tagged w/ Unborn Babies
-
Before you we have two opposing sides, the democrats who are death worshipers. Advancing their twisted values to appease their own guilt. Supporting abortion, even late term where a baby is cut and torn from the womb piece by piece and thrown into a garbage receptacle like an apple core, most times for the sake of convenience. On the other hand they show more emotional support for puppies and kittens than they do human beings. Also supporting assisted suicide, when grandma is just too inconvenient anymore. The advocacy of legal drug use, a usually slower form of suicide. Supporting Islamo-Facism by backing fundamentalist regimes who murder their own people, sometimes by stoning other times by beheading, simply for being unfaithful to their spouse or for being gay. The list goes on. On the right Conservatives, who hold the sanctity of life at a premium. Where all people are created equal, including the unborn. Where life is cherished at all costs and where human rights should be above the rights of animals. Who believe that preserving the life of another human being through support and counseling is better than a permanent end to life. We see recreational drug use to be anything but. Behold a video. Take your four minutes out of your day to view this precious piece of work produced by natgeo. If you can watch this video in its entirety and still believe an unborn human fetus is nothing other than a mass of unintelligent tissue, without the capability of thought and perception then there is no help for you.Before you we have two opposing sides, the democrats who are death worshipers.... more
-
-
Posting all the sordid details of your life on Facebook? Fine, if you're into that sort of thing. Posting all the sordid details of someone else's life, without their permission? That's when you start to wade into slightly murky ethical waters, and when that other person is a baby it's an even more questionable situation.
A study commissioned by AVG finds that 92 percent of American children have some sort of "online presence" by age two, with an average "digital birth" happening at around six months. That means most children will have had some picture posted or status updated before they're walking, while a third get online before they've even left the womb, pics popping up on Facebook before doctors get a chance to wipe the sonogram jelly from mummy's tummy. It's all innocent enough, but a bit disconcerting too, with AVG CEO JR Smith summing it up nicely:
It's shocking to think that a 30-year-old has an online footprint stretching back 10-15 years at most, while the vast majority of children today will have online presence by the time they are two-years-old - a presence that will continue to build throughout their whole lives... it reinforces the need for parents to be aware of the privacy settings they have set on their social network and other profiles. Otherwise, sharing a baby's picture and specific information may not only be shared with friends and family but with the whole online world.
You do know how to manage your privacy settings, right?Posting all the sordid details of your life on Facebook? Fine, if you're into... more
-
-
When surgeon Joseph Bruner went in to do surgery on 21 week old unborn baby named Samuel Alexander Armas, after he was diagnosed with Spina Bifida, he had no idea what was about to happen. During the procedure, the doctor removed the uterus, via C-section, then he made a small incision in the mother’s womb so he could operate on little Samuel.
What happened next left everyone who witnessed it speechless…
Read the rest of this emotional miracle here http://www.bigredkev.com/2010/02/unborn-baby-holds-doctors-hand.htmlWhen surgeon Joseph Bruner went in to do surgery on 21 week old unborn baby named... more
-
-
-
The question as to when human life and personhood begins has been made a controversial issue because the proponents of abortion do not want it to begin at least before the first 24 weeks of gestation. There, however, should be no controversy because the scientific facts are incontrovertible. These facts have been obscured on both sides by individuals who do not possess the necessary education, training and experience in science to evaluate and interpret the materials and render valid conclusions or who, influenced by their religious or chauvinistic fervor have reached erroneous or untenable suppositions and conclusions, argumentum ad hominem. Justice Blackmun opined in Roe P. Wade that the determination as to when life and personhood begins is a difficult decision that the court is not in a position to speculate on and there in does not have the resolve since those trained in medicine are unable to arrive at any consensus. The U. S. Supreme Court Justices then carried their defective reasoning even further in Roe v. Wade when in contrast with all other civilized societies, ruled that the unborn is a non-person regardless as to whether it is a human being or not. This decision then made the unborn ineligible for the protection that is guaranteed to all human persons under the U. S. Constitution. What Blackmun and the other U. S. Justices were really saying was that maybe human life and personhood begins at conception but since we do not know for sure, we will allow abortion until someone proves differently. That reasoning is so flawed that it makes me cringe just thinking about it.
The latter is the mentality of most of the ardent supporters of abortion which is in sharp contrast to logical reasoning when applied to possible life or death situations. In the field of medicine, the proper medical diagnostic approach must proceed in a rational manner with the safety of the patient always foremost, primum non nocere, first do no harm. An example of this is the patient with chest pain. Here, it behooves the physician to consider chest pain as heart related until proven otherwise even though chest pain is only heart related in less than 20 % of the cases since an error in diagnosis may cause the patient his life. I have personally investigated many unfortunate cases in my role as medical examiner, where this approach was neglected by physicians and the patients subsequently died. In Roe vs. Wade, millions of human beings were legally murdered by the stroke of a pen. Ergo, the Roe versus Wade Decision should have utilized the premise, ...a human person until proven otherwise...thereby preventing. the slaughter of millions of innocent human beings. In the words of Louis Brandeis, "if we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable" The 'better safe than sorry mentality'.
In recent years there has been a revolution in genetics that confirmed what geneticists and embryologists have been saying for years, that human life with all of its characteristics for a particular human being must be coded in the fertilized egg. In 1948, Dr. Bradley Patten, one of the most distinguished embryologists in the world definitively related in his textbook, "It Is the penetration of the ovum by the spermatzoon and the resulting mingling of the nuclear material each brings to the union that constitutes the culmination of the process of fertilization and marks the initiation of the life of a new individual. In the midst of the current Genetic Revolution, one of the foremost, highly honored geneticist in the world, Jerome Lejeune, M. D., Ph.D., Professor of Genetics at the University of Paris and Sorbonne, related, "...each of us has a unique beginning, the moment of conception...when the information carried by the sperm and by the ovum have encountered each other, then a new human being is defined because its own personal and human constitution is entirely spelled out.The question as to when human life and personhood begins has been made a controversial... more
-
