tagged w/ Voting Machines
-
-
A top Republican internet strategist who was set to testify in a case alleging election tampering in 2004 in Ohio has died in a plane crash. Michael Connell was the chief IT consultant to Karl Rove and created websites for the Bush and McCain electoral campaigns. Michael Connell was deposed one day before the election this year by attorneys Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis about his actions during the 2004 vote count in Ohio and his access to Karl Rove’s email files and how they went missing.
Follow link to complete transcript and video of Amy Goodman's interview with Mark Crispin Miller.A top Republican internet strategist who was set to testify in a case alleging... more
-
-
jimmyp
-
added this
-
11 months ago
- |
-
I have compiled the 20 tips that will help you make sure that your vote will get counted... this time! Check it out and spread! www.AmericanPoliticsAllYouCanEat.com (a documentary film by Jordi Ortega & Johl Smilowski)I have compiled the 20 tips that will help you make sure that your vote will get... more
-
-
Blogged by David Safier
Tool Developed to Detect Possible Fraud in Election Tabulating Software
Pima County, AZ, Election Integrity Group Creates Software to Analyze Diebold GEMS Databases, Wants to Share Capability With Others...
Guest Blogged by David Safier of Blog for Arizona
Just in time for the elections, the Pima County, Arizona, Election Integrity Committee has developed computer tools to examine election databases created by the Diebold/Premier system. The EI group is offering to examine data from any jurisdiction in the country that uses Diebold's faulty GEMS (Global Election Management System). GEMS will tabulate about half the nation's votes on November 4th...
Last year, the Pima County EI group won a groundbreaking legal case which gave it access to all the county’s computer-generated databases since 2002. Recently, computer programs were completed to examine the databases. They have already revealed problems and inconsistencies that warrant further examination. For example, they found that a few dozen memory cards from optical ballot scanners were uploaded twice, causing changes in vote counts. (A document by Tom Ryan gives more details about the capabilities of these tools and possible problems they have uncovered.)
The programs search for such things as unusual increases in vote tallies, changes in configuration information, and similar indicators that could point to vote flipping or other inappropriate activity. They go through the election from start to finish --- from the Logic and Accuracy tests to the early voting and election day counting to the final wrap up. The results can then be displayed in a spreadsheet.
Anyone interested in more information should email ElectionIntegrity@earthlink.net.
This program isn’t a magic bullet that will prove an election has been rigged. By pinpointing specific problem areas, the results allow investigators to focus on the portions of the GEMS database where possible election fraud is most likely to have occurred.
When the Pima County EI group won access to GEMS databases dating back to 2002 in a court ruling, it was also granted access to all databases from future elections. As a result, it’s likely that Pima County will have the most carefully monitored elections in the nation.
Election Integrity groups outside of Pima County that suspect election fraud have a huge hurdle in front of them – gaining access to the GEMS databases. Hopefully, the newly available tools will encourage them to put pressure on local officials to make the data available.
The long term objective of the Pima County EI Committee is to distribute the programs widely, but currently the data examination is only being done in Tucson. The programs are still evolving in their scope and sophistication, and the analysis team in Tucson is still learning how to use the tools to maximum advantage. Years of work has given the team a familiarity with the GEMS systems that usually isn’t available elsewhere.
This PDF goes into more detail about the computer tools. The Pima County EI group can provide more information, including technical details about the GEMS databases. Please email questions to ElectionIntegrity@earthlink.net.
Blogged by David Safier
Tool Developed to Detect Possible Fraud in Election... more
-
-
Voters' presidential preferences remain favorable to a Barack Obama win on Tuesday, with 51% of traditional likely voters supporting the Democratic nominee for president, and 43% backing John McCain. An additional 1% say they support some other candidate, leaving 5% undecided.
With the last day here, does current think the Gallup Poll matters?Voters' presidential preferences remain favorable to a Barack Obama win on Tuesday,... more
-
-
Eight years on from the Florida chaos that introduced hanging chads to the world there have been reports of problems with touch-screen machines recording the wrong candidates in early voting.
These machines, which will be used by a third of American voters, have a simple interface that allows voters to cast ballots by pressing coloured areas on a screen.
Complaints first surfaced in West Virginia and have been repeated in Colorado, Tennessee and Texas. A number of voters in several Texas counties said that the machines flipped their votes from Democratic choices to Republican ones, and vice versa. In several instances officials were ordered to check the calibration of their machines.
Voting watchdog organisations wrote to 16 secretaries of state last week advising them of a problem with one make of electronic machine that caused votes for one candidate to be recorded as a vote for the rival.
Andrew Appel, a professor, said the touch-screen machines used in 18 of New Jersey’s 21 counties could be hacked into in seven minutes. He added that someone could replace a machine’s memory chip with one containing a fraudulent computer program capable of changing the results.
The machines’ manufacturer, Sequoia Voting Systems, disputed the findings and New Jersey state election officials expressed complete confidence in the security of its machines.
Many believe that optical scanners – especially ones that count the ballots at the election precinct, not at a central office – are the most reliable method. Those error rate for those systems in 2004, according to a University of Missouri study, was 0.7 per cent. The study found that touch-screen machines had an error rate of 1 per cent. Eight years on from the Florida chaos that introduced hanging chads to the world there... more
-
-
Ben heads to UC Santa Barbara to talk to the professors behind a study on Sequoia Voting Systems, a voting machine used in seventeen states as well as Washington DC. The study led to the machine being decommissioned in the
state of California. This is serious investigative journalism, which means a clip of a farting baby was used only twice.
The infoMania Tech Report is a weekly segment where technology guru Ben Hoffman takes a look at the newest tech products, gadgets and video games. It has been called “the funniest tech show on the web.” (No source for that quote is available at this time. In fact, there’s a good chance it was made up.)
infoMania is a half-hour satirical news show that airs on Current TV. The show puts a comedic spin on the 24-hour chaos and information overload brought about by the constant bombardment of the media. Hosted by Conor Knighton and co-starring Brett Erlich, Sarah Haskins, Ben Hoffman, and Sergio Cilli, the show airs on Thursdays at 10 pm Eastern and Pacific Times and can be found online at current.com/infomania. And make sure to check out our facebook profile for special features at infomaniafacebook.com.
Ben heads to UC Santa Barbara to talk to the professors behind a study on Sequoia... more
-
-
Once again, Monday got away from us. I assure you it's for a good cause.
// VC2 Leaderboard Winner //
Anyone who's been following the election has probably heard the name, Bill Ayers. Whether being labelled a domestic terrorist, or being championed as Citizen of the Year, the one voice that has failed to be heard is Ayers' own. Luckily for us, VC2 producer Mulcahey scored an exclusive interview with Bill Ayers and put together this VC2 leaderboard winning pod. Take a look and leave Mulcahey some kudos!
View Who is the real Bill Ayers?: http://current.com/items/89410378_who_is_the_real_bill_ayers
See more contributions from Mulcahey: http://current.com/people/Mulcahey
// Top 5 Contributors on Current.com //
Once again, here are your top 5 contributors from last week:
Apocalipstick (166 items)
http://current.com/people/Apocalipstick
goldenways (119 items)
http://current.com/people/goldenways
TravG73 (99 items)
http://current.com/people/TravG73
wlwatkins (83 items)
http://current.com/people/wlwatkins
abeer58 (67 items)
http://current.com/people/abeer58
Apocalipstick and goldenways ran away with it this week, but we are happy to welcome wlwatkins to the pack. Thanks for all your contributions.
// Most Commented Stories //
Here are the top commented stories from each day last week, in case you missed them the first time around:
Monday
W.Va. Machines are switching votes to GOP
http://current.com/items/89426453_w_va_machines_are_switching_votes_to_gop
Several voters in West Virginia have reported that the electronic voting machines have been flipping votes for Barack Obama to John McCain.
Tuesday
Remove In God We Trust from our Money
http://current.com/items/89446200_remove_in_god_we_trust_from_our_money
Should our money have say "In God We Trust?" Some suggest it shouldn't, and that citizens can take action simply by using a pen to cross out the phrase on their bills.
Wednesday
Dead bear covered with Obama signs found at school
http://current.com/items/89431665_dead_bear_covered_with_obama_signs_found_at_school
Police at Western Carolina University and wildlife officials were investigating the discovery early Monday of a dead bear cub draped with a pair of Barack Obama campaign signs
Thursday
Man finds racial slur printed on receipt
http://current.com/items/89433001_man_finds_racial_slur_printed_on_receipt
A Kansas city man found a racial slur printed on receipt after returning a pair of shoes.
Friday
3,000 professors sign to support William Ayers
http://current.com/items/89438971_3_000_professors_sign_to_support_william_ayers
Over 3,000 educators nationwide have signed a statement supporting William Ayers in response to the McCain campaign's focus on Ayers' radical acts in the 1960s and 1970s.
Saturday
McCain volunteer lied about attack
http://current.com/items/89444216_mccain_volunteer_lied_about_attack
The McCain volunteer who claimed she was attacked by an Obama supporter admitted that she lied about the attack.
Sunday
Graphic abortion pictures on trucks stir people to call cops
http://current.com/items/89451536_graphic_abortion_pictures_on_trucks_stir_people_to_call_cops
Billboard size pictures of aborted fetus on trucks were so graphic that some Fort Meyers citizens called the police.
10 myths about Atheism
http://current.com/items/89448441_10_myths_about_atheism
A recent poll showed that only 37% of Americans would vote for an otherwise qualified atheist for president. This article examines some of the common myths about atheism.
We're three days in and it's already shaping up to be a great week. See back here for the next recap!
Best,
Mario
Online Community Team
Subscribe to our blog: http://recp.rm05.net/servlet/SignUpForm?f=154944
Connect on Current.com: http://current.com/people/mario_a
Follow the Current.com team on Twitter: http://twitter.com/current
Follow me on Twitter? http://twitter.com/manima
Once again, Monday got away from us. I assure you it's for a good cause.
// VC2... more
-
-
In this disturbing video, the potential problems voting machines could cause on Election Day is seen in stark light.In this disturbing video, the potential problems voting machines could cause on... more
-
-
ANP: Voters to sue the state over voter rights.
Earlier this week, ANP reported that come November, Pennsylvania voters could face substantial delays at the polls. Now, voters are suing the state of Pennsylvania. With the help of Voter Action and the NAACP, they filed a complaint in the Philadelphia federal court, specifically citing an interview between the American News Project and Philadelphia Deputy City Commissioner Fred Voigt.
ANP: Voters to sue the state over voter rights.
Earlier this week, ANP reported... more
-
-
NAACP, Voting Rights Coalition Demand Paper Ballots If 'Majority' of Voting Machines Fail
Sec. of the Commonwealth Had Previously Decried Paper Only Necessary if ALL Voting Machines Break Down in a Precinct...
Finally! A lawsuit [PDF] has finally been filed today in federal District Court in Pennsylvania, against the Democratic Secretary of the Commonwealth, Pedro A. Cortes and the Commissioner of the state's Election Commission, Chet Harhut, over Cortes' recent decree that paper ballots only need be given out to voters in the event that every voting machine in a precinct breaks down.
That stunning decry was in opposition to PA's state law which allows election officials the discretion to give emergency paper ballots to voters if even a single machine breaks down in a precinct.
That neither Obama nor the DNC have said a word about this in the month or so since Cortes issued his decry has been maddening, and should be an outrage to voters of all parties in the Keystone State, sure to be another battleground state this November. The lawsuit was finally filed today by the state's NAACP in concert with the 866-MYVOTE1 Election Reform Network.
While the complaint should call for paper ballots to be made available to any voter who wishes one, or, at a minimum, to be given out if just one machine breaks down in a precinct, or even if the wait time in line is longer than 30 minutes, unfortunately, the suit calls very conservatively for emergency paper ballots to be given out if 50% or more of the voting machines in a precinct break down. But at least it's something, we guess, particularly in lieu of Obama and/or the DNC taking any action at all here, given they have the most to lose by the ridiculous action from state Democrats.
Pennsylvania uses unverifiable Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, usually touch-screen) machines across most of the state, and saw machine failure after failure, as we documented in detail during their April primary this year. The failures resulted in untold numbers of disenfranchised voters, as noted in news reports, and logged by calls to the 866-MYVOTE1 hotline...
"Voters should not be forced to wait hours in line in order to exercise their fundamental right to vote," said John Bonifaz, legal director for VoterAction.org and co-counsel for the plaintiffs in a statement issued today. "While the use of electronic voting machines continues to pose a separate threat to the integrity of the vote-counting process, federal court intervention is necessary to ensure that voters will not be disenfranchised by long lines on Election Day in Pennsylvania, when these machines become inoperable."
In a declaration filed with the suit, J. Whyatt Mondesire, the president of the NAACP State Conference of Pennsylvania, notes: "One of the major impediments to members exercising their right to vote is the long lines frequently encountered on election day...Thousands of members have faced serious delays in voting when machines have broken down in the past and this problem will be much more severe this year when unprecedented numbers of voters will be coming to the polls."
NAACP, Voting Rights Coalition Demand Paper Ballots If 'Majority' of Voting Machines... more
-
-
Three Putnam County voters say electronic voting machines changed their votes from Democrats to Republicans when they cast early ballots last week.
This is the second West Virginia county where voters have reported this problem. Last week, three voters in Jackson County told The Charleston Gazette their electronic vote for "Barack Obama" kept flipping to "John McCain".
In both counties, Republicans are responsible for overseeing elections. Both county clerks said the problem is isolated.
They also blamed voters for not being more careful.
"People make mistakes more than machines," said Jackson County Clerk Jeff Waybright.
Shelba Ketchum, a 69-year-old nurse retired from Thomas Memorial Hospital, described what happened Friday at the Putnam County Courthouse in Winfield.
"I pushed buttons and they all came up Republican," she said. "I hit Obama and it switched to McCain. I am really concerned about that. If McCain wins, there was something wrong with the machines.
"I asked them for a printout of my votes," Ketchum said. "But they said it was in the machine and I could not get it. I did not feel right when I left the courthouse. My son felt the same way.
"I heard from some other people they also had trouble. But no one in there knew how to fix it," said Ketchum, who is not related to Menis Ketchum, a Democratic Supreme Court candidate.
Ketchum's son, Chris, said he had the same problem. And Bobbi Oates of Scott Depot said her vote for incumbent Democratic Sen. John D. Rockefeller was switched to GOP opponent Jay Wolfe.
"I touched the one I wanted, Rockefeller, and the machine put a checkmark on the Republican instead," Oates said of her experience Thursday.
She said she caught the mistake, called over a worker in the county clerk's office and was able to correct her vote. But she worries other voters may not catch such a mistake.
When asked if she is sure she touched the box for Rockefeller, she said, "I'm absolutely positive."
Putnam County Clerk Brian Wood said on Saturday that he is upset there are "so many negative stories out there and not enough positive ones. We want people to vote. People need to know the facts.
"But we haven't had any major issues. We try to explain to voters how the machines work then they come in," Wood said.
In Putnam County, early voters have the option of asking for either touch-screen machines or optical scan ballots -- paper ballots on which people mark in their election choices.
Wood said some voters might not realize that touch-screen voting machines may take a few seconds to record their choices
Three Putnam County voters say electronic voting machines changed their votes from... more
-
-
"The electronic voting machines used in 18 of New Jersey's 21 counties can be hacked into in as little as seven minutes and manipulated to alter votes or fix elections, a new report by a Princeton University professor shows.
The report, by Andrew Appel of the Center for Information Technology Policy at Princeton, was released Friday following a hearing in an ongoing lawsuit to void the machines as unreliable.
"The AVC Advantage is too insecure to use in New Jersey," Appel concluded of the machine he tested over the summer. "New Jersey should not use any version of the AVC Advantage that it has not actually examined with the assistance of skilled computer-security experts."
Appel, a computer expert, tested New Jersey's most often-used touch-screen voting machine over the summer after questions arose about the accuracy of vote totals on some machines used in the Feb. 5 presidential primary.
His tests involved two machines that were used that day, including one that malfunctioned, said Penny Venetis, a law professor at Rutgers School of Law-Newark and co-director of its constitutional litigation clinic. Venetis represents the Coalition for Peace Action and others who have sued to force New Jersey to scrap its 10,000 electronic voting machines and return to paper balloting.
"We want these machines to be decommissioned. Enough is enough," Venetis said.
"The landmark is that for the first time a 100 percent independent review of the technology took place," said Irene Goldman, chairwoman of the coalition and one of the plaintiffs. "Everybody should be very happy there is a report that tells the truth about these machines."
With a trial date set for January, millions of New Jerseyans will vote on those machines in the Nov. 4 presidential election. Venetis said at least 20 states have banned touch-screen voting machines similar to those used throughout New Jersey.
New Jersey has tried for at least three years to address critics concerns by retrofitting the machines with printers that provide paper receipts. Voters could check their choices against what the machine recorded.
However, the state has missed several deadlines for retrofitting the machines because of technological glitches.
The case got a boost Friday, when Superior Court Judge Linda Feinberg authorized the release of Appel's critical report.
Appel said the machines, manufactured by California-based Sequoia Voting Systems, contain design flaws that could allow votes to go uncounted and cartridges that can be manipulated to change votes.
Sequoia disputes the findings.
"Throughout our report response, we show how simple, established, and previously used accuracy and security protections ... make the items in their report next to impossible," company spokesman Edwin Smith said. "Many of the scenarios painted by plaintiffs depend on the existence of crooked, malicious, and corrupt poll workers, while the success of some scenarios depends on both corrupt poll workers and inattentive voters."
The New Jersey Secretary of State's office, which oversees elections, did not respond Friday to a request for comment.""The electronic voting machines used in 18 of New Jersey's 21 counties can be hacked... more
-
-
A judge of the New Jersey Superior Court has prohibited the scheduled release of a report on the security and accuracy of the Sequoia AVC Advantage voting machine. Last June, Judge Linda Feinberg ordered Sequoia Voting Systems to turn over its source for a thorough examination. At that time she also ordered a report 30 days after delivering it to the Court - which should have been today.
Three weeks after the report was delevired, on September 24th Judge Feinberg ordered it not to be released. This is part of a lawsuit filed by the Rutgers Constitutional Litigation Clinic, seeking to decommission of all of New Jersey's voting computers. New Jersey mostly uses Sequoia AVC Advantage direct-recording electronic (DRE) models. None of those DREs can be audited: they do not produce a voter verified paper ballot that permit each voter to create a durable paper record of her electoral choices before casting her ballot electronically on a DRE. The legal basis for the lawsuit is quite simple: because there is no way to know whether the DRE voting computer is actually counting votes as cast, there is no proof that the voting computers comply with the constitution or with statutory law that require that all votes be counted as cast.
This report needs to be released now, not after the election. "Of the people, by the people, and for the people" is not just a slogan, it is supposed to be the core value of the law.
Strangely enough, the last armed revolt against the government in the US was in Athens, Tn. in *1946*. The cause? Voting issues ...
http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/1985/2/1985_2_72.shtmlA judge of the New Jersey Superior Court has prohibited the scheduled release of a... more
-
-
Day two of Live From Main Street and GRITtv’s special programming on voting in the United States. Registration deadlines loom and there are many obstacles. From reading tests to ID challenges, felon disenfranchisement laws and the endless purging of voter rolls the U.S. is almost alone among industrial world democracies in having no uniform federal voting law. WHY IS THAT?
As early voting begins in states across the country, we are joined by Wendy Weiser who directs the Brennan Center's work on voting rights and elections; Docia Buffington, the lead organizer for the Youth Voter Collective; renowned author and professor, Frances Fox Piven. She has written many books including Why Americans Still Don't Vote; and Dr. Divine Pryor the Executive Director of the Center for NuLeadership on Urban Solutions.Day two of Live From Main Street and GRITtv’s special programming on voting in the... more
-
-
GRITtv
-
added this
-
1 year ago
- |
-
I hope more attention is brought up concerning the vulberability of voting machines before this upcoming election.I hope more attention is brought up concerning the vulberability of voting machines... more
-
-
This year, as a result of a lot of changes in voting machines around the country, numerous voting districts across many states will be using new voting equipment that has either never been used in an election or has never been used in a national election involving millions of voters.
When new systems are used, problems often arise either with the equipment itself or with election officials and voters who are unfamiliar with it.
To see what equipment you and your state will be using in November and to familiarize yourself with it before the election, VerifiedVoting.org, an election integrity group that led the movement to get voter-verified paper audit trails added to touch-screen voting machines, has produced a comprehensive interactive map identifying the voting systems being used in election districts across the country. As far as I know, this is the most up-to-date list of voting equipment that exists.
The map offers several options for viewing. You can look at systems at a statewide macro level or click on a state to get a micro view of the various systems being used in each county or voting district, including the accessible equipment being offered for disabled voters. At the district level, you'll also find information about the maker of the voting machines and contact information for the election office.
The voting machine landscape has changed a lot since the 2000 presidential election when punch-card voting systems and dangling chads spawned a heated national debate and Supreme Court battle.
As a result of the 2000 debacle, the Help America Vote Act was passed in 2002 allocating federal funds to replace antiquated punch-card and lever machines with newer election technologies. Election officials quickly spent millions of dollars to buy paperless touch-screen voting machines -- also known as Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) machines -- that were touted by their makers as faster, more accurate and easier to use than punch-card machines.
But in 2003, technical reports began surfacing about serious security issues with the machines as well as reports about breakdowns and other problems. Public opinion has forced some voting districts to back away from the equipment since then. In some cases entire states -- such as California and Florida -- have outlawed DRE machines for use by anyone other than disabled voters and have recently replaced their touch-screen systems with new optical-scan machines.
In the last two years, 131 counties across 9 states -- California, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia -- have abandoned their DRE machines in favor of paper ballot voting systems, according to statistics collected by VerifiedVoting.
While some states like Nevada and Utah have added paper trails to their DRE machines, the District of Columbia and six states -- Delaware, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, New Jersey and South Carolina -- still use DRE's without paper trails statewide. A handful of other states use mixed systems -- paperless DREs in some districts and paper-based voting systems in other districts.This year, as a result of a lot of changes in voting machines around the country,... more
-
-
Diebold (the company's now called "Premier Election Solutions") voting machines in actual use in Ohio, Maryland, and other states for the last ten years may have been dropping votes that would only be noticed if jurisdictions crosschecked results after uploading vote tallies from memory cards to a central tallying point.
Chris Riggall, a spokesman for Premier Election Solutions, is "confident" that elections officials through the years would have realized votes had been dropped when they crosschecked their tallies to certify final elections results and would have reloaded cards so as not to lose votes.
"We are indeed distressed that our previous analysis of this issue was in error," Premier President Dave Byrd wrote Tuesday.
As recently as May, Premier said the problem was not of its making but stemmed from anti-virus software that Ohio had installed on its machines.
Fixing the problem?
Well, "..changes to systems must go through the Election Assistance Commission, Rigall said, and take two years on average for certification and approval -- and that is apart from whatever approvals and reviews would be needed by each elections board throughout the country.."
Diebold (the company's now called "Premier Election Solutions") voting machines in... more
-
-
Thursday 21 August 2008
by: Mary Pat Flaherty, The Washington Post
"A voting system used in 34 states contains a critical programming error that can cause votes to be dropped while being electronically transferred from memory cards to a central tallying point, the manufacturer acknowledges.
The problem was identified after complaints from Ohio elections officials following the March primary there, but the logic error that is the root of the problem has been part of the software for 10 years, said Chris Riggall, a spokesman for Premier Election Solutions, formerly known as Diebold."
And the winner is? I guess whoever owns the machines.....
Thursday 21 August 2008
by: Mary Pat Flaherty, The Washington Post
"A voting... more
-
-
The demise of touch-screen voting has produced a graveyard of expensive corpses: Warehouses stacked with thousands of carefully wrapped voting machines that have been shelved because of doubts about vanishing votes and vulnerability to hackers.
What to do with this high-tech junkyard is a multimillion-dollar question. One manufacturer offered $1 a piece to take back its ATM-like machines. Some states are offering the devices for sale on eBay and craigslist. Others hope to sell their inventories to Third-World countries or salvage them for scrap.
A few more are holding out hope that the machines, some of which were purchased for as much as $5,000, could one day be resurrected.
"We store them very, very carefully in the hopes that someone, someday may decide that we can use them again," said San Diego County Registrar Deborah Seiler, whose jurisdiction spent $25 million on the devices.
It wasn't supposed to be this way. After the disputed 2000 presidential recount, Congress provided more than $3 billion to replace punch card and lever-operated machines. State officials across the country said the new systems would eliminate human error and political tampering.
But problems with the machines soon followed: vanishing votes, breakdowns, malfunctions and increasing evidence that the devices were vulnerable to hackers.
Story continued at link...The demise of touch-screen voting has produced a graveyard of expensive corpses:... more
-
-
ivxx
-
added this
-
1 year ago
- |
