACT for several seconds after impact. At the 6sec mark we see the ignition of the shape charges which eventually rip open the wide plane-shaped hole we all remember.
As the explosive charges only manage to open a 130ft-wide gash, a problem arises for the perpetrators : a Boeing 767's wingspan is 156 feet. So, to fix this problem, the far right tip of the gash (representing 'plane's wingtip') gets penciled in digitally on the video to reach the approx160gash-width required to 'sell' the idea of a Boeing767 melting entirely into WTC 1. (NOTE TO SKEPTICS : No, that black gash appearing suddenly is NO SMOKE - it appears too quickly and develops in opposite wind direction).
The inescapable conclusion is that NO LARGE PASSENGER JET crashed into the WTC1.
This “911 AMATEUR” series is the sequel to my
wider analysis of all the 9/11 TV footage with
over a million views over the internet :
"SEPTEMBER CLUES" (part1-8)
English version : www.livevideo.com/socialservice
italian subtitles : www.livevideo.com/tricky1975
spanish subtitles : www.youtube.com/user/jesudel
THE ULTIMATE PROOF
NO PASSENGER JET HIT WORLD TRADE CENTER 1
An analysis of the... more
-
-
The Official "We're In A Lot Of Trouble" Video
-
-
New World Order- DJ Chris Geo
it's actually a very good song
-
-
It says...
"A seven-page report for former commission members by the panel's former executive director, Philip Zelikow, says the group made broad initial requests for intelligence information from interrogations, "including repeated requests for very detailed information" about the interrogations and how they were carried out."
*******
Look at him. Is this not a face that only a mother could love? (low blow just kidding)
Zelikow you will remember was the executive in charge of the Bush transition team when they took over the White House. Any evidence that he objected to being in the official record of the 9/11 commission report was not included. Many crucial pieces of evidence were intentionally kept from the commission and their report thanks to Zelikow.
He is also is credit by some outside groups critical of the Administration as one of the Masterminds of the Preemptive War Strategy.
I think it is nice and all that the Washington Post printed this article, but give me a break! There was so much that I have seen on videos on Youtube and Google that were on the TV at one point but conveniently they are consistently left out every time a retelling of the 9/11 myth is repeated.
Can you think of things that were left out of the official report?It says...
"A seven-page report for former commission members by the... more
-
-
jubal
-
added this
-
4 years ago
- |
-
A march on 9/11 in New York City to various media outlets calling for truth in 9/11 investigations.A march on 9/11 in New York City to various media outlets calling for truth in 9/11... more
-
-
DKVOVK
-
added this
-
6 years ago
- |
-
"WASHINGTON, Dec. 6 The Central Intelligence Agency in 2005 destroyed at least two videotapes documenting the interrogation of two Al Qaeda operatives in the agencys custody, a step it took in the midst of Congressional and legal scrutiny about the C.I.As secret detention program, according to current and former government officials.""WASHINGTON, Dec. 6 The Central Intelligence Agency in 2005 destroyed at least... more
-
-
klenga
-
added this
-
4 years ago
- |
