tagged w/ corrupt courts
-
Undeniable proof that there is no justice in America. Courts are a sham and public officials corrupt. Money buys you freedom absolutely and the rich and famous can thumb their nose at the law and never suffer consequences. Any ordinary citizen would have been in prison several times over she is a danger to society. This wont end until she kils herself or someone else.Undeniable proof that there is no justice in America. Courts are a sham and public... more
-
-
mik661
-
added this
-
1 year ago
- |
-
An excellent article and worth a read, but here are a couple of key excerpts---
*Bush's Key Line of Defense Destroyed*
Those statements, both on Sunday and in his December 2008 interview with Karl, destroys a key line in the Bush administration's defense against war crimes charges. For years, Cheney and other Bush administration officials pinned their defense on the fact that they had received legal advice from Justice Department lawyers that the brutal interrogations of “war on terror” detainees did not constitute torture or violate other laws of war.
Cheney's statements, however, would suggest that the lawyers were colluding with administration officials in setting policy, rather than providing objective legal analysis.
*Torture Preceded Legal Advice*
If ABC's Karl had a firmer grasp on the issues he queried Cheney about he would have known that as recently as last week, three UK high-court judges released seven paragraphs of a previously classified intelligence document that proved the CIA tortured Binyam Mohamed, a British resident captured in Pakistan in April 2002 who was falsely tied to a dirty bomb plot, months before the Bush administration obtained a memo from John Yoo and Jay Bybee at the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) authorizing specific methods of torture to be used against high-value detainees, further undercutting Cheney's line of defense.
The document stated bluntly that Mohamed's treatment "could readily be contended to be at the very least cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment by the United States authorities."
Under the United Nations Convention Against Torture, the treatment of Mohamed and the clear record that the Bush administration used waterboarding and other brutal techniques to extract information from detainees should have triggered the United States to conduct a full investigation and to prosecute the offenders.
In the case of the US's refusal to do so, other nations would be obligated to act under the principle of universality.
More...An excellent article and worth a read, but here are a couple of key excerpts---... more
-
-
Many studies conclude modern western women are less happy than women of earlier generations, or in cultures with less feminist influence. hese analyses overlook the delicate topic that modern women are not happy being feminist whores. Gender equality aside, feminism is about portraying all women as the abused, trafficked, prostituted, exploited victems of all men. Under feminism, all married women are exploited whores, as are all single women in relationships with men regarded victemized whores being exploited and raped. Feminism causes women to go around competing with each other as to how abused and exploited they are.. bragging about domestic violence, and how many abusive husbands they have divorced. RadFem abuse and rape stories are about 95% FALSE, so anytime we hear a RadFem talking about domestic violence, abuse or rape, we can be pretty darn sure we are listening to a whore making up lies. It sucks for the 5% or so real victems of abuse or rape, because they have to carry around pictures and police reports to prove that thier story is true, and that they are not just a lying whore playing the feminist game.
In a feminist world all our wives, girlfreinds, mothers, daughters, sisters. etc.. are all abused, exploited, trafficked whores and prostitutes. Women with virtue or integrity or fidelity are irrelevant. A feminist whore that wants a divorce so her ex hubby will be forced to pay her so she can have multiple sex partners, has exactly the same legal standing in 'no fault' divorce as a wife of exacting fidelity or one that really was abused, mistreated or abandoned. No fault divorce takes no account of which party breaks the marriage contract nor which one is harmed by the breach.
Feminist whores could make a decent wife, if there were fewer incentives to divorce. A lowdown hooker whore leaves the john when he stops paying for sex or after she robs him. Feminist divorce courts are a scam with judges/lawyers as the 'pimps' who side with the whores to spit the cash. A decent whorehouse has some reputation not rob customers, but the divorce court whorehouse has the opposite reputation, and whores expect to be able to spit anytime with all hubby's money, and use the pimp/judges to strongarm style force him to subsidize her future whoredom with alimony and child support,
It pretty much sucks being a feminist whore, but not as bad as it sucks being a man who marries one..
.. lol ...
(this article is written for entertainment purposes, and any similarities with your reality are intentional)Many studies conclude modern western women are less happy than women of earlier... more
-
-
The constitution and laws of the United States purportedly support marriage and parental rights, but in reality these precepts are undermined by whores of Radical Feminism that pervades our courts. "Whore" is a word that evolved from the prehistoric Germanic word 'hraz' meaning "one who desires" to the later christainized meaning "adulterer." The feminine of this, 'hrn', became 'hre' in Old English, the ancestor of Modern English word 'whore'. Modern meanings include: 1) A prostitute. 2) A person considered sexually promiscuous. 3) A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain. Promiscuous was long defined as lewd conduct or any sex outside of marriage, a similar meaning exists today for sex outside of a committed relationship. Whoredom was frequently the basis or grounds for a divorce, in accordance with biblical precepts. A very strict definintion of whore would be any sex outside of marriage, thus all prostitutes are whores, but not all whores prostitutes. An exceedingly strict view of prostitute would only exempt married persons who avail themselves to thier spouse with no conditions or restrictions, as many relationships exist where sex is often playfully bartered as a reward for something, such as a gift, cash, or mowing the lawn.. a practice even within marriage.
No fault divorce ignores grounds for divorce, so a woman seeking divorce for the desire to have sex outside of marriage (whoredom) has the same legal standing as an abandoned loyal, faithfu,l wife, or a woman who was abused, neglected or mistreated in a marriage. No fault divorce takes no account of which party violated the marriage contract, nor which party was injured by the breech of marriage contract. Radical feminism proclaims all women are the abused, exploited, coerced victims of all men, and in so doing has reduced all women to the status of trafficked whores and prostitutes, which is essentially the Radical Feminist definition of marriage. Radical Feminism diseminates propaganda to target and villify all men as abusers, with women a privildged victim class with special rights and benefits. This is exactly the same propaganda used by the Woman's Klan to justify slavery and often violent discrimination of blacks, who were portrayed as irresponsible, aggessive, hostile beasts, who basically needed to be beat down to protect 'white womanhood'.
The book Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony and the Rape of American Justice, was written by MARGARET HAGEN, PhD. She is an expert in this field, and teaches Psychology, Criminal Justice and Forensic Psychology at Boston University. Her book provides an excellent analysis of venal ’whores’, usually feminists, who work for the courts and provide biased, fabricated, and false testimony.
Many family courts consist of layers of lawyers, judges, therapists, counseling, visit centers and other venal whores who's livihood is spewing radical feminist ideology that advocates divorce and single parent motherhood as preferable to marriage, paternity, shared parenting, or fatherhood as it is alleged by our laws. In effect, whoremongering courts may easily reverse the intent and meaning of laws purporting to support marriage and fatherhood, by merely trotting out their favored whores, who provide biased, lewd , vulgar or unsupported testimony in favor of maternal custody over shared parenting. Child Custody, is the main determinant to the distribution of marital assets, the house, and the future income of both parents. Feminist whores consistently advocate sole or majority of custody to women, because this outcome results in financial benefits to the mothers, and funding to the other whores, whoremongers and thier feminist programs.The constitution and laws of the United States purportedly support marriage and... more
-
-
Marriage represents a substantial risk to men. Investing in a family is likely the most substantial investment of time and effort a man can make. Women typically 'win' no-fault divorces, and walk away with everything including the house, the marital savings, the car, the children, and even his future earnings. Men prudently view marriage as a unilateral debt obligation that women may 'cash in' at any time, and leave men broke and distressed over the loss of children. Accumulation of marital assets such as home equity could be viewed as detrimental as it provides incentives for the wife to divorce. Renting, secret acounts, or concealment of finances may be viewed as a financial hedging strategy for divorce risk.
The decision to be a single custodial parent is largely a financial choice made by women who perceive a benefit from filing a divorce or declining a marriage. Marriage represents risk uncertainty to women, while government programs (Child Support Collections, ADF, etc) are a sure thing. The security of government programs is more attractive than the uncertainty of getting or staying married, they are a government divorce incentive system. In some jurisdictions, 80% or more of divorces are filed by women. This is opposite to feminist propaganda that portrays typical divorces as a 1950's era phenomenon of the husband running off with the cute young secretary. Women are divorcing to secure financial benefits for themselves. The U.S.C.B. reports (Pub. P60-230) that 83.1% of sole custodial parents are female, and this knowedge is the assurance to women that she can file with high confidence in the outcome. The divorce incentive system works for women because the expectation of winning most or sole custody.Marriage represents a substantial risk to men. Investing in a family is likely the... more
-
-
A federal court jury on Friday acquitted the big chemical products company W. R. Grace and three of its former executives on all charges that they had knowingly contaminated the small Montana mining town of Libby with asbestos, then conspired to cover up the deed. Legal experts said the case was an uphill climb for prosecutors almost from the beginning.
Judge Donald W. Molloy refused, for example, to allow the jurors to see some evidence — ruling it overly prejudicial — including memos in which executives talked about the costs of people dying in Libby.
Marshalling the evidence was not the only problem for prosecutors, though. In late April, Judge Molloy denounced the star prosecution witness, Robert H. Locke, in open court, and raised doubts in front of the jurors about the practices of the prosecutors.
Mr. Locke, a former Grace executive, testified that Grace executives knew that asbestos was sickening people and that they actively worked to hide that knowledge. But after his testimony, evidence turned over by the prosecution showed that Mr. Locke had grossly understated on the witness stand how often he had met with prosecutors.
Judge Molloy told the jurors that the government had committed an “inexcusable dereliction of duty” by not providing evidence of that relationship sooner. He ordered the panel not to consider Mr. Locke’s testimony in considering the fate of one defendant, Robert J. Bettacchi, and to use “great skepticism” in evaluating Mr. Locke’s testimony about the case as a whole.A federal court jury on Friday acquitted the big chemical products company W. R. Grace... more
-
-
mik661
-
added this
-
3 years ago
- |
-
Law enforcement officials are vastly expanding their collection of DNA to include millions more people who have been arrested or detained but not yet convicted. The move, intended to help solve more crimes, is raising concerns about the privacy of petty offenders and people who are presumed innocent.
More Profiles in the DNA Database Until now, the federal government genetically tracked only convicts. But starting this month, the Federal Bureau of Investigation will join 15 states that collect DNA samples from those awaiting trial and will also collect DNA from detained immigrants — the vanguard of a growing class of genetic registrants.
The F.B.I., with a DNA database of 6.7 million profiles, expects to accelerate its rate of growth from 80,000 new entries a year to 1.2 million by 2012 — a 17-fold increase. F.B.I. officials say they expect DNA processing backlogs — which now stand at more than 500,000 cases — to increase.Law enforcement officials are vastly expanding their collection of DNA to include... more
-
-
mik661
-
added this
-
3 years ago
- |
-
MEXICO CITY, March 25 (UPI) -- The voracious demand for illegal drugs in the United States has fueled Mexico's violent drug trade, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Wednesday.
Clinton arrived in Mexico City Wednesday to meet with Mexican President Felipe Calderon. She was set to urge him to redouble his efforts to excise corruption in law enforcement and the courts, and also discuss what the United States would do to help, The New York Times (NYSE:NYT) reported. A new White House initiative announced Tuesday will deploy 450 law enforcement officers and new equipment along the border.
"Our insatiable demand for illegal drugs fuels the drug trade," Clinton said, mincing no words in describing the U.S. role. "Our inability to prevent weapons from being illegally smuggled across the border to arm these criminals causes the deaths of police officers, soldiers and civilians."MEXICO CITY, March 25 (UPI) -- The voracious demand for illegal drugs in the United... more
-
-
mik661
-
added this
-
3 years ago
- |
-
Debates about many foreign policy issues persist because it is hard to know what the right course of action is and reasonable people can reach different conclusions about them. But there is a special category of foreign policy where almost everyone agrees the existing policy is wrong-headed yet almost everyone also believes the policy is impossible to change.
I'm sure FP readers have their own favorites in this category, but I thought I'd start the conversation with three nominees of my own.Debates about many foreign policy issues persist because it is hard to know what the... more
-
-
mik661
-
added this
-
3 years ago
- |
-
America's detention system for immigrants has mushroomed in the last decade, a costly building boom that was supposed to sweep up criminals and ensure that undocumented immigrants were quickly shown the door.
Instead, an Associated Press computer analysis of every person being held on a recent Sunday night shows that most did not have a criminal record and many were not about to leave the country — voluntarily or via deportation.
An official Immigration and Customs Enforcement database, obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, showed a U.S. detainee population of exactly 32,000 on the evening of Jan. 25.America's detention system for immigrants has mushroomed in the last decade, a... more
-
-
mik661
-
added this
-
3 years ago
- |
-
It would have been the biggest case of the term resulting in a potential landmark decision, but on Friday the US Supreme Court decided to dismiss the appeal filed by Ali Saleh Al-Marri, the last man being held on US soil as an enemy combatant.
In a one paragraph order, the high court dismissed the case and approved Mr. Al-Marri's transfer from his solitary confinement cell in the Navy brig in Charleston, South Carolina, to a federal lockup in Illinois.
The move means that the justices will not examine the president's power to order the indefinite military detention without charge of anyone he deems to be an enemy combatant. The high court had agreed to take up Al-Marri's case. Oral argument was expected in late April.
But last week, President Obama ordered Al-Marri released from military detention and placed within the criminal justice system. Al-Marri has been held in the brig for five years and eight months.
Government lawyers argued that Al-Marri's Supreme Court case was now moot.It would have been the biggest case of the term resulting in a potential landmark... more
-
-
mik661
-
added this
-
3 years ago
- |
-
President Obama has begun releasing Bush secret memo's detailing the end run his admin did around the constitution. Admin attorney John Woo concluded that the 1st and 4th amendments did not apply in combating terrorism.President Obama has begun releasing Bush secret memo's detailing the end run his... more
-
-
mik661
-
added this
-
3 years ago
- |
-
A mother of two girls was sentenced in Tacoma, Washington to three months in jail for the basball bat attack of a registered sex offender in her trailer park. She had accused him of molesting her daughters, an accusation which was later proven to be untrue.A mother of two girls was sentenced in Tacoma, Washington to three months in jail for... more
-
-
mik661
-
added this
-
3 years ago
- |
-
After 20 years on death row and becoming confined to a wheelchair due to MS, 47 year old Paul House was released from prison. He had been convicted of the assault and murder of Carolyn Muncey of Tennessee nearly 23 years ago. The Supreme court ruled that no reasonable jury would have convicted him given access to new dna evidence that was collected from under the fingernails of the victim and cigarett butts. None of the DNA evidence matched House. However, Prosecutors are still retrying him on Murder charges in a trial beginning June 1st. DA Paul Phillips says that the new evidence just means that House must have had a coconspirator.After 20 years on death row and becoming confined to a wheelchair due to MS, 47 year... more
-
-
mik661
-
added this
-
3 years ago
- |
-
A rational analysis of the child support issue is more helpful in explaining the child support problem. Page 40 of The Law and Economics of Child Support Payments By William S. Comanor addresses the phenomenon of the 'Deadbeat Dad' starting with the well known example of the 'baby momma' on welfare scenerio, showing that since dads pay money to the state, and AFDC pays the mother there simply is no incentives for fathers to pay support thru the system, because every $1 paid contributes $0 additional benefit to the child, and only payments 'under the table' directly to the mother or child have any real benefit to the child.
The growing popularity of the concept of 'Child Support Civil Disobedience' reaches a similar conclusion. Many NCP's argue that all parents should and do have a responsibility to care for thier child, but that making these payments thru the state is the least responsible course of action, because doing so funds a corrupt and evil machine that feeds off of the destruction of families, and keeping parents away from thier children. This argument further holds that the only 'real' support a NCP gives a child is the time and money actually spent with, and on a child. In other words, the forced 'child support payment' to the state is viewed as having no benefit to the child, while 'direct' payments such as time and money spent durring 'visits', going on outings, buying the child clothing, schools supplies, etc.. is viewed as the only 'real' means to satisify a parent's moral obligation to support thier child.
The book by Comanor explains the 'Child Support Civil Disobedience' phenomenon thru an analysis of the difference between individual and collective consumption preferences. In a marriage, many 'collective' economic decisions are made by parents, which reflect not only the individual preference of each parent, but each parents concern for the 'collective' preferences of the household. Likewise, the amount each parent allocates to spend on the child is likewise dependant upon collective resources. The problem with child support payments is that it raises the income of the custdial parent, thus raising the consumption preference of that parent, so that only a portion of the NCP's child support payment is now allocated to the child. So, like in the welfare 'baby momma' scenerio, each $1 dollar of NCP support payment is no longer $1 going to the child, but rather a fraction gets apportioned to the child, with the remainder enhancing the consumption of the CP due to the increase income caused by the support payment. So the NCP views 'off the books' support payments as a dollar for dollar contribution to the child, while forced state run 'child support payments' are viewed as contributing little or nothing to the child.
In the case of a high conflict divorce, reasonable parents may conclude that none of thier 'child support payments' does anything at all to support thier child. The all Street Journal published a recent study showing the average legal fees for divorce to be about $78,000. In other words a $500/month child support payment by the NCP to the CP would take 13 years to payoff typical legal fees needed to 'win' the custody battle and resulting child support payment. Thus $1 of 'lawyer support' payment goes to creating the non-custodial parent = $0 benefit to the child. Considering these facts, the idea of 'Lawyer Support' civil disobedience has a much nicer ring to it.
The cost of typical custody dispute legal fees is also about the cost of sending a child to a decent college for 4 years, and for most parents it is not merely consumption 'preferences' but income restrictions that lead many parents to avoid making payments to the state or the CP. Legal fees change the consumption preferences and ability of parents and reduce expenditure on children accordingly.A rational analysis of the child support issue is more helpful in explaining the child... more
-
-
couple who had their children taken away from them for two years after falsely being accused of sexual abuse have been awarded a six-figure compensation payout.
Tim and Gina Williams went through a 'total nightmare' of having their three young children placed in separate foster homes after being wrongly placed under suspicion by social workers.couple who had their children taken away from them for two years after falsely being... more
-
-
Revelation 13
Anyone with ears to hear
should listen and understand.
Anyone who is destined for prison
will be taken to prison.
Anyone destined to die by the sword
will die by the sword.
...17 And no one could buy or sell anything without that mark, which was either the name of the beast or the number representing his name.
18 Wisdom is needed here. Let the one with understanding solve the meaning of the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is 666
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=REV+13-14;REV+18;&version=51;
This revelation can be viewed as a prophesy or vision or warning of a time when the Beast controls mankind, by controling thier ability to buy, sell, work, travel, etc, and the use of a mark, or number to track people, and it warns us that being alert to the number 666 can help us solve the mystery of the Beast. Forget for a moment interpretations that focuses on 666 as the mark on men, but instead consider 666 literally in Rev 13:18 as the number of the beast.
We now exist under control by a Beast, known by the number 666.
42 USC 666 uses the pretext of cracking down on deadbeat dads; to implement a national system requiring State and Federal agencies to locate absent parents anywhere across the country to extract unpaid child support payments. A parent who falls behind on payments will have their real property encumbered, bank accounts seized, wages garnished, tax refunds intercepted, and all occupational and business licenses either suspended or withheld. Furthermore, courts may impute income well above the abilty to pay, thus ensuring the non-compliance of a parent, and thus swift criminalization under 42 USC 666. In effect, this empowers the beast, under 42 USC 666 to financially control parents, very similar to the concept of controling the ability to buy and sell; expressed some 2000 years ago in Rev 13:16. Submission of other parents is extorted by fear of becoming the next target of the Beast.
The Lord, through the biblical prophet Jeremiah, explained the conditional nature of prophecy:
At what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy it; If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them. And at what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant it; If it do evil in my sight, that it obey not my voice, then I will repent of the good, wherewith I said I would benefit them. (Jeremiah 18:7-10)1
We could regard tracking numbers such as driver licenses, social security numbers, or maybe even the label or stigma of being non-custodial parent as the mark which parents must carry that allows the beast to control them. Would anyone argue that it is virtually impossible today to thrive in modern society without social security and other numbers, and that 44 USC 666 targets and enlsaves non custodial parents, and empowers the state to sieze virtually everything, and utterly destroy a parent under the rule?Revelation 13
Anyone with ears to hear
should listen and understand.... more
-
-
Most cities on earth are blighted by fatherless matriarchal ghettos of crime, violence, poverty, disease, drop outs, prisoners, and drug addics, and more sadly government programs based upon ideology of feminists and women's studies only make the problem worse. Solving the problems of societies ills will begin with healing and strengthening the family, which must begin with restoring the rights of fathers to be a part of the family, no less than the rights of women to participate in the world of business.
Fred
www.f4jfl.comMost cities on earth are blighted by fatherless matriarchal ghettos of crime,... more
-
-
On this 16th Day of December 1773, Patriots and rabble rousers in the New England Colonies stood together in disobedience that famously forced a reassessment of society's moral parameters that would spark the creation of this great nation, and change the course of world civiliization.
When we consider our duty to Civil Disobedience, it hinges on a distinction between an "unjust law" and an "illegitimate government." Plato suggested those who broke an unjust law had to accept punishment as part of the bargain. However, when an entire government is illegitimate and unjust, preserving public order, and acceptance of punishment, need not apply to civil disobedience.
John Locke, an elightened inspiration of the first American Revolution, said that force may be used to oppose even the highest magistrates if they themselves are lawbreakers:
"Wherever law ends, tyranny begins [...] and whoever in authority exceeds the power given to him by the law, and makes use of the force he has under his command [...] upon the subject which the law allows not, ceases in that to be a magistrate, and acting without authority, may be opposed as any other man who by force invades the right of another. And why this should not hold in the highest, as well as in the most inferior magistrate, I would gladly be informed." "May the commands then of a prince be opposed? [...] Force is to be opposed to nothing but to unjust and unlawful force.
"
"Revolutions happen not upon every little mismanagement in public affairs [...] many wrong and inconvenient laws will born by the people without mutiny [...] But if a long train of abuses, prevarications, and artifices, all tending the same way, make the design visible to the people, it is not to be wondered, that they should then rouse themselves.
"
Is this not the distinction between a lawful government having unjust laws and an illegitimate government? More recent scholarship has upheld this distinction between civil disobedience and what could be called "militant" action:
"Civil disobedience [...] is clearly distinct from militant action [...] the militant does not accept [the existing political system] as one which is nearly just or reasonably so, he believes [...] that it departs widely from its professed principles [...] While his action is conscientious in its own terms, he does not appeal to the sense of justice of the majority (or those having effective political power). Instead he seeks by well-framed militant acts of disruption or resistance [...] to force a movement in the desired direction. Thus the militant may try to avoid the penalty [...] [since this would] express a recognition of the legitimacy of the constitution to which he is opposed. [...] Now in certain circumstances militant action and other kinds of resistance are surely justified.
" [1] John Rawls, A Theory of Justice
Consider the government edict: "The Reichsgericht itself refused to recognize Jews living in Germany as persons in the legal sense" Supreme Court of Germany (1936), per Ernst Fraenkel, German legal scholar. Now consider how the family courts routinely and arbitrarily pick and chose one parent to have 'legal rights' as a parent. Hitler's rise to power was completely legal [2], but many consider the Nazi government illegitimate because the Nazi's denied legal protection to entire classes of human beings. In this regard there no moral distinction between their policies and our own government's policy toward non-custodial parents. Do parents engaging in civil disobedience owe a duty of self-surrender to such a government? The answer must be no.
If there be Patriots about, Please take time to comemorate the Boston Tea Party on this December 16.
Fred Schuler
www.f4jfl.comOn this 16th Day of December 1773, Patriots and rabble rousers in the New England... more
-
-
There is no other field of law ridden with more corruption than Family court. Judicial Corruption is as routine and rampant and resiliant to reform as is the infamous corruption found in the Courthouses and Politics of Chicago.
This story revisits the epic FBI investigation of Judicial Corruption in Chicago decades ago, in which hundreds were convicted or lost thier jobs. Sadly, today, that same corruption continues to be entrenched in political and judicial activities.
"Corruption and graft have become so entrenched over the decades that they've become part of the political culture, and experts cite a list of reasons why: Weak state campaign finance laws that have allowed influence peddlers to make big contributions. Lawmakers who don't always get close scrutiny. A patronage system that makes employees beholden to political bosses. And a jaded public that seems to accept chicanery as the cost of doing business."There is no other field of law ridden with more corruption than Family court. Judicial... more
-
