False Flag // Current TV

It’s The End Of The World As We Know It

2012 is here! The Mayans said it would be crazy! Earthquakes are poppin’ off,... more

R3zn8D
added this
1 month ago
|
33 comments

CBS News' Dan Rather: Osama bin Laden Was Near Death in 2002

Shortly after the 9/11 Terror Bombings, CBS' Dan Rather reported in 2002 that the... more

maasanova
added this
21 days ago
|
2 comments

Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I.

THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years — or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.

ut all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. Suspects naïvely played their parts until they were arrested.

When an Oregon college student, Mohamed Osman Mohamud, thought of using a car bomb to attack a festive Christmas-tree lighting ceremony in Portland, the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of “inert material,” harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover F.B.I. agent even did the driving, with Mr. Mohamud in the passenger seat. To trigger the bomb the student punched a number into a cellphone and got no boom, only a bust.

This is legal, but is it legitimate? Without the F.B.I., would the culprits commit violence on their own? Is cultivating potential terrorists the best use of the manpower designed to find the real ones? Judging by their official answers, the F.B.I. and the Justice Department are sure of themselves — too sure, perhaps.

Carefully orchestrated sting operations usually hold up in court. Defendants invariably claim entrapment and almost always lose, because the law requires that they show no predisposition to commit the crime, even when induced by government agents. To underscore their predisposition, many suspects are “warned about the seriousness of their plots and given opportunities to back out,” said Dean Boyd, a Justice Department spokesman. But not always, recorded conversations show. Sometimes they are coaxed to continue.

Undercover operations, long practiced by the F.B.I., have become a mainstay of counterterrorism, and they have changed in response to the post-9/11 focus on prevention. “Prior to 9/11 it would be very unusual for the F.B.I. to present a crime opportunity that wasn’t in the scope of the activities that a person was already involved in,” said Mike German of the American Civil Liberties Union, a lawyer and former F.B.I. agent who infiltrated white supremacist groups. An alleged drug dealer would be set up to sell drugs to an undercover agent, an arms trafficker to sell weapons. That still happens routinely, but less so in counterterrorism, and for good reason.

“There isn’t a business of terrorism in the United States, thank God,” a former federal prosecutor, David Raskin, explained.

...

Yea right...terrorism is big business in the US. We got all the naked body scanners after the so-called "underwear bomber." Then you find out Michael Chertoff, former Homeland Security director's private firm invested in them and were already ordered prior to the event. The list goes on and on: 7/7 London, Mumbai, Oklahoma City and the coup de grace of false flags, 9/11. Research OPERATION GLADIO...this sh!t's been going on for 60 years.THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years... more

rodstradamus
added this
1 month ago
|
0 comments

Government Planning to Evacuate Chicago

A couple weeks ago we reported on the Urban Warfare training that was going on in... more

JRBarilla
added this
1 month ago
|
3 comments

Dr. Sabrosky: The Truth Behind 9/11 Will Annihilate Israel

Press TV just now picking up on a two-year old interview with Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College.

***

A US Marine Corps veteran and author asserts that Israel masterminded the 9/11 attacks, saying if Americans were informed of this, they would exterminate the Zionist regime.

“I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the Headquarters Marine Corps, and I have made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100 percent certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period,” Alan Sabrosky, writer and consultant specializing in national and international security affairs, said in a clip appearing on the public video-sharing website You Tube.

Sabrosky said his colleagues who are still serving in uniform initially react with incredulity to his assertions but upon his explanations regarding the controlled demolition of the buildings their disbelief gives way to rage.

“First is disbelief, and what I show them immediately afterwards is an interview with a Danish demolitions expert named Danny Jowenko, and it shows the third building at the World Trade Center going down - WTC7.”

“The thing that's necessary is to tell people: three buildings went down; the third was not hit by a plane, it was wired for controlled demolition, therefore, all of them were wired for controlled demolition.

Sabrosky said if the Americans were apprised of the truth behind the attacks, they would not hesitate to eliminate Israel without any consideration for the costs involved.

“If Americans ever know that Israel did this, they are going to scrub them off the earth,” he said.

In his September 22, 2011 address to the UN General Assembly, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for an independent international probe into the 9/11 incident, saying the attacks provided the US with a convenient excuse to wage wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

“The Zionists are playing this as truly an all-or-nothing exercise, because if they lose this one, if the American people ever realize what happened, they're done,” Sabrosky concluded.Press TV just now picking up on a two-year old interview with Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D,... more

maasanova
added this
1 month ago
|
2 comments

Are the US and Israel Planning a False Flag Nuclear Attack to Start Iran War

Interesting video about the issue, you decide.

jubal
added this
2 months ago
|
121 comments

Sarkozy's Backers To Use Toulouse Attacks To Steal French Election

Believe it or not, at one point last year with Obama's bombing of Libya, France had more wars going on than the US!

***

The Crisis

A little over a week ago, on the 11th March, a French off-duty soldier was shot dead by an unknown gunman wearing a helmet in a suburb of Toulouse. The gunman escaped on a Yamaha T-Max scooter.

Then on the 15th of March, the same gunman shot dead two soldiers and wounded a third outside their barracks in Montauban (30 mins north of Toulouse). Again, he escaped on a scooter.

Then on the 19th March, the same gunman arrived at a Jewish primary and secondary school in Toulouse at 8am and shot dead a Rabbi teacher, his two young sons and a four-year-old girl, the school principal's daughter. All were shot in the head at point blank range. The young girl with a .45 caliber hand gun. He again escaped on a scooter. French security services have definitively linked the shootings and concluded that the same person was responsible for all three.

The killer's choice of targets were intended to maximise outrage. Witnesses of the broad-daylight shooting in Montauban saw him calmly reload his weapon and shoot one of the unarmed soldiers from point blank range as he tried to crawl away. Clearly, the gunman had professional training.

French President Sarkozy's 2012 re-election bid has been faltering almost since he was 'elected' in 2007.

Long viewed by a majority of the French public as a latter-day Napoleon wannabe, some were perplexed as to how he won the 2007 presidential race, given that one year before the election, opinion polls placed him a definite second, and between then and the election he did nothing to justify his alleged increase in popularity, with his 'Bling Bling' approach to electioneering turning the stomachs of many French people.

In addition, within a few months of his 'victory' in May 2007, Sarkozy's popularity had plummeted to around 30% as people reacted to his austere economic reforms, on which he had openly campaigned, mind you. How to explain such a sudden turnaround so soon after his victory?Believe it or not, at one point last year with Obama's bombing of Libya, France... more

maasanova
added this
2 months ago
|
0 comments

Kony 2012 Debunking Shows How Far Alternative Media Has Come

Great analysis on the Kony 2012 propaganda video. I didn't even need to watch it... more

maasanova
added this
3 months ago
|
0 comments

An Appeal To President Barack Obama

In yesterday’s The Ugly Truth podcast, I made an appeal to the listeners to... more

maasanova
added this
3 months ago
|
9 comments

Proof That ''Anonymous'' Is CIA, Government Operations, Cyber Terrorist's And Not Activist's - YouTube

This is very interesting. What do you think about this? True or false, what do you... more

wbradleyjr1
added this
4 months ago
|
5 comments

FBI May Shut Down Your Internet Access March 8th

This March 8th, the FBI is planning to unplug DNS servers it set up to help eliminate... more

Vierotchka
added this
4 months ago
|
9 comments

Brookings Institute: ‘Tehran-Sponsored 9/11′ Needed to Trigger Iran Invasion

‘Which path to Persia: Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran’ by... more

maasanova
added this
4 months ago
|
0 comments

USS Liberty Part II?

USS Liberty Part II? "On June 8, 1967, US Navy intelligence ship USS Liberty... more

maasanova
added this
4 months ago
|
0 comments

Another New Pearl Harbor? U.S. to send old warship to Persian Gulf

And the message is, “Israel is going to sink this old clunker and we’re gonna blame YOU [Iran] for it!”

With the collapse of the oil embargo to force Iran into a confrontation over the Straight of Hormuz, the US and Israel are looking for another way to get the long-sought war with Iran started, and more to the point, need to make it look like Iran is starting hostilities in order to make it politically more difficult for Russia and China to support Iran.

Now, recall that Israel has a past history of attacking US warships and framing others to trick the US into attacks on Israel’s enemies, with the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty (initially blamed on Egypt) as the most well-known example.

So here we have the USS Enterprise, the oldest carrier in the fleet, on her last legs, scheduled to be decommissioned next year. Her name is well known, in part because of the Star Trek TV series. Decommissioning a nuclear aircraft carrier is a very expensive process. USS Enterprise is powered by 8 nuclear reactors, all of which must be disposed of as nuclear waste material along with all the associated machinery. The US Navy would save a great deal of money, more than the scrap worth of the steel, if USS Enterprise were to be sunk in the Persian Gulf, where the radioactive mess is someone else’s problem to deal with.

So, why send an ancient ship at the end of her useful life into harms way? The same reason Franklin Roosevelt moved a bunch of obsolete warships from San Diego to Pearl Harbor, while the newer carriers and warships were well away from Hawaii on December 7th, 1941.

Israel has 3 Dolphin submarines, given to her by Germany. They have been seen transiting the Suez Canal in the past, and could well be operating in the Gulf of Oman, even the Persian Gulf by now, lying in wait for a used-up and obsolete warship, more useful as a sacrificial lamb than an actual weapon, a ship with American sailors, to be attacked as Israel attacked the USS Liberty, then to be blamed on the designated target, Iran, by a compliant media.

Did I miss anything?

WWII began when the US cut off Japan’s supply of oil, leading to their attack on Pearl Harbor. And you missed the fact that the World Trade Centers were scheduled to be demolished because of asbestos used in construction, but it was purchased by a Zionist with one of the Bush brothers involved, and then insured for billions right before 9-11 happened.

Coincidence? Or a false-flag event? Remember, a third WTC building was also demolished into its own footprint like the other two on the same day. These neocon/Zionist traitors got away with it. Beware of their plots and ploys now. Expose their treasonous treachery, because, as with 9-11, the mainstream media is running cover for the corporatocracy that profits from war.

The best defense against the Big Lie is the Whole Truth. God help us!And the message is, “Israel is going to sink this old clunker and we’re... more

maasanova
added this
4 months ago
|
36 comments

Paul-Haters Caught Planning To Dress Up As KKK, Pose As Paul Supporters

Coming on the heels of last week’s dirty deception by the Huntsman campaign,... more

misfit20
added this
5 months ago
|
92 comments

Who Started It? Closing Hormuz

Walter Block on Iran and Ron Paul.

The closure of an international body of water is an act of war. If Iran implemented such a policy in the Strait of Hormuz, it would thus constitute an act of war. This is because in order to do so, this country would have to physically violate the rights of peaceful shippers. One might object that at present, Iran has only threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz. However, in my understanding of libertarian theory based upon the non aggression principle (NAP) not only are people (or governments!) not permitted to actually invade, or violate the rights of peaceful individuals, they are not entitled to threaten this either.

However, before we unduly criticize the Iranians for this threat, let us put the matter in context. The U.S. government has also threatened a blockade of Iran. With many statements emanating from Washington D.C. to the effect that the U.S. government "is not taking anything off the table," they are menacing actions a lot more serious, and invasive, than a mere blockade.

Why is the U.S. acting in so bellicose a manner? This is because it seems to be a settled part of present American policy that Iran should not persist in its (supposed) goal of arming itself with nuclear weapons.

Now, somewhat paradoxically, I agree with the Obama administration on this matter. Iran should not have nuclear weapons. But, neither should anyone else! Why not? This is because they are necessarily offensive. This type of ordnance cannot be used in a way that distinguishes between the guilty and the innocent. States Rothbard in this regard: "… while the bow and arrow and even the rifle can be pinpointed, if the will be there, against actual criminals, modern nuclear weapons cannot. Here is a crucial difference in kind. Of course, the bow and arrow could be used for aggressive purposes, but it could also be pinpointed to use only against aggressors. Nuclear weapons, even ‘conventional’ aerial bombs, cannot be. These weapons are ipso facto engines of indiscriminate mass destruction." (For a further elaboration of this thesis and a discussion of its implications, see here.)

However, this demand of Iran on the part of the U.S. comes with particular ill grace given the fact that the latter country has thousands of such nuclear devices. If the Obama Administration had suddenly become infused with libertarianism in general, and with Rothbard’s analysis of nuclear weapons in particular, it would certainly be justified in continuing to press the Iranians not to develop such firearms. But it would begin this quest by getting rid of its own stocks first.

But are not the Iranians unstable? Are they not likely, under the leadership of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, to use these items against innocent people? Did not this person threaten to wipe Israel off the map with them, that is, use such weapons against that country? No. This was a mis-translation of what he actually said (see here, here, here, here, here and especially here {hyperlinks omitted see article at the link}). Nor is it possible to ignore the fact that there is only one country on the face of the earth that has actually employed atomic weapons against innocent men, women and children. And that country, strangely enough, is not Iran. Rather, it is the good old U.S. of A., land of the free and home of the brave. (See here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and especially here {hyperlinks omitted see article at link})

So, while I certainly endorse Rothbard’s analysis according to which any and all atomic weaponry is illicit according the NAP, it does not at all logically follow that a country with thousands of such armaments, that has the distinction of being the only one to have ever murdered people with such a heinous weapon, is justified in using force to prevent another nation from obtaining one for itself. (I here stipulate, arguendo, that this is indeed the case; Iran of course insists it is interested in nuclear power for entirely peaceful purposes.)....

Continued at:

http://lewrockwell.com/block/block193.htmlWalter Block on Iran and Ron Paul. The closure of an international body of water is... more

Dagum
added this
5 months ago
|
4 comments

Tying Israel Irrevocably to 9/11 - “We Know Who, We Even Know Why…”

A majority of Americans are aware that 9/11 had clear signs of government complicity,... more

maasanova
added this
5 months ago
|
1 comment

Flashback: Former National Security Advisor warned of staged terror attack to launch war with Iran

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/060207falseflag.htm An old... more

maasanova
added this
7 months ago
|
20 comments

Iranian plot was an inside job - Pepe Escobar (13.10.2011.)

A US government informant acting as a member of the Zetas, a drug cartel in Mexico,... more

Vierotchka
added this
8 months ago
|
8 comments

U.S. Says Iran-Tied Terror Plot in Washington, D.C. Disrupted ( Article)

FBI and DEA agents have disrupted a plot to commit a “significant terrorist act... more

factoverfiction
added this
8 months ago
|
0 comments

select your country

Community Spotlight

TAGS

tagged w/ False Flag

top videos

find current on tv

find current online

recent comments

© 2012 Current TV, LLC All Rights Reserved

the basics

follow us online

tools

stay in touch

© 2012 Current TV, LLC
All Rights Reserved