tagged w/ Scientific Method
-
Firefighters for 9-11 Truth is a non-partisan association of firefighters and affiliates created to increase awareness, provide public education, demand a real investigation that follows National Standards, and provide support to our Brothers and Sisters in need. We are deeply troubled by the “official story,” and the way the rescue workers from Ground Zero are being forgotten.
We believe there is overwhelming evidence of obstruction of justice, and destruction of evidence voiced even by numerous 9/11 Commissioners themselves. Senator Cleland resigned from the Commission stating, “This investigation is now compromised.” http://firefightersfor911truth.org/Firefighters for 9-11 Truth is a non-partisan association of firefighters and... more
-
-
This is AE911Truth's new 9/11 documentary on the mysterious destruction of World Trade Center Building #7 on 9/11/01. Join actor, Ed Asner, and architect, Richard Gage, AIA, as they narrate an unfolding story that decimates the official account ("collapse due to normal office fires") of this 47 story high-rise which was destroyed on the afternoon of 9/11 in record time: top to bottom in under 7 seconds - and at free-fall acceleration for a third of its fall. http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=20391&Itemid=12This is AE911Truth's new 9/11 documentary on the mysterious destruction of World... more
-
-
So if you have wondered why covert operations like 9/11 are so difficult to unravel or why it is all but impossible to convince the feds who investigated it that this was actually a US false flag/stand-down/inside-job, deep-black covert operation, the answer to that question appears to be that the plan was designed from conception to obfuscate what happened, not only regarding the public but also the government’s own experts, who would be assigned to investigate them—and even to keep most of those who had an actual part in those operations in the dark, so only those at the highest levels of the government knew what happened and, even among them, only a few probably knew the full dimensions of the plan. The objective throughout, accordingly, has always been to keep the public in a state of uncertainly, where everything about these events is believable and nothing is knowable—which is the ultimate objective of disinformation.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/14/peeling-the-911-onion-layers-of-plots-within-plots/So if you have wondered why covert operations like 9/11 are so difficult to unravel or... more
-
-
Pilots for 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals and pilots throughout the globe who have gathered together for one purpose. We are committed to seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001. Our main focus concentrates on the four flights, maneuvers performed and the reported pilots. We do not offer theory or point blame at this point in time. However, we are focused on determining the truth of that fateful day based on solid data and facts -- since 9/11/2001 is the catalyst for many of the events shaping our world today -- and the United States Government doesn't seem to be very forthcoming with answers or facts.
We stand with the numerous other growing organizations of Firefighters, Medical Professionals, Lawyers, Scholars, Military Officers, Veterans, Religious and Political Leaders, along side Survivors, family members of the victims -- family members of soldiers who have made the ultimate sacrifice -- including the many Ground Zero workers who are now ill or have passed away, when we ask for a true, new independent investigation into the events of 9/11. We do not accept the 9/11 Commission Report and/or "hypothesis" as a satisfactory explanation for the sacrifice every American has made and continues to make -- some more than others. http://pilotsfor911truth.org/Pilots for 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals and pilots... more
-
-
-
Detailed analysis of the debris field, physical damage, and other factors in the alleged impact of a Boeing 757 on the Pentagon building on the morning of September 11, 2001 reveals an almost complete absence of debris expected from such an event. (Elliott 2003) The initial (pre-collapse) hole made by the alleged impact on the ground floor of Wedge One of the building is too small to admit an entire Boeing 757. In order to decide whether or not a Boeing 757 (or aircraft of comparable size) struck the Pentagon on the morning in question, a comprehensive review of all the debris and other physical evidence is hardly necessary. It turns out that a study of the wings alone suffices for the purpose. Wings that should have been sheared off by the impact are entirely absent. There is also substantial evidence of debris from a much smaller, jet-powered aircraft inside the building. We conclude with a high degree of certainty that no Boeing 757 struck the building. We also conclude with a substantial degree of certainty that a smaller, single-engined aircraft, roughly the size and shape of an F-16, did, in fact, strike the building. http://pentagonmissingwings911.bravehost.com/index.htmlDetailed analysis of the debris field, physical damage, and other factors in the... more
-
-
You have reached a website hosting a documentary with groundbreaking witness interviews proving the 9/11 official story false. There are many aspects of 9/11 but this movie focuses specifically on the events as they happened at the Pentagon.
These first-hand eyewitness accounts were obtained by Citizen Investigation Team in a persistent effort to find the truth in light of a myriad of questions. We contacted as many of the previously published eyewitnesses we could obtain contact information for, and we canvassed the neighborhoods of Arlington Virginia on foot in a quest to find previously unknown witnesses. Our goal was to establish the final flight path of the plane before it reached the Pentagon as seen by the eyewitnesses. http://www.thepentacon.com/You have reached a website hosting a documentary with groundbreaking witness... more
-
-
A dozen carefully researched books have exposed the official story of 9/11 to be a terror fraud. Yet the mainstream media have monolithically failed to ask elementary questions about anomalies in this story. So-called alternative media have been little better. Towers of Deception explains why and prescribes actions to break out the truth. http://www.towersofdeception.com/A dozen carefully researched books have exposed the official story of 9/11 to be a... more
-
-
The Physics911 website could be classified as a static site, as it tends to change little over time. In the belief that less is more when it comes to understanding what did not happen on September 11 2007, as well as what may have happened, our small size is an advantage; the main ingredients are all here, arranged into sections for easy access and understanding.
WHAT DID NOT HAPPEN: a collection of articles explaining the physical impossibility of key ingredients of the official scenario
WHAT MAY HAVE HAPPENED: these articles try to answer the questions that arise naturally from the realization that the official story is a deliberate lie
OTHER ATTACKS: If September 11 was an inside job, what about those subsequent strikes by Al Qaida against “western civilization?”
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: It may help to know that the patterns revealed in the foregoing sections have historical precedents, General Partin’s analysis of the Oklahoma City bombing being a case in point. It also helps to have reliable intelligence about events before, during and after 9/11 as clues to the true nature of the attacks. The idea of news videos of the incoming aircraft being in some manner faked is laid to rest by Eric Salter’s article.
PHOTO/VIDEO GALLERY: Some dramatic footage and stills taken on 9/11 reveal visible problems with the official story
COUNTERSPIN COVERAGE: Cracks in the official edifice can be found even in the major media
http://physics911.net/The Physics911 website could be classified as a static site, as it tends to change... more
-
-
I applaud the integrity and courage of all of the individuals listed on the website for publicly supporting the search for the truth about 9/11 in spite of opposition by our government and lack of support in the mainstream news media.
My objective, at this point, is to have our government launch a new, extremely thorough, independent, and totally impartial re-examination of the terrible acts of 9/11 and the events leading up to them. In my opinion, and in the opinion of the above listed experienced individuals, the current 9/11 Commission Report is seriously inadequate in explaining what really happened.
I also want to acknowledge that virtually none of the information on this website is the result of any original investigation on my part. I have merely researched and compiled public information available on the Internet. I want to thank those in the 9/11 Truth Movement for their years of effort since 9/11 in conducting a great deal of research and for keeping the Movement alive in the face of both ridicule and indifference.
http://patriotsquestion911.com/I applaud the integrity and courage of all of the individuals listed on the website... more
-
-
We hope our website provides a helpful range of information, resources and networking to empower the blossoming 9/11 Truth movement. Since 2003 we have been trying to develop and help distribute resources addressing this momentous issue. We greatly appreciate all the efforts that so many of you are courageously undertaking to expose the lies in the official story of September 11th. http://www.911sharethetruth.com/We hope our website provides a helpful range of information, resources and networking... more
-
-
There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact. -Mark Twain
“Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn’t go away.”
– Phillip K. Dick
Substance is that which exists in itself and which does not need the conception of any thing else in order to be conceived-Spinoza.
This is not restricted to psychiatry alone.It permeates other fields as well(pl.read my blog on Autism drug,a fraud filed under Health).
Experiments are conducted repeatedly under similar conditions and not identical ones for we do not know exactly what these conditions are.For instance ,when we form water, we combine 2 atoms of Hydrogen with 1 atom of Oxygen with a catalyst in similar proportions and we await the result, water.We do not know the exact properties which induces them to combine the way they do;we assume that the property to combine in a particular way shall remain permanent.
This brings us to the fundamental axiom (which is not to be questioned(?)),that Nature will behave uniformly,Law of Universality of Nature.
This we believe(?) to be true as this can never be proven as we have not explored all the options available to us to confirm this axiom.
With Quantum Mechanics and Time study, we are just about touching the periphery of some other Laws of Nature.
We do not know what lies ahead.
Science is at best pragmatic ,not Absolute.
http://ramanan50.wordpress.com/2011/01/11/most-scientific-theories-false/There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of... more
-
-
Rachel Maddow talks about her former show, The War on Brains — she mentions that even though the program no longer exists, America’s war on brains continues. Perhaps the most ridiculous example is the woman who claims that “the separation of church and state” is not mentioned in the US Constitution — a fact that can be easily confirmed by anyone who can read by checking the original document.Rachel Maddow talks about her former show, The War on Brains — she mentions that... more
-
-
1947: John Bardeen and Walter Brattain, with support from colleague William Shockley, demonstrate the transistor at Bell Laboratories in Murray Hill, New Jersey.
It’s been called the most important invention of the 20th century. The transistor, aka point-contact transistor, is a semiconductor device that can amplify or switch electrical signals. It was developed to replace vacuum tubes.
Vacuum tubes were bulky, unreliable and consumed too much power. So AT&T’s research-and-development arm, Bell Labs, started a project to find an alternative.
For nearly a decade before the first transistor was developed, Shockley, a physicist at Bell Labs, worked on the theory of such a device. But Shockley couldn’t build a working model. His first semiconductor amplifier had a “small cylinder coated thinly with silicon, mounted close to a small, metal plate.”
So Shockley asked his colleagues, Bardeen and Brattain, to step in. One of the problems they noticed with Shockley’s first attempt was condensation on the silicon. So they submerged it in water and suggested the initial prototype have a metal point “that would be pushed into the silicon surrounded by distilled water.” At last there was amplification — but disappointingly, at a trivial level.
Following more experiments, germanium replaced silicon, which increased amplification by about 300 times.
A few more modifications later, Brattain had a gold metal point extended into the germanium. That resulted in better ability to modulate amplification at all frequencies.
The final design of a point-contact transistor had two gold contacts lightly touching a germanium crystal that was on a metal plate connected to a voltage source. Also known as the “little plastic triangle,” it became the first working solid-state amplifier.
Bardeen and Brattain demonstrated the transistor device to Bell Lab officials Dec. 23, 1947. Shockley was reported to have called it “a magnificent Christmas present.” But Shockley himself was not present when it happened and was said to be bitter over losing out on that day.
He had his revenge, though. Shockley continued to work on the idea and refine it. In early 1948, he came up with the bipolar or junction transistor, a superior device that took over from the point-contact type.
Bell Labs publicly announced the first transistor at a press conference in New York on June 30, 1948.
The transistor went to replace bulky vacuum tubes and mechanical relays. The invention revolutionized the world of electronics and became the basic building block upon which all modern computer technology rests.
Shockley, Bardeen and Brattain shared the 1956 Nobel Prize in Physics for the transistor, but the trio never worked together after the first few months of their initial creation of the transistor.
Shockley left Bell Labs and founded Shockley Semiconductor in Mountain View, California — one of the early high-tech companies in what would later become Silicon Valley.
Brattain remained a fellow at Bell Labs. Bardeen became a professor at the University of Illinois in 1951, and he shared a second Nobel Prize in Physics in 1972, for the first successful explanation of superconductivity.
http://www.wired.com/thisdayintech/2009/12/1223Shockley-Bardeen-Brattain-transistor1947: John Bardeen and Walter Brattain, with support from colleague William Shockley,... more
-
