Tax Rates // Current TV

H.R. 8, The ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Bill, Passes Senate : Here’s The Official Text. Now, About The House . . .

More on this later, but how good a bill this is for progressives? Perhaps,... more

mfb1949
added this
5 months ago
|
0 comments

New Year’s Eve Fiscal Cliff NO-gotiations – Here’s Senate GOP Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s ‘To Do’ List

Wicked busy!... more

mfb1949
added this
5 months ago
|
1 comment

Fiscal Cliff, New Year’s Eve : Democrats, Biden – ‘We Won The Election, Let’s Surrender.’ Progressive Push Needed

WHat next?!... more

mfb1949
added this
5 months ago
|
0 comments

Fiscal Cliff Countdown : Unchain Us, Senator Reid, From Chained CPI

On Friday I wrote that a fiscal cliff deal that would appeal to enough GOP House and... more

mfb1949
added this
5 months ago
|
0 comments

Three Days Until Fiscal Cliff — Will A House Progressive Uprising Scuttle A Deal?

Ask Fiscal Clifford... more

mfb1949
added this
5 months ago
|
2 comments

Fiscal Cliff Approaching Fast

After the new year, the Congress has gone off the fiscal cliff and tax rates have gone... more

GlobalEconomist
added this
5 months ago
|
0 comments

In One Picture : Boehner’s Risky “Plan B” Fiscal Cliff Gambit Could Cost Him The Speakership

Watch out belooooowwwwwwww!!!!! http://latestbloomer.uskoa.com/?p=3171

mfb1949
added this
5 months ago
|
0 comments

Norquist Jumps Off The Fiscal Cliff! The First Five Self-Defeating Things About His Non-Endorsement Endorsement Of John Boehner’s “Plan B”

House votes at 8:00 pm, or thereabouts http://latestbloomer.uskoa.com/?p=3102

mfb1949
added this
5 months ago
|
0 comments

“Jeeves, Draw Mr. Norquist’s Bath.” — Whose Turn In Norquist’s Bathtub?

Lifeguard . . ? Lifeguard . . ? ANyone . . ?... more

mfb1949
added this
6 months ago
|
0 comments

These Right Wing Nut Job Blogs Don't CARE Much for Opposing Views

You comment, the regulars tee off on you, then YOU get banned before you can reply.... more

ParkyBill
added this
1 year ago
|
0 comments

Registering the Wealthy to Vote is Un-American

It's like giving them the combination to all the safes in the Treasury and the... more

ParkyBill
added this
1 year ago
|
0 comments

Bad Day for Your 401K, Huh?

Let me see if I can't cheer you up a little by telling you how corporations are... more

ParkyBill
added this
1 year ago
|
1 comment

Tax Fraud: Debunking the claim that higher income-tax rates reduce GDP.

The American debate over taxes is ferocious and highly partisan. Some, mostly Republicans, reflexively oppose all taxes. Others, mostly Democrats, decry the lack of progressivity and fairness in the tax system and favor higher tax rates for the wealthy.

This debate isn't new. The same arguments have been repeated, with the same passion, since our income tax system was created—first during the Civil War and then—after its initial rejection by the Supreme Court—following the ratification of the 16th Amendment in 1913. A wonderful book by Steven Weisman, The Great Tax Wars, brings this history to life.

But as Weisman makes clear, one thing has changed in a spectacular manner, and that is the American public's—and American politicians'—willingness to defend high marginal income-tax rates as an essential and proper way to pay for the cost of government. Until a generation ago, many Americans and their representatives argued vehemently that the wealthy ought to pay more in taxes, but that position has drastically declined in popularity. Weisman sets the debate in the context of the battle between those who invoke justice—progressive taxes create equity and hence justice—and those who invoke virtue—the belief that hard work should be rewarded and taxing higher income at an elevated level creates a disincentive to the hard work we should promote.

Leaders of a century ago invoked justice in remarkable language that is unimaginable today. President Woodrow Wilson called paying taxes "a glorious privilege." Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. observed that "taxes are what we pay for civilized society." In 1942, President Franklin Roosevelt said, "In this time of grave national danger, when all excess income should go to win the war; no American citizen ought to have a net income, after he has paid his taxes, of more than $25,000." That $25,000 is the equivalent of $323,208 in today's dollars. Can you conceive of a modern president suggesting that no American should earn more than $323,000 after taxes? (President George W. Bush went to war twice without once calling for such a common sacrifice to pay for it.) And President Harry Truman in 1948 vetoed a broad-based tax cut, even in the face of an expected and eventual congressional override, and then asked for a tax increase following his upset victory.

But President Ronald Reagan transformed our conversation about government and turned taxes into the enemy of progress. It is commonly thought that President George H.W. Bush's violation of his "read my lips" pledge cost him re-election and President Bill Clinton's 1993 tax increases cost him control of Congress.

Central to the intellectual debate about marginal tax rates has been the question of whether higher rates discourage people from working. President Reagan is famously reported to have observed that, as an actor, once he hit the top marginal rate—then 91 percent—he stopped making movies for the rest of the year. The result of sky-high marginal rates, this anecdote was supposed to prove, was declining productivity and economic growth.

Is this true? Let's look at a graph of the nominal top marginal tax rate in any given year and GDP growth in that year.

A caveat—obvious but critical—is in order. Simultaneity does not equal causation. Annual growth rates are a consequence of many factors, macro and micro, and the isolated impact of marginal tax rates on growth is hard, if not impossible, to discern from these numbers alone.

That said, it's obvious that there is no correlation between higher marginal tax rates and slowing economic activity. During the period 1951-63, when marginal rates were at their peak—91 percent or 92 percent—the American economy boomed, growing at an average annual rate of 3.71 percent. The fact that the marginal rates were what would today be viewed as essentially confiscatory did not cause economic cataclysm—just the opposite. And during the past seven years, during which we reduced the top marginal rate to 35 percent, average growth was a more meager 1.71 percent.

More sophisticated efforts to analyze this relationship also produce decidedly murky results. An excellent review of this in the Yale Law Journal, "Why Tax the Rich? Efficiency, Equity, and Progressive Taxation," concludes that there is scant, if any, legitimate academic support for the proposition that moderate, as opposed to dramatic, increases in marginal rates have any impact on the willingness of the wealthy to participate in the economy.

So where does this leave us? Probably with Weisman's conclusion—that the debate between justice and virtue will continue for years to come. But this debate may be little more than a Rorschach test—an inkblot into which we read our underlying values about income distribution and social welfare. Those who see taxes as the bane of progress will still claim that higher marginal rates are the enemy of economic growth. Those who favor greater progressivity will say there is no evidence of such a claim. They will conclude—and they will be right—that the wealthier can afford to pay more, with no harm to the nation's economic growth.The American debate over taxes is ferocious and highly partisan. Some, mostly... more

randomly
added this
3 years ago
|
1 comment

White House says no tax hike for middle class

President Barack Obama remains committed to not raising taxes on U.S. families earning less than $250,000 despite some conflicting statements from senior members of his economic team, the president's spokesman said Monday.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs restated the assurance after Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and National Economic Council Director Larry Summers appeared to leave open the possibility Obama would tap middle-class Americans' income.

"I'm going to deal with this and I'll do this one more time," Gibbs said after repeated questions from reporters about the differences between the economists and Obama. "The president was clear. He made a commitment in the campaign. That commitment stands."

Geithner and Summers sidestepped questions on Obama's intentions about taxes. Geithner said the White House was not ready to rule out a tax hike to reduce the federal deficit; Summers said Obama's proposed health care overhaul needs funding from somewhere.

"There is a lot that can happen over time," Summers said, adding that the administration believes "it is never a good idea to absolutely rule things out, no matter what."

During his presidential campaign, Obama pledged "you will not see any of your taxes increase one single dime" and repeatedly said middle-class families would not be effected.

But the simple reality remains that his ambitious overhaul of how Americans receive health care — promised without increasing the federal deficit — must be paid for.

"If we want an economy that's going to grow in the future, people have to understand we have to bring those deficits down. And it's going to be difficult, hard for us to do. And the path to that is through health care reform," Geithner said. "We're not at the point yet where we're going to make a judgment about what it's going to take."

Those comments dominated Gibbs' daily meeting with reporters.

"The president was clear during the campaign about his commitment on not raising taxes on middle-class families," Gibbs said. "And I don't think any economist would believe that in the environment that we're in raising taxes on middle-class families would make any sense, and the president agrees."

Geithner appeared on ABC's "This Week." Summers appeared on NBC's "Meet the Press" and CBS' "Face the Nation."President Barack Obama remains committed to not raising taxes on U.S. families earning... more

Future_America
added this
3 years ago
|
27 comments

Super-Rich Tax Cheats

The disgruntled Liechtenstein man who ratted out super-rich tax dodgers and sold the... more

Vierotchka
added this
4 years ago
|
1 comment

select your country

Community Spotlight

Join a Community Group

BFD - Big Featured Discussion

Viewer Created Content

TAGS

tagged w/ Tax Rates

H.R. 8, The ‘Fiscal Cliff’ Bill, Passes Senate : Here’s The Official Text. Now, About The House . . .

New Year’s Eve Fiscal Cliff NO-gotiations – Here’s Senate GOP Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s ‘To Do’ List

Fiscal Cliff, New Year’s Eve : Democrats, Biden – ‘We Won The Election, Let’s Surrender.’ Progressive Push Needed

Fiscal Cliff Countdown : Unchain Us, Senator Reid, From Chained CPI

Three Days Until Fiscal Cliff — Will A House Progressive Uprising Scuttle A Deal?

Fiscal Cliff Approaching Fast

In One Picture : Boehner’s Risky “Plan B” Fiscal Cliff Gambit Could Cost Him The Speakership

Norquist Jumps Off The Fiscal Cliff! The First Five Self-Defeating Things About His Non-Endorsement Endorsement Of John Boehner’s “Plan B”

“Jeeves, Draw Mr. Norquist’s Bath.” — Whose Turn In Norquist’s Bathtub?

These Right Wing Nut Job Blogs Don't CARE Much for Opposing Views

Registering the Wealthy to Vote is Un-American

Bad Day for Your 401K, Huh?

Tax Fraud: Debunking the claim that higher income-tax rates reduce GDP.

White House says no tax hike for middle class

Super-Rich Tax Cheats

top videos

The Young Turks

Is President Obama’s presidency becoming ‘Nixonian’?

John Fugelsang

Christmas for the tea party starring John Fugelsang and Santa Claus

Say Anything!

Dee Snider on how he met his wife: ‘Our courtship is illegal in most states now’

Talking Liberally

Stephanie and Charles Pierce on Mitt’s most ‘disastrous’ world tour ever

find current on tv

find current online

recent comments

© 2013 Current TV, LLC
All Rights Reserved

the basics

follow us online

tools

stay in touch